SUPREME

billandkeonne.org

Hoppean crypto anarchist 🏴‍☠️
ᛟᛟᛟᛟᛟ 496e2074686520596561722032353235
#FreeSamourai

Public Key

npub1juxh95vxasvfr959hkug7rwzje60sw3k7cegrerhktnd97s7yvms0yd0je

NIP-05 Address

[email protected]

Profile Code

nprofile1qqsfwrtj6xrwcxy3j6zmmwy0phpfva8c8gm0vv5pu3mm9ekjlg0zxdcpz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumn0wd68ytnwv46qk8hajh

Publishing to

relay.nostr.net

Author Public Key

npub1juxh95vxasvfr959hkug7rwzje60sw3k7cegrerhktnd97s7yvms0yd0je

Show more details

Last Notes

2026-08-09 00:43:05 CEST

- reply

512 blocks would reduce lag, but a few realities remain. Variance is still high with only 512 samples. Difficulty would swing more on pure luck than the current window. Isolation and timestamp attacks become somewhat easier the shorter the window gets.
Any change requires a hard fork and actual consensus. Just lower it to 512 is easy to say and hard to coordinate without creating more drama than the current system.

2026-08-09 00:32:34 CEST

- reply

Monero’s every block adjustment is more responsive and keeps block times tighter under normal conditions. The cost is more algorithmic complexity and it still lags significantly after sudden hashrate shifts. Both designs work, Bitcoin prioritizes stability and simplicity over tight short term control. That’s why a near zero hashrate minority chain can sit almost frozen for a long time before difficulty can drop enough to recover

2026-08-08 23:30:52 CEST

If you fell for the luke and mechanic purity test, you're ngmi

2026-08-07 05:21:00 CEST

Nobody wants to hear it, but people who actually understand Bitcoin, didn't have a coldcard. It was an IQ test, and its unfortunate that people got scammed by a fat jew in Canada.

2026-08-07 04:55:05 CEST

- reply

🍌

2026-08-07 04:54:45 CEST

- reply

Coldcard and the honey pot lmfao🍌
#nevent1q…gtd6

2026-08-07 04:53:15 CEST

2 days till the orphan chain

2026-08-03 22:48:03 CEST

Now is a great time to learn how to buy non kyc bitcoin. The coldcard debacle ruined alot of people's privacy. People with non kyc bitcoin (no identity attached to coins) were somewhat spared.
https://learn.robosats.org/

2026-08-02 01:37:16 CEST

https://blossom.primal.net/898ac4ed34466dc44c355fa98c3495bafe25bfc46c8d9ac6fa96e806d438ef55.jpg

2026-07-30 23:51:10 CEST

https://blossom.primal.net/c05bf6bccd24dc2a32dafec9e356ab57960028f8dd64d71d1d72a71f020291ed.jpg

2026-07-30 23:50:24 CEST

- reply

In all seriousness, what didn't you understand about any of the posts

2026-07-30 20:54:38 CEST

- reply

Your comment speaks volumes

2026-07-30 05:56:18 CEST

- reply

Both are complete trash

2026-07-30 05:55:18 CEST

Billandkeonne.org #PardonSamurai
https://blossom.primal.net/1399c88e4816cfd766d4eb9eb4e5030637da712b1bbaa43c08547f46323996ac.jpg

2026-07-30 05:50:28 CEST

- reply

https://x.com/i/status/2070634970708836807
https://x.com/i/status/2073428350488440902
https://x.com/i/status/2071749938082685250
https://x.com/i/status/2051848488644714518

2026-07-30 05:43:54 CEST

- reply

So now Saylor is an attack on bitcoin. It wasn't when he called it digital property. It wasn't when he declared it a store of value. It wasn't when he said strategy turns bitcoin into money. What about the cyber hornets or digital Manhattan?
Nope, it was only when he didn't agree with the dumbest bip and narrative since bcash.
10 days until these people fade into oblivion.
#nevent1q…hkh0

2026-07-20 05:03:20 CEST

In a democratic welfare state, open or uncontrolled immigration creates forced integration. -Hans Herman Hoppe
https://blossom.primal.net/775bc2e3f96f9ce35a1fa49db8d486152c171d558d474a0d3c0f6efac6c54197.jpg

2026-07-15 04:44:20 CEST

https://blossom.primal.net/7c8395ce2de0879f94a6f6e5e8f75eab69e4c7d79ac10d1b398787f39646e313.jpg

2026-07-15 04:34:09 CEST

- reply

Thats my next one I wanted to watch after the masterpiece obsession. Highly recommend?

2026-07-12 14:47:59 CEST

#gm #nostr
https://blossom.primal.net/a4e31d750444bff225d9b92f054ad874e850584247e8c77440449311348cfa9c.jpg

2026-07-12 00:29:42 CEST

The world isn't a nice and clean place anon. Leave your suburban gates and walled gardens. Go make something of yourself or die and be forgotten.
https://blossom.primal.net/d4d997bd5cae7d152504f2a649ee9a388fc3b8ac50bf487842c1a46b54834a43.jpg

2026-07-11 20:03:44 CEST

Only the people who have already made it, the ones who don’t lie awake worrying about bills will tell you to stay humble and follow your dreams.
Stop being humble, anon. Get angry. Use that rage to go take what you want. The ones preaching humility and patience aren’t going to help you. They already secured their spot. Why would they care what happens to you?

2026-07-11 03:51:41 CEST

- reply

Ouuu a nice holster would be amazing

2026-07-09 02:53:45 CEST

https://blossom.primal.net/85afad4af0418bf0803a8d8170be52aadc915ac0c399d4eb6c3ad4758119fa08.jpg

2026-07-06 01:33:08 CEST

"I never watched the Saylor series and im proud of it"
https://blossom.primal.net/4ab7994d0efca51685649df8d34017c10de9afebf93f1eabb583905bb1ca3948.jpg

2026-07-05 02:27:24 CEST

Hate your government, happy 4th of July #nostr
https://blossom.primal.net/dfa83f104d5b304d391e3dd4b693251ddcaa328ae1531f8b44bc1052d1e102a0.jpg

2026-07-04 17:27:23 CEST

The irony of BIP-110 is that in trying to stop efficient spam, it pushes remaining data embedding toward less efficient workarounds that often waste more block space per byte.
By restricting large contiguous data pushes, big opreturns, and common Taproot inscription patterns (OP_IF + oversized witnesses), the proposal forces spammers into chunked formats using many smaller 256-byte pieces. Those workarounds add overhead from extra transaction structure, inputs/outputs, and potential utxo churn.
Early demos (including Peter Todd’s) and Ordinals’ planned envelope updates show this is already happening. with claims of only 1% cost increase for some protocols. We may reduce the volume of certain spam, but what gets through can bloat the chain less efficiently than before. This is what Bitcoin development culture has become in 2026, fighting spam with temporary consensus changes that spammers adapt around, while the fee market was already the real limiter

2026-07-04 16:49:28 CEST

Understanding BIP110
1.What it claims to be
BIP-110 is a proposed temporary one-year soft fork (bit 4) that adds new consensus rules limiting how much arbitrary data can go into Bitcoin transactions. ScriptPubKeys mostly capped at 34 bytes, data pushes and witness elements at 256 bytes, plus restrictions on certain Taproot constructions and opcodes during the window. Pre-activation UTXOs are grandfathered. After a year the rules auto-expire. Proponents say it fights “spam” that bloats the chain and distorts fees, and that it refocuses Bitcoin on being money.
2.Why I’m against it
The execution is the problem.
It uses a low 55% miner signaling threshold for early activation plus a mandatory signaling period starting at block 961,632 (projected ~August 7, 2026). At that point, nodes running the bip110 software will start rejecting blocks that don’t signal, even if the vast majority of hashpower never supported it. Miner signaling right now sits at roughly 0.3%. This isn’t broad consensus, it’s a small group trying to force a rule change with a mechanism explicitly designed to create pressure and potential chain friction. Bitcoin’s strength has always been its conservatism and the fact that changes require real, broad agreement. A contentious soft fork with a low bar and mandatory enforcement risks a messy, temporary (or worse) split at the exact moment when stability matters. We’ve seen how even short periods of uncertainty ripple through exchanges, services, and user confidence. That cost falls on everyone, including people running privacy tools that depend on a reliable base layer. More importantly, this approach treats consensus rules as a blunt instrument to police use cases. Once you open that door “we’ll temporarily make this data invalid because we don’t like how it’s being used” you create precedent. Future groups can argue for the next restriction “for the good of Bitcoin.” Fee markets, relay policies, and node operators already have tools to deal with unwanted traffic. Using softfork COERCION!!! instead feels like the wrong direction for a system built on permissionless, voluntary participation. Spam and data storage have real costs (yes, the 2023 fee spikes were annoying). But they’re also symptoms of demand meeting limited blockspace. Solving that by rewriting consensus to ban certain data feels like treating the symptom while risking the patient. Temporary or not, it still diverts energy, creates division, and puts sovereignty at risk for users who just want to run plain Bitcoin Core without being pressured into signaling.
3.What actually matters right now
The date to watch is early August 2026 (block 961,632). That’s when the mandatory signaling phase hits for anyone running the patched software. If you’re against this, the simplest and most sovereign move is to keep running standard Bitcoin Core (or Knots without the BIP-110 patch) and do not signal. Let the chain follow the majority hashpower that has shown no interest in this. Verify everything yourself. Read the BIP, look at the activation client code, watch the actual signaling numbers. Don’t outsource your node or your principles. The best discussions are happening on Nostr anyway. The X outrage cycle doesn’t move the protocol, running nodes and refusing bad changes does.
Bitcoin doesn’t need more top down attempts to define acceptable use cases through consensus. It needs a reliable, decentralized base layer that people can build real privacy and sovereignty tools on top of without wondering if the next “temporary” rule change will complicate their UTXOs or their node. #bip110 #knots #privacy #bitcoin #nostr #grownostr

2026-07-04 15:45:32 CEST

- reply

The thread you posted earlier literally says OCEAN made changes “just for the sake of privacy” after the issue with how these transactions were being handled under the old Knots setup.
If no one ever treated CoinJoin as spam, what exactly needed fixing?
You are a dunce

2026-07-04 15:36:58 CEST

- reply

The part that actually matters here is this. Even according to the history you posted, OCEAN recognized the impact on privacy transactions and made a unilateral change to support them anyway. That’s the correct priority when these conflicts come up. The real issue isn’t old pool defaults or who ported what between Core and Knots. It’s whether node software and relay policies make strong, non custodial on chain privacy tools meaningfully harder to use. When patterns associated with effective CoinJoin get treated as spam to deprioritize, while other data-heavy transactions don’t face the same friction, that’s a policy choice worth examining. Spam bloat is a real problem for node runners and long-term decentralization. But privacy-enhancing transactions that improve fungibility and reduce surveillance aren’t the same thing as arbitrary data. We should be able to handle both without one undermining the other.
You dunce

2026-07-04 15:24:28 CEST

https://blossom.primal.net/61c33940b454cfaf82b9d0de1f45e38ec98e784304b30eb861f408a664325407.jpg

2026-07-04 15:19:03 CEST

- reply

Go to x for that shit. I posted enough explaining the technical details for people l. I learned that its just a ideological battle at the end of the day and most people are technologically illiterate.

2026-07-04 15:05:33 CEST

Happy 4th #nostr
https://blossom.primal.net/25d5102242ec5cea67272c7fdcb31743cd7422fe6034626d7bf77956f0bff0ae.jpg

2026-07-04 14:35:01 CEST

- reply

This was before now and you're missing the point entirely.

2026-07-04 07:43:23 CEST

Luke says Bitcoin becomes a CBDC if BIP110 fails. But when Whirlpool CoinJoin hit his Knots 42-byte OP_RETURN limit, Ocean and Knots treated the privacy transactions as spam to be deprioritized.
He didn’t fight to make real privacy easier, he defended the filter.
You can’t claim to be saving Bitcoin from centralization and surveillance while making the best on chain privacy tool harder to use.
Pick a lane.

2026-07-04 07:40:59 CEST

Meanwhile, back when Samourai’s Whirlpool CoinJoin used a 46-byte OP_RETURN (Knots default was 42), his Bitcoin Knots node software and Ocean mining pool made those privacy transactions harder to relay and get mined. He called it bad design and spam, not something worth accommodating. So how exactly does making on-chain CoinJoin privacy more difficult protect Bitcoin from becoming centralized and surveilled like a CBDC?
Real privacy tools like Whirlpool are one of the best defenses we have against chain analysis and the control CBDCs are built on. You don’t fight fake decentralized money by kneecapping the actual privacy that keeps Bitcoin fungible and sovereign.
The “Bitcoin dies without my rules” crowd keeps revealing their priorities.
https://blossom.primal.net/2ac5220057314e8d470e59a71d3a69a62a75080105d1e129acda0b596d28557a.jpg

2026-07-03 23:57:20 CEST

One of the best TFTC episodes
#nevent1q…9ua4

2026-07-03 23:46:47 CEST

The time is now anon
#Courage #Freedom #Liberty #MementoMori Nostr #Quote #Wisdom #Art
https://blossom.primal.net/d7efe1499a250f58ff68ea6b735d13c7af7357be047ee4cdaa8cc39575360c6e.jpg

2026-07-03 23:21:38 CEST

- reply

Whirlpool especially

2026-07-03 23:09:43 CEST

There is no peaceful revolution, voting doesn't work anon. You must speak a language that only they understand.
https://blossom.primal.net/ec45d06a5544316b1cd57dba27d28499c0fafd363c26fcb0befef77fefb605a0.jpg

2026-07-03 22:42:21 CEST

Happy 250th #nostr https://blossom.primal.net/90640a448c645fc5f5c9aefdfbe84ba6e40ffbe0d8c7035a7fc4911fe560eeae.jpg

2026-07-03 21:56:17 CEST

The point for someone who values privacy and self-reliance is having a parallel monetary system where the base rules can't be changed unilaterally by a small group, and where you can opt into stronger privacy and sovereignty practices if you want. It doesn't require mass adoption of cypherpunk habits to function as a store of value or medium for those who do. In a world trending toward more surveillance (CBDCs, expanded financial monitoring, platform deplatforming), having one major asset where the protocol itself doesn't force trust in custodians or issuers is rare. Most alternatives either have explicit controllers (many altcoins, traditional finance) or weaker track records of resisting capture. Bitcoin's value accrues to those who actually use the decentralized features, self-custody, node verification, coin control, and privacy techniques, not to passive holders waiting for statistics to improve on their own. The network doesn't "decentralize for you." It gives you the tools and incentives to do it yourself, while making it expensive for others to stop you. #bitcoin #nostr

2026-07-03 04:59:38 CEST

On-chain privacy exists, you just gotta learn anon.
https://ashigaru.rs/docs/ashigaru-terminal-overview/
https://blossom.primal.net/b2fa1d1dc4c3cc0477775263eb581820d9697ac686c05e41b666d166f5f1f966.jpg

2026-07-03 04:51:18 CEST

- reply

Love it, also donating to the cause is based

2026-07-03 04:09:14 CEST

- reply

This is coercion

2026-07-03 04:08:53 CEST

- reply

This is coercion
#nevent1q…pznn

2026-07-03 03:46:13 CEST

Finally decided to take a break from X. The bitcoin talk has gotten so bad that I just couldn't do it anymore. #nostr only for awhile.

2026-06-29 04:39:59 CEST

Bitcoin remains the dominant crypto on darknet markets powering 98% of transactions due to liquidity. In 2024, DNMs saw $2B in BTC inflows. 2025 estimates near $2.6B. Markets resilient despite takedowns.
https://www.chainalysis.com/blog/crypto-drug-sales-darknet-markets-2026/

2026-06-27 23:49:40 CEST

- reply

Blasphemy

2026-06-27 23:10:59 CEST

Your BIP 110 king!
https://blossom.primal.net/4edbaf3ce049a1b7943018c3570249ecb8caec112532169c0b0e6a3ac431a3d1.jpg

2026-06-27 23:01:19 CEST

Your node your rules, bitcoin knots is malware.

2026-06-27 22:58:39 CEST

https://x.com/i/status/2070933019624419667

2026-06-27 00:32:31 CEST

As long as block space has any marginal cost below what some people are willing to pay for non-monetary uses, some amount of spam will find its way in. Consensus rules can raise the friction on specific techniques, but they can't remove the underlying incentive. #bitcoin

2026-06-27 00:28:06 CEST

- reply

Bitcoin company?

2026-06-27 00:27:44 CEST

No real anarcho capitalist supports bip 110.
1. Coercive rule imposition: Even though it's a soft fork, it relies on nodes enforcing new validity rules that make previously valid (and paid-for) constructions invalid. This is collective action redefining what counts as legitimate use of the protocol, rather than pure market discipline.
2. Changing the rules after the fact: People built businesses, collections, and protocols on top of Taproot's data-carrying capabilities. Using protocol changes to restrict that retroactively (or prospectively during the window) feels like ex post facto interference.
3. Precedent for control: Once you accept using consensus to "protect" Bitcoin from disfavored uses, the door opens to future interventions justified by the greater good or true purpose. Ancap theory is deeply skeptical of any mechanism that lets a subset of participants dictate terms to others via enforced rules.
This goes beyond the existing block weight limit + fee market. It is an attempt to dictate the character of block space usage, to declare certain paid transactions illegitimate at the protocol level.

2026-06-26 12:57:56 CEST

- reply

Andy back looking like the zombie he is

2026-06-26 02:47:18 CEST

HB https://blossom.primal.net/689ff9200e5a73e975395ef4352bd93318cea3a19da54b43dfc2bdbd349bce7f.jpg https://blossom.primal.net/e5677b53848ececee1ebe724b3c11723da95b18425bddb00ecb45961a14620b1.jpg bip 110 was never about spam. Luke will forever be a scam.

2026-06-24 23:21:19 CEST

https://x.com/i/status/2069875459722969196

2026-06-21 18:49:32 CEST

Bitcoin is just one tool among many for financial sovereignty. Anyone who accepts one but rejects others, is a bad actor and should not be listened to.

2026-06-19 04:24:49 CEST

Thieves hate privacy
Government hates privacy
Thieves=Government
#privacy #bitcoin #nostr

2026-06-15 04:20:51 CEST

Race, privacy, energy, currency, food, land and culture. Everything in the world revolves around this. Everything I named is being attacked on all fronts. Everything I named can and must be fixed if we are to succeed. #nostr #gn

2026-06-13 06:11:34 CEST

- reply

Nice, mind if I ask what kinda work you do?

2026-06-13 06:01:35 CEST

Ayn Rand is a litmus test #nostr #gn
https://blossom.primal.net/1f168812edd072e1d857af69a07b46c8205bb74d541e812cfc81b62faae1d1b2.jpg

2026-05-17 02:41:51 CEST

Monero is a good project but the community is cringe and probably filled with spooks.

2026-03-12 02:49:08 CET

- reply

SlingshotVPN has not undergone any published third-party penetration testing or cryptographic audits from recognized firms such as Cure53, Deloitte, or Radically Open Security. Without an audit, zero-log claims are unverifiable assertions, not proven architecture.
Server footprint spans only 22 countries, limiting jurisdictional diversity and increasing the risk of traffic correlation attacks compared to providers with 60-100+ node countries.
No documented legal challenges means their no-logs policy has never been stress-tested under subpoena, warrant canary pressure, or mutual legal assistance treaty (MLAT) requests.
Cant pay with bitcoin or XMR
I'll still keep a watch on this project, I understand its new and still has alot of growing to do.
If threat modeling matters to you, use providers with reproducible audit trails. #VPN #Privacy #OPSEC #InfoSec

2026-02-23 03:07:25 CET

Bitcoin exists on a spectrum of usefulness depending on your circumstances. For someone in Zurich, it's mostly a speculative asset. For someone in Caracas or under a sanctioned regime, it can be a genuine monetary lifeline. As global debt levels rise and currency debasement becomes more common even in developed nations, that spectrum could shift considerably over the next few decades.

2026-02-21 14:55:34 CET

₿ #nostr
https://blossom.primal.net/b1228b08b0d51e80684b53e40018cef5763efcdfdd5487a9bd0d89326d376bc9.jpg

2026-02-17 15:58:25 CET

#Bitcoin #XMR crypto anarchism
https://blossom.primal.net/ad31b34abb4b21767fbb49817e92ee312719a9bc01b2be4c669420c2178a095b.png

2026-02-04 13:30:26 CET

- reply

He should be exiled from the universe

2026-02-02 16:48:17 CET

Its healthy that Bitcoin Knots exists

2026-01-25 00:32:28 CET

- reply

#pardonsamourai
Dont forgot to sign the petition if you haven't yet and help out the families
https://billandkeonne.org/
#nevent1q…wr4l

2026-01-13 03:35:48 CET

Saylor is one of the worst things to happen to bitcoin.