<unnamed>

Public Key

npub13thhtj384uq2dacvzjr94efgvrxdcd50geyecl8kkg6jkzd8p86sgtwvcs

Profile Code

nprofile1qqsg4mm4egn67q9x7uxpfpj6u55xpnxux685vjvu0nmtydftpxnsnagpp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqemqwwr

Publishing to

nos.lol

Last Notes

2026-03-05 16:31:37 CET

- reply

Your use case is in no shape or form spam or bloat, it's the most simple transaction possible, it doesn't matter if it's a self transfer, that happens all the time when people consolidate transactions. I can even decide to just send to a different wallet that it's also mine. People won't also be creating dns entries in your system all the time. My only question is if to your system if I can afterwards consolidate the transaction or do I need to keep it untouched, otherwise I would say don't worry.

2026-03-05 13:24:44 CET

- reply

in this scenario it's even more expensive for them bc they have to pay mining fees and AI tokens.

2026-03-05 13:22:59 CET

- reply

probably yes.

2026-03-05 11:59:30 CET

- reply

we need more 110 blocks. we need to redirect hashpower to pro 110 miners.

2026-03-05 11:58:00 CET

- reply

rug the spammers/scammers. 110 them all.

2026-03-04 14:02:01 CET

- reply

Could you share the payment statistics? percentage of each payment? it would be interesting.

2026-03-04 12:29:31 CET

- reply

doesn't that mean he wants to control bitcoin? ironic.

2026-03-04 12:26:36 CET

- reply

can you people read and understand what you are reading? he just stated a fact that everyone knows.

2026-03-04 12:16:17 CET

No, you cannot do any use case on bitcoin. Can we do covenants now? No. Guess what, the network has to agree on that use case.

2026-03-04 12:10:35 CET

- reply

what is ridiculous? he's right. you can't do any use case in bitcoin, that's why there are soft and hard forks. it's permissionless about people because you don't have to ask permission to any one to use it.

2026-03-02 15:41:19 CET

- reply

So that they can force you to have a digital ID

2026-03-02 11:23:27 CET

- reply

You speak out against Israel atrocities bro, US maxis don't appreciate that.

2026-03-01 14:38:21 CET

- reply

I agree that US is still the super power but China can't do anything on the middle east, that region it's mostly US allies. I think if US remove Taiwan dependency on chips US will let Taiwan be taken.

2026-03-01 04:26:17 CET

- reply

In the future, why do they hates us? why won't they negotiate? Just because we killed his dad?

2026-03-01 00:22:29 CET

Open-source contributions will just be sharing AI token costs between members. It will even be easier to predict the cost of implementing a feature and just have people funding it.

2026-03-01 00:16:16 CET

- reply

epstein files release was just a warning.

2026-03-01 00:14:23 CET

- reply

I prefer https://ouisync.net/ it's available on Zapstore.

2026-02-28 20:17:11 CET

- reply

two weeks ago. felt good.

2026-02-28 11:58:45 CET

- reply

Finally someone says it.

2026-02-28 02:37:52 CET

- reply

otherwise I like appimages because they are selfcontained and portable. I don't like to have things installed all over the OS. I like standalone or like choco were I can list, it's contained and i say remove this app, and it cleans it all.

2026-02-28 02:34:51 CET

- reply

I like chocolatey it has all the main apps, it's simple and I think you can wrap existing apps in a choco package.

2026-02-28 02:22:20 CET

- reply

idk there's so many options that is chaotic imo. I kinda like appimages. I wish there was chocolatey for Linux. one simple package manager that works for all the apps.

2026-02-27 21:16:45 CET

Core 30 ppl logic: the way to fight spam is to outbid them so that they are forced to pay more. Spam in bip110 costing 1000x more : doesn't matter.

2026-02-27 21:01:53 CET

- reply

BIP-110 still makes your transaction invalid
Yes, it does but I could just make a different one that simply uses more inputs/pushes/witness elements. - >>Lmao. and still he paid 22 usd with the a sub sat mempool.

2026-02-27 20:24:58 CET

- reply

dude puts tiny image, pays 10000x more than it would, it's still not bip110 valid and claims 110 doesn't work.
#nevent1q…rwzq

2026-02-27 18:20:00 CET

- reply

how can I try this? I just tried the pwans but got no ID after the tx confirmed.

2026-02-27 16:39:40 CET

- reply

apparently some carriers support sms over ip. if you have wifi it could be it.

2026-02-26 21:24:15 CET

- reply

1)What? lmao

2026-02-26 19:54:24 CET

- reply

https://cdn.satellite.earth/ca636871067ef3d1bed4c786057bb186fbaf99f6f8f417786b590ddb92dcc643.jpg

2026-02-26 16:13:54 CET

- reply

Same here. looks like down.

2026-02-26 13:06:09 CET

- reply

all I read is a list of shitcoins.

2026-02-25 23:42:58 CET

odell : oh when the chain splits Luke and mechanic will spam the main chain with nasty stuff! Dude, what's preventing ANYONE from doing it? that's the whole point of 110. What's the current plan to avoid that? Just pray really strongly that no one doesn't?

2026-02-25 23:14:28 CET

- reply

Predictable. Anyway this is only on the short term imo. Price always corrects in the long term. But the way Bitcoin brokes this is by using Bitcoin as money.

2026-02-25 21:32:00 CET

- reply

thanks captain.

2026-02-25 21:06:46 CET

- reply

bitcoin companies that need devs must recruit them.

2026-02-25 17:00:55 CET

Our purpose is to drive the price of everything to zero, move to the next problem and repeat.

2026-02-25 16:56:58 CET

- reply

You can do your own clone of Twitter or FB, but you don't have the network effect. the same should be true for open source, there can be clones but if people trust you and your project collaborators i think your project will have an edge over an AI clone with zero collaborations. There is other problem wich is AI agents spamming your project with PRs, people will probably have to put some LN paywall to be a contributor or submit a PR. Either way software is going to zero.

2026-02-24 15:36:14 CET

- reply

my agent setup the whole vps alone, I just had to pay the LN invoice for the vps. he completely manages it alone

2026-02-24 02:38:24 CET

- reply

with bip 110 they would have to split their data across many different chunks and pay way more in fees. And people spamming with inscriptions are not even using op_return, so opening up op_return is just one more data option to spam, it's not replacing another form.

2026-02-23 20:49:43 CET

- reply

about 4 : spam is not priced out by fees, fees prevent Denial of Service type of attacks. not spam, spam as in undesired content, must be specially targeted.

2026-02-23 17:13:46 CET

If you look at some blocks there is a lot of hashrate that are almost 100% bip110 compliant. viabtc and F2pool don't seem to include subsat txs wich makes most of inscriptions. So financially they loose close to zero compared to know and get no risk in a chain split. Just saying.

2026-02-23 16:45:14 CET

- reply

stupid thing is i would accept something like 160 bytes to accommodate citreas needs, and Core stopped gaslighting, i think most people in knots side would accept that.

2026-02-23 15:40:44 CET

- reply

Miner capitulation. let's go.

2026-02-23 01:18:15 CET

- reply

bip110 doesn't have a white list. it restricts arbitrary data usages.

2026-02-22 22:04:39 CET

- reply

Flush them all out

2026-02-22 16:22:49 CET

- reply

At this point the biggest risk in an attack is not about hashrate cost but miner centralization. it's easier for a state to takeover miners in the US for eg than anything else.

2026-02-22 16:16:14 CET

- reply

I didn't say it's scales and grows forever, bitcoin price doesn't have to grow every cycle neither does hashrate. fees are the less significant factor in miner revenue, it's also the least predictable. It's a free market, it's not our job to find revenues for miners, there are a lot of variables in the market, we are now at 70k, not far from 2021 ATH, half the block reward and yet Hashrate is a lot higher. In 2022 bear market hashrate was already higher than in 2021. The hashrate will always adjust according to a lot of factors, fees are one of the smallest ones.

2026-02-22 15:37:21 CET

- reply

Core should be ultra conservative, they should only make rule changes when people and businesses start screaming demanding that new feature.

2026-02-22 15:30:05 CET

- reply

hashrate follows price. it's a function of price and it's a free market. you will always have the correct equilibrium of hashrate for the current bitcoin price/market cap. You get the security needed for the market cap value. Then there are a lot of factors, there's the production cost and bitcoin price, even if bitcoin price stays the same after 4 years there's also the efficiency gains in production that offsets that. Miners market adapts, that's why hashrate was lower than now even when block reward was a lot higher, that's why hashrate drops when price drops, even though that even on bear markets hashrate goes to ATHs. It's a free market and they adapt and compete. bitcoin mining is still in early times, hashrate will be a lot higher in the future. We don't need to try to to fix the "weather" its all equilibrium, it will sort itself.

2026-02-22 13:49:54 CET

Bitcoin is a system made of equilibrium, much like nature, nature self corrects, self adjusts, you don't need to do anything, if you do, it will self adjust and it will have an unpredictable effect that you might not like. People have the tendency to try to control details in the system that they think that are flawed, that's what central banks do, that's what climate lunatics do, they try to "fix" the weather.

2026-02-22 13:38:18 CET

"We have to find ways to have blockspace demand because of the security budget, block reward gets cut every 4 years, bitcoin can't double forever, so let them spam because fees are good for the network" - stop thinking like a shitcoiner!! There is no such thing as a security budget!

2026-02-22 13:31:10 CET

- reply

it doesn't matter if btc doubles value or not after halving. it's a non issue.

2026-02-22 13:29:25 CET

- reply

it doesn't matter.

2026-02-22 12:31:25 CET

- reply

it's like tossing a dice, but you have to toss it until it's 100kb or more ok? you ppl are not technical enough.

2026-02-22 03:34:51 CET

odell used to text in all caps to speak clearly. he stopped that didn't he? that was the signal. everything after that is not to be taken seriously.

2026-02-22 02:26:28 CET

You can't opt out of soft forks, you even if you don't upgrade your node you still get the consequences of a soft fork like taproot. you can still get the spam or any bug of a new SF, it's even better to upgrade so that you can validate all the rules that the network has since they will affect you anyway. One more reason to avoid any change since it will be imposed on the whole network.

2026-02-22 01:54:17 CET

Tinker bois had ideia : What if we do this thing taproot that no one asked for ? looks cool, allows a bunch of possibilities. reality : Spam! Shit, you know what let's open up op_return! -> bip110. You see the problem? the problem is people. everyone thinks they know what's best for btc. Saylor is right on this, everything there is a change the clock resets, we should learn from gold, no one can change gold, bitcoin should remain unchanged as long as possible until there's something that must absolutely be done.

2026-02-22 01:39:36 CET

- reply

Although even without upgrading you cannot escape consequences of soft forks.
#nevent1q…k4z9

2026-02-22 01:37:47 CET

- reply

Completely valid option that more people should adopt.

2026-02-22 01:27:05 CET

- reply

I share this view. unfortunately core decisions led to this.

2026-02-22 01:22:30 CET

You gotta choose your VC node implementation wisely pleb. Blockstream + Taproot Wizards node or Jack/Ocean node for now. In the future maybe Odell node, Synonym node? Your og bitcoin heros are all VCs now anon.

2026-02-22 01:12:05 CET

- reply

How are we still claiming thing like odell is claiming? No one controls Bitcoin otherwise it would be useless right? No one controls bc node runners choose what to run, they can choose bip110 or not, and the more node implementations the better.

2026-02-22 00:36:01 CET

You know what would be cool? instead of those core influencoors asking to bet them for bip110 like that has any relevance, we should subsidize pro or anti 110 by renting hashrate, its probably possible with @nprofile…kc8a. Maybe @nprofile…ckyu could offer something similar.

2026-02-22 00:01:02 CET

- reply

worked well for ethereum using blockspace for all the crap I guess.

2026-02-21 23:48:26 CET

- reply

Talk to @nprofile…qus8. I want to use your models trough them.

2026-02-21 23:43:10 CET

- reply

Stop asking questions. trust the influencooors.

2026-02-20 16:15:51 CET

- reply

At this point I'm gonna run 110 just to see all these "influencers" on their high horse that constantly appeal to authority shit themselves.

2026-02-20 15:10:52 CET

- reply

No.

2026-02-19 21:00:56 CET

- reply

Finally.

2026-02-17 21:01:26 CET

- reply

1x1=2

2026-02-17 11:51:40 CET

- reply

Plebs need to wash away these pseudo influencers. running 110 just for that is already a good reason.

2026-02-17 01:30:35 CET

- reply

F2pool is leaving a lot of inscriptions out. is it just bc of low fee rates?

2026-02-15 15:09:37 CET

- reply

Now do Citrea investment and why you are so nervous about all this and replying to every Kratter video.

2026-02-14 13:01:39 CET

- reply

hmm looks like they are only leaving subsat txs. nevermind.

2026-02-14 12:42:51 CET

- reply

Look at the recent blocks mined by F2pool eg: https://mempool.space/block/000000000000000000011ec5713e8737c587860848ec3f49ddabd1c531a0927e they are leaving a lot of txs(inscriptions) out.

2026-02-13 13:19:13 CET

- reply

if your dev team is not mentioned and funded by epstein you have no credibility. Another win for Core! lmao. BTW is F2pool filtering spam from blocks? looks like it.

2026-02-13 12:38:40 CET

Most VPS providers still don't accept btc, wtf are they doing? I want to easily spin up VPS or pods myself or with an Ai agent without going through creating account and giving credit card details. jfc.

2026-02-13 09:14:46 CET

- reply

I see all that as absolute wins.

2026-02-12 11:41:02 CET

- reply

Both are centralized. period. Decentralization comes from the fact that I can choose wich one I want to run even if it's just from one guy, or my own implementation. The thing that matters is how many people review and have eyes on it and run it, because there is less risk. If you run a version just by one guy that almost no one uses you expose yourself to more risks.

2026-02-11 13:52:59 CET

- reply

"Nostr: Were your shitposts will live forever...maybe."

2026-02-11 13:50:28 CET

- reply

"Nostr: Event not found."

2026-02-11 13:49:32 CET

- reply

"Nostr: screaming into the void with no downtime".

2026-02-11 11:52:39 CET

- reply

I sent an email once asking to pay in bitcoin and never got any response. But I want one of those.

2026-02-09 22:25:26 CET

- reply

The president has little influence. The current government is center right.

2026-02-09 00:49:32 CET

- reply

yes. everyone will have custom made UX in open protocols

2026-02-08 22:16:34 CET

- reply

Not relevant.

2026-02-08 21:34:10 CET

- reply

Satoshi is buying and sending to his main wallet.

2026-02-08 19:50:30 CET

- reply

We need all of those uses cases.

2026-02-08 16:49:46 CET

- reply

Stripe accepts bitcoin, bitcoin from my own wallet. what the receiver does with it it's not my problem, neither can you control it.

2026-02-08 12:36:30 CET

- reply

You also can't hold monero as a SoV so you have to come back to BTC, as many others do the same you can then exchange only in BTC, you don't need monero to buy bread. This is all part of the growing out of a niche. Here were I live there are a few good places to spend bitcoin,there are bitcoin communities, if you look on btc map you see the growth, does Stripe accepts monero? Can bitcoin lose black markets? sure, but we need to grow out of black markets. we should we keep pushing for circular economies on bitcoin, and educate and spend bitcoin, what we need is business owners that are bitcoiners, and that will also grow.

2026-02-07 20:27:59 CET

- reply

something like PPQ. AI no email just top up with bitcoin and pay as you go.

2026-02-07 12:34:53 CET

- reply

that's like...your opinion...if you don't like it.. or whatever... you cant say like this is bad...or whatever.

2026-02-07 00:46:31 CET

These Core guys are getting way intitled. oh If you celebrating the exit of Gloria you are crazy and not a true bitcoiner, you people will never talk to any bitcoin dev, I hope the normal sane people can all come and leave you all out. STFU. Satoshi left, bitcoin continued. The crazy ones are the ones that bought the coin while others calls us crazy. we are the one who run the nodes. We care about the coin and the network, we don't care about your feels. we. do. not. like. rulers. That includes people who think that are better than others.

2026-02-07 00:37:28 CET

- reply

lol. you think bitcoin will only attrack "normal" "sane" people if more people use it? Bitcoin is for enemies. Bitcoin is for anyone. It were the "crazy" ones that started the whole thing. As for interacting with bitcoin devs, well I think bitcoin is an open source project, so anyone can be a dev and many can interact, I also think Luke doesn't mind interacting. lmao.

2026-02-06 17:48:23 CET

https://cdn.satellite.earth/15257d167b594bfdeb506345eb40bb5d61307a3099ea0a1fa1d406e3c50e1324.jpg

2026-02-06 01:05:31 CET

- reply

it so happens that I sell both.

2026-02-05 22:40:15 CET

"Have fun with your bitcoins"

2026-02-04 19:01:50 CET

- reply

My openclaw that paid a human to chase me and break my legs.

2026-02-03 20:19:07 CET

- reply

50k programmed

2026-02-03 16:43:50 CET

- reply

probably spam filter, don't know if it applies to all relays, some relays are very strick even in time between messages.