Ronin

They could do more than that, if the user reached them and prove that he is the legit owner, the owner could give the tx ID that they were planning on broadcasting and miners would include just that or just send the tx to the miners out of band.

2026-08-02 02:44:20 UTC

"runs" it's the new "steady lads..."

2026-08-02 02:24:02 UTC

Keep in mind that just because you are a maxi who self custodies, and consumes all the btc content, doesn't automatically makes you an expert about securing your family and friends btc, you are just passing information that you learned from the community, if even btc OGs and coders got blindsided by this, how can you assure your family and friend that your setup for them is solid? Just be transparent about what you know, the options, the pros and cons of self custody and let people choose their path. Not everyone is revolution material.

2026-08-02 01:42:33 UTC

Bitcoiners now texting their normie friend that they got into Bitcoin and self custody to help the revolution, that they need to buy casino grade dices write 0 and 1s in a completely airgapped device with immutable Linux distro to calculate the seed words, add a passphrase, do this 3 times for a multisig back all up and distribute them geographically, if the normie complains tell him that if he could manage to learn to drive he got this, if along the way somehow he lost the coins at least he died on the hill we wanted it was like a true bitcoiners and it was for the greater good.

2026-08-02 00:47:24 UTC

Since anyone can do the same hack, people could try to hack before the bad guys to keep the funds safe and return them to the owners.

2026-08-01 16:18:11 UTC

I stopped advising people to self custody, it's a lot of responsibility, if something happens to their funds its on you, what i do is just explain the options and tradeoffs. Self custody is hard, don't try to fool people, for most people having the coins on an exchange is still the best option.

2026-08-01 16:02:26 UTC

- reply

Miners could help here. If they take out of band tx for spam they could take the owner tx out of band and reject the attacker tx.

2026-07-31 02:18:09 UTC

- reply

who?

2026-07-31 00:52:30 UTC

we need better tools to self custody. Things like op_vault maybe could help, maybe covenants idk.

2026-07-30 15:15:02 UTC

Make legacy bitcoin payments great again, pre segwit, pay full price, take more block space by tx, blocks will be 1MB again and will outbid spam.

2026-07-29 14:56:34 UTC

- reply

This is planned. Blackrock wants to tokenize stocks, they want to do it on bitcoin, that's the plan. Making bitcoin like ethereum.

2026-07-24 22:34:33 UTC

- reply

Drop Core. Let them be at an empty table.
#nevent1q…aajv

2026-07-23 17:14:43 UTC

- reply

Bitcoiners need to dump Core. Decentralize node implementations. Get the economic majority, fuck suitcoiners and exchanges, build circular economies, and decentralize hashrate. All this before it's too late.
#nevent1q…rakt

2026-07-23 17:10:41 UTC

- reply

wasn't Saylor the one that said that funding devs was dangerous?
#nevent1q…ex90

2026-07-19 21:34:12 UTC

- reply

My note is about Core argument that removing op_return filter is about better predictict what will be in the next block.

2026-07-19 16:26:24 UTC

- reply

wen node?

2026-07-19 15:59:16 UTC

Miners can always have out of band services, Ocean could have a service where you would send your tx to them alone for only them to get your tx fee. BTW right now you can pay out of band in LN or fiat to some big pools to accelerate your txs, doesn't that break fee estimates? doesn't that benefits big pools? Stop falling for gaslighting.

2026-07-19 15:43:31 UTC

Do not try and predict the next block; that's impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth… there is no single policy/node implementation. Then you'll see that it is not the block that wasn't how it should be according to prediction; it is only yourself.

2026-07-19 15:12:49 UTC

- reply

witness data is cheaper than op_return.

2026-07-19 15:10:50 UTC

- reply

how do you predict what will be in the next block if the network has multiple node implementations and miners also put in a block what they see fit according to their own views like ocean?

2026-07-18 13:44:02 UTC

Bitcoin needs to have more node implementations, Core has a way too big market share, same for mining, its centralized. Right now core can put a SF, and 3 or 4 pools just activate it because they mostly don't care what SFs do, if Core looses the biggest market share, miners have to actively pick a node implementation. 1-Decentralize node implementations, 2-Decentralize mining. 3-Reject SFs, with each SF the attack surface only increases. Bitcoin doesn't need new toys, it needs stability and merchant/real world adoption, adoption is not failing because of lack of features, merchants and normies don't care about Defi or NFTS, Bitcoin already has what it needs to be used as money. We don't need distractions with Defi features, Bitcoin needs to stop, and people must focus on the ground work.

2026-07-16 11:22:56 UTC

- reply

Wages don't keep up with real inflation and even less against something like a house.

2026-07-16 10:35:48 UTC

- reply

they can manage to be better with different fiat currency but they will still be inflated away, they will loose purchasing power to buy a house, groceries etc, it happens with usd, eur, all. Fiat system is designed to keep you poor.

2026-07-16 10:20:20 UTC

- reply

people can use whatever they want, that's why most are poor. People use many altcoins but Bitcoin still has the largest market cap, that tells something.

2026-07-15 19:26:21 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…49ty

2026-07-15 19:22:07 UTC

- reply

Alternative "platform". Didn't X also blocked Nostr word or post or something at some point?

2026-07-15 15:21:41 UTC

- reply

or Nostr.

2026-07-14 19:11:55 UTC

- reply

True. At this point i I would like 110 to go forward just to see Core shit themselfs.

2026-07-14 12:55:45 UTC

- reply

agreed. root problem is segwit discount.

2026-07-14 11:03:31 UTC

- reply

I just use Claude Sonnet most of the time, opus as advisor, sometimes fable for specific tasks. I cut session/context as fast as possible. finish a task, document it, start new session for a new task in the same project/workspace. also have auto compact firing earlier than default.

2026-07-11 02:00:21 UTC

- reply

I would rather remove witness discount, ans maybe cap the amount of data per tx.

2026-07-11 01:33:29 UTC

- reply

They can pay high fees, just not for an extended ammount of time, because the payment would be higher than the ROI over time, in fact inscriptions died of a lot since their peak. what we can't say is fees handle it and they say making them pay more does nothing, either fees handles it or they don't. The problem is the incentives, segwit gave data a 75% discount, taproot gave 4MB data, and now more data space in a block with op_return. I'm not saying bip110 is the solution to all evils, but we need to change the incentives and make data more expensive than it is now.

2026-07-11 01:03:31 UTC

- reply

There is no solution to spam other than small blocks and fee market - small blocks and fee market are hinting at higher cost to the spammers, and we'll everyone, forcing encoding in pubkey forces just that, the difference is that it punishes only spammers, not valid txs. Spammers right now have a discount, so in a fee market they still pay with a discount VS normal txs. So when ppl say fees are for spam, well, they have a discount, and forcing to use pubkeys increases their costs.

2026-07-10 19:07:28 UTC

- reply

I think protocol allows you to do whatever you want.

2026-07-10 17:19:18 UTC

- reply

yeah client maintenance is a problem.

2026-07-10 16:15:59 UTC

- reply

we are here. There is no "correct" feed, clients will have differences in feeds, and can probably miss to fetch some notes, some clients are better than others on that regard but Nostr is a bit harder to get all the data and knowing you really got all the data. Pubky is model actually better in this regard imo.

2026-07-10 15:29:31 UTC

- reply

"I can save them"

2026-07-10 11:26:28 UTC

- reply

ok. dude is retarded.

2026-07-07 15:44:07 UTC

- reply

sorry I wasn't clear. kind 4 DM is the old format and has that problem. the new format don't remember the nip nip17 I think, does not have that problem. Amethyst supports both types I think, there should be an icon in your Amethyst DMs that let's you activate/deactivate the new format.

2026-07-07 15:11:12 UTC

- reply

only if your clients uses that old nip. with kind4 theres a new format that does not have that problem.

2026-07-07 10:32:32 UTC

- reply

nah. Current knots percentage represents well the ammount of people clearly against Core actions, many didn't agree but just didn't upgrade. knots reaching about 20% of the nodes is already huge. Even without 110 I think it would still be in this plateau. But over time Core will loose more market share.

2026-07-06 13:36:44 UTC

- reply

Man has too much digital energy. Needs to dump some.

2026-06-24 20:04:41 UTC

will the power law hold?

2026-06-17 12:06:39 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…e4fz

2026-06-17 12:05:32 UTC

- reply

nah. still dreaming with the light phone 3.

2026-06-17 11:46:35 UTC

- reply

For agents or not so important things there's https://lnemail.net/

2026-06-17 11:44:27 UTC

- reply

Proton. No LN just onchain.

2026-06-16 01:18:49 UTC

- reply

btw there is a small follow up/caneo on Sam bell after he goes back to earth on a movie called "Mute" where you can see Sam and multiple clones in a court.

2026-06-09 16:09:08 UTC

- reply

market already "accepted" the current state as "normal", the current status is not unknown or worse. Market priced the unknown, and with some pessimism. Now it's "balanced". Just my ignorant opinion.

2026-06-08 23:12:29 UTC

- reply

that will mark the fiat top this cycle.

2026-06-07 02:20:10 UTC

- reply

Lol.

2026-06-04 21:26:00 UTC

- reply

or just B before value for bitcoin, B after value for sats

2026-06-04 01:16:27 UTC

- reply

I think it's just bear market cycle playing out and then we look for possible causes. But I'm thinking not only Saylor but maybe also MS announcing Majorana 2.

2026-06-02 23:18:11 UTC

- reply

Received.

2026-06-02 23:14:00 UTC

- reply

Done.

2026-06-02 23:07:49 UTC

- reply

Minibits never failed me. Just sent you 21sats all fine on my side.

2026-06-01 18:43:54 UTC

Maybe now people can realize that when some say don't use onchain, onchain bad, don't use LN too hard, use X instead, that X is beneficial to them somehow. When there is money there are agendas. So check when people interests and agendas are, take their opinions with a grain of salt.

2026-06-01 07:11:34 UTC

- reply

And nerds.

2026-05-31 14:49:16 UTC

- reply

Forever. Maybe.

2026-05-30 14:18:53 UTC

- reply

that's why ossification is key, everyone lies, everyone has an opinion, everyone thinks they know best, everyone has their own interests. No SF no changes, just basic maintenance. Bitcoin should be something beyond the control of any one like gold, can't change it.

2026-05-29 13:30:45 UTC

Bitcoiners: you buying coffee doesn't belong in the chain forever. use LN!
Also Bitcoiners: Dust txs with monkey jpegs are valid txs that pay fees.

2026-05-27 20:54:53 UTC

- reply

Dude expected to spend a few usd and get 3btc back from finding a block. not too smart.

2026-05-27 11:46:27 UTC

- reply

Pubky solved all this in their design afaik.
Better just accept Nostr does not guarantee that and it works on a best effort.
#nevent1q…mr7z

2026-05-26 10:44:08 UTC

- reply

would they be LN compatible?

2026-05-25 17:04:24 UTC

- reply

holy shit

2026-05-25 10:02:53 UTC

- reply

Why?

2026-05-24 15:43:40 UTC

- reply

JB and fiatjaf talking about it on Twitter in the early days.

2026-05-23 22:42:43 UTC

- reply

Probably someone didn't like the agreement between US and Iran to stop the war...

2026-05-23 17:53:46 UTC

one thing about onchain is that there are no projects or solutions to sell to you, you just use it and it works, its the most permissionless, that can bother some.

2026-05-23 17:41:16 UTC

- reply

dude you promote a centralized paper sat solution where people can and were already rugged we even had nutzap that went nowhere and had terrible ux. wtf are you on about.

2026-05-23 16:04:49 UTC

- reply

Lightning is a bit like nostr, it's terrible and it's great.

2026-05-23 11:56:43 UTC

- reply

it happens, probably something on my side not yours.

2026-05-23 11:42:18 UTC

- reply

21 sats

2026-05-23 11:23:21 UTC

- reply

the closest thing that exists now on Nostr is for clients to propagate the event that tells the network the relays you are using, and there are some relays that are specific just for those kinds of events like purplepage.es or something like that. But yes I guess nothing stops you from implementing something like that. I prefer a different approach for nostr based on DVMs.

2026-05-23 11:12:57 UTC

- reply

idk, according to @nprofile…ewsn pubky tried to share these issues with nostr devs and got ignored or attacked. idk if technically there's anything preventing the same to be done on Nostr, i don't believe so maybe I'm wrong. But you will end up doing what pubky did I guess, using mainline dht for discovery. People may not like it but pubky design looks solid to me.

2026-05-23 11:02:30 UTC

- reply

that's basically what pubky does.

2026-05-22 20:17:24 UTC

I really don't care but people outraged about onchain zaps because of privacy, because of the link of your identity to your balance, well your identity alone on Nostr will already by itself tell a lot, who you follow, memes you like, posts you like, re-tweet etc, are public, if not carefull apps and relays can also get your IP, so before they track your sats, they probably will get you for the memes, and your "extremist" views.

2026-05-22 20:04:34 UTC

- reply

And devs are fighting that onchain zaps are like the worst thing ever. At lest onchain sats don't vanish. lol.

2026-05-22 20:02:43 UTC

- reply

Is that a Spark wallet? maybe you can use the seed in Wallet of Satoshi and check your balance there.

2026-05-22 17:21:46 UTC

- reply

Oh boy, Lula is gonna get the Maduro treatment.

2026-05-22 17:16:18 UTC

- reply

that's their game plan. to be hated so that the world starts a war with them and god comes to save them. They are completely lunatic.

2026-05-21 15:48:20 UTC

- reply

Make onchain great again.

2026-05-21 15:24:07 UTC

Dude that does centralized paper sats says onchain zaps bad, ocean decentralized mining pool bad. lol.

2026-05-21 15:20:43 UTC

- reply

lol

2026-05-13 21:44:51 UTC

- reply

it would be cool if it allowed at least timelocking. I feel having the two keys together can make you a 5 wrench attack target.

2026-05-12 19:32:12 UTC

- reply

I guess we will end up using dumb phones then.

2026-05-12 17:01:54 UTC

- reply

This is the way. Offer services that people want, Bitcoin only. No Fiat.

2026-05-12 15:05:13 UTC

- reply

This is the way.

2026-05-09 20:56:23 UTC

- reply

"I've moved on to other things..."

2026-05-09 10:43:19 UTC

- reply

My guess, you can only login with a signer extension.

2026-05-03 12:12:12 UTC

- reply

Using AI to to validate your code is not an option anymore. Hope Core devs are doing the same.
#nevent1q…a650

2026-04-29 14:15:53 UTC

- reply

none of that doesn't seem right at all to me, knots never had the same number as Core. I usually check in coin.dance or in clark moody.

2026-04-24 21:07:19 UTC

- reply

https://njal.la/

2026-04-23 15:40:41 UTC

- reply

yeah something like that. They could be seen as not being completely aligned with all the secrecy and methods and could not let them walk around with all that knowledge. Maybe they don't want another Bob Lazar.

2026-04-23 15:32:33 UTC

- reply

They were close to find out tech that the military still doesn't want to be public knowledge.

2026-04-21 15:50:40 UTC

- reply

Nature is healing