allen

@nprofile…205a : “our view of reality is, out of necessity, participatory. you can’t remove the observer and have a god’s eye view of reality.”
@nprofile…a49c : “observation is action.”
Gigi: “yeah.”
Cale: “you cannot look at something without touching it.”
Gigi: “exactly.”
Calle: “your finger needs to push the thing in order to feel it. and even the photon arriving in your eye at some point reflected off an object, so that photon interacted with the object itself.”
Gigi: “and from the photon’s point of view, zero time has passed.”
Calle: “ … I don’t know what that means.”
😂 😂 😂
#nevent1q…sj7a

2026-06-28 11:35:22 UTC

- reply

it’s so bad that normies literally have no idea because it’s beyond believable so they just don’t believe you.

2026-06-27 18:15:47 UTC

it’s getting to the point I want to tweet something about the UK that would get me imprisoned pretty much every single day.
of course I can’t post these things here either, but I’m at least more comfortable to say that if you see me in person any time soon and you are curious about the literal controlled demolition of the greatest civilisation in history, buy me a drink and we’ll see how wrongthinky I feel.

2026-06-19 14:10:28 UTC

omfg strc pahahahahaha rofl lolz jfc haha innit

2026-06-18 11:01:31 UTC

- reply

for those lacking the context from the twitter OP: the rape gangs were not just random horny foreigners. they were (/are!) an organised criminal network actively enabled and encouraged by the police, social services, health services, civil servants, and the media.
there are cases of Pakistani men bringing 11 year old British girls to hospitals for abortions or to remove shards of glass from their vaginas, no questions asked by medical professionals, and released right back into their “care”. a British man was arrested for trespassing for trying to break into a house where his daughter was being gang raped. I could go on but, again, you really need to read the entire report. child protection gave Pakistani men tours of orphanages so they could choose who they wanted to take.
the reason all this was done was to aggressively quell any native dissent against the wonders of multiculturalism, so that communists could import third worlders forever and win elections forever. the Labour Party in particular but frankly the entire political establishment for at least 30 years has functionally been a rapes for votes scheme.
if selling native girls to foreigners for sexual slavery and torture in exchange for their electoral support isn’t treason then I don’t know what is.
this people need to be given the death penalty in an orderly fashion or else it will happen in a disorderly fashion.
#nevent1q…v9yg

2026-06-18 10:44:34 UTC

- reply

yeah but also I’d happily do it.

2026-06-15 11:23:27 UTC

nostr is about to be inundated with british zoomers

2026-06-13 07:50:33 UTC

- reply

it’s a bold strategy, Cotton, let’s see if it pays off for em.

2026-06-10 20:40:13 UTC

there’s a nonzero chance nostr becomes the comms layer of resistance to the British state.
they are firing through censorship decrees faster than you can cut a native’s head off over here.

2026-06-09 18:02:02 UTC

- reply

it definitely either goes up or down

2026-06-09 11:10:52 UTC

- reply

because mimesis

2026-06-09 11:07:56 UTC

- reply

night mode bro, do you hate your eyes or something?

2026-06-09 09:42:52 UTC

- reply

I don’t think you are following. what you said is correct and is a level of fluency only either a linguistic pedant or a non native speaker could be expected to achieve.

2026-06-08 12:00:35 UTC

- reply

“who pays whom”
3 mins in and I’m DED ☠️

2026-06-08 11:56:19 UTC

- reply

there is no video but I know they were strolling around in green and orange morph suits.
I can just feel it in the fabric of the universe.
#nevent1q…k77e

2026-06-08 11:53:42 UTC

- reply

BUT WERE YOU WEARING ORANGE AND GREEN MORPH SUITS?
THE PEOPLE NEED TO KNOW!

2026-06-08 11:27:19 UTC

- reply

I’m not clear it’s okay either but I’d like you to explain why?

2026-06-08 11:26:40 UTC

- reply

the context is much more specific than “you told them”. it’s “you told them because you had to tell them to exercise your threat of violence”. it feels like much more of a grey area than you are making out.

2026-06-08 09:20:15 UTC

- reply

hmm idk, only just catching up on this but it sounds like the guy doxxed himself, no?
if you are receiving spurious legal threats from somebody who claims to want to be anonymous but also tells you their name to legitimise the threat, I’m struggling to follow how you can “doxx” them?

2026-06-06 10:17:00 UTC

- reply

what about activation signaling? 😏

2026-06-04 13:06:17 UTC

- reply

only going up to omega to the omega? what is this, ordinals for ants?
it should be at least omega-one times bigger.

2026-06-04 11:13:02 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…s4gu loves ordinals. proven with a meme.
#nevent1q…333f

2026-06-04 11:09:58 UTC

- reply

I posted this10 whole minutes ago, why aren’t people zapping me wtf

2026-06-04 10:58:43 UTC

- reply

hella strong cosign on this one. if people use nostr less because it isn’t turning their brain to sludge, that’s a great thing.
#nevent1q…s0z7

2026-06-04 10:51:39 UTC

guys I zoned out for a while, wtf is “digital credit”?
is it as opposed to, like, *actual* credit?

2026-06-04 10:47:21 UTC

- reply

rookie error, if you want to see Brits you go to Dubai.
(or Magaluf)
#nevent1q…wdmv

2026-05-12 16:27:07 UTC

- reply

but was it good?

2026-04-19 14:33:46 UTC

I prefer nostr for new content in general but this is stuff all bitcoiners know anyway and I wanna try to viralise it into normies’ minds:
https://x.com/allenf32/status/2045477517201477686

2026-03-31 10:19:40 UTC

- reply

what he said
#nevent1q…z2uq

2026-03-23 09:07:01 UTC

- reply

infinite wish hack. big smarts.

2026-03-20 12:27:50 UTC

wholesome sauce innit
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/w14JUOe6cbk

2026-03-17 10:03:43 UTC

Take off the fake deep, take off the fake woke, take off the, "I'm broke, I care"
Take off the gossip, take off the new logic that if I'm rich, I'm rare
Take off the Chanel, take off the Dolce, take off the Birkin bag
Take all that designer bullshit off, and what do you have?

2026-03-16 14:42:03 UTC

- reply

is there a futures market?

2026-03-16 12:27:40 UTC

- reply

it’s only a quarter baked currently. I’m trying to bait nostr into filling in the gaps.

2026-03-16 12:23:23 UTC

- reply

Claude, be less human to boost my ego. make no mistakes.

2026-03-16 12:22:46 UTC

- reply

that’s the worst.

2026-03-16 12:20:59 UTC

- reply

hard or soft?

2026-03-16 12:20:30 UTC

I actually have some thoughts about AI in case anybody hasn’t heard much on the topic and is curious?

2026-03-16 12:00:37 UTC

- reply

but a16z invested so I’m confused

2026-03-16 11:58:50 UTC

- reply

bro I’m a carpenter

2026-03-03 19:31:18 UTC

super fun, worth a watch:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fsLh-NYhOoU

2026-02-26 16:27:23 UTC

- reply

probably

2026-02-12 11:11:04 UTC

- reply

then you are more optimistic than me on the timeline. I think we have the low-hanging fruit of people who will be interested for either technical or ideological reasons. but for the vast swathes of normies, fiat is always going to work better. until they are made to care about either inflation, privacy, or censorship resistance, you literally can’t build anything superior, as judged by criteria they care about.
I don’t mean this to be too doomery. I still think we win in the end and of course all this stuff ought to be built to facilitate victory. I’m just trying to be realistic about *how* we win.

2026-02-12 09:32:29 UTC

- reply

most people think fiat works. we win at the margin when they get rugged and learn the error of their ways.

2026-02-02 04:27:39 UTC

- reply

you.
you are the fake giraffe.

2026-01-31 05:15:50 UTC

- reply

that’s like 60 million bitcoin 👀

2026-01-25 14:28:31 UTC

TIL it’s an open problem whether there exists a polynomial bijection from Q to QxQ and therefore apparently a very very difficult question.
who knew?

2026-01-24 13:00:36 UTC

- reply

I haven’t used but reading the comments it seems a bit clunky if viewed solely from that perspective. I think with enough volume you could justify a market maker that can actually quote prices and redeem instantly.

2026-01-24 09:58:13 UTC

- reply

I once wasted an entire hour of pitching Axiom listening to some public pension plan schlub tell me how farcaster is the future and that it’s very existence proves crypto is a better stack to build apps on that route around bitcoin entirely. I hope the plan’s beneficiaries thank him for his service.
#nevent1q…8xh4

2026-01-24 09:55:14 UTC

- reply

with enough volume you could turn this into a fully fledged p2p exchange.

2026-01-24 09:53:37 UTC

- reply

speaking of which, @nprofile…8tea, do you even believe the reals exist?

2026-01-24 09:52:16 UTC

- reply

doesn’t it feel weird? Q has infinitely many holes in it.

2026-01-24 09:51:42 UTC

- reply

heine borel and anything relying on compactness fails.
weirdest/coolest result is IVT fails too, which is bizarre because on R continuity is strictly stronger than IVP, but in dense-but-not-complete R that flips.

2026-01-23 13:12:46 UTC

they don’t tell you that virtually every concept surrounding continuity works on functions from Q to Q.
they don’t tell you this because they want you to be ignorant and afraid.

2026-01-22 21:31:35 UTC

so interesting:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jxu80s5vvzk

2026-01-22 11:06:01 UTC

- reply

ah but you are assuming the algebra works such that (a,b)*(c,d)=(a*c,b*d) whereas I am analogising it to how C works with reals.

2026-01-22 11:03:39 UTC

- reply

😂

2026-01-21 22:34:07 UTC

- reply

think of it this way: to perform any arithmetic operation in QxQ you can only possibly require multiplication and addition of rationals, which, given Q is closed (just not complete) will give you answers in QxQ too.

2026-01-21 22:30:15 UTC

- reply

why don’t they work? every nonzero element has a multiplicative inverse (which is kinda trivially demonstrable). what are you thinking the issue is?

2026-01-21 22:27:07 UTC

- reply

I think you are reading too much into it. QxQ is useless, just fun. you may have missed it but I declared the other day this is a mathslop account now.

2026-01-21 21:46:00 UTC

- reply

exactly

2026-01-21 21:45:38 UTC

- reply

I don’t think so. {a+bi : a,b∈Q} is a field, multiplication exists and is closed. it’s just not complete, but that’s obvious because Q isn’t complete.

2026-01-21 21:25:02 UTC

- reply

go on …

2026-01-21 21:20:25 UTC

nobody ever talks about the complex-ish numbers as QxQ
everybody’s all “nooooooo you need to go from Q to R and THEN to C noooooo you have to do it in that order!”
but like … you don’t :/

2026-01-21 20:57:51 UTC

teacher: “what is a number?”
student: “a number is a connected component of the terminal sub-bicategory of the 2-category of finitary endofunctors on the-“
[teacher shoots student in the face. the rest of the class is frozen in shock and fear.]
teacher: “anybody else? what is a number?”

2026-01-19 22:07:41 UTC

- reply

although I guess mod 12 it is …

2026-01-19 22:07:08 UTC

- reply

definitely not 7, I’ll tell you that for free

2026-01-19 22:06:30 UTC

- reply

exqueeze me?

2026-01-19 21:44:39 UTC

twitter is for hate scrolling the collapse of the west. nostr is for mathslop. this is a mathslop account now 👍

2026-01-19 21:43:28 UTC

- reply

this is an autist dog whistle, isn’t it?

2026-01-19 21:42:45 UTC

the first number is zero and the second number- wait no, that sounds dumb-

2026-01-15 21:53:34 UTC

- reply

I absolutely do not and I would request you be careful with these fighting words, good sir.

2026-01-15 21:19:41 UTC

I thought this was kinda cool. bummer Claude can’t access a real dictionary. if anybody wants to suggest a basis of English under definitional closure, that would be pretty dope:
https://claude.ai/share/86a61607-41fc-4e55-b6ba-bcc8dad0db4f

2026-01-15 14:19:01 UTC

- reply

Bitcoin is about acceleration. do you know what else is about acceleration?

2026-01-15 14:18:21 UTC

- reply

the attack surface of the calculus is -AAAAAARGHHHHHHH

2026-01-15 10:21:26 UTC

honestly can’t stand people who say “the calculus”. I don’t think there is anything in bitcoin that annoys me this much …

2026-01-14 22:17:47 UTC

innit bruv
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nVF4N1Ix5WI

2026-01-12 19:29:05 UTC

- reply

I see what you did there

2026-01-04 10:04:50 UTC

- reply

I preferred medieval total war tbh. rome felt too restrictive and contrived with the roman clans it made you start with.

2026-01-02 23:14:27 UTC

lex friedman just did a podcast on (pretty much) my undergrad thesis so I forgive him for being a bit dumb on other things and I encourage you all to waste nearly 4 hours on this so we can be better friends:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=14OPT6CcsH4

2026-01-02 14:55:59 UTC

- reply

for the foundations of mathematics

2026-01-02 13:13:10 UTC

y’all keen on homotopy type theory or we sticking with ZFC for now?

2025-12-21 22:33:51 UTC

- reply

I made it up

2025-12-21 21:35:00 UTC

you can actually just ignore the current thing

2025-12-19 17:56:05 UTC

- reply

at this point my wife and I will try literally any holistic health trend. red light, sunlight, seed oils, tallow, organ meat, Wim hof, microplastics, wireful headphones, etc, etc. just tell us mainstream medicine disapproves and we are good to go 👍

2025-12-19 16:48:55 UTC

Gödel’s third incompleteness theorem is that any sufficiently complex pseudo-intellectual thoughtwank is incomplete without nonsensical reference to the first two theorems.

2025-12-19 16:41:02 UTC

- reply

that is not at all what the incompleteness theorems say, nor do they have any bearing whatsoever on physical systems. this is all literal nonsense. it is not even wrong.

2025-12-19 16:17:31 UTC

- reply

it’s Friday, Friday, gotta get down on Friday

2025-12-19 16:09:46 UTC

- reply

can you please explain this sentence?
“Gödelian limits already explain why this axiom cannot be settled by measuring Planck time from within the system”

2025-12-19 16:08:41 UTC

- reply

a quantum resistant car, obvs

2025-12-19 16:06:23 UTC

- reply

of course, because if you could prove it’s impossible then it wouldn’t work as FUD, would it?

2025-12-19 13:29:28 UTC

- reply

me, I like mobilecoin

2025-12-19 13:28:56 UTC

- reply

it’s also the game theoretically perfect FUD because it will never actually happen, hence the theoretical threat will never go away, hence the materially conflicted can get research grants and engagement farm forever.
it’s “the climate crisis” for cryptography nerds.

2025-12-19 13:26:07 UTC

- reply

*reassigned ownership in a strictly above board legal manner

2025-12-16 23:16:24 UTC

- reply

wireful ftw

2025-12-16 23:13:10 UTC

- reply

LIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIFT

2025-12-09 11:23:33 UTC

- reply

NO U!

2025-12-09 11:23:19 UTC

- reply

;