0x2F9E

I don’t know the whole context of what he’s saying but it doesn’t really matter, the change was done because miners were ignoring it because they had the incentive to. They can just put the spam in bare public keys man. It’s a whack a mole you can’t win. Spam has been on Bitcoin since satoshi dice, and look we’re still going. You want to get rid of spam? Price it out. Stop wasting your energy.

2026-02-22 10:27:27 UTC

- reply

Nope. I understand basic information theory which means spam while annoying is unavoidable in a censorship resistant system. And why a relay policy closely matching consensus allows small miners to see more transactions to yes, here’s the kicker, maintain mining decentralisation. Keeping up?

2026-02-22 10:20:26 UTC

- reply

Oh dear. You don’t get it, like, whatsoever do you?

2026-02-22 10:13:08 UTC

- reply

Yeah I’m shrugging my shoulders too at that. You can run whatever dogshit software you like. So go do it, I think it’s called “Knots” or something?

2026-02-22 10:11:56 UTC

- reply

They pushed it through to maintain Bitcoin’s decentralization. Fantastic stewards and well done to them.

2026-02-22 09:59:24 UTC

- reply

What sort of responsible stewards would they be if they bowed to pressure from mongs like you? Just fork. Bye.

2026-02-17 17:56:32 UTC

- reply

That might be the biggest load baring “If” I’ve ever seen. Any miner with the tiniest amount of intelligence isn’t going to run miniscript breaking dogshit software that does nothing to stop spam anyway. Give them some credit.

2026-02-17 17:09:06 UTC

- reply

I cannot WAIT to dump this retard fork for more BTC, and the miners will do the same

2026-01-02 21:03:38 UTC

- reply

What’s Orchard?

2025-10-31 22:31:26 UTC

- reply

Come on man

2025-09-04 08:14:29 UTC

- reply

Not surprising

2025-09-04 08:14:04 UTC

- reply

🥱

2025-09-04 08:13:41 UTC

- reply

What the fuck are you talking about out dickhead

2025-09-03 20:18:21 UTC

- reply

I don’t know what that means when people say cope sorry. Please fork off the chain with your own desired consensus rules if you have a problem with basic information theory.

2025-09-03 18:45:50 UTC

- reply

👍

2025-09-03 14:40:32 UTC

- reply

I have things to do. Better minds then mine clearly and obviously eviscerate the argument on a minute by minute basis. If you can’t see that then you have a logic processing deficiency which I don’t think is fixable unfortunately, please voice your support for a hard fork for your nonsense so we can all part ways and I can dump your fork.

2025-09-03 14:23:37 UTC

- reply

It’s a few seconds to reply to a post, there wasn’t a huge motivating drive because I was so angry I just had to reply, so no, I don’t feel strongly about it. The filterors arguments speak for themselves, they’re attacking themselves with their stupidity, nobody else needs to do it as well.

2025-09-03 14:00:53 UTC

- reply

What the fucking hell is that? Not into all weirdo conspiracy nonsense sorry you’ll have to lay it out for me

2025-09-03 11:49:34 UTC

- reply

You’ve lost your mind unfortunately

2025-09-03 11:49:09 UTC

- reply

Agreed. Same for some others.

2024-07-22 23:15:34 UTC

- reply

Why do we need this?

2024-01-24 21:34:23 UTC

- reply

Seems to be going well for Tor in it’s initial stages

2024-01-23 20:38:17 UTC

- reply

Could this be combined with a main chain payjoin? Consolidate several UTXOs from payer and merchant into one output UTXO. Payer gets all their change as eCash?

2024-01-03 15:28:20 UTC

- reply

Is Cashu on the roadmap too?