William ₿ Travis

Been buying bitcoin since 2018. I particularly like http://river.com. The Bitcoin White Paper http://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf

Christ is Lord.

Public Key

npub18w8307u2nux8dx6cr88net4rjg4xs3x57lmksjhdnajhrwexherq75re2x

NIP-05 Address

[email protected]

Profile Code

nprofile1qqsrhrchlw9f7rrkndvpnneu463ey2nggn200amgftke7et3hvntu3spzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumn0wd68ytnzv9hxgkn4v2y

Publishing to

relay.nostr.band

Author Public Key

npub18w8307u2nux8dx6cr88net4rjg4xs3x57lmksjhdnajhrwexherq75re2x

Show more details

Last Notes

2026-05-27 23:30:05 CEST

- reply

I really thought it would be closer to 10%. The people who think they're insured are in for a world of hurt when the bank hack happens.

2026-05-27 02:09:41 CEST

- reply

All I can do it pray. Autism is its own challenge, but he has a range of other nuerological issues that get in the way.

2026-05-26 13:05:07 CEST

- reply

That one rogue nation is not behind those financial institutions (nor is it a rogue nation. It is true that Jews have been involved with financial manipulation, debt schemes and asset extraction over the centuries, but every centralized govt captured by financial corporations pursues this goal. Look at a list of the major banking families and you will see many nationalities represented. Look at Blackrock's board and you will see the same.

2026-05-25 20:21:35 CEST

- reply

This is also the right perspective. At 56, I am still figuring stuff out.

2026-05-24 12:56:52 CEST

- reply

Trying to compete against that silly pickle ball.

2026-05-23 03:52:10 CEST

- reply

I guess if your in it for the sweet gainz, you should have invested in the hunan displacement technology and the shiny rocks.
Or you quit worrying about these things and focus on increasing your stack for the day when none of that other stuff will do you any good because the govt took it all away at the press of a key.

2026-05-22 04:49:56 CEST

- reply

How much environmental damage did acquiring the lithium for the batteries cause (not to mention all the fuel spent on mining, processing, and shipping that lithium)? But whatever, Australia. Pat yourself on the back.

2026-05-21 05:34:56 CEST

- reply

Having a child should mean that you put two human beings before yourself, but I know that's getting rare these days.

2026-05-21 05:09:17 CEST

- reply

Going with painting

2026-05-20 23:47:01 CEST

- reply

It still is.

2026-05-20 22:32:34 CEST

- reply

https://blossom.primal.net/9a9d56a9b1a888522e0cbef7cce0af9fcb59f67214c795d36e666f12393d481c

2026-05-20 18:48:24 CEST

- reply

I think about that as I consider how to defend my homestead from threats. Two dimensions is one thing. I can make it difficult for people to approach my house, but I have nothing vertical. Nor do I think I could possibly stop a drone swarm. What I need is a laser array that can disable multiple targets in milliseconds. I bet that will cost me a couple of dimes.

2026-05-20 18:34:38 CEST

- reply

They deserved it.

2026-05-20 03:18:15 CEST

- reply

Must be for the zaps.

2026-05-20 03:17:35 CEST

- reply

I thought he was reported dead early on.

2026-05-20 03:16:08 CEST

Perks of the Texas countryside.
https://blossom.primal.net/9a9d56a9b1a888522e0cbef7cce0af9fcb59f67214c795d36e666f12393d481c

2026-05-19 18:32:30 CEST

- reply

Obviously you mean against human targets. US, of course. The two and only.
Otherwise, the most recent detonation is North Korea in 2017. 100kt blast. It caused an 6.3 magnitude earthquake.

2026-05-19 06:02:46 CEST

- reply

I'm still trying to figure out why I hang around here.

2026-05-18 06:04:31 CEST

- reply

Sinclair was one of my favorite seminary professors.

2026-05-17 04:24:13 CEST

- reply

It felt very normal to spend a day this way rather than worrying abouf what's coming next.

2026-05-17 02:16:28 CEST

- reply

I looked at this, but it seems complicated to set up.

2026-05-17 02:03:22 CEST

- reply

What have you felt like?

2026-05-17 01:33:37 CEST

Why not frame out the rest of the patio today?
https://blossom.primal.net/47ad568d97421d68477df07fb9439913934cffe0ff465b7e8bd70c97bbabe14f.jpg

2026-05-16 14:36:19 CEST

- reply

It seems this has been true for 40 years.

2026-05-15 23:26:29 CEST

- reply

I have no issues with Iran having nukes.

2026-05-15 23:13:31 CEST

- reply

Plot twist: Netanyahu was the architect of the October 7 massacre.

2026-05-15 07:27:30 CEST

- reply

I get that frequently with mere photos.

2026-05-15 06:24:28 CEST

- reply

This is the equivalent of selling the family car to feed the fam.

2026-05-15 04:39:58 CEST

- reply

Instead of that trillion dollar coin, they are just going to print pop tarts.

2026-05-15 04:39:00 CEST

This is what is known as asset stripping .
https://nanaimonewsnow.com/2026/05/14/carney-says-hes-open-to-selling-infrastructure-like-airports-to-finance-projects/

2026-05-15 04:33:45 CEST

- reply

I seriously think some stock person put them in the wrong place.

2026-05-15 04:29:56 CEST

Wut, Target?
https://blossom.primal.net/3a6781dc52631c8b93ad26cc7af22aee645c5e1c05d683415020854842931b15.jpg

2026-05-15 02:39:34 CEST

- reply

That's amazing. Mine would start to run into the woods, hear a strange sound, freak out, and then forget how to get back. The other one simply won't leave the house.

2026-05-15 02:06:05 CEST

- reply

Does he not run off?

2026-05-14 13:55:04 CEST

One thing I think facebook gets right is groups. My wife is in several support groups to help her manage my son's various issues (autism, ostomy matters, T1D, etc). I've watched her support other moms and they in return, sometimes in person and sometimes online. In my view, that's what makes social media really work. We need more of that on Nostr.

2026-05-14 13:35:06 CEST

- reply

Good point. He does, however, have to feel motivated to fix the problem. That's often what I'm dealing with.

2026-05-14 05:44:26 CEST

- reply

This is a constant effort.

2026-05-14 05:43:45 CEST

- reply

Always trying different things here.

2026-05-14 05:43:01 CEST

- reply

This is a really good point. Now if I can just find a problem that actually interests him.

2026-05-14 05:38:49 CEST

- reply

I tend to view bitcoin this way. I've used it both as a money and as an asset. I don't think the functions have to be mutually exclusive.

2026-05-14 04:37:32 CEST

How do you convince a lonely teen on the spectrum that life has something to offer him?

2026-05-13 04:55:22 CEST

- reply

Grok doesn't know they aren't Jews. 😆

2026-05-13 00:06:50 CEST

- reply

Does that matter?

2026-05-12 22:40:45 CEST

- reply

Plot twist: it's the wrong popcorn.

2026-05-12 22:17:06 CEST

- reply

Everyone is watching the 10 year.

2026-05-12 22:12:46 CEST

- reply

Question is, what's the program.

2026-05-12 05:51:22 CEST

- reply

It's why I put every dime I can into bitcoin and hodl. It takes the money out of the system.

2026-05-12 05:44:19 CEST

- reply

I think it's telling that Cheeto is taking the finance and tech bros with him. Larry Fink and Elon will likely make sure Trump stays on the program with the Chinese.

2026-05-11 04:19:06 CEST

- reply

👆

2026-05-11 04:17:22 CEST

- reply

It's just Bibi posturing. I fully expect the US to exit and turn over oversight of Iran's uranium program to the Cjinese.

2026-05-11 04:15:30 CEST

- reply

That's my view.

2026-05-11 02:57:02 CEST

- reply

That account sounds like a Fed.

2026-05-10 21:03:08 CEST

- reply

Saying there's no one better is not necessarily a compliment. It reveals how bad a class of people he is involved with. He should be surrounded by people who understands what he does. As it is, there are virtually none, and we will all pay for it.

2026-05-10 20:10:25 CEST

- reply

Bibi is blowing into the air at this point.

2026-05-10 19:49:05 CEST

- reply

He may be, but he's fighting the distraction instead of highlighting the actual threat. I feel like Massie protests around the edges. Bit I understand. He protested directly during covid and probably lost his wife as a result.

2026-05-10 17:10:37 CEST

- reply

Someone needs to tell Massie that CBDCs come in a range of forms. Just like the Central Bank (Fed) doesn't print money directly, CBDCs can also be indirect (programmable private stablecoins). The issue isn't who issues the money. The issue is who makes the rules that governs the money.

2026-05-10 17:06:50 CEST

- reply

You assume they died of a virus.

2026-05-09 17:20:48 CEST

- reply

There was nothing to contain.

2026-05-09 17:19:50 CEST

- reply

What about republican presidents who like to take your money and give it to others just as much as the democrats?

2026-05-09 03:46:33 CEST

- reply

It's that far to my mailbox. And there's a hill in between. I'll stick with that.

2026-05-08 20:44:25 CEST

- reply

🤔

2026-05-06 03:34:29 CEST

- reply

The Jews did it.

2026-05-06 02:17:47 CEST

- reply

I don't know how I feel about credit in general. There's always someone on the other side of rhat trade that hopes you default so he can take your collateral. Not sure how that concept applies with Strc. I'm still trying to figure it out, which is why I won't criticise Saylor.

2026-05-05 14:02:57 CEST

- reply

Agreed. It's the best most people will do. It's not real bitcoin, but it's closer to it that any other thing. And it's proven pretty resilient, which will give people confidence in bitcoin, even if because of strc they don't understand it.

2026-05-05 14:01:14 CEST

- reply

No question it's a concerning situation. You shouldn't get to behave the way they do with no consequences. Of course we can say that about a lot of countries.
I just don't see where they are gaining any real power or could even maintain it after this all plays out.

2026-05-05 00:05:21 CEST

- reply

Seriously? What is Nic's deal. Is this a revenge thing for getting his feelings hurt?

2026-05-04 19:41:26 CEST

- reply

That is unpopular, but there is a lot to admire. I believe if any of us could have used the system the way he has to stack our own bitcoin, we would have done it.

2026-05-04 05:04:35 CEST

- reply

People were ok with Zelenskyy doing it. Not a single person in Europe batted an eye. Why not Trump, then?

2026-05-04 01:58:24 CEST

- reply

No hat, no sunscreen, no sunglasses. I work out in the Texas sun for hours and do not burn.

2026-05-04 00:36:27 CEST

- reply

Actually true

2026-05-03 22:57:59 CEST

- reply

That's imprecise. Out of 195 countries, France ranks 14th in the world in oil consumption. While the total is a fraction of what the US consumes, France can't operate without oil (at least a quarter of energy production is directly related to oil). But more importantly and relevant here is the revenue share of the oil coming out of the ground. That's what everyone is competing for.
BP's global revenue from oil production is about $195B annually. Dutch-Shell, which is based in London, has annual revenue of $345B (roughly $540B).
French TotalEnergies has revenues of $237B, roughly half of what the largest British companies are producing. There are other French producers, but they don't come near to impacting the gap.
That's a significant difference. Given that at the moment, dollars for oil is what makes the world go round, minimizing the French impact in the industry prevents them from gaining monetary power and overcoming UK financial interests.

2026-05-03 20:42:44 CEST

- reply

The Rothchilds used to use the military industrial complex to impose its will on regions. In that context, Israel is a tool used to create the chaos needed to justify the military industrial complex's presence in the ME. The greater Israel narrative might mean something to the Jews, but the country doesn't exist without subsidies. The bigger project is financially impossible.
Thanks in part to Israel and the made-up threat of Iranian nukes, France has been blocked out of the Middle East since 1979. France had a lingering foothold in Iran until the Revolution. There was no direct funding from the US for the revolution, but the Iran-Contra plan was launched very shortly afterwards, which leads me to believe the CIA was heavily involved in ejecting the French-friendly Shah.
That's my view on Israel.

2026-05-03 18:48:52 CEST

Why The US-Iranian War is about France
(I have revised this post since putting a sloppy draft up a few days ago).
Since 1860, the Bank of England and the big banks in NYC have been at war with France. While Napoleon was defeated at Waterloo in 1815, Napoleon III created the Latin Monetary Union in 1860 at the height of the Pound Sterling's monetary dominance. The goal was to create a new gold-backed system based on the French Franc. The union, which initially included France, Switzerland, Italy and Belgium. It never issued paper notes, sticking to bronze, silver and gold. The Austria-Hungarian Empire refused to join because it rejected bi-metalism. Albania joined in 1912 after breaking away from the Ottoman Empire. This will come up again later.
In the mid-1850s in the US, President Buchanan was also interested in sound money reform, but he had committed to serving only one term, and his departure opened the way for the statist Abraham Lincoln, who believed the government should create the currency. Lincoln, against the banks, wanted a national banking system where paper money would be printed, circulated, and regulated. He said it would be “sound”, but with government in the mix that would be unlikely. He also tried to sell the idea that with the government issuing the money, the people would no longer be the servants of it. This alone made his assassination, whoever actually planned it, an acceptable outcome for the bankers.
Meanwhile, in Europe, Britain was actively opposing the Latin Monetary Union. They had been on a strict gold standard supported by banknotes since 1800, and would have to change the weights of its coinage throughout the empire if it joined. Mkre importantly, it would likely have had to give up it's status of global reserve currency and the power that came with it. Napoloen III's plan was a direct assault on Britain's global hegemony, an acceptable state of affairs given they were only one generation removed from Napoleon's plan to invade Britain.
While many in the US in the 1850s saw value in the Latin Monetary Union's plans, Britain saw to it that the US could not join France in the union by funding both sides of the US Civil War, which began just as the union was being formed. The Rothschilds were heavily involved in the Civil War funding schemes. Not to gloss over an important era of American history, but the war and the strains of reconstruction set up the formation of The Federal Reserve System in 1913.
The civil war was a proof of concept moment for the Rothchilds, and they would continue this strategy to weaken both the Latin Monetary Union and France in WWI by funding the Germans and the French armies at the same time. There was a lot of money to be made in this effort, but it also reinforced the UK's efforts to hold France down and gain access to new resources.
By the late 1890s, the union had been weakened by internal disagreements, and it would fade out of history in 1926.
The rise of oil and a new kind of empire
As this fight over the monetary system played out, a new form of riches emerged across the world in the form of black gold. Oil was discovered in the US in 1859 in Pennsylvania. Additional oil reserves were discovered around the globe including Texas and the Middle East. The Texas discoveries were important because in addition to being massive, the Texas refiners began to teach the emerging oil nations how to convert it into various types of fuels, giving the state an oversized influence in international affairs.
Oil was discovered in Persia in 1908. At that time, Britain and France began to compete with each other for contracts as Hungary and Austria promoted the breakaway of Albania from the Ottoman Empire. Meanwhile Egypt was funding the Young Turks in Istanbul. Everyone wanted the end of the Ottoman's control over the region, and England and France were salivating over the chance to gain control of the new oil trade routes.
In 1916, France and the United Kingdom, signed the Sykes-Picot agreement, which would carve up the Empire in the event of dissolution. It was a secret agreement and was never enforced.
Comeptition between France and the UK was fierce for decades, with contracts abounding across the region, with the notable exception of the 1929 Red Line Agreement. Written up by the French, it drew a cricle around the region from the Bosphorus to the tip of the Arabian peninsula. It formed a cartel of various interests, few of which represented Arab interests. Persia was excluded from this arrangement, but France held sway over the fields in the north of the country which Britain controlled the south.
After the first war, France continued to exert itself in Africa, Syria and Lebanon (through a League of Nations Mandate), and in Indochina.
As events moved towards WWII, the bankers eyed the European opportunity to ensure France would be reduced, if not finished as a monetary threat. They were making it difficult for the financial interests to extract resources at the rate they wanted, and the competition would have to be addressed.
Into the picture steps Montagu Norman, the governor of the Bank of England, and Prescott Bush. They saw an opportunity to get something done on this front as WWII started to shape up. They put together a plan to fund the German rebuilding effort. There's This much to this story, including personalities and partnerships, but the short of it is that their funding continued until 1942, almost two years after the German army had crushed France.
Remember, despite the European war beginning in 1939, the American army did not put troops into the land war until November 1942, almost a year and a half after Hitler entered Paris in June of 1940.
Why did American and British bankers support Germany so long? Prescott Bush did not love the Nazis. There was something else going on. Keep in mind that at that point, it had barely been 80 years since Napoleon III imagined the Franc as the world's currency. US companies were deeply embedded in the Middle East Oil situation, and France was a major competitor for the oil fields.
80 years is not that long a time. Think about Bretton Woods. It's been 80 years since that agreement, and we still care very much about that, as much as we are in Iranian oil.
What followed WWII, from French political isolation in Africa, to Kermit Roosevelt's managed coup in Iran in 1953, to America's massive funding of France in the Indochina war almost to the point of France's bankruptcy, to Nixon refusing to give them gold in exchange for dollars in 1971, to blocking them out of Iran after the Shah was deposed, so much of what has happened in the world points to a monetary and resource war against France as UK-US policy.
Now, with Trump threatening to pull out of NATO, Macron is alarmed, and Germany is re-arming and forcing men to ask for permission before leaving the country for some time. Is Germany afraid of Russia? Maybe. But have you ever looked at a map of US bases in Germany? They are all on the west side of the country.
When Texas was afraid of Apache raids, they put the forts on the frontier, not on the Louisiana border.
You can draw your own conclusions about where the UK-US might have thought the real European threat was. With US military bases in UK, Italy and Germany, France is boxed in. And even though France has a presence in Western Africa (another monetary tale), US bases are all along the east coast of Africa. France has no military access to the oil of the Middle East. The country has been vassalized by the financial powers.
Americans don't think long term, but England and France were at war from 1108 when Henry I invaded Normandy until 1815 and the Battle of Waterloo. The war has continued to today, but it has been a financial one since 1860.
The next phase is the trade of Europe to the military industrial complex in exchange for the MIC departure from the Middle East. If the US leaves there as well, don't be surprised if Germany and Russia start pounding France again, and watch the bankers laugh while they fund both sides.
Am I right about this or wrong? I don't know. I'm not a historian, but the signs are there that in the reordering of the globe into a multipolar world, France is about to get pulverized, and the 1,000 year struggle between France and England might finally come to an end.

2026-05-03 04:00:24 CEST

- reply

That's normally the way these things end.

2026-05-03 03:58:56 CEST

- reply

Bitcoin hasn't changed.

2026-05-03 03:56:55 CEST

- reply

Saylor wanted to be more negative, but it seems like someone has given him his speaking points on the issue.

2026-05-03 03:28:16 CEST

- reply

It was a little sloppy. I should have written it out first and then copied it over. Also, there is a lot more to tell.

2026-05-02 05:28:49 CEST

- reply

I agree, and I think to a certain extent the US will recede to the western hemisphere, but unfortunately, it will likely continue to stir the pot from Canada to the tip of South America.

2026-05-02 04:52:40 CEST

Since 1860, the Bank of England and the big banks in NYC have been at war with France. While Napoleon was defeated at Warterloo in 1815, Napoleon III created the Latin Monetary Union at the height of the Pound Sterling's monetary dominance. The goal was to create a new gold-backed system based on the French Franc.
In the US, President Buchanan was also interest in sound money reform, but he was ushered out of office, in favor of the statist Abraham Lincoln, who believed govt should create the currency.
Britain strongly opposed the Latin Monetary Union and saw to it the US was out by funding both sides of the US Civil War. The Rothchilds were heavily involved in the funding schemes. The family would continue this strategy to weaken France in WWI by funding the Germans and the French.
One interesting note: oil was discovered in Persia in 1908. At that time, Britain and France began to compete with each other for contracts. The Sykes-Picot agreement, which gave France Syria and Lebanon, gave Persian oil claims to Russia and Britain. The agreement was never implemented, and all the countries competed for access to Persian (Iranian oil).
After the first war, France continued to exert itself in Africa, Syria (through a League of Nations Mandate), and in Indochina.
As events moved towards WWII, the bankers got active again, with Montagu Nelson, the governor of the Bank of England and Prescott Bush colluding together to fund the German rebuilding effort. This funding continued until 1942 after the German army had crushed France.
Remember, despite the European war beginning in 1939, the American army did not enter the war until November 1942, almost a year and a half after Hitler entered Paris in June of 1940.
Why did American and British bankers support Germany so long? Prescott Bush did not love the Nazis. There was something else going on. keep in mind it had barely been 80 years since Napoleon III wanted the franc to be the world's currency.
It's been 80 years since Bretton Woods, and we still care very much about that.
What followed, from French isolation in Africa, to Kermit Roosevelt's managed coup in Iran in 1953, to America's massive funding if France in the Indochina war almost to the point of France's bankruptcy, to Nixon refusing to give them gold in exchange for dollars in 1971, to blocking them out of Iran after the Shah was deposed, so much of what has happened in the world points to a secret bankers war against France.
Now, with Trump threatening to pull out of NATO, Macron is freaking out, and Germany is re-arming and forcing men to ask for permission before leaving the country for some time. Is Germany afraid of Russia? Maybe. But have you ever looked at a map of US bases in Germany? They are all on the west side of the country.
When Texas was afraid of commanche raids, the put the forts on the frontier, not on the Louisiana border.
You can draw your own conclusions about where the US might have thought the real European threat was. With US bases in UK, Italy and Germany, France is boxed in. And even with a presence in Western Africa, US bases are all along the east coast of Africa. France has no military access to the oil of the Middle East. The country has been vassalized by the financial powers.
Americans don't think long term, but England and France were at war from 1108 when Henry I invaded Normandy until 1815 and the Battle of Waterloo. The war has continued to today, but it has been a financial one since 1860.
The next phase is the trade of Europe to the military industrial complex in exchange for the MIC departure from the Middle East. If the US leaves there as well, don't be surprised if Germany and Russia sfart pounding France again, and watch the bankers laugh while the fund both sides.
Am I right about this or wrong? I don't know. I'm not a historian, but the signs are there that in the reordering of the globe into a multipolar world, France is about to get pulverized, and the 1,000 year struggle between France and England might finally come to an end.
[And yes, in case you were wondering, I conceived of and wrote this entire post with my very own human mind.]

2026-05-01 23:45:44 CEST

- reply

That's what I suspect. Not one of these guys, including Michael Saylor, who talked about with Peter McCormack, will explain directly who is going to buy all the stuff the robots make and where those people are getting their money.

2026-05-01 21:18:03 CEST

- reply

bowel movement, you say?
https://blossom.primal.net/fa5a1a7ac507a1f8c8afa9c285fe02927c755fadf82c18503b9863f82138d32e.gif

2026-05-01 20:36:11 CEST

- reply

https://blossom.primal.net/3e7e9ee6eecd45f8272fd5525bbb4375d9bff4f31969a3f5ed4854e9bd312e9f.gif

2026-05-01 20:08:13 CEST

Someone help me understand how we all get wealthy when AI and robots take over.

2026-05-01 18:45:30 CEST

- reply

Lol. You literally just blamed "religious zealots" as a group by which you mean conservative Christians, and then you cry when the exact same argument is used on you.

2026-05-01 18:16:25 CEST

- reply

They'll get us down to a basket of basics, which will then be approved on the UBI plan.

2026-05-01 18:10:48 CEST

- reply

And Jews are hypocrites because their identity is ONLY for the purpose of loving God's laws and by doing so draw the world to Him. They have done the exact opposite.

2026-04-27 18:42:14 CEST

Was that our bitcorn conference dunp?

2026-04-24 04:48:10 CEST

- reply

Sounds like Vezzini.

2026-04-22 03:15:02 CEST

- reply

Israel is the cat in this scenario.

2026-04-22 00:54:08 CEST

- reply

They sound like toddlers.

2026-04-22 00:53:28 CEST

It's interesting to me that there's still bitcoin FUD out there. I mean what are you fighting for at this point?

2026-04-21 04:52:55 CEST

- reply

Look, here's the thing. I don't know about all the podcasts, but I would be lying if I said I wasn't waiting for the govt to finally break it all and then try to reset it. In my view, that's when bitcoin maximalism will have it's chance to shine. Or we'll all be running for our lives. 😆

2026-04-20 21:12:53 CEST

- reply

Golden age of UBI.

2026-04-20 05:05:46 CEST

- reply

Looks like FBC of Richadson in the distance.

2026-04-17 21:00:33 CEST

- reply

I didn't quote everyone. I just showed you a chart and said an opinion.

2026-04-17 18:56:54 CEST

- reply

I'd say it's moved out of the range into a recovery zone
https://blossom.primal.net/300b160d729d4f6fe5faf23199f472532bd703b027f6cbe9f1b698a897c9713b.jpg

2026-04-16 05:49:56 CEST

- reply

Hear me out...music, but farts.

2026-04-16 04:02:13 CEST

- reply

Calm your autism down. There's enough of that to go around on Nostr.

2026-04-16 01:39:52 CEST

- reply

Honestly. It's what I did.

2026-04-16 00:59:19 CEST

- reply

That should tell you how much I do or don't care about those conversation. 🤣