npub1x9…ruv0d

Public Key

npub1x9l34jt50vam3qdhrs3ew23cz78rtvsc8yau3xrzlxnv0ygxfrvqpruv0d

NIP-05 Address

Profile Code

nprofile1qqsrzlc6e968kwacsxm3cguh9gup0r34kgvrjw7gnp30nfk8jyry3kqpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduqs6amnwvaz7tmwdaejumr0dschceyz

Publishing to

relay.damus.io

nos.lol

Author Public Key

npub1x9l34jt50vam3qdhrs3ew23cz78rtvsc8yau3xrzlxnv0ygxfrvqpruv0d

Show more details

Last Notes

2025-07-07 22:52:06 UTC

- reply

uh, once again, no, Beard.
Once again, nope. No.
Chloe Moretz was a MAP icon. She was attractive then. Are you seriously going to deny that she was attractive in that promo photo from "Hick"? Lol. Get bent.
Saying someone is attractive does not mean you are sexualizing them. For the life of me, I can't understand why you are so obsessed with sexual purity and moralism while being a "lolicon" (ironic or not). It just reeks of hypocrisy, like an extremely smelly fart.
MAP means "Minor-Attracted Person", not "Minor-Sexually-Attracted Person".
Lol, once again, the Miller Test is about pornography. Editing a MAP flag on a non-sexual/pornographic image is not "sexualizing" it, and even if it was, it is not "pornographic". And, hold up, the MAP flag is a socio-political thing, so it actually HAS a degree of political significance lol
"If I see something that I think"
You know what that's called, Beard? That's called "subjective opinion", which, funnilly enough, is, again, a criticism of the Miller and Dost tests hahaha
You should confer with Matrix more about being heavy-handed.

2025-07-07 22:31:54 UTC

- reply

the miller dost test applies to pornography, not a picture of a girl on the beach and someone saying "cute *drooling emoji*".
Jesus, you are a fucking retard.

2025-07-07 21:25:14 UTC

I just want to remind people, seeing as I actually have studied a bit of law while I was at university.
In regards to the Constitution of the United States, there is no small-writing clause in the 1st Amendment which says "*Free Speech but you can't post a picture of a little girl at the beach and caption it "cute" with a drooling emoji, if you do that you're a criminal and free speech does not apply".
The only speech that is criminalized/ignored by the 1st Amendment is direct (public) incitement to violence.

2025-06-20 12:23:51 UTC

- reply

I didn't say you're an illegal online immigrant you retard.
I said you're not American.
The fact that you care so much about America betrays some weird parasocial relationship.
Saying "I want immigration to be controlled" is a response to being called a xenophobe.
Fucking Jesus Luke, read properly!

2025-06-20 12:22:32 UTC

- reply

I ANSWERED YOUR QUESTION YOU FOOL
Saying "what if" is not a "gotcha". It is so stupid how you "right-wingers" act. So insanely stupid.
"What if I was right"?
You want me to agree with that? No. You're wrong.

2025-06-20 12:21:09 UTC

- reply

Lol, the fact that he's not American is even more ammunition against him.
I want immigration to be controlled, you tard.
God, "right-wingers" are so insufferably stupid it hurts my brain.

2025-06-20 12:19:22 UTC

- reply

Hur dur muh "what if"
We're talking about a hypothetical about how "right-wingers" would use the right pronouns because they're cultists for Trump and how leftists wouldn't because they don't like Trump...
Do you not see how idiotic this reasoning it?
You're placing the pronoun issue as related to whether someone is good or not.
They don't like Brianna Wu/Caitlin Jenner/Blaire White etc... but they still use the right pronouns. Those are cases IN THE REAL WORLD, not in your stupid right-wing hypothetical fantasy where even there you can't win and just lie.

2025-06-20 12:14:02 UTC

- reply

they/them can imply she/her.
I can talk about you using "they did" I felt about them" and it still makes sense.
Jesus, learn the fucking English language!

2025-06-20 12:10:43 UTC

- reply

Your fucking retarded breakfast meme response is just like your retarded "muh Democrat" response.
Retarded.
If Trump was a trans woman leftists would use the right pronouns, but still hate them. They call Blaire White/Brianna Wu by the right pronouns but hate them because they're right-wing hypocrites. Jfc.

2025-06-20 12:06:27 UTC

Right-wingers are so fucked that even when they try to create hypotheticals in order to make themselves look good, they lie in the hypothetical, so they make themselves look even more delusional.

2025-06-14 15:02:58 UTC

- reply

I do more standard bent-over rows than Pendlay rows.
More back emphasis because you have to maintain spinal rigidity.

2025-06-14 11:54:01 UTC

- reply

Uh.....Rows are meant for your back...
If you're feeling it in your chest or arms, then you're doing it wrong.
You're meant to feel it most in your upper-back.

2025-06-10 22:22:20 UTC

There's something about single-arm dumbell rows that just makes them harder than barbell rows.
Barbell I can do underhand or overhand rows with 50kg/110lbs, 10+ reps for at least like 5-6 sets before I really start struggling.
Today I went back to doing single-arm dumbell rows and I struggled to do 4 sets with 22kg/48lbs.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YDTUYiKFcFo

2025-05-17 13:34:01 UTC

- reply

"Enjoy what's coming"
What, pray tell, is coming?
You plan to kill all men who disagree with you while claiming that you fight for men?
What?
You are deranged. Typical.

2025-05-17 13:32:22 UTC

- reply

Lol
You again clarify that you hate the majority of men then.
Lol
"Culling"?
Where have I heard that term before?
Are you, by any chance, an O9A LARPer?
Lol

2025-05-17 13:23:09 UTC

- reply

I'm not denying women and men are different, you mong.
I'm not attempting to run logic in circles.
I'm saying that the majority of men disagree with you, therefore you want to kill the majority of men while claiming you are standing up for them.
You are just as bad as RadFem/TERFs. You are a mirror-image of them. You hate women more than you love men.

2025-05-17 13:16:03 UTC

- reply

"Women are weak"
"Wut dey gonna do, try to fight back?"
"Any man who gets in the way dies"
"KYS"
"They must serve"
"The majority of men must realize this"
"CUCK"
"Muh Commies"
Lol
Sounds like you're actually a weak man, tbh.
You claim men are super strong and the naturally superior because they are men or something, but then you say any man who disagrees with you needs to be killed, and then you say that the majority of men actually do disagree with you, so....
Again, sounds like you're weak, filled with ressentiment at the situation, and want to gaslight normal men into neutering themselves while projecting and calling them "cucks" for not agreeing with you...

2025-05-17 05:05:45 UTC

- reply

No, that's obviously not going to work.
You can't demand that women go back to a Handmaid's Tale style life. That is an impossibility.
Even if I don't like the way women are nowadays, it's just not going to be accepted.
> Kill all Communists and niggers (all colors)
Lol, we went from crazy to batshit real fast.
"Right-wing" types try not to be insane challenge - Impossible.

2025-05-17 05:00:55 UTC

- reply

We need to "re-educate" all society, from bottom up, or from top down.
The entire "moral" system we have is rotten to the core.
And the reason for that is sexual Puritanism. You could argue it is the main and last holding of "Christianity" in Europe and the Anglosphere as a whole.

2025-05-17 04:58:41 UTC

- reply

I would posit that most of that shit is brought on by Anglo-American "sexual morality" style Puritanism. Such puritanism and self-hate brings on psychological issues both on the micro as well as macro levels.

2025-05-17 02:17:11 UTC

- reply

I discovered the beauty of the female form early on, grew up, repressed it, had a friend who had a lgf in school, repressed that, discovered lolicon, and then everything came back, and now I'm here.

2025-05-17 00:54:22 UTC

- reply

Oh well then my bad.
At least you're honest.
These varis/poast/detroit people are sexual degenerates who hide their degeneracy by LARPing as "BASED" "right-wing" TrVdCVths or whatever.
Truly insane people.

2025-05-16 23:51:28 UTC

- reply

Of course, there are countries where the AOC used to be even lower, until Anglo-American puritans made demands of societies that weren't theirs.
The point is, 14 is fine, but the people on here think it's a "minor", therefore if you think 14 is fine you are a MAP.
Why is it so hard for people to accept this?
I don't see what is wrong with it.
Just accept who you are.

2025-05-16 23:45:14 UTC

- reply

OK?
What, is she 14?
What point are you making?

2025-05-16 23:44:10 UTC

- reply

Lol
So you're a minor-attracted person?

2025-05-16 23:35:38 UTC

- reply

I made a point about age of consent, he said that 14 is fine, I pointed out that 14 is a "minor" then he cited "European Law!!!!1111!!!".
He is a hypocrite, obviously, even AOC stuff aside, he is a hypocrite for his stance on lolicon.

2025-05-16 23:23:53 UTC

- reply

He says he wants to sex 14 year olds.
14 year olds are "minors".
Only like 2-3 states in Europe consider them "young adults".
His reasoning is ridiculous and based on Americanism while trying to hide his own attractions.
This is why he is so obsessed with violence against MAPs (even though he is one by his own admission).
He is not going to call himself a nijikon. He calls himself a "right-wing lolicon" (oxymoron).
He is an idiot, and his followers are idiots.
You'd be better served leaving them.

2025-05-16 23:15:44 UTC

- reply

Yeah, you should......You know....Leave that instance then?
It's crazy man.
ChristiJunior claims to hate all MAPs but then he goes around saying he wants to sex a 14 year old lol
And his American followers who hate MAPs love him!
What a schizo.

2025-05-16 23:12:44 UTC

- reply

niggers jews niggers jews
cucked
I hate everyone
Cultural vandalism is great
Why shouldn't I?
Are you retarded?
You're kidding
Lol
I don't know man...Seems like the guys responding to your post are fucking insane.

2025-05-16 23:09:15 UTC

- reply

No I can see it fine. I didn't respond because it's just a generalized statement which you think is profound but it's not really.
All the people surrounding you are extremely "hateful", so...

2025-05-16 22:52:10 UTC

- reply

lol
Yeah and it's fucking stupid hahahaha
Jesus Christ, what is wrong with you idiots?

2025-05-16 22:32:04 UTC

- reply

what if they ask for it based not on pressure from outside parties but on their own views?
Still "no"?
Well then, you're anti-trans, aren't you?

2025-05-16 22:28:48 UTC

- reply

you don't have a problem with trans people existing, you just have a problem with trans people existing...
So you're saying you can only be trans once you're 18+?
This is the same logic as kids can only have sex when they're 18.
Ludicrous.

2025-05-16 22:22:49 UTC

- reply

you're on the "anti-trans" side and you fight against the "trans" side.
You literally made a post about giving puberty blockers to minors earlier.
Again, are you ignorant or trying to gaslight me?

2025-05-16 22:16:22 UTC

- reply

Ideologies that suck should collapse, haha
Think of it this way.
If a MAGAchud uses almost exclusively alt-right talking points made by racialists but insists that they aren't "racist", are they thinking "independently" or are they just ignorant as to which "team" they are on?

2025-05-16 21:53:03 UTC

- reply

So you don't like trans people, but for no reason in particular?
You just don't like them, just because?
Are you sure you're not on the same side as J. K. Rowling Feminism?

2025-05-16 19:45:08 UTC

- reply

It's amazing how the J. K. types were given time in the sun, and then they used it to just vitriolically attack men, even those who aren't trans or pro-trans.
If you're a man who is "anti-trans", uses the same logic that J. K. does, and then she and her ilk still attack you just for being a biological man, what does that make you think and/or feel? What's the point in being on "their side" when they hate you anyway?
It honestly makes me support the rights of trans people more.
And the same thing goes for "Conservative Trans" people.
Brianna Wu/Blaire White are examples of the cognitive dissonance that one has to engage in to support "RadFems"/"TERFs" in "Current Year" (TM). No wonder both are so deranged and/or fake.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c1O6S7MWXb8&t=8159s&ab_channel=DeadDomain

2025-05-16 19:32:45 UTC

"RadFems"/"TERFs" hate men more than they love women.

2025-03-27 12:26:05 UTC

- reply

I'm mixed on the idea...
Freak.U was not some ideal bastion.
Allot of the issues that people have with other instances applied to Freak.U.

2025-03-22 13:22:06 UTC

The real "Trad" position is to support and expand children's rights, to be open in discussions about child-sexuality (and sexuality in general), and to rekindle the view that consensual non-abusive relations between children and adults are normal.
Many "Trad" LARPers are only "Trad" in a supposed Christian context.
Yet non-Christian tradition (i.e. Greco-Roman) goes back way further, and the further back you go, the "Trad-er" you are.
And even then, many "Christians" get caught over and over again for being pederasts or pedophiles.
Yet Christian "Trad" LARPers hyper-focus on Jews and Muslims, as if they are the only ones who engage in such practices.
Original Milo Yiannopoulos (before his "gay conversion therapy") was right. Pederasty/pedophilia is actually a non-issue. The "harm" that comes from it is due to social responses and stigma.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oJhHwspZGcg&ab_channel=TheProvidence
https://media.gameliberty.club/media/media_attachments/files/114/206/282/927/099/014/original/0977a9049f12d757.jpg

2025-03-19 01:57:47 UTC

- reply

I wasn't sexually abused as a child.
I have been sexually assaulted as an adult. 3 times, in fact.

2025-03-19 01:30:55 UTC

- reply

I'd like to see that data.
Please provide me with it, if you will.

2025-03-19 01:27:48 UTC

- reply

I have never raped a child, nor ever will.
You think someone who was physically assaulted as a child, and sexually assaulted as an adult, would want to inflict that on a child?
Are you crazy?
Meanwhile, you openly state that you want to kill children on the assumption that they may have a relation with someone younger than them when they grow up.
You're the lunatic, not me.

2025-03-19 01:23:30 UTC

- reply

so you support child murder?
And I'm the bad guy?
Jeeeeeeesus Christ jimminy crickets...

2025-03-19 01:21:55 UTC

- reply

My mother whipped me with a belt and threw chairs at me when I was a kid.

2025-03-19 01:16:43 UTC

- reply

Lolicons are pedophiles.
You jack off over cartoons of children.
Jfc.
At least be like Mark Twain (real American) and OWN it.

2025-03-19 00:25:30 UTC

- reply

"Good faith debate"
"Total tranny death"
Luke would probably agree with you that "total tranny death" is a "good faith" argument, smdfh.

2025-03-19 00:22:06 UTC

- reply

Gender is what you feel.
Sex is what you are.
What you do is not directly and explicitly informed by what you are lol
What sort of "faggy" reasoning is this?
And now I'm a gay liberal.
Lol, you make such a dogmatic statement like that, and then say that I'M the one doing the dogma-posting, lol
How old are you?

2025-03-19 00:18:26 UTC

- reply

right, so you're supporting murder?
While claiming that there isn't oppression?
Lol

2025-03-19 00:17:48 UTC

- reply

"You don't want any of this smoke"
Lol
Man, you poa.st/nicecrew people are so deranged, it's genuinely crazy.
Pathetic, but crazy.

2025-03-19 00:14:19 UTC

- reply

it is "oppression" when you get murdered on the street for simply existing.
Don't act like trans people being murdered in public doesn't happen.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Brianna_Ghey

2025-03-19 00:09:09 UTC

- reply

Now I'm gay? Damn, gay AND trans? Guess that makes me straight then hahaha
I don't know, you were the one threatening me...
What are you, a sadomasochist or something?
Jfc

2025-03-18 23:56:43 UTC

- reply

bruh, you don't intimidate shit just because you "name da Jooz".
I've been around here longer than you have...

2025-03-18 23:52:31 UTC

- reply

bruh, I broke almost every rule in school.
I was literally expelled.
What a weird insult.

2025-03-18 23:45:40 UTC

- reply

you're the one who replied in this thread out of nowhere to try and seem tough with a HRT comment....
And you're calling me the "dork"?
Lol

2025-03-18 23:43:56 UTC

- reply

Wow, and water is wet!!
I'm a philosopher now!!

2025-03-18 23:43:04 UTC

- reply

lol
At least own your insult, haha
Man, this is just pathetic.
Do you think because you think I'm trans I'm going to report you to the Feds for a hate-crime or something?
Jfc, grow a pair (pun intended).

2025-03-18 23:41:58 UTC

- reply

*Sigh*
Reads like something from a poa.st pseudo-philosopher...

2025-03-18 23:39:56 UTC

- reply

right, so after denying it, you DO think I'm trans, lol.
Make your mind up!

2025-03-18 23:36:27 UTC

- reply

Why talk about "my whole belief system"?
What am I "delusional" about?
"This shit's not real"?
What?
What exactly is your point?

2025-03-18 23:35:25 UTC

- reply

They are different, because a man can identify as a woman while being biologically a man.
A woman can identify as a man while being biologically a woman.
It's simple, really.
Gender relates to identity, sex relates to biology.
They are different concepts.

2025-03-18 23:33:34 UTC

- reply

What a strange thing to say.
Do you think I'm trans or something?
Just because I'm playing devil's advocate?
Lol

2025-03-18 22:55:07 UTC

- reply

the "gray zone" is sex =/= gender.
That's it.
Conservatards can't stand that gray zone because they view sex and gender as synonymous. As with most things, they shot themselves in the foot, and now their only recourse is outright oppression (with predictable results) to try and amend the "problem".

2025-02-19 21:51:55 UTC

- reply

The double-irony is that, in the years before the war, Zelensky billed himself as the "peace" candidate. He campaigned on "peace with Russia" and "an end to the ATO". He was elected on that message.
It can now be seen that Russia took that as a sign of weakness and attacked.
If you're an anti-Maidanist, then the Ukrainians are victims of the West.
If you're a pro-Maidanist, then the Ukrainians are victims of Russia.
Either way, they are victims. Trump is lying when he claims that Zelensky "started" the conflict.

2025-02-19 21:48:24 UTC

Zelensky did not start the war. Putin did.
It doesn't matter about Maidan, which was before his time.
And, even if you state that Maidan was a "Western-backed coup", then that makes everything that followed the West's fault, not Zelensky's.
Putin invaded. This is Putin's war.
Real patriotic people will go through hell for independence from colonization or slavery. Just look at Syria, or Gaza.
Zelensky shouldn't be asked to sacrifice his country and people, especially when he and they get nothing in return. Especially when, after getting nothing, they then have to "pay back" America 2-3x the amount they received.
You are asking a rape victim to pay their rapist, with interest.
Insane.

2025-01-17 00:32:27 UTC

- reply

yeah, the observation isn't new, but the solution I propose is relatively new. I'm not the only one saying it, to be fair.
"Conservatives" are afraid of embracing progressivism because they view it as "left-wing" or whatever, whereas progresivism is neither left or right-wing. Progressivism is about taking society forward.
Margaret Sanger's eugenicist reasoning behind advocating for abortion is a good example.

2025-01-16 21:58:37 UTC

Another realization I've come to.
The solution to the problem of Conservatives always either losing or cucking is to be radically progressive, unironically.
Neither Dem or Rep (both betray their bases all the time), but progressive,Teddy Roosevelt style.
They don't realize how silly and a self-own a meme like this is.
Progressives are "the times". "And the times they are a changing". Progressives are the chugachugachoochoo that moves society. You just have to accept it.
"Conservatives" want to go back or stop time honestly from my perspective mostly out of fear of the unknown. "Nothing lasts forever".
You don't survive by swimming against a current. If you do that, you just tire yourself out and then drown. You survive by riding the current downstream until you find land or the current subsides so you can escape.
Or, instead of a current, think of "riding the tiger"...
One of these days I'll extrapolate on this further...
https://media.gameliberty.club/media/media_attachments/files/113/840/255/277/792/801/original/a30303687ce88a2a.jpeg

2025-01-01 21:46:44 UTC

- reply

based?
https://media.gameliberty.club/media/media_attachments/files/113/755/291/622/691/636/original/38e9c1e4dedf6932.jpg

2025-01-01 20:54:01 UTC

I've said it before, but man, I swear, sometimes I really get the feeling that young girls KNOW just by momentary eye-contact alone. It's like they have a special sense.
The amount of times I've made accidental eye-contact, and then they give me a sort of look that only "experienced" older teenagers or adult women could give....
I can't be the only one who thinks this, right.
Right?
https://media.gameliberty.club/media/media_attachments/files/113/755/077/450/164/695/original/fbbd0c54c6f0c78c.mp4

2024-12-08 13:07:55 UTC

- reply

You yourself earlier were talking about some admixture being OK, as long as it doesn't upset the majority ethnic makeup (the center).
Ukrainians are not "pure", for example (well, maybe Western Ukrainians, but that's only a small part of Ukraine). Russo-Ukrainians are the ones doing the fighting and dying FOR Ukraine. You have the Crimean Tartars etc... that's not "ethno-nationalism", that's just patriotism.
The British are a mixture of Germanic, Gallic, Gaelic and Scandenavian.
You're ignoring reality.
"Admixture is genocide"
This is just the mirror image of the people pushing Chedder Man. The fact you can't see this is astounding, tbqh.
30 years? How successful have you been with this? I don't want to be an asshole, but I don't think very successful.
"Symbolic whiteness"
"THIS ALWAYS FAILS"
This is what Americans are arguing for. "White nationalism" is an American thing. You're projecting.
I'm not advocating for a unified Europe, or for "White nationalism" in Europe. Where have I said that? I'm arguing for coming to terms with reality and history.
"Learn from history"
Well, that's highly ironic...

2024-12-07 21:14:32 UTC

- reply

How is it missing the point when you're talking about "unbroken"? You're just using a different word. At least, that's how I'm interpreting what you're saying. Correct me if I'm wrong.
You say "we" and "the West", but I take it you live in America, and not Europe?
I'm not disagreeing with the main point you're making (there is a "center", Spengler would say there is a "spirit" of a people which distinguishes them from others).
My position is that if groups have some admixture, that's fine. Nothing inherently wrong with that.
Being "mixed" does not mean that you don't belong to an overarching "culture". It's just more nuanced than "I am only this one group". Being of only one ethnic group is pretty rare, even in Western Europe.
I live in a place where the "pure"/"unbroken" ("Aryan" naturally blonde + blue-eyed) people reside in a pretty much isolated province. Everyone else has admixture from somewhere or other (mostly from within Europe). Yet, of course, they're all part of the same overarching culture/"spirit".

2024-12-07 19:57:23 UTC

- reply

Also, one of the crazy things about my family history is that my great-grandfathers probably fought on opposite sides during WW1.
WW2 they both fought for the "Allies".
Wild, isn't it?

2024-12-07 19:50:20 UTC

- reply

I'm a Slav mutt.
High Slav (landed Czechslovak/Bohemian nobility who moved to Amerikkka) + low Slav (Serbian).
Throw some tiny Jewish admixture in there, just because you can't be a Slav nowadays without a tiny bit of Ashkenazi.
*My Czech ancestors were extremely antisemitic, just fyi.
Too untermensch for the Neezis, too bourgeois for the Commies.

2024-12-07 17:23:12 UTC

- reply

Germanics are a people of miscegenation too.
Italian Fascists at least recognized that, both regarding themselves as well as regarding the Germanics.
Hitler and Himmler genuinely believed their people were "pure" (no people are "pure", it just doesn't work that way).
Yeah, you can say they were "purer" than others, but that doesn't make them "pure".

2024-12-07 13:10:26 UTC

- reply

I mean, Hitler was a bit of a fucking dumbass (*understatement*), tbh.
His whole thing was basically the Germanic/"Aryan"/"Nordic" version of the Russkiy Mir.
And as we see in Ukraine, that is hardly "ethno-nationalism". That's "my nationalism is the only nationalism" nationalism because everyone is secretly "Germanic".

2024-12-06 16:57:16 UTC

- reply

I think the feeling you describe is more localism.
In the same way that Bavarians considered (and still consider) themselves Bavarian, and not Prussian, or how Catalans view themselves, or how Scots view themselves etc...
Yes, I agree, the challenge is having a positive goal that is inward-looking rather than outward-looking.

2024-12-06 01:48:56 UTC

- reply

Yeah, fair enough, I guess having resources but not having organization makes sense.
"Russia is never as strong as they look. Russia is never as weak as they look"
I guess there is some merit to the argument of "decolonization" of Russia as a Federation/"Empire". Breaking it apart and going back to Novgorod (although Finland won't be happy with that), Moscovy and all the others. "Russian nationalism" is a misnomer. On the one hand, their power would be much smaller (good thing?), but on the other, with a smaller region to control, they'd, you know, have a better chance of actually controlling things and becoming more (I hate to say it) Democratic (in a Decembrists fashion). They may even become wealthy because of it (resources + smaller less diverse pop + smaller area to control = profit?)
I'm veering away from straight nationalism, I think. Even though I started my "dissident" journey as one (maybe as a "hipster nationalist" as you say). I see its problems now, more clearly than ever before. Nationalism exists when there's an outside enemy. European-style nationalism was a product of Napoleon's Empire and the enlightenment (one could argue it was brought about by Napoleon's failure to be sincere when he talked about "spreading the enlightenment"). Without an enemy, nationalism falters. And no one wants perpetual conflict, at least, not anymore (with the advent of the internet, mass-communiation and mass-migration).
I think Spencer and many on his side are grappling with this. He even went on a rant about Wifejack, saying "if this is the "right-wing", then I support White Genocide (TM)".
Hahaha "little Ukraine hiccup" is like the meme of "small Chinese conflict = 10 million dead".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zWmhRSAcWkI&ab_channel=MasterofRoflness

2024-12-05 14:32:52 UTC

- reply

I don't like calling them (Russia) a turd world shithole. It may be somewhat true, but they have so much in terms of resources. They should be a first world state, based on that alone. It's part of the reason everyone in the modern-day wanted to invade them. Even a Ukrainian patriot I've been following points this out.
It's sad, and tragic.
All of Russian history is so tragic. I guess I should have seen this coming earlier, given historical trends.
I can only pray that some good-hearted Russian makes the decision to end Putin and save his narod and rodinu.

2024-12-05 13:43:37 UTC

- reply

the whole "anti-Western coalition" (minus China, which has always been on the sidelines) is breaking apart.
Their propaganda can no longer "keep it up", either for their own people, or the neutrals.
They are stalling or outright losing on the battlefield(s).
Their soldiers are realizing that what they are fighting for is not for their people or any wider noble "cause". They are just fighting for elite interests. The exact same thing they complain about from the West.
It was the opposite for me. I was chummy with the "alt-right" when they were pro-Russia. At the same time that Richard Spencer was interviewing Dugin haha
Spencer of course is now extremely anti-Russia/Putin. He's kinda seen it all. He can easily call out Russian propaganda because he was swimming in it for so long.
Qanon was literally outed as a CIA/NSA agent long ago, if I remember correctly.
Believe it or not, there was a time when Azov guys were training in military camps along with Russich guys (because "nationalists gotta stick together!"). Now those were wild times.

2024-12-04 22:02:18 UTC

Russia has abandoned Assad. Confirmed.
Hezbollah has abandoned Assad. Confirmed.
Iran is only sending in waves of Iraqi militia who are being slaughtered by A-10s from America. Confirmed.
The SAA can hardly stand. Confirmed.
And yet Iranian/Assad propagandists (who I used to watch) are spinning tall tales about a "glorious successful counteroffensive" in Hama.
With what? They have nothing left. Their allies have abandoned them. Those allies are the only reason they lasted this long.
For the love of God, please stop this. Stop lying. Save your people. Negotiate.
Iranians and Russians want the "stop the war(s)" chants to be in the West/Israel, but not in their own states. When they are in their own states, they beat those people to death.
I see it now. I was lied to. My empathy was taken advantage of. I feel sick.
The reality is that they are crumbling, and people are dying by the hundreds and by the thousands to maintain now easily deboooonked lies.
Fuck Khamenei, the betrayer.
Fuck Putin, the butcher.
They hate their own people.
Fuck them.
I know this is going to sound extremely ironic, almost satirical, but may God help the "FSA" to finish this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gz8ex2H996E&ab_channel=WeebUnion