Roy

There are always trade-offs... There are a lot of different designs you can do with PRFs. We decided to prioritizie simplicity in our protocol, inline with *our* use cases. We don't need to support imported wallets or deal with UTXOs in our SDK. We've also vetted the approach with design partners.

2026-01-12 01:17:48 CET

- reply

That's not how it works. The primary nostr salt is fixed. Then it can store additional salts.

2026-01-09 21:53:07 CET

- reply

It's crazy right now with the SDK, once things settle down...

2026-01-09 19:31:16 CET

- reply

We're adding this to Misty Breez very soon

2026-01-09 19:30:36 CET

- reply

Try Misty Breez

2026-01-02 15:29:47 CET

- reply

We're also using private mode by default: https://sdk-doc-spark.breez.technology/guide/config.html#private-mode-enabled-by-default

2025-11-16 10:59:56 CET

- reply

Notice zaps require public mode till we'll have client side receipts: https://github.com/breez/spark-sdk/pull/389

2025-11-06 19:24:27 CET

- reply

Btw, by your definition, all the companies you listed above have "proprietary API", some of them don't even open source their code, but claim to be open source... So allow to lolz

2025-11-06 19:22:18 CET

- reply

I second that! Do your research. Do your due diligence.

2025-11-06 19:21:18 CET

- reply

That's your blind spot, not mine. I think they are committed to an open network. They already executed on their commitment. They open sourced the SE/SO. They communicated a public roadmap wrt to privacy. I think you're completely misjudging because? You're not doing that with Arkade, you're not doing that with Phoenix, for some reason you're targeting David Marcus. I judge them based on their actions.

2025-11-06 19:03:11 CET

- reply

Not anyone can run an LSP. You need a lot of liquidity to run an LSP. I don't know what you mean by "proprietary API", the Spark SSP interface is public. The Spark SO is open source. You can run a Spark, an Ark or a Liquid federation. Yes, it's not easy to do, but the public interface isn't the showstopper here. It's the server management. Let's be honest, since we're operating an LSP, and interfaced with other large LSPs - running a LSP is super challenging as well. Perhaps the barrier of entry is lower now, because WE pushed for a spec and WE open sourced our LSP code - but it's still super challenging. They same dynamics apply to Spark, Ark etc.

2025-11-06 18:57:26 CET

- reply

I just think you're on the wrong track. I know we're a good actor and we help Spark be more private. We already do so. We're also pushing other sub-networks and the native Lightning tech itself.

2025-11-06 18:53:46 CET

- reply

They can send it to you as well and to any Lightning node as a matter of fact. There's a reason Phoenix and WoS pulled out of the US. Now they are back - but nothing has changed from a tech standpoint.

2025-11-06 18:52:11 CET

- reply

But that's exactly what it is. An LSP can track balances, IPs, transaction details as well. We should be honest about it.

2025-11-06 17:10:21 CET

- reply

Not extreme at all. LSPs are inherently centralizing. The more liquidity you have, the more users you will attract.

2025-11-06 17:09:07 CET

- reply

1. It's not theoretical. Lightning is already being surveilled, don't be naive.
2. It's our job to allow users to switch LSPs and sub-networks at their will.
I don't subscribe to the FUD around Spark. I think it's a cool tech that will only get better and more private. And if not, the market will reject it and use something better.

2025-11-06 17:03:20 CET

- reply

So we agree. Effectively the biggest LSP, Phoenix, does know the destination and dies trampoline payments and implementations like LDK use an external graph sync mechanism because regular graph sync doesn't work with mobile clients. There are always trade-offs.

2025-11-06 12:00:43 CET

- reply

I recommended you a few times in the past not to overhype the privacy state of Lightning. I suggest you align your documentation with this: https://lightningprivacy.com/en/introduction

2025-11-06 11:55:09 CET

- reply

And if you are referring to in-Spark transactions, the same issue exists in an in-LSP transaction... I.e. the sender and receiver are connected to the same LSP.

2025-11-06 11:33:15 CET

- reply

Get your facts straight. You can blame me all you want, but this is a complete misunderstanding of how Lightning works.
If the LSP knows the destination node, it knows the destination. period. And you don't understand how Phoenix works - they don't do source routing. They use they LSP as a trampoline nodes. They construct the path and they know the destination.
Moreover, even in cases of source routing - if the user is connected to a single LSP - the LSP effectively controls the path because the graph information is fed by the LSP...

2025-10-12 00:37:41 CEST

- reply

The default behavior in the Breez SDK is not to expose the spark address in the bolt11, so you can't do what Evan showed above. However, since spark reuses addresses (currently), you can still apply stuff like timing attacks to discover the underlying address. This should be addressed soon by the spark team (they are switching to a dynamic address model).

2025-10-08 13:08:50 CEST

- reply

We also have a Spark-based implementation

2025-10-02 20:45:40 CEST

- reply

🙏❤️

2025-10-02 12:58:13 CEST

- reply

Ah?

2025-09-17 00:32:29 CEST

- reply

You should come to the Bitcoin Embassy in Tel Aviv

2025-09-17 00:31:11 CEST

- reply

There's a relatively small but dedicated Bitcoin community, practically no one accept Bitcoin unfortunately...

2025-09-14 16:31:43 CEST

- reply

Very soon: https://github.com/breez/breez-sdk-liquid/pull/920

2025-09-12 08:23:33 CEST

- reply

Yes

2025-08-28 16:12:23 CEST

- reply

Ofc you can

2025-08-27 09:02:48 CEST

- reply

Again with the FUDing. Self-custodial is a regulatory term. If you hold your keys to the asset, the wallet is self-custodial, no matter ls what the asset is BTC, USDT or L-BTC. Now, the question is how protected the asset itself. With BTC, if you have a way to unilaterally exit to mainnet (which Liquid doesn't, but Spark for example does), you have control over your funds.

2025-08-26 20:16:30 CEST

- reply

Misty Breez is self-custodial. You're referring to L-BTC, which is held in a Liquid federation. There are 15 functionaries (all from different entities) in Liquid, so no need to FUD in order to get ppl using your service.

2025-08-10 07:34:18 CEST

- reply

💯⚡

2025-07-28 21:58:11 CEST

- reply

So check again

2025-07-24 10:50:31 CEST

- reply

Try Misty Breez

2025-07-11 19:38:14 CEST

- reply

Not what I meant. Boltz|CNL is used for in our Nodeless SDK, you're classifying all as Aqua. I don't really care about attribution, but in our native SDK, multiple nodes are being used, but that's besides the point.

2025-07-10 09:56:30 CEST

- reply

Misty Breez and all Breez SDK wallets as well...

2025-07-03 20:01:12 CEST

- reply

Yes, we plan to

2025-06-19 23:03:24 CEST

- reply

#nevent1q…7wyj

2025-06-13 11:19:10 CEST

- reply

Better that ocean would implement pay note. The alternative would be to create another bolt12 offer (which you can via the Breez SDK), but tbh it's not something we want to do in Misty (we want to keep bolt12 static in Misty till a much wider adoption).

2025-06-13 11:16:04 CEST

- reply

Soon: https://github.com/breez/misty-breez/pull/560

2025-06-04 21:12:10 CEST

- reply

👀

2025-05-27 08:49:53 CEST

- reply

1. The QR code works with Phoenix (just tested)
2. Yep, the cost of doing swaps, but on the other hand you don't pay for liquidity. Also, for larger amounts Phoenix is 0.4% and Misty is 0.1% (+ the fixed liquid tx fee).

2025-05-24 22:36:53 CEST

- reply

Nope

2025-05-24 22:36:40 CEST

- reply

Nice!

2025-05-24 11:08:41 CEST

- reply

It does

2025-05-24 11:07:50 CEST

- reply

You can do it via mobile notifications "magic" on both iOS and Android

2025-05-23 21:10:14 CEST

- reply

It takes time to get wallet adoption. We just added full bolt12 in our nodeless SDK this week, we still don't have it on Greenlight. But I agree with Matt, it's here, and we need to push for wider adoption.

2025-05-23 21:07:35 CEST

- reply

We worked with Phoenix and Boltz to improve it, let us know if something isn't working as expected after the latest updates (both Phoenix and Misty).

2025-05-23 08:49:29 CEST

- reply

👀

2025-05-20 20:47:51 CEST

- reply

We have a couple, but this is the largest so far - many more to come 🚀🚀🚀

2025-05-17 22:26:21 CEST

- reply

Fixed

2025-05-14 14:04:28 CEST

- reply

🔥🔥🔥

2025-04-28 16:29:10 CEST

- reply

No: https://blog.breez.technology/misty-breez-lightning-made-easy-b2090bb7435c

2025-04-28 15:15:27 CEST

- reply

We need to handle this better. We'll address it soon.

2025-04-28 14:22:35 CEST

- reply

Misty (*@breez.fun) has 100 sats minimum

2025-04-28 13:16:28 CEST

We've added Misty Breez APKs for de-googled devices like @nprofile…nztg, download here:
https://github.com/breez/misty-breez/releases/tag/v0.1.4-beta

2025-04-28 13:07:39 CEST

- reply

Try the signed by Breez APK here: https://github.com/breez/misty-breez/releases/tag/v0.1.4-beta

2025-04-24 20:06:22 CEST

- reply

Give us a few days

2025-04-24 13:03:24 CEST

- reply

You can also receive offline payments

2025-04-23 19:35:50 CEST

- reply

can you share a link please?

2025-04-19 17:44:49 CEST

- reply

It took me 5min to convert our demo app to a telegram mini-app 🤯
#note1j55…yecx
https://m.primal.net/QWIk.png

2025-04-18 16:21:16 CEST

- reply

Published!

2025-04-12 17:04:18 CEST

- reply

Very soon

2025-04-09 13:58:08 CEST

- reply

Working on it

2025-04-08 13:48:12 CEST

- reply

nope

2025-04-08 13:20:10 CEST

- reply

perhaps we have a bug, it should work with and without.

2025-04-08 12:25:06 CEST

- reply

what's exactly are you asking? we're already support sending to bip353. are you asking about receive? we first need to support bolt12 receive, bip353 will come shortly afterwards hopefully.

2025-04-08 07:23:28 CEST

- reply

1000 is the min for all breez.fun addresses. Will be lowered to ~100 soon, but not to 7 lol.

2025-04-06 14:15:57 CEST

- reply

Let's say that the last time I spoke with Paul about Lightning he was very skeptical. It's up to us to prove him wrong. Since then we've also released our nodeless SDK. @npub149m…as0t take a look a Misty Breez and lmk what you think.

2025-04-06 13:22:03 CEST

- reply

David, all these issues are resolved with our Nodeless SDK. There's no liquidity management. Edge is focused on trading, not payments and Paul doesn't believe in Lightning. While Ark is promising, it is theoretical because no one understands the economic model of running an Ark at scale.

2025-04-05 14:13:42 CEST

- reply

If LSPs are a target, so would ASPs.

2025-04-05 08:02:59 CEST

- reply

#nevent1q…f2fu

2025-04-04 22:15:46 CEST

- reply

We're working to reduce the limit, expect a lower limit in a few weeks

2025-04-03 20:46:04 CEST

- reply

we will lower the threshold in a few weeks

2025-04-03 19:31:46 CEST

- reply

Re Liquid: https://x.com/adam3us/status/1907776480827855227
Re self-custody: Misty self-custody l-btc, not btc. From a technical standpoint, if only the user can access the asset, we're talking about self-custody. Everyone should make their own decision about accepting the Liquid trust profile, but we're being very clear about it.

2025-04-02 20:26:38 CEST

- reply

we'll get it fix

2025-02-25 16:48:25 CET

- reply

#nevent1q…94nk

2025-02-23 21:49:25 CET

- reply

#nevent1q…fjd8

2024-12-31 16:27:13 CET

- reply

I talked to the team, they already escalated the issue internally. The dev team will follow up ASAP, probably on Thursday. Apologies again for this experience, we need to understand what is happening in your env that is causing this.

2024-12-31 16:02:18 CET

- reply

I'm sorry to hear that. Let me follow up with the support team to understand what's taking so long. I'll involve the dev team if needed.

2024-12-18 14:55:57 CET

- reply

we're working with Boltz on reducing both

2024-09-20 16:05:06 CEST

- reply

Breez isn't custodial

2024-09-18 18:26:15 CEST

- reply

No worries, thanks for the update 🙏

2024-09-18 08:03:30 CEST

- reply

We had to restart our node yesterday, lmk if you still have issues w/ Breez

2024-09-06 05:58:23 CEST

- reply

love you brother ❤️

2024-09-02 11:33:42 CEST

- reply

EOL? I never said that... I've clearly stated we're not deprecating the app. Whilst we are focused on our SDK, the app is being maintained and we're keeping it aligned with the latest lnd stack.

2024-08-16 13:37:20 CEST

- reply

It's from @npub1r8l…x5dk's podcast https://youtu.be/sgaTlU2pEPs

2024-08-08 22:58:49 CEST

- reply

saw your email. not sure why the swap didn't work... apologies for the inconvenience. our support team will follow up with you (probably tomorrow).

2024-08-08 22:42:09 CEST

- reply

2024-07-28 06:16:13 CEST

- reply

it's far from perfect, but the alternative is a few more clicks. Maybe we should add it as an option. Appreciate the feedback 🙏

2024-07-15 18:17:06 CEST

- reply

Breez uses Boltz.exchange (reverse sub swap), so you'd have to ask Boltz to RBF.

2024-06-17 02:41:09 CEST

- reply

Easter egg: long press on the amount to see the fiat value

2024-05-07 21:02:36 CEST

- reply

Thank you so much 🙏❤️

2024-04-30 17:33:46 CEST

- reply

It's not sketchy. The APK is signed with the Breez signature. You won't be able to upgrade from your existing Breez otherwise. You can wait for the next release though, we're working on it.

2024-04-26 22:27:50 CEST

- reply

email us and we'll sort it out: [email protected]