Lord Wilmore

"Integrated" does not mean dependent on. If your ideal bitcoin end state doesn't include business, institutional, and governmental adoption, what's the point?

2026-07-27 16:35:51 UTC

- reply

Power move

2026-07-27 16:22:37 UTC

- reply

Great to see

2026-07-26 23:48:11 UTC

- reply

What is the game theory there? How is there a long-term outcome that doesn't result in a minority chain be becoming irrelevant?

2026-07-26 00:50:22 UTC

- reply

Jack is Nostr's strongest soldier

2026-07-26 00:44:06 UTC

- reply

The context of the original post was finance, so banks and such.

2026-07-26 00:41:57 UTC

- reply

Watch what the smart money is doing

2026-07-25 15:25:23 UTC

- reply

They're risk free in terms of dollars but not in terms of value

2026-07-24 22:18:36 UTC

- reply

😂

2026-07-24 14:14:25 UTC

- reply

What specifically is going down in India?

2026-07-24 14:12:30 UTC

- reply

Greatest form of advertising

2026-07-22 20:52:32 UTC

- reply

Get out?

2026-07-22 14:10:44 UTC

- reply

The last thing the state wants is for its citizens to have the freedom the leave with their money.

2026-07-21 21:15:33 UTC

- reply

Oh boy.

2026-07-21 17:03:46 UTC

- reply

In what direction were they heading?

2026-07-20 12:35:54 UTC

- reply

If religious people generally report being happier, having more kids, having better sex, and fearing death less than non-religious people, what harm is that path really doing them? What do they gain by "accepting reality"?

2026-07-19 23:39:09 UTC

- reply

The burka was probably invented centuries after Muhammad.

2026-07-19 21:13:16 UTC

- reply

Marriages are arranged

2026-07-18 22:29:08 UTC

- reply

So he admits the miracles but denies their meaning? Grants the sign but denies what it signifies?

2026-07-18 22:27:49 UTC

- reply

It also prevents "looks" discrimination. You're not able to prefer one woman over another if men aren't allowed to see any women except their wives.

2026-07-18 22:26:37 UTC

- reply

Why would that sadden you?

2026-07-18 02:58:19 UTC

- reply

Hot take: both styles of attire are the product of female sexual competition.

2026-07-18 02:23:07 UTC

- reply

Why would you denigrate someone who you perceive as being weaker than yourself?

2026-07-18 02:20:32 UTC

- reply

Amen

2026-07-18 02:19:17 UTC

"Inflation is a process of subtle expropriation, where the victims understand that prices have gone up but not why this has happened." —Rothbard

2026-07-16 19:10:49 UTC

- reply

Miners reap the profits until the attacker runs out of funds?

2026-07-16 16:29:23 UTC

- reply

His statement doesn't make logical sense. You can't have a "majority" at the "top" and still have a meaningful concept of what the "top" is. If everyone is a billionaire, no one is... (And wouldn't his framing imply that the majority is served by an overburdened slave class at the "bottom"?)
There's nothing inherently wrong with being of lower economic means than someone else. You don't have to be at the top to live a meaningful, fulfilling life. While economic status is a necessarily rivalrous rank ordering where one person's being at the top necessarily means everyone else isn't, satisfaction and contentment are not.

2026-07-16 16:25:16 UTC

- reply

Fair enough! 💪

2026-07-16 16:24:39 UTC

- reply

Decentralization is certainly essential for the foundational monetary layer. Once established, that provides a better foundation upon which you can build more centralized systems, such as for daily commerce. For example, I can trust lightning payments and companies like Block for commerce more because I know that they build on bitcoin, which is decentralized.
Similarly, for communication, I want certain protocols, like the internet, to be decentralized, but I also benefit from some amounts of centralization, i.e., the Signal app.
Nostr has a chance at becoming one of the foundational decentralized protocols of a new era of social media. I think it will flourish when centralized providers are able to use it as a substrate to offer services on top of it.

2026-07-16 15:23:55 UTC

- reply

Maximum decentralization and trust minimalization are difficult and should be reserved for only the most extreme necessary foundational layers

2026-07-10 15:05:00 UTC

- reply

Relay issue? I see this frequently as well, not sure why.

2026-07-07 14:14:49 UTC

- reply

Gross or net?

2026-07-05 01:21:20 UTC

Does anyone still use Bitchat?

2026-07-02 15:52:28 UTC

- reply

We'll be ready for them when they are.

2026-07-02 15:17:26 UTC

- reply

Can you point me to a good explainer for BIP 110?

2026-07-02 15:17:01 UTC

- reply

I don't think it's so bad. Different. But not bad.

2026-07-02 15:16:23 UTC

- reply

Joke's on you I never left

2026-06-30 16:40:04 UTC

- reply

So is money your religion?

2026-03-11 05:44:11 UTC

- reply

Greetings, Programs.

2026-02-27 23:14:30 UTC

- reply

The future of dissent will exist in private walled gardens
#nevent1q…s4gq

2026-01-26 18:55:16 UTC

- reply

I don't know why these people are fighting but it's at least cool to see it happening on Nostr.
(Didn't mean to zap though, tapped the wrong button)
#nevent1q…pees

2026-01-22 20:46:01 UTC

- reply

Stampeding a church and harassing parishioners is a severely greater offense than protesting outside of an abortion clinic or even rioting at a government building, in my opinion. It is in the spirit of the first amendment to protect the sanctity of worship by prosecuting those who would violate it.

2026-01-22 20:08:37 UTC

- reply

He had advance knowledge of the protest, apparently including non-public information and plans.

2026-01-08 13:34:34 UTC

- reply

post local
#nevent1q…c7q5

2026-01-01 07:17:13 UTC

- reply

The ultimate stage of Bitcoin enlightenment: I agree with the MMTers

2025-12-10 17:28:46 UTC

- reply

If you think that's cool, you should see some Instagram reels comment sections

2025-12-10 17:24:59 UTC

- reply

Yo.

2025-11-29 19:58:15 UTC

- reply

Like any religion, Bitcoin has its fanatical adherents and its rabid enemies.

2025-11-26 04:57:09 UTC

- reply

The dam has broken for me, looks like Peach will be the end of me as well

2025-11-26 04:47:25 UTC

- reply

You @nprofile…6yv2 we really should work together. Can we make a truce?

2025-11-26 03:23:34 UTC

- reply

I guess it worked out that way . . . you definitely had me on the ropes there though!

2025-11-18 15:38:03 UTC

- reply

It can't possibly be

2025-11-13 19:38:26 UTC

- reply

Zap me!

2025-11-13 04:03:05 UTC

Zap this to buy me a cup of coffee — with bitcoin (literally!)

2025-11-10 16:05:17 UTC

- reply

Where can I see the merchants who have this switched on?

2025-11-10 13:56:02 UTC

- reply

Is there any map of bitcoin squares in the wild?

2025-11-10 06:31:17 UTC

- reply

How do you catch a cloud and pin it down?

2025-11-10 06:30:58 UTC

- reply

It will grow over the long haul. People need to be exposed to positive examples in their own lives to believe in it.

2025-11-10 06:30:13 UTC

- reply

By whom?

2025-11-10 06:29:57 UTC

- reply

It's the only way to live

2025-11-09 01:16:04 UTC

- reply

How about removing income taxes outright?

2025-11-06 16:28:48 UTC

- reply

How do we make this happen?

2025-11-05 21:44:31 UTC

- reply

I don't know that we can educate ourselves out of this one

2025-10-29 14:47:58 UTC

- reply

That's pretty cool.

2025-10-28 03:39:56 UTC

- reply

I talked to a newly-minted bitcoiner today thanks to your videos, Julian. Keep up the good work!
#nevent1q…hwx9

2025-10-27 02:18:38 UTC

- reply

Well, the funny part is that if everyone had listened to them, the purchasing power would have beaten bitcoin

2025-10-26 20:11:31 UTC

- reply

Why are they making this so weird?
#nevent1q…620q

2025-10-26 17:26:58 UTC

- reply

That's the point

2025-10-26 16:43:28 UTC

- reply

I guess this is the ultimate test of my time preference.
#nevent1q…2w2y

2025-10-26 16:42:56 UTC

I believe in Bitcoin. I save in bitcoin. Does it offer any other ways to make my life easier today?

2025-10-25 15:48:45 UTC

- reply

It all makes sense once you grasp this

2025-10-25 15:38:49 UTC

- reply

God, I see what you've done for others...
#nevent1q…kaxx

2025-10-25 13:42:26 UTC

- reply

Open protocol, not a walled garden

2025-10-25 13:42:08 UTC

- reply

This is the way
#nevent1q…fk9m

2025-10-25 03:19:35 UTC

- reply

You haven't seen the worst of it

2025-10-25 03:19:12 UTC

- reply

It's gonna get so much worse

2025-10-25 03:07:59 UTC

- reply

I like it

2025-10-24 23:30:26 UTC

- reply

Yeah that's another way to go about it lol.
Fix the price to a specific point in time. Index it upwards with the CPI.

2025-10-24 23:14:45 UTC

- reply

You are correct. As long as the equilibrium is dollars, it's costly for any one player to defect. A catalyst will be required to shift everyone from one equilibrium to another.

2025-10-24 22:51:33 UTC

- reply

It's tricky to keep the price stable in sats when the BTC-USD exchange rate is so unstable, at least as long as your customers are all pricing their consumption in dollars.
Your prices could increase or decrease 2% on a typical day, and would on average get more expensive over time. Not to mention the flash crashes which involuntarily put your product on sale.
As more people keep larger stacks of sats in reserve, this will become less of a problem.

2025-10-24 22:36:48 UTC

- reply

For pricing in bitcoin, it might make sense to set the price at a moving average over the past 7 days or what not.

2025-10-24 22:20:00 UTC

- reply

This is vital. The only way to make bitcoin attractive to the masses is to pass along a discount to consumers for paying in bitcoin. This should be justified by the savings on transaction fees you get from opting out of credit card payment processing.
#nevent1q…e4xh

2025-10-24 02:52:35 UTC

- reply

It could get spicy, stay frosty

2025-10-24 02:51:22 UTC

- reply

I think we're ahead of the ball here. We just need to wait for the rest of the world to catch up. And in the meantime, enjoy our nice little niche with a highly selected group of people.

2025-10-24 02:49:08 UTC

- reply

Turns out it was actually just the malware itself all along

2025-10-23 23:26:34 UTC

- reply

Thanks for taking a look! I'm enjoying the game a lot

2025-10-23 22:07:28 UTC

- reply

A couple of other unexpected behaviors that I am noticing:
1. I can't figure out how to transfer units between non-adjacent territories. Right now I have to walk troops square by square to get them to an intended target.
2. When I capture a player-owned territory, I don't also capture their economic units. The population counter for the territory resets to 100 when I take possession of it.

2025-10-23 20:51:36 UTC

- reply

Haha yes, these numbers are getting astronomically large.
Maybe there is way to model larger conflicts instead of iterating millions of dice rolls.
Otherwise, introducing diminishing marginal returns to population growth which would encourage territorial expansion.

2025-10-23 20:45:05 UTC

- reply

Yes, the lags have cleared up. However, it appears to crash when I try to run a large attack. I have a neighbor with nearly a billion units at this point. I tried attacking him when it was about 500 million v 500 million, and the battle would not resolve. Instead, my client completely lagged out for several minutes, and when I got back online the attack did not resolve.

2025-10-23 18:51:18 UTC

- reply

How do we know that's not how human memory works?

2025-10-23 18:00:17 UTC

- reply

Update: I may have crashed the server.

2025-10-22 15:46:56 UTC

- reply

Okay, another follow up question lol. What is supposed to be the intended outcome of capturing a territory? Do you capture all or a portion of the existing population?

2025-10-22 14:38:45 UTC

- reply

Perfect, thank you!

2025-10-21 20:04:49 UTC

- reply

Cool! Thanks. I also have further questions about the specifics of the battle mechanic.
Is it the case that you essentially have 3v3 dice rolls until the attacking army has 2 units or fewer? Or is some other formula used for the number of attacking dice?