Tyler Burns

Retired InfoSec Analyst - Cypherpunk - Vegan Ⓥ 🌱 - Animal Rights - Bitcoin - Privacy Proponent

Public Key

npub1d30mhvhd0sagmu83wdm26wqk00heptfn05xvgmfx7r9xscstnfcs7xynp3

NIP-05 Address

Profile Code

nprofile1qqsxchamktkhcw5d7rchxa4d8qt8hmus45eh6rxyd5n0pjngvg9e5ugpzdmhxue69uhh2uewv9a85ctdduhxuet5qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqg5waehxw309ahx7um5wghx77r5wghxgetkqyf8wumn8ghj7am0wsh82arcduhx7mn9krnlms

Publishing to

Author Public Key

npub1d30mhvhd0sagmu83wdm26wqk00heptfn05xvgmfx7r9xscstnfcs7xynp3

Show more details

Last Notes

2026-03-13 22:43:47 UTC

- reply

You mean like this one? Maybe open your eyes next time?
https://njump.to/nevent1qqsf8l0g5w848s8qpfh5lpje6qjeyxdzaqujjgj76xefg3s9anrlc9gppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qgsy67zzq5tc9cxnl6crf52s4hptdwhyaca5j7r8jwll535tdadedvcrqsqqqqqp82mhqy

2026-03-03 03:43:44 UTC

- reply

I want to know who these people are that are traveling to the past.

2026-02-24 15:31:50 UTC

- reply

I retired this year after 10 years of frugality and heavy saving to reach my goals. I owe a lot of that progress to Mr MoneyMustache. But his views on bitcoin were biased and shortsighted. I did far too much defending of bitcoin on his website's forums over the years to an entire following of people who are all too privileged to understand the benefits bitcoin has to the world. Bitcoin aligns perfectly to the FIRE movement, but far too many just don't see it...yet.

2025-12-21 13:37:02 UTC

- reply

Waiting too long until it is too late is irresponsible.

2025-06-22 13:52:00 UTC

- reply

The whole system is broken and needs to be rebuilt from the ground up.
#nevent1q…m8n6

2025-06-21 17:23:38 UTC

- reply

Did you really win? Because technically it looks like you're hanging under @nprofile…k07r's account...

2025-06-19 14:53:50 UTC

- reply

Turning thumbprints into bitcoin symbols one play session at a time.

2025-06-18 22:53:42 UTC

@nprofile…jtwl Tell me about myself.

2025-06-18 14:58:43 UTC

- reply

Haha, that's pretty cool though!

2025-06-18 12:30:36 UTC

Two things can be true.
-Iran shouldn't be developing nukes.
-US and Israel shouldn't be telling Iran they can't have nukes until they denuclearize as well.
No one in this world should have nukes. Denuclearization should be the priority, not war.

2025-06-17 23:46:09 UTC

- reply

Also, this seems to be a story all too common in South America. If anyone hasn't seen it yet, I highly recommend the documentary Crude which covers a similar tragedy with water in Ecuador.
#nevent1q…fdvy

2025-06-17 23:42:47 UTC

- reply

Incredible story. Something good out of something tragic. Hopefully there will be some more progress in the future for them with bitcoin empowering them along the way. Great reporting as always by @nprofile…20wr
#nevent1q…rs7y

2025-06-16 19:35:51 UTC

- reply

I was referring to WoT relays, but WoT on the client side would definitely be a good first foray into establishing WoT for users (I'm assuming that's what you're referring to here).

2025-06-16 19:09:57 UTC

- reply

How do you onboard new users into WoT? New users won't be in WoT initially which still means their on-boarding experience is tarnished by spam. Paid relays help, but then that is still expecting new users to finely tune relay lists and pay for relay services to start with.
Sometimes freedom of content like this just requires the user to go through some hoops to see only the content they wish to see.

2025-06-14 20:50:41 UTC

If you want some self defense but live in a state where obtaining a fire arm is overly prohibitive or don't want to go through the troubles or privacy issues of background checks, etc, there are some seriously powerful airguns out there that don't require any permit to own and ship right to your house.

2025-06-14 00:00:17 UTC

This is a pretty cool device.
https://geyser.fund/project/wesatoshis?hero=tylerburns

2025-06-13 12:20:39 UTC

- reply

Be in control of your data. Some real good advice here.
#nevent1q…mcwk

2025-06-12 00:56:53 UTC

- reply

That's pretty cool. I wonder what the durability is like with all that extra friction on the tire and motor. Definitely a cool idea.

2025-06-10 12:21:42 UTC

- reply

If something isn't viable for its own reasons and shortcomings, that's no fault of the better option.

2025-06-10 11:28:18 UTC

- reply

Don't skew the definition of authoritarianism. A single person performing an action doesn't necessarily mean they have full control of something, which is what is required under authoritarian rule.
Also, just because the market of free and open software chooses a single implementation, doesn't mean other choices don't/won't exist. Choice is never eliminated.

2025-06-10 10:23:53 UTC

- reply

Authoritarianism (noun):
A political system where power is concentrated in the hands of a single leader or a small group.
...Knots, a fork of bitcoin core where a single person is maintainer and has full control of the codebase.
🤔

2025-06-09 19:21:10 UTC

- reply

Validity of the security of something comes with time, no? MD5 was secure until it wasn't. What we do know is that current algorithms in use will come under attack from quantum computing at some point. So it makes sense to seek/research alternatives against that threat. Perhaps the "post-quantum" or "quantum-resistant" name is the snake oily part, but ultimately it is a worthwhile endeavor none-the-less. Whether any of the crop of "post-quantum" algos stand the test of time is simply a matter of time...

2025-06-07 22:39:11 UTC

- reply

"As part of improving the laws". Haha, ya, that's right...improving the laws...

2025-06-07 17:29:53 UTC

- reply

For sure. Governments will use any excuse to expand power. But we just need to be careful to not use that as an excuse ourselves to disregard real threats and risks. We just need to make sure to put a check on government power while tackling these problems with real solutions.

2025-06-07 17:21:42 UTC

- reply

Self-sovereignty means understanding the very real risks that come from climate change and being prepared for them, not ignoring them. Living in a location where your local climate is maybe more stable doesn't mean you won't be impacted by a changing climate globally.
https://predicament.substack.com/p/what-most-people-dont-understand

2025-06-06 23:27:04 UTC

- reply

Let's put it this way, in whatever the apocalypse scenario is, bitcoin will outlast traditional finance.

2025-06-06 16:50:02 UTC

- reply

Thanks! 👍

2025-06-06 16:48:47 UTC

- reply

I appreciate it!

2025-06-06 16:46:15 UTC

- reply

Thanks! Frugality and sticking with a plan for the most part. 🚀

2025-06-06 16:37:13 UTC

After a 22 year career in IT/Information Security, this is my last month of work. After that, I'll be officially retired, or FIRE'd. Not sure what the next phase of my life will bring, but with my new found freedom and time, the sky is the limit!

2025-06-06 16:16:19 UTC

- reply

I was going to reply with the same thing. I don't know any decent doctor that would diagnose an autoimmune disease solely based on TSH levels since there are multiple reasons why they could be off. I have Hashimoto's as well and an autoimmune disease means your body has antibodies that attack your organ/gland. So it isn't something that can just be cured of with food and you can test for the presence of these antibodies with a blood test (not just testing for TSH). So she probably didn't actually have an autoimmune disease like the doctor originally said. I'm in excellent health and fitness, but unfortunately, as is the case for anyone with actual autoimmune disease, food and exercise is not a cure.

2025-06-06 14:38:02 UTC

- reply

I imagine it is only a matter of time.

2025-06-05 23:52:55 UTC

It is crazy to me that, even after what we witnessed today, there are still people out there that say women are too emotional to lead.

2025-06-05 14:54:37 UTC

- reply

The only counter to that I'd argue is that with a fully collateralized loan, there is no capital creation in the process and therefore is not a ponzi. Even if the borrower turned around and purchased additional bitcoin with the loan proceeds they received, there is no new capital in the system inherent to the origination of the loan if the bank is simply using their own acquired capital to provide these services (both the loan origination and the later bitcoin brokering).
I think your argument against lending in this case here isn't necessarily against lending specifically, but against the idea of fractional reserve banking that creates new capital via debt and therefore does meet the definition of a ponzi as you described. The capital that gets created can never be fully realized if everyone decides to cash out or break terms at any given time. Money was created out of thin air based on future obligations. If all lending was fully collateralized, then any loan could be closed out at any time without risk of loss for either party. What creates the problems is the fractional reserve part.

2025-06-05 11:14:51 UTC

If you want to call it a bitcoin loan then make a 1 year loan term 52596 blocks and monthly payments are due every 4383 blocks.

2025-06-05 10:48:07 UTC

- reply

I'm clearly struggling to type lol

2025-06-05 10:29:00 UTC

- reply

I meant 2 of 2, so I edited it. They locknthe bitcion in a 2 of 2 multisig. But it is like lightning where they both sign an unbroadcasted commitment transaction allowing either of them reclaim the bitcoin, but have it time locked for the borrower until after the loan term. At any time the lender can claim the bitcoin without a timelock because the borrower signed a commitment transaction handing giving the bitcoin to them without a timelock.

2025-06-04 21:40:32 UTC

- reply

The lender would have full control of the bitcoin locked in the 2 of 2 multisig since they would be the one given the bitcoin in the commitment transaction. So there shouldn't be any need for additional collateral.

2025-06-04 21:14:44 UTC

- reply

I think perhaps a more secure way of lending would be with a 1 of 2 multisig walletb(borrower and lender each holding a key) with each party signing a commitment transaction for the term of the loan. The borrower is then timelocked from the bitcoin until the end of the loan term, but the lender can spend the bitcoin at any time.
Then, the borrower has some guarantees that if the lender goes belly up during the loan period, then can retrieve their bitcoin after the timelock is up. But the lender has guarantees of the collateral value during the life of the loan.
This is similar to how the lightning network HTLCs work. Just a thought.
Not sure how that'd work in the legal world though. Usually a company that goes belly up sells off their assets, of which the loans still need to be paid back. But still probably better than traditional multisig.
Time locks are great for inheritance though!

2025-06-04 15:49:55 UTC

- reply

I thought I recall Andreas having some bitcoin early on, but needed to spend it for expenses or something like that.

2025-06-04 11:40:04 UTC

- reply

Then why would they say "without notice to you?" If the only rehypothecation being done was the transfer to the custody company, they could give notice of that to the borrower and then leave that out of the terms. Instead, they leave it open that it could be rehypothecated any number of times without you knowing.

2025-06-04 02:40:09 UTC

- reply

Superficial understanding is Joe Rogan's middle name. lol

2025-06-04 02:18:04 UTC

Bitcoin unaffected. Blocks still ticking. Current time: 899714
https://www.thetravel.com/nasa-three-gorges-dam-china-disrupting-global-timekeeping/

2025-06-04 01:37:51 UTC

- reply

I sadly had to remove it as one of my blossom servers. It just wasn't working for me. But, hey, this is exactly why blossom is so great; resiliency with decentralization and having multiple blossom servers to host with.

2025-06-03 21:59:10 UTC

I receive an email notification for every new bitcoin transaction in my wallet that my node detects. That way when someone steals my bitcoin from cold storage, I get alerted and can pull up the transaction in my block explorer and cry.

2025-06-03 21:53:43 UTC

I can't recall the last time I ever had a lightning transaction that failed. It just works.

2025-06-03 21:31:05 UTC

https://stacker.news/items/996271/r/tylerburnsveg

2025-06-03 13:04:50 UTC

- reply

If I have $100 in collateral for my $100 dollars I am in debt for, I get liquidated if I am unable to pay, not pushed into bankruptcy. That was my original point.

2025-06-03 12:52:55 UTC

- reply

Don't get me wrong, as someone who has retired at the age of 42 and have been debt free aside from a mortgage on my home, I abhor debt and understand that more than anyone. But everyone's financial situation is different and saying a penny of debt is equal to slavery is nothing but hyperbole.
Sure, living in a van and travelling the world is a great and free life style. But some people want families and a home and land for their children to grow up in. Who is more enslaved in that regard then, the renter or the home owner with a mortgage?
Everything is relative in the end.

2025-06-03 12:23:51 UTC

- reply

That's a great sound bite. Do you also advise people not take a mortgage in order to become a home owner?

2025-06-03 11:48:00 UTC

- reply

If the LTV ratio is 100%, then you're not really relinquishing control of anything that wouldn't have been spent anyways, no? In the long run I think bitcoin loans will trend toward these higher LTV ratios and thus make taking loans on your bitcoin a better option than it is today.

2025-06-02 21:19:19 UTC

- reply

I'm really looking forward to this one.
#nevent1q…uagz

2025-06-02 15:25:43 UTC

- reply

Is there anything more fiat than spam? 😆

2025-06-02 14:46:07 UTC

- reply

The delivery person receives money for every delivered letter and every delivered letter is delivered in the same envelope and looks the same to them, spam or not. So they just deliver it for the money. Imagine every letter that is sent to you looks the same and is in the same envelope. Now pick and choose what to accept and what not to accept.
The postal worker shows up at your door for delivery and some spam that gets delivered you can throw away and some spam that gets delivered you have to store and keep forever. Because some spam has a marking on it that says you can throw it away while other "spam" you can't prove is spam and might be an important letter, so you have to keep it forever. I'd imagine you'd prefer to receive spam you can throw away.

2025-06-01 22:10:50 UTC

This is pretty cool. Fast, anonymous, and disposable email accounts enabled via lightning.
https://lnemail.net/

2025-06-01 13:52:51 UTC

- reply

I agree, I think patents definitely favor large corporations more than small businesses. A lot of corporations simply have defensive patents, not for the sake of actually producing a product of their own, but to prevent other companies from producing a competing product. But I certainly can see a benefit toward small start ups with a unique product idea trying to make it to market against larger companies. Perhaps make patents only last a year or two rather than the decade plus they last now?

2025-06-01 13:28:53 UTC

- reply

One defense of patents is hear is that a smaller business with a new idea never has a chance to compete against a large conglomerate that can just steal their ideas and use their immense resources to scale and make it to market faster. I don't have any good answers either way, but I can understand that argument. A lot of good arguments against patents as well.

2025-06-01 12:48:13 UTC

- reply

You said:
"I don’t trust any “only android” services that can’t meet apple security requirements."
And then went on a long rant about how Google tracks you all while ignoring Apple doing exactly the same. If you really cared so much about security and privacy, you'd be promoting something like GrapheneOS.

2025-05-31 02:23:05 UTC

- reply

I was trying to figure out how this works and then realized that's where their profile pictures load from. Good catch and thanks for the info.
...of course now I won't see this post going forward either. lol

2025-05-31 02:06:48 UTC

- reply

They seem to be hitting some of the free relays like Damus, nostr.band, and bitcoiner.social pretty hard.

2025-05-31 00:24:27 UTC

OK, just installed @nprofile…h8kn on my phone. This is pretty cool. Having a backup of all your social media content right on your phone is a killer feature of Nostr.

2025-05-30 14:17:59 UTC

- reply

Borrowers go underwater on their traditional loans with banks all the time. If the bank is that risk averse, then can always set tight margin call values, but it really isn't necessary to require such low LTV ratios at origination with such pristine collateral like bitcoin.

2025-05-30 05:15:36 UTC

- reply

idk. FBI got involved with the investigation as well...which also got other developers doxxed as a result.
https://cryptonews.com/news/fbi-investigates-bitcoin-developer-event-linked-to-dashjr-hack/

2025-05-30 04:25:44 UTC

- reply

Luke had his own bitcoin stolen out from him with some pretty poor security practices and had his servers accessed by unauthorized attackers. Even if you trusted him as an individual, it is a ridiculous proposition to suggest running critical software maintained by this singular individual with this history.

2025-05-30 04:09:42 UTC

- reply

Even if your statement were accurate, the solution isn't to move to a fork that has only a single maintainer. If someone holds your opinion of the situation and promotes that as a solution, it outs them as being completely unserious about the problem at hand.

2025-05-29 22:12:50 UTC

- reply

It baffles me there are people that want any sizable portion of the bitcoin network running on knots. It isn't just about code review either. Knots has one dev/maintainer. This means you could potentially have one single dev with the ability to push out a code change that people running knots will blindly install upon new release.
Imagine if 50%+ of the bitcoin network were running Knots with one person having the ability to maintain the code of all those nodes. That is a scary proposition and it is insane to me that there are bitcoiners promoting that idea.
Imagine a backdoor in all those nodes or a breaking code change. Yes, many would catch the change and not push said new release to their nodes, but many would. Yes, it would very quickly become breaking news for all to urgently hear in the community. But that's not the point. That's not how you maintain the codebase for a multi-trillion dollar monetary network. You don't have one maintainer for a critical codebase like this.
It isn't one person "standing on the backs of giants." It is one person with control.
#nevent1q…9uxv

2025-05-29 21:00:34 UTC

- reply

No.
https://github.com/bitcoinknots/bitcoin/activity

2025-05-29 17:32:24 UTC

I am noticing a much larger presence is non-bitcoiner NOSTR users lately. This is a fantastic sign of adoption.

2025-05-29 00:21:33 UTC

- reply

Thanks for posting it!

2025-05-28 23:43:09 UTC

What in the actual hell is this? This conference is reaching new levels of cringe.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/s/IofBcWiRKm

2025-05-27 20:15:30 UTC

- reply

That being said, if bitcoin's price has appreciated this much without Saylor's supposed buying demand, then it means bitcoin is far more scarce/illiquid than the market previously thought. That's a good thing for actual bitcoin holders.
#nevent1q…vffy

2025-05-27 17:29:12 UTC

- reply

For sure. There are always more security layers you can add.

2025-05-27 17:25:50 UTC

- reply

It does matter. If the attacker doesn't have access to the blind oracle server (it was taken offline/deleted) then it could be argued that a HWW with a secure element intact would be the easier target than the Jade HWW without a corresponding blind oracle. Since what would be needed to perform an attack is in hand with the secure element HWW versus the now deleted blind oracle with the Jade.
Obviously this would depend upon knowing that your Jade was stolen to begin with to be able to respond in kind with deleting your blind oracle server to begin with.
But my argument wasn't that one is better than the other as often in security it isn't so black and white. I was merely presenting a specific attack path where having a separate blind oracle could present a more difficult challenge than a secure element.

2025-05-27 15:54:22 UTC

- reply

Agreed, but with the hardware wallet in hand they have all they need to do so.

2025-05-27 15:33:45 UTC

- reply

I mean, ya, stealing a hardware wallet AND also the oracle server is obviously a SHTF scenario. But that's also not a hurdle (stealing an external server) an attacker would need to go through for hardware wallets using a secure element. There are trade-offs for everything when it comes to security. Finding the balance for your own personal use case and risk tolerance is important.

2025-05-27 15:28:33 UTC

- reply

One benefit I could see is that if you host your own oracle server and you lose your hardware wallet, you could take your oracle server offline preventing any access to that data and forever deleting it. Or limit access to your self-hosted oracle server to begin with. But yes, this would only be possible if you're hosting your own blind Oracle PIN server, which I would highly recommend if using a Jade wallet.

2025-05-27 01:28:54 UTC

- reply

Any recording available for this yet? I would love to see it.

2025-05-25 20:59:27 UTC

- reply

I love my Weber kettle.

2025-05-21 02:12:00 UTC

- reply

A bitcoin node still downloads and validates all transactions and blocks, even if pruning is enabled. And if you set up your node to track your wallet history, it will store those transactions even if they're past the prune period.

2025-05-21 01:31:05 UTC

- reply

Ya, I just read the article. I commented and then read it. Ooops!
That would be cool. Hopefully NY starts to see the overall trend and momentum gathers to put pressure on the state lawmakers to repeal the Bitlicense. NY is so far behind all other states in this industry.

2025-05-21 01:26:11 UTC

- reply

Bitlicense is a NY DFS thing. As much as the NYC mayor would want, he doesn't really have the power to end it. NY legislators and the governor need to get their act together and repeal it.

2025-05-20 13:35:59 UTC

- reply

It is like the "we have to protect the children from predators" on the right. Both are just power grabs needing an excuse.

2025-05-17 01:41:34 UTC

- reply

SLS is in most toothpastes and used to give me canker sores in my mouth all the time. Since switching to an SLS free toothpaste, I've stopped getting them entirely.

2025-05-16 21:59:15 UTC

US credit rating downgraded to the surprise of no one.
Buy bitcoin!
https://ratings.moodys.com/ratings-news/443154

2025-05-14 15:52:31 UTC

- reply

Seems like context is important. Seems like he is just using bitcoin which is OK.
https://image.nostr.build/fa044954a05a32105c10813130692c7e98be68545ddae987b7a1da17c270efbc.jpg

2025-05-13 00:21:01 UTC

- reply

We don't deserve Greg Maxwell. I'm grateful for all his contributions.
#nevent1q…4ve9

2025-05-08 21:53:31 UTC

- reply

Same, doesn't crash for me either. You using GrapheneOS by chance?

2025-05-08 14:08:21 UTC

- reply

Traditional sauna with good loyly, no contest.

2025-05-08 10:42:38 UTC

- reply

You seem to be an adversarial type when simply confronted with questions. I won't bother you anymore.

2025-05-08 10:39:58 UTC

- reply

Believe it or not topics can have implications on other related topics.

2025-05-08 10:30:39 UTC

- reply

Haha, no intention of sending you there, though it does often sound nice.
It was actually just an honest question though that I've asked myself just as often.
I'm also a big proponent of privacy improvements on the blockchain and someday it would be great to have privacy improvements where it is difficult or impossible to tell what exactly a transaction is (things like schnorr sig and taproot help). If we someday get there and all data looks the same, telling the difference between "spam" and "legit" will be a fruitless endeavour.

2025-05-08 10:20:39 UTC

- reply

I didn't derail anything. The entire premise is based on the answer to the question I first asked. "How do you reduce spam on the blockchain?"
You may not have an answer to that question and that's fine. But the position you hold (reduce spam) absolutely depends on an answer to that question, which in reality doesn't have a good answer.

2025-05-08 10:11:40 UTC

- reply

It didn't. Ocean and DATUM is the answer for how you decentralize mining more and move toward allowing individual miners select their own block templates. It doesn't answer the question of: when choosing your own block template (as an individual miner or pool) how do you selectively choose what data is good or bad if all txn data looks the same? In a similar vain, the same question can be asked about relaying transactions and whether ultimately it is better to have a more restrictive default txn relay network with many more private ones and unpredictable blocks.

2025-05-08 10:02:27 UTC

- reply

That didn't answer my question on how it is technically achieved. Ocean and DATUM have nothing to do with it, though they're great for mining decentralization.

2025-05-08 09:46:58 UTC

- reply

How do you move away from spam on the blockkchain?

2025-05-07 13:05:57 UTC

- reply

If only the analogy made sense.

2025-05-06 20:54:04 UTC

- reply

What does that look like to you? How do you go about that?

2025-05-06 20:28:42 UTC

- reply

You have no idea what you're talking about.

2025-05-06 13:50:20 UTC

- reply

That new logo just looks like an alternative bitcoin with infinite supply and no 21 million cap. lol

2025-05-05 15:12:02 UTC

- reply

FWIW, I agree with you on the whole mempool, spam, OP_RETURN, debate. But just wanted to clarify on this scenario in particular.