Bitpunk

Since you're using home assistant, you could also make them yourself with esphome and an esp32 with a CO2 sensor hooked up. You might just get yourself into a rabbit hole 😂

2026-01-17 16:24:12 CET

- reply

$170 for ONE? damn.... I build them myself for like $20 😂

2026-01-17 16:22:40 CET

- reply

2000 is insane, I take 700 as my preferably max. already 😅

2025-11-27 23:41:00 CET

- reply

Only way you can get rid of someone like this is to just ignore them and not give them the attention they love. People with a certain disorder love this kind of attention, that's the only reason he's still around...

2025-11-25 18:25:08 CET

- reply

Anywhere we can watch a recording unc?

2025-11-20 22:37:50 CET

- reply

You would be dead most likely 😂

2025-11-20 22:15:46 CET

- reply

In 2 hours, someone was quick!

2025-11-14 10:32:40 CET

- reply

A reboot of the old Vine app, but I believe it's built on Nostr

2025-11-13 11:55:39 CET

- reply

Yes, there is!
https://btcmap.org/dashboard

2025-11-13 11:52:38 CET

- reply

Beautiful

2025-11-11 22:01:47 CET

- reply

Square displays Satoshi's with the ₿, which was proposed as renaming Satoshi's as bitcoin, which I think is retarded

2025-11-11 21:51:43 CET

- reply

A plant can also create a fossil though, right?

2025-11-03 08:45:37 CET

- reply

Rollercoaster Tycoon 🎢

2025-10-31 15:12:50 CET

- reply

Saw people on Twitter going at it frantically 😂

2025-10-30 21:41:18 CET

- reply

They are found! Wonder who got them this time 😊

2025-10-30 21:33:52 CET

- reply

Without agreement it would just be welfare. Now it's actually work and purpose. Love it. 🧡

2025-10-25 08:56:21 CEST

- reply

No, you're part of revolution. 🧡
They are just LARPing.

2025-10-23 16:58:08 CEST

- reply

DM's that work

2025-10-16 07:09:07 CEST

- reply

No, I sat this one out, wanted to give someone else the opportunity. This time it was a lot easier to find the clues, but wouldn't be fair to go at it week after week!
Also it looks like the person who claimed it sent it to an exchange 🤢 I would never do that

2025-10-14 21:26:37 CEST

- reply

This new phone is still said to take 1.5 years. And Pixels are still supported, so don't worry

2025-10-09 07:07:48 CEST

- reply

Ha, didn't expect to be covered in your article 😅
I love that you wrote:
"It might sound corny, but I feel a real connection with each week’s winner."
I thought I was being corny about it, but apparently not! Let's just call it wholesome instead. 😊

2025-10-09 06:54:10 CEST

- reply

That would be nice to see!

2025-10-03 17:15:41 CEST

- reply

Oops, sorry for not being clear enough. I learned about UTXO's some time ago, when someone posted 'consolidare your UTXO's while fees are low' . And I was so confused.
I since went down the rabbit hole.
But I that moment was also the first time I opened mempool.space and for the first time I understood what Blockchain actually meant.
My feedback was trying to say, please keep putting the bitcoin address in there and show people a link to a mempool/blockchain explorer. That has been my biggest tool to study Bitcoin in the past 😊
And that it will motivate other people as well to start digging down that rabbit hole, who haven't done so yet
You did just incentivice me to start writing more, because that's one thing I apparently suck at nowadays! 😅

2025-10-03 11:04:15 CEST

- reply

I keep opening this video just to listen to the intro 😂

2025-10-03 10:59:04 CEST

- reply

That's another good one, sharing the addresses. It just so happened that this 8th wallet didn't update the past UTXO's properly (my fault). But I did check addresses and recognised one of them!
Also the ability to check if the sats were still there helped to motivate me to try again after a couple hour break 😅
Even having to look up words on the bip39 word list could lead you down a rabbit hole if you've never heard of a seed phrase before. Depends a bit on the target audience of course, not sure if your audience is people who don't know about self custody. But even checking a bitcoin address on mempool.space is already very interesting if you never did that! (That's actually how I learned about UTXO's!). It took me quite a while to go from self-custody to understanding what a UTXO is for example.
For me, it was just a very exciting treasure hunt. And actually a meaningful prize (I'll share why in a DM if you like 😊). It's weird maybe, but you and uncle will be living in a strangers head for a long time with a warm feeling 🧡

2025-10-02 21:36:27 CEST

- reply

Here is my feedback, I think the level of difficulty was good, I had a lot of fun!
At first I thought you were hiding the words in your questions, so I started writing keywords down that I took away from your questions, until I noticed the 3rd word riddle that was shown on screen. At that point I still thought it could be a mix of both, but started paying attention to the videofeed itself.
Once I figured out where the riddles were, it was not that hard to find all the riddles hidden on screen, by paying attention. You got a 100% watch retention from me, I even sat through the sponsored segment, thinking you'd definitely hide one in there. 😅 (Actually way over 100% because I had to rewatch the first part).
So for watch retention, I think this tactic is quite smart!
The hardest part was actually figuring the riddles out, for the first one I for example figured:
- huge/giant/large/great/immense/vast
Then for every other riddle where you doubt, you start multiplying possibilities.
I tried around 100 combinations, of which around 8 gave me a valid checksum, but were not the right combination. Then I gave up for a while.
In the end it was the riddle about Fashion that was hardest to figure out. I spent way too long trying trend/style/brand.
I did everything by hand though. I know it would be possible to write a simple program that would check all possibilities, but I put in the work. I actually had a lot of fun even though it took me 2 or 3 hours!
Is there a way I can thank you both for the fun challenge and reward? 😊

2025-10-02 17:54:56 CEST

- reply

Yes, it took more time than I'd like to confess though! If you want some feedback, let me know. 😊

2025-10-02 17:14:48 CEST

- reply

Sats found by a human, using proof of work 🙏🏼😊
Thank you @nprofile…qhqe and @nprofile…s97p, I always love listening to Uncle! Thank you for being a calm voice in all these Bitcoin wars and arguments!

2025-09-09 21:12:59 CEST

- reply

https://blossom.primal.net/346129dcdfa53bd96ed668a3bfaa678ca1fe8502d22236d792b16ab091699e00.webp

2025-08-28 12:48:15 CEST

- reply

And I believe lower mercury levels compared to the big boys

2025-08-26 06:49:29 CEST

- reply

$110059

2025-08-14 19:05:17 CEST

- reply

I get nervous from the way you hold those eggs 😂

2025-08-13 21:42:50 CEST

- reply

They want your Bitcoin with custodians only, so they are able to steal ("seize") it easily...
Worst thing is. Most people are not like us and are never going to download apps somewhere apart from the Play store... 😮‍💨

2025-07-08 13:36:19 CEST

- reply

But you don't know the receiver's pubkey before you leave the house...
I'm just saying that securing with a receiver pubkey and paper ecash don't seem to go hand in hand 😅

2025-07-07 14:30:45 CEST

- reply

But why would you print that on a paper bill?

2025-07-06 11:22:40 CEST

- reply

Which makes the paper aspect useless because it would only be printed for one receiver to be used?

2025-06-25 10:49:28 CEST

- reply

Thank you Satoshi 🧡

2025-06-05 22:50:33 CEST

- reply

How does it decide how the withdrawn amount per mint is split?

2025-06-04 06:34:43 CEST

- reply

What's your reason to package your apps, are you going offline often?

2025-05-31 22:18:30 CEST

- reply

She wouldn't date down

2025-05-31 08:12:03 CEST

- reply

Being smaller makes it more effective 😀

2025-05-29 07:15:02 CEST

- reply

It's a rapier

2025-05-28 06:35:16 CEST

- reply

Imagine paying to watch this 😂

2025-05-27 10:34:42 CEST

- reply

Great question and some decent answers.
But to answer your question directly:
The trust you put is within the wallet, not the node in your example.
When you create a transaction from a UTXO in one of your addresses (address A) to someone else's address (B), this transaction still needs to be signed before it is valid. The signing of this transaction uses your private key to sign for the specific addresses and amounts.
If anything changes with this transaction, like a different amount, send or receive address, the signature would also look different. And the previous signature does not work, since it is specific on those details.
So the only way to swap around receiver or amounts send, is by knowing your private key. Which is held in your software/hardware wallet.
That's why a trustable/verifiable/reputable wallet is so much more important than your own node, to secure your Bitcoin.
💡 Extra: so why is your own node important?
Freedom. A node is used to relay information, like your signed transaction or the UTXO's you have on your addresses. Running your own node ensures privacy, otherwise you let a service know how much you own. They can censor transactions by not relaying your signed transactions (so they will never be seen by the rest of the network). And they could show you false balances, for whatever reason.
However, running a node ensures the network to stay decentralised, ensures your freedom and your privacy.

2025-05-27 08:31:19 CEST

- reply

We're not scared in dollar terms when we raise these concerns.
We're scared that we'll let fiat scammers piss over the one chance we have to escape the system.

2025-05-27 08:22:28 CEST

- reply

They are not figuring it out though. It's just an easy way to promote themselves. Remember politics is a zero-sum game

2025-05-26 08:18:53 CEST

- reply

Sprinkled a bit too much Gen-Z in there 😂

2025-05-24 11:13:46 CEST

- reply

We need more green in all our cities 🌳

2025-05-23 06:55:48 CEST

- reply

They don't want medium of exchange because their coins are stuck on an exchange 💀

2025-05-22 20:18:56 CEST

- reply

Some people are cute retarded, others are just retardedly retarded 😂

2025-05-22 13:13:24 CEST

- reply

They rebranded to tic tac toe?

2025-05-22 06:10:12 CEST

- reply

Creators on X paying to be able to create 😅

2025-05-21 08:44:41 CEST

- reply

Buy a (refurbished) mini pc, wipe it, throw Linux on it and you're good to go. Cheaper than a Raspberry PI even.
And then... Let's fix the filters 🔥

2025-05-21 08:37:03 CEST

- reply

Concerning graph, when Coinbase blows up, it's going to be carnage

2025-05-20 13:17:36 CEST

- reply

I would love to shop there!

2025-05-19 18:50:38 CEST

- reply

Creating a BIP is just a way to distract us from other things going on in the core repository 👀

2025-05-19 16:58:20 CEST

- reply

Stop trying to distract us from the OP_RETURN debate, we all know this is ridiculous anyway 🙄

2025-05-19 06:29:05 CEST

- reply

That looks more like Korean BBQ than hot pot. Both are delicious though 😊

2025-05-18 19:37:12 CEST

- reply

It confused me as well for a bit, when I started Nostr and it autofollowed your account. I was wondering what ecash you were talking about, since it didn't make sense to me you'd be happy about a shitcoin lol

2025-05-17 08:21:17 CEST

- reply

Nice! Doesn't sound like you're new to BTC 😉

2025-05-16 07:52:34 CEST

- reply

Don't put your hope into politicians unless you want to be disappointed

2025-05-15 20:12:26 CEST

- reply

Bit weird timing to (incorrectly) call it non-custodial

2025-05-15 19:40:20 CEST

- reply

Take control over your own btc 😊

2025-05-15 19:39:19 CEST

- reply

Why do they keep copies of passports after verification? 🤨
Why do overseas customer support agents have access to passport copies? 🤨

2025-05-15 18:52:07 CEST

- reply

The speaker list is insane

2025-05-15 15:16:08 CEST

- reply

Strong together like a million ants 🧡
Thank you for promoting decentralised mining!

2025-05-10 07:46:05 CEST

- reply

Both?

2025-05-09 06:51:01 CEST

- reply

That's brutal 😂

2025-05-06 09:50:19 CEST

- reply

Is there currently a discussion going on about the witness discount as well, since it seems quite related to this whole saga?

2025-05-03 15:40:28 CEST

- reply

There are enough people who wish Facebook/Instagram would still actually show them their friends' posts instead of whatever shit the algorithm is pumping out.
If you just create a solution like that on top of Nostr, people don't care what is happening in the back...

2025-04-30 21:25:45 CEST

- reply

That's actually pretty funny. They should probably also do that for their normal savings account then 😅

2025-04-30 16:10:44 CEST

- reply

The explanation about what a spread is, is also ridiculous

2025-04-30 07:54:05 CEST

- reply

That's just a sad filter for most of us 😂

2025-04-26 21:36:27 CEST

- reply

🤢 gross, but good on your for taking some liquidity into the good direction I guess 😂

2025-04-26 08:43:55 CEST

- reply

I love consolidation

2025-04-26 08:37:04 CEST

- reply

I do think you're right...
But the nice thing is, it's just a semantic layer. I can just put my wallet's denomination in bits while you use sats on your invoice. 😄

2025-04-26 08:32:48 CEST

- reply

Probably half of it, the other half of your winnings will be taxed 😂

2025-04-25 21:19:30 CEST

- reply

No, there is a millibitcoin, 1 bitcoin > 1,000 millibitcoin > 1,000,000 bit
The problems with sats is that it doesn't follow steps in 1000's...
That's the reason things got a bit awkward.
Honestly, I'll get used to whatever is common, sats or bits, it's just like using a different currency when you travel, no big deal after a few days of getting used to it 🙂

2025-04-25 20:38:46 CEST

- reply

We already have a bit, 100 sats is a bit, like cents to a dollar. With 1,000,000 bits in 1 bitcoin.
I like this denomination and it's already established, some wallets give you the option to display in bits.

2025-04-25 20:27:58 CEST

- reply

I'm against shifting as well.
However I would prefer using 'bits' and sats more.
It is intuitive to have
1 BTC =1,000,000 bits
and
1 bit = 100 sats
That way it clicks a lot easier in my head when doing calculations back and forth. The only thing we need is wallets and apps giving the option to show bits... 🪙

2025-04-25 13:36:25 CEST

- reply

I like to say "They live on in our mind from now on". In a bit more detailed way, explaining the beauty that is the image of someone or a pet, remaining inside the fabric of our brain after they die.
Living on within those neurons as long as we keep them there. Makes you also want to cherish those thoughts more.

2025-04-25 05:57:38 CEST

- reply

Fake buzzbot

2025-04-23 08:06:07 CEST

- reply

Playing around with Sparrow wallet helped me a lot to make it all click in my head. Also this tutorial by @nprofile…sv9d
https://youtu.be/8zM_1lOXtBU
Again, I don't know the implementation in BTCPay Server, which might give you a different interface 🙂

2025-04-23 07:58:42 CEST

- reply

A 2-3 multisig needs 3 seeds (private keys), you can reuse the seed you used for singlesig, as one of the 3 seeds.
Your funds are seperate from eachother, because your singlesig generates a different public key (and thus addresses) than your multisig.
As an example, when you have a 2-3, with 3 seeds, A, B, C... You could switch one seed for another: A, B, D.
This now gives a totally different public key and addresses, so basically a different wallet, while A and B are reused. Note that this is just an example, not that it's smart to do this last example 😂

2025-04-22 08:05:52 CEST

- reply

Spare your sats, there's no buzzbot notification, meaning the invoice was not paid

2025-04-22 07:16:51 CEST

- reply

In that case, yes, you can use a singlesig that has utxo's on it as a signer for a multisig.
The reason I said rotate is because your example might've caused confusion or if you have multiple owners (which could be a reason for multisig) and those other owners also know this seed for example.
Just know that you get two different "wallet" instances (public keys)

2025-04-21 21:16:43 CEST

- reply

I don't use BTCPay Server, but generally:
With multisig, the private keys (seeds) from all the signers determine the public key. You ask if you can do that without changing the seed, no because now you have multiple seeds.
You can use the old singlesig seed as one of the signers, but it's better to rotate, and your addresses don't stay the same anyway.
It's hard to answer your question because you say different things, let me know if I can clarify a specific example 🙂

2025-04-21 20:16:11 CEST

- reply

I don't trust cat people 😂

2025-04-21 20:15:18 CEST

- reply

Happy egghunt! 🥚

2025-04-21 20:14:32 CEST

- reply

👀

2025-04-20 18:25:11 CEST

- reply

Electricity on the train... It's free real estate 😂

2025-04-20 18:20:23 CEST

- reply

No trust at all, can't verify

2025-04-20 17:51:24 CEST

- reply

I think distribution should be a setting to play with. Now it's more of a casino where the house often takes home a lot. But it would be nice to choose you want to reward comments, if you're not in it to profit of the casino.

2025-04-20 17:48:34 CEST

- reply

How far back does this go?

2025-04-20 17:44:13 CEST

- reply

And in the comments you keep scraping for the leftovers 😂

2025-04-19 21:01:52 CEST

- reply

Do you only sell all or nothing bundles?

2025-04-18 10:22:28 CEST

- reply

Done dirty 😂

2025-04-18 10:10:56 CEST

- reply

And a random comment 😂

2025-04-17 22:04:50 CEST

- reply

So does buzzbot look at this comment or the original post? 🤔