theElderMillenial
The elder millennial

Inflation isn’t greed.
Bitcoin isn’t a savior.
Gold isn’t obsolete.
Writing about money, energy, and reality

Public Key

npub1dx22aygv05z0fpln97cx8ft2grwkhca7vm7qenjgrhkfw8hex9sq06525e

Profile Code

nprofile1qqsxn99wjyx86p85slejlvrr544yphttuwlxdlqveeypmmyhrmunzcqpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduqs6amnwvaz7tmwdaejumr0ds8r3n3y

Publishing to

relay.damus.io

nos.lol

Author Public Key

npub1dx22aygv05z0fpln97cx8ft2grwkhca7vm7qenjgrhkfw8hex9sq06525e

Show more details

Last Notes

2026-07-05 16:35:42 CEST

America at 250: Do We Still Understand the Country We Live In?
On July 4, 2026, the United States marks its 250th anniversary.
For a quarter of a millennium, Americans have celebrated Independence Day with fireworks, parades, family gatherings, and speeches about freedom. It’s one of the few holidays that belongs to every American regardless of political party, religion, or background. Yet this milestone also presents an opportunity to ask a surprisingly simple question:
What kind of government does the United States actually have?
Ask ten people and you’ll likely hear ten different answers.
Some will say America is a democracy.
Others will insist it’s a constitutional republic.
Some will argue that the Founders opposed democracy altogether.
Each answer contains a piece of the truth, but none tells the whole story.
The United States is best understood as a liberal democracy built upon a constitutional republic.
The problem is that the word liberal has changed so much over the last century that many Americans misunderstand what the phrase actually means.
That confusion matters.
Because if we no longer understand the principles our institutions were built to protect, it becomes much easier to weaken those institutions without realizing what’s being lost.
As America turns 250, perhaps the most patriotic thing we can do isn’t simply celebrate our history. It’s to understand the system that has carried this nation through two and a half centuries.
When “Liberal” Didn’t Mean Left
Today, the word liberal is usually associated with modern progressive politics. Turn on cable news and you’ll hear “liberal” used as a label for one side of America’s political divide.
But historically, that’s not what liberalism meant.
The word comes from the idea of liberty.
Classical liberalism emerged during the Enlightenment in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. Thinkers such as John Locke argued that individuals possess natural rights that governments do not create and therefore should not be able to take away. Governments exist not to grant freedom but to protect it.
Those ideas profoundly influenced America’s founding generation.
When the Declaration of Independence declares that all people are endowed with certain unalienable rights, it reflects this tradition. When the United States Constitution limits governmental power and the United States Bill of Rights protects freedom of speech, religion, due process, and assembly, those are liberal principles in their original sense.
So when political scientists describe America as a liberal democracy, they are not saying America is governed by today’s political liberals.
They are saying America was built on the principle that government should be constrained by individual rights and the rule of law.
That’s a very different conversation.
Democracy Answers Only One Question
Most Americans define democracy with a single word:
Voting.
Voting is certainly part of democracy, but it isn’t the whole story.
Democracy answers one fundamental question:
Who gets political power?
The answer is straightforward.
The people choose their leaders through elections.
But another question is just as important:
Once elected, what is government allowed to do?
That’s where liberalism enters the picture.
Liberalism says that some rights should remain protected regardless of which party wins the next election.
Free speech.
Religious liberty.
Equal treatment under the law.
Due process.
Freedom of the press.
Property rights.
The right to peacefully criticize those in power.
These protections are not obstacles to democracy. They are safeguards against the abuse of democratic power.
Because history teaches an uncomfortable lesson:
Majorities can be wrong.
They can become fearful.
They can become angry.
They can support policies that violate the rights of minorities or political opponents.
Without limits on governmental authority, democracy can slowly become little more than majority rule.
The American experiment was never designed to stop at elections.
It was designed to ensure that elections occurred within a constitutional framework that protected liberty.
Why the Founders Distrusted Concentrated Power
One misconception about America’s Founders is that they simply distrusted kings.
They did distrust monarchy.
But they also distrusted concentrated power itself.
Whether power rested in a king, a president, Congress, the courts, or even an enthusiastic majority, they understood that power naturally expands unless restrained.
That’s why the Constitution deliberately divides authority.
Power is separated among three branches.
Authority is shared between the federal government and the states.
Laws require multiple institutions to cooperate.
Judges serve independently.
Rights are placed beyond ordinary political bargaining.
From a modern perspective, these arrangements can appear frustrating.
Government often moves slowly.
Compromise is difficult.
Political conflict seems constant.
But that slowness wasn’t necessarily a flaw.
It was a feature.
The Founders preferred slower government to unchecked government because history had repeatedly demonstrated how quickly concentrated power could become tyranny.
Rights Matter Most When They’re Unpopular
One of the greatest misunderstandings about constitutional rights is believing they exist to protect popular opinions.
They don’t.
Popular speech doesn’t require constitutional protection.
Popular religions don’t require constitutional protection.
Popular political movements rarely require protection.
Rights become meaningful precisely when they defend unpopular people, unpopular beliefs, and unpopular speech.
That’s easy to forget during moments of fear or intense political division.
Every generation eventually encounters ideas it finds offensive.
Every generation faces voices it wishes would disappear.
Yet constitutional rights ask a difficult question:
Should governments possess the authority to decide which opinions deserve protection?
America’s answer has traditionally been no.
Not because every opinion is wise.
But because granting government that authority creates a power that rarely remains limited to today’s unpopular target.
The same principle extends beyond speech.
Due process protects people accused of crimes before guilt is established.
Religious liberty protects beliefs outside the majority.
Equal justice protects individuals regardless of political popularity.
Rights are strongest when they defend people we disagree with.
Otherwise, they become privileges granted only to those currently in favor.
Democracy Without Liberty Is Possible
Many people assume that if a country holds elections, it must also be free.
History suggests otherwise.
Political scientists often distinguish between liberal democracies and what are sometimes called illiberal democracies.
An illiberal democracy may still conduct elections.
Citizens may still vote.
Political parties may still compete.
But over time, other institutions begin to weaken.
Independent courts become less independent.
The media faces growing pressure.
Executive authority expands.
Political opponents become viewed not as competitors but as enemies of the nation.
Public trust declines.
The transition is rarely dramatic.
There is seldom a single moment when democracy disappears.
Instead, institutional guardrails slowly erode while elections continue.
That distinction matters because democracy is more than voting.
It also depends upon independent institutions capable of limiting power regardless of who temporarily controls government.
The Twenty-First Century Test
America’s first 250 years were shaped by the printing press, railroads, industrialization, radio, television, automobiles, and the internet.
The next 250 years will almost certainly be shaped by technologies that make those earlier revolutions seem modest.
Artificial intelligence.
Mass data collection.
Predictive algorithms.
Digital identity systems.
Biometric verification.
Advanced surveillance technologies.
None of these developments are inherently good or evil.
Every technology can expand opportunity while also expanding power.
Artificial intelligence can improve healthcare while increasing governmental and corporate ability to monitor behavior.
Digital identity can reduce fraud while centralizing information.
Algorithms can personalize education while influencing political opinions.
The question isn’t whether technology should advance.
It will.
The question is whether our institutions evolve quickly enough to ensure that growing technological capability remains accountable to constitutional principles.
As technology becomes more powerful, institutional guardrails become more—not less—important.
The Real Threat May Be Civic Ignorance
Political debates often convince us that the greatest danger comes from the other party.
History offers a more sobering possibility.
A society that forgets why its institutions exist may weaken them regardless of which political coalition happens to be in power.
Today many Americans passionately defend democracy while giving little thought to constitutional limits.
Others passionately defend liberty while dismissing democratic norms.
America depends upon both.
Democracy provides legitimacy.
Liberal constitutional principles provide restraint.
One without the other produces instability.
If citizens no longer understand why checks and balances exist, why independent courts matter, why freedom of speech protects disagreement, or why constitutional rights limit majorities, those institutions gradually become easier to dismiss as obstacles rather than safeguards.
That is why civic education matters.
Not because everyone must agree politically.
But because constitutional self-government requires citizens who understand the rules of the system they’re participating in.
Looking Toward America’s Next 250 Years
The United States has survived a civil war, economic depressions, world wars, social upheaval, financial crises, technological revolutions, and profound political disagreements.
Its endurance has never depended upon perfect leaders or perfect political parties.
It has depended upon institutions strong enough to outlast individual administrations and generations willing to defend principles larger than themselves.
The next century will bring challenges the Founders could never have imagined.
Artificial intelligence will reshape work.
Automation will transform economies.
Biotechnology will raise new ethical questions.
Global power will continue to shift.
The speed of change will only increase.
Yet the fundamental questions remain remarkably familiar.
How should power be distributed?
What rights belong to every individual?
Who limits those entrusted with authority?
How do free people govern themselves without surrendering either liberty or stability?
Those are not eighteenth-century questions.
They are permanent questions.
As America celebrates its 250th birthday, perhaps the most meaningful act of patriotism isn’t simply honoring the past.
It’s making sure we understand the principles that made the American experiment possible in the first place.
Fireworks last only a few minutes.
Institutions can endure for centuries—but only if each generation understands why they exist.
America’s future will not be secured by slogans alone.
It will be secured by citizens who recognize that democracy decides who receives power, while liberal constitutional principles determine what that power is allowed to do.
That idea may not fit neatly into today’s political arguments.
But it may be one of the most important ideas America carries into its next 250 years.

2026-07-04 17:37:31 CEST

- reply

There is no crypto industry

2026-07-04 15:57:02 CEST

Prices are falling when priced in bitcoin #bitcoin
https://blossom.primal.net/aa05ef63dcffa77ea799bac8aef4796185902b5bc08f26f80365b523ee9353ab.jpg

2026-07-04 15:52:09 CEST

Bitcoin was supposed separate the state from money , what happened? #bitcoin

2026-07-01 19:26:37 CEST

- reply

https://blossom.primal.net/b0173ba6d61437e75a5c5fd540773e3c0c78760ed7f4a5363ba39276d9801591.gif

2026-07-01 19:22:23 CEST

- reply

https://kalshi.com/sign-up/?referral=241bb058-5105-4ecb-a867-ef9db66dfb5b&m=true&utm_source=mobile_app&utm_medium=copy&utm_campaign=referral&utm_content=referral_qr_sheet

2026-07-01 19:20:26 CEST

America Doesn’t Have a UFO Problem. It Has a Gambling Problem. https://youtube.com/shorts/_433h98U4w0?is=LoF44lkOOonOEWdS

2026-06-30 13:21:42 CEST

Are MAGA Republicans patriotic socialists? #trump
https://blossom.primal.net/b8a799c1e34f73c0be32a6aa4c317d46c7f8aed2e097e4464036f19788faf023.png

2026-06-30 00:09:47 CEST

Remember when “degenerate gambler” was a common phrase?
Today we’ve put a casino in everyone’s pocket, run betting ads during nearly every sporting event, and call it entertainment.
What’s interesting isn’t just the normalization of gambling. It’s how little opposition there seems to be from many who once called themselves social conservatives.
What changed—the culture, the politics, or both?

2026-06-29 23:03:13 CEST

https://youtube.com/shorts/_Lk12O7Nu_0?is=aowqOFgy0khxO96A #trump #gold #silver #bitcoin

2026-06-29 22:13:42 CEST

@nprofile…mgy6 your thesis on a “true free market “ is missing one thing the criminal element of the population , gangs , cartels , the mob . #bitcoin

2026-06-26 23:24:39 CEST

- reply

Well maga is a collectivist movement #trump #maga

2026-06-25 16:55:00 CEST

@nprofile…2n02 can a true free market exist without some form of protection of goods and services? #bitcoin

2026-06-25 16:51:59 CEST

@nprofile…2n02 you have this a utopian view when it comes to bitcoin. As if a free market can exist without criminals using threats of violence or violence to take someone’s goods without some form of protection or police force #bitcoin

2026-06-25 16:00:30 CEST

If ai is deflationary problem Is our money is inflationary #ai #money #bitcoin

2026-06-25 15:58:47 CEST

- reply

The currency is debt based how can it be a symptom

2026-06-25 15:48:06 CEST

Is MAGA Individualist or Collectivist? #trump #maga #fascism #history #economics
https://youtube.com/shorts/C4vQfPFEBro?feature=share

2026-06-23 17:10:33 CEST

@nprofile…g4t5 Energy Return on Investment (EROI
https://blossom.primal.net/94a234c62bd75d9683527aabead070b1804c70a39618816bd85e9cd8e2e139f4.png

2026-06-23 17:07:58 CEST

Bitcoin maxis say energy is falling when priced in bitcoin don’t understand Energy Return on Investment (EROI ) #bitcoin #solar

2026-06-23 16:56:22 CEST

@nprofile…g4t5
Is energy really the limiting factor, or are we confusing energy abundance with resource abundance?
Even if electricity becomes cheap, batteries, copper, rare earths, water, land, and industrial supply chains still operate in a finite physical world.

2026-06-23 15:57:16 CEST

When did conservatives stop asking what the market wants and start asking what the nation needs? The answer may explain where America is heading after neoliberalism. #MAGA #Capitalism #FreeMarkets #EconomicNationalism #Politics #Millennial #FutureOfAmerica #Neoliberalism #Individualism #TheElderMillennialFuturist

2026-06-22 22:13:10 CEST

When Did War Critics Become Traitors? #IranWar #FreeSpeech #1984 #Authoritarianism
https://youtube.com/shorts/iAoy9QI0Vsg?feature=share

2026-06-22 18:23:15 CEST

- reply

You seem to be confused are for or against ai being centralized?

2026-06-22 18:20:16 CEST

- reply

Few hands isn’t that the government?

2026-06-22 17:48:39 CEST

- reply

https://blossom.primal.net/07966d9073544d801f0cfcef3741f354bbf8d757ffc9de5b606b2445b2c2b94d.gif

2026-06-22 17:47:43 CEST

- reply

So ai companies are becoming too big too fail ?

2026-06-22 17:29:52 CEST

- reply

So more fiat currency?

2026-06-22 17:19:44 CEST

- reply

Define growth in this context?

2026-06-22 17:16:28 CEST

- reply

Stable coins are just basically central bank digital currency

2026-06-22 17:15:18 CEST

@nprofile…tkhj you often talk about energy . The problem is oil is not just an energy source. In just about every we use in our economy. Has tech increased the amount of oil discoveries? The largest oil discoveries was the 1960’s Saudi Arabia . Tech has just made us use oil faster (shale oil tech)

2026-06-22 17:08:08 CEST

- reply

What happens when the oil reserves run out ? Is that when Iran wins the war #iran #war #trump

2026-06-22 16:59:41 CEST

- reply

A return in fiat currency?

2026-06-22 16:57:32 CEST

- reply

500x in fiat terms ?

2026-06-22 16:49:46 CEST

https://youtube.com/shorts/SRN1cvEQq-0?is=DmVQrcjzvKIzz-OY #ArtificialIntelligence
#AI
#Economics
#FutureOfWork
#ElonMusk

2026-06-21 23:55:15 CEST

@nprofile…fqv5 Elon says AI will create abundance.
Our financial system depends on scarcity.
AI pushes prices down.
Debt pushes policymakers toward inflation.
One of the biggest stories of the next decade may be the collision between deflationary technology and an inflationary debt-based economy.

2026-06-09 18:21:01 CEST

- reply

The real world depends on resources that depend on oil production

2026-06-09 18:19:20 CEST

- reply

Define cost in the context of energy

2026-06-09 18:18:56 CEST

- reply

Resources cost energy to produce

2026-06-09 18:18:11 CEST

- reply

What unit of do you use when when you say “cost “ . Energy in terms of energy would be a better why of looking at price

2026-06-09 18:15:56 CEST

- reply

https://www.patreon.com/posts/160629743?utm_campaign=postshare_creator #America250 #Constitution #FoundingFathers #GeorgeWashington #ConstitutionalRepublic #WeThePeople #NoKings

2026-06-09 18:14:18 CEST

America turns 250 next month.
As trust in institutions declines, more Americans are openly asking whether the country needs a stronger executive, a CEO-style president, or even a benevolent strongman to cut through the dysfunction.
It’s an understandable reaction to political paralysis.
But it raises an interesting historical question:
If concentrated power is the solution, why did the generation that founded the United States spend so much effort preventing any president from becoming a king?
The Constitution wasn’t designed to maximize efficiency. It was designed to limit power.
The founders understood something many societies eventually forget: the powers you give to a leader you support will eventually belong to a leader you oppose.
My latest article explores why the founders rejected monarchy, why every republic eventually faces the temptation of the strongman, and why this debate feels especially relevant as America approaches its 250th anniversary.
“The Crown America Never Took: Why Didn’t the Founders Want a CEO?”
Link in comments.
#America250 #Constitution #FoundingFathers #GeorgeWashington #ConstitutionalRepublic #WeThePeople #NoKings

2026-05-25 18:13:52 CEST

- reply

Serious question for the Bitcoin community:
If 1 Bitcoin now represents roughly 4–5 years of the average global worker’s labor…
at what point does Bitcoin stop functioning as currency and start functioning more like a concentrated global reserve asset? #bitcoin
Curious what some of the larger voices here think.

2026-05-25 18:12:57 CEST

@nprofile…jx6r Serious question for the Bitcoin community:
If 1 Bitcoin now represents roughly 4–5 years of the average global worker’s labor…
at what point does Bitcoin stop functioning as currency and start functioning more like a concentrated global reserve asset?
Curious what some of the larger voices here think.
#Bitcoin #Macro

2026-05-25 18:10:25 CEST

@nprofile…98fg At roughly 4–5 years of the average global wage per coin…
is Bitcoin becoming too valuable to function as everyday money?
Asking seriously, not sarcastically.
#Bitcoin #Macro #zapp

2026-05-03 00:39:13 CEST

Peak oil : the end of easy energy #oil #war #iran #energy
https://blossom.primal.net/028bca5e8a1a4a7fc5e25045470b4f9ac71df96df42d55c0ce8e03449c504b96.png

2026-01-25 17:13:27 CET

#trump #ice #guns
https://blossom.primal.net/2bbdb8940b4d40edc0584faee91c137215152c66a31f30739f9e2c99c01d9f0f.png

2026-01-16 00:23:45 CET

Is ICE Trump’s Secret Police in the Making? #trump #ice
https://blossom.primal.net/bc2cd638a261c5dbc6949949f761b613f557e26fa333b0d4ec06a1a7f55a8a28.mov

2026-01-14 15:12:14 CET

- reply

Against any country doing what ?

2026-01-13 12:17:17 CET

- reply

Speaking of trump . Have you noticed he has not mentioned bitcoin or crypto in months?

2026-01-13 12:15:14 CET

- reply

Strength by who ? Are you against other countries doing it . By the way this was common before world war 2

2026-01-11 00:45:15 CET

- reply

Peace through imperialism?

2026-01-10 14:51:36 CET

- reply

Specifically which leaders .

2026-01-10 00:42:39 CET

MAGA on CIA then vs now
https://blossom.primal.net/24cb4fd434f3d17cb75ba1d78abff329c30668311532f80542da99ccb5cd00c8.png

2026-01-08 16:05:42 CET

- reply

If you “voted for” the Monroe Doctrine…
• Can you explain it?
• Can you explain the military cost?
• Can you explain the history of coups and occupations tied to it?
If not, what you voted for wasn’t policy — it was obedience to Donald Trump.
Zap if education matters more than slogans ⚡️

2026-01-08 16:04:25 CET

MAGA keeps saying “we voted for this” — meaning the return of the Monroe Doctrine.
Be honest:
Most Trump voters can’t explain what the Monroe Doctrine is, what it costs, or what it historically meant.
You didn’t vote for policy.
You voted for a cult of personality around Donald Trump.
Zap if you think supporting something you don’t understand isn’t patriotism ⚡️

2026-01-07 23:55:43 CET

- reply

To bypass the dollar and us sanctions?

2026-01-07 16:32:46 CET

America Smaller, Not Stronger
The idea of returning to the Monroe Doctrine is being sold as strength, but in reality it represents strategic retreat. The original Monroe Doctrine was never a flex of power. It was an admission of weakness. In the early 1800s, the United States lacked the military and economic power to compete globally, so it pulled back to the Western Hemisphere to buy time. It was a defensive pause, not dominance.
Trying to revive that logic today flips its meaning. Retreat would now be voluntary, signaling that America no longer believes it can compete in the world it helped build. Supporters frame this as realism, pointing to endless wars and mounting debt. But realism also means understanding that power vacuums do not stay empty. When America steps back, other powers step forward.
Letting rivals dominate entire regions doesn’t create peace. It reshapes trade rules, supply chains, and technology standards in ways that undermine American interests. It tells allies they are on their own and encourages instability that eventually pulls the United States back in under worse conditions.
Real strength isn’t drawing lines on a map and hoping rivals respect them. Strength is credibility. Shrinking influence, fewer allies, and reduced ambition aren’t renewal. They’re contraction. Great nations don’t grow stronger by leaving the field. They grow stronger by competing, adapting, and refusing to shrink their vision of what they can be.

2026-01-07 00:16:47 CET

“If oil has to be expensive to justify military-backed extraction, then the age of cheap energy is already over.”https://www.patreon.com/posts/147593742?utm_campaign=postshare_creator

2026-01-07 00:14:07 CET

- reply

Like from nations like a military superpower?

2026-01-06 17:37:50 CET

- reply

No as in bitcoin doesn’t protect nations ?

2026-01-06 17:36:18 CET

- reply

What about states and their own sovereignty

2026-01-06 17:26:27 CET

If you think Israel controls the United States…
https://blossom.primal.net/42051c00973181770f5e0468acfd31ac104cecc3e2c9b75d779d4249b27f059e.mp4

2026-01-06 17:25:15 CET

- reply

Abuse by the United States ?

2026-01-06 16:40:47 CET

A question for MAGA …
https://blossom.primal.net/178de4dc146c278577be62dd345d360e9819cbbe80d81645f78460edcb0a1257.mp4

2026-01-06 15:02:05 CET

- reply

With debt to gpd deficit to gpd at 6 and debt growing exponentially

2026-01-06 13:30:34 CET

- reply

What’s more important oil reserves or bitcoin reserves?

2026-01-06 12:12:09 CET

Does Trump’s attempts at taking Venezuelan oil reserves show oil is more valuable then bitcoin? #oil #Venezuela #trump

2026-01-06 12:08:27 CET

- reply

Of America?

2026-01-06 12:07:28 CET

- reply

https://blossom.primal.net/ccf28a7d1421549d812c1ff0403534961c79c7c383afd548081499a8bf3fcb89.mov

2026-01-06 12:06:31 CET

- reply

People are saying trump taking the oil is some Saving Petro dollar

2026-01-06 00:41:45 CET

- reply

Post 1971 aka the petro dollar … and the worlds largest oil reserves wasn’t about oil ???

2026-01-06 00:39:30 CET

The problem with taking Venezuela oil #oil #trump #war
https://blossom.primal.net/ccf28a7d1421549d812c1ff0403534961c79c7c383afd548081499a8bf3fcb89.mov

2026-01-05 15:17:41 CET

- reply

https://www.patreon.com/posts/147468706?utm_campaign=postshare_creator

2026-01-05 15:14:21 CET

What If America Were Venezuela in 1850….

2026-01-05 13:24:57 CET

- reply

Trump: “We are finally putting America first. We are ending our policy of never ending war and regime change.”

2026-01-05 13:24:01 CET

- reply

Trump: “We are finally putting America first. We are ending our policy of never ending war and regime change.”

2026-01-05 13:23:53 CET

Trump: “We are finally putting America first. We are ending our policy of never ending war and regime change.”

2026-01-05 13:23:20 CET

- reply

Stable coins aren’t cbdc’s ?

2026-01-04 23:01:46 CET

- reply

Like Russia ?

2026-01-04 23:01:24 CET

- reply

Defense of sovereign states by using force to tell them what they can can not do ?

2026-01-04 18:54:20 CET

- reply

With bitcoin countries can bypass American dollar is that the freedom

2026-01-04 18:53:27 CET

- reply

America is freedom…peace throw imperialism

2026-01-04 18:52:49 CET

- reply

Or imperialism by America?

2026-01-04 18:04:38 CET

- reply

Well bitcoin can protect against Trump’s imperialism causing the death of the dollar

2026-01-04 18:03:32 CET

- reply

Imperialism is truth and justice?

2026-01-04 18:02:56 CET

- reply

Freedom from American imperialism?

2026-01-04 17:29:56 CET

- reply

So why is an imperialist Trump so pro bitcoin?

2026-01-04 17:28:48 CET

- reply

https://youtube.com/shorts/8a-noIa0juY?si=EXZXD1sXmMzLdNPG

2026-01-04 16:56:24 CET

- reply

Serious question for MAGA and America First supporters:
If imperial power comes at the cost of the dollar’s reserve currency status…
is that a price you’re willing to pay?
⚡ Zap if this question needs to be asked.

2026-01-04 16:55:32 CET

2026-01-03 19:20:33 CET

- reply

American oil companies doesn’t make it ours as in the government

2026-01-03 13:12:11 CET

- reply

When was the last time a bitcoin influencer has said that ?

2026-01-03 12:58:15 CET

- reply

You can’t call Bitcoin “anti-war”
and cheer when wars weaken competing states.
Pick a principle.
Zap if you agree ⚡️#bitcoin #trump #Venezuela

2026-01-03 12:54:35 CET

- reply

If “‘everything will fall in terms of bitcoin “ why work why produce anything but bitcoin. Well we won’t have to work because of ai …said sarcastically

2026-01-03 12:52:48 CET

Anti-war currency”
meets regime change.
Zap if you agree ⚡️#bitcoin #trump #Venezuela #oil

2026-01-03 12:51:41 CET

- reply

What ever happened to bitcoin being the anti war currency? #bitcoin #trump #Venezuela

2026-01-03 01:01:00 CET

- reply

Fixes a depression how
So ?

2026-01-03 00:04:32 CET

- reply

Totally disagree. Even so where is gold
price on that world

2026-01-03 00:01:37 CET

- reply

Nationalism is just as collectivist as socialism

2026-01-02 23:59:53 CET

- reply

Trump talks about “ crypto industry “
There is no crypto industry it’s all bullshit .