<unnamed>

Public Key

npub1f2d7g0p206c5nqjqfhftvrxg8u25gy6egqpv290qk27nc60k0fms43wnvu

Profile Code

nprofile1qqsy4xly8s48av2fsfqym54kpnyr792yzdv5qqk9zhst90fud8m85acpp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqpz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumn0wd68ytnwv46qu35fd2

Publishing to

nos.lol

relay.nostr.net

Last Notes

2025-06-11 17:34:28 CEST

- reply

Do you not understand the difference between a registered voter and an actual vote cast in an election? Neither article claims that related voter fraud is in any way significant, and this one even acknowledges it happens but explicitly points out that it's too rare to have an impact.
That's not to say we shouldn't clean up the rolls. We should. In small towns, it might actually be able to tip a tight race with few voters, but it's nowhere near the threat you're making it out to be.

2025-05-04 17:15:05 CEST

- reply

Making propaganda? Well do I have good news for you, then...

2025-04-24 13:58:15 CEST

- reply

I got the point of the meme, but my point is that literally everything it's saying is somehow wrong. The oil problem was real and required research and technological advancement. The ice age was one or a few at most crackpots that the scientific community didn't take serious but got spread as corporate propaganda to muddy the waters, and people still think it was a real idea 50 years later. Acid rain stopped because of air pollution regulations that governments enacted and enforced, and it probably would have devastated at least some ecosystems if allowed to continue. The ozone later was getting absolutely thrashed by CFCs and other chemicals, and they only stopped being used because of the Montreal Protocol, where many nations agreed to ban their use. The last two are just straw men of the most extreme projections, regardless of how seriously they're taken, so about as respectable as the ice age bullshit.
You're trying to say government can't solve problems while actually providing two examples of how government can solve real world problems. They're even two examples of things that very well could have becomes full on climate crises. Your evidence argues against your own point at every turn.
Not only are we fully capable of combatting climate crises as your own examples have shown, we're also fully capable of creating them. The earth is finite in size. We take substances that were removed from the atmosphere for millions of years and pour inconceivable amounts of it into the atmosphere while simultaneously cutting down huge swathes of forest that could have helped remove some of it again. We can calculate how much of these gases the human race produces, compare it to the volume of the atmosphere, calculate its impact on concentrations, and measure to confirm those calculations. We can predict, measure, and verify our impact on the environment.

2025-04-24 10:41:41 CEST

- reply

Pretty sure at least two were solved by direct government action. Definitely at least the ozone layer problem, I think but am not 100% sure the acid rain was solved largely by regulation. So the ozone, at least, is a great example of how government action can actually be wildly successful at combatting a climate crisis.