JOHNARNOLD
JOHN ARNOLD

https://preview.redd.it/sweet-man-made-horrors-beyond-my-comprehension-v0-5zs22ug9g4sa1.jpeg?width=640&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=e17931ede5ce2a84189e6eaaed830dc79cf69a9d
#nevent1q…n07d

2026-03-06 17:31:40 CET

- reply

Good time for “thebeautyofsaas” to be telling himself this

2026-03-06 16:04:47 CET

- reply

We are definitely possibly going higher and also definitely possibly going lower. Unless we stay flat, which is also definitely possible.
#nevent1q…6rxc

2026-03-06 15:29:38 CET

- reply

They also, frankly, do not seem all that concerned about hiding it

2026-03-06 15:22:31 CET

Hey anon
Yes, you
Come closer
Not everything is a distraction from the Epstein files

2026-03-05 18:27:53 CET

- reply

https://cdn-useast1.kapwing.com/static/templates/astronaut-meme-always-has-been-template-template-thumbnail-d04ae87c.webp

2026-03-05 13:08:41 CET

https://blossom.primal.net/0437daddb8252df9c12327ac85648782ebe08f799486c757814e8a2a95fe18aa.jpg

2026-03-01 13:30:42 CET

- reply

You’re absolutely right!

2026-02-25 14:09:59 CET

We’re going to win.
https://blossom.primal.net/8b231baa7fda853ebd53f83a81ce06608192f444be86928e971847fa9b4aa591.mov

2026-02-24 19:38:04 CET

- reply

https://blossom.primal.net/66c60d5a027f53cf163b34c55e2ce9139ebcab33860c120eb56c0c1fc2363b3a.jpg
#nevent1q…x6cl

2026-02-24 19:32:04 CET

- reply

PSA: the Galileo affair is a psyop
#nevent1q…qsv9

2026-02-20 19:26:58 CET

Can’t believe all the sheeple on here. All this [CURRENT THING] is obviously just a distraction from [PREVIOUS THING].

2026-02-17 20:20:20 CET

- reply

I will never forgive Sam Altman for making my beloved em dash unusable

2026-02-17 18:05:09 CET

Running list of insta-mute triggers
https://blossom.primal.net/68a8865906362ee92334557d4dad2c26a23571e7b5e5cfba3057e31a1b862621.jpg

2026-02-13 19:15:14 CET

- reply

https://lede-admin.dailydot.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/69/2024/08/dont-worry-about-it-babe-1.jpg?w=710
#nevent1q…4vjy

2026-02-11 16:10:46 CET

https://blossom.primal.net/c1dac295613e25439079cc4c44d0ae1ca6aa94762114cc8cc8c7a34e8a114fa9.png

2026-02-09 16:47:07 CET

- reply

Update: but not this
#nevent1q…uus2

2026-02-06 20:56:07 CET

- reply

“I’ve moved on to other things.”
-Satoshi, April 23, 2011 🧐
https://blossom.primal.net/3dfac7edf4ee3d9081930b3f9723bf2abdb0080de3b156f934b1b05ffce2049f.jpg
#nevent1q…cq32

2026-02-06 15:10:09 CET

https://blossom.primal.net/0acc69747fa5c6f73291c80c8b5bcab5147931e91fb3972b954b37a5eea94060.png

2026-02-06 14:57:03 CET

- reply

FWIW, this is not how it works
#nevent1q…uyt0

2026-02-05 16:18:22 CET

- reply

Secret?
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GgVoaJnXoAAfHVE.jpg

2026-02-05 14:01:37 CET

- reply

Going about as you’d expect
https://x.com/MiyaHedge/status/2019276743551463671?s=20

2026-02-05 12:41:06 CET

- reply

Officially shifting into this phase of the bear
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GR4X1XZXUAATntj.jpg
#nevent1q…0rj8

2026-02-04 16:54:52 CET

The world if we all just stayed humble and stacked sats
https://en.meming.world/images/en/thumb/a/a4/The_World_If.jpg/300px-The_World_If.jpg

2026-02-04 12:02:48 CET

It is the year of our Lord two thousand and twenty six and some of you are still out here talking about “over leveraged bitcoin treasury companies”

2026-02-03 15:25:37 CET

- reply

https://primal.net/e/nevent1qqs972p9l4alnrzq8tge4hz38m35ut5u3vvqpx2qwj7xc2su0382cgqx5xr5l

2026-02-01 12:28:03 CET

Bitcoiners: Everything you see is fake, don’t trust verify
Also bitcoiners: Every word of this terabyte document dump allegedly from the email account of one of history’s great villains is completely real and should be taken at face value

2026-02-01 11:59:34 CET

https://i.imgflip.com/aixwvf.jpg

2026-01-30 19:06:13 CET

- reply

https://sun6-19.userapi.com/eErOseAg-kgRvGEMz11WxnItAaLRMXAf2LKrgw/nbltSsPvDvc.jpg
#nevent1q…v9hw

2026-01-29 12:29:59 CET

- reply

https://i.imgflip.com/aiofh6.jpg
#nevent1q…633g

2026-01-28 16:21:25 CET

- reply

They will say things like this without ever considering that their decades of consistently making the most disqualifying decisions imaginable might suggest they should find something else to do

2026-01-26 12:52:04 CET

It’s a good time to be short any system that assumes epistemic continuity with your fellow man

2026-01-23 21:37:31 CET

- reply

https://blossom.primal.net/effb37a466531c2ab01d10b4a740ec91afbcc2127a3042c3bc644614f0804282.jpg
#nevent1q…yalx

2026-01-23 21:28:04 CET

- reply

So true

2026-01-23 17:29:55 CET

- reply

Another potential candidate to watch
https://blossom.primal.net/079358741a9445cc3913623fb4ca55104ea3909c7eeb6506839fab403fc7c840.jpg

2026-01-22 20:56:04 CET

- reply

Incidentally I think this basically captures what the next major catalyst is lol

2026-01-22 20:14:59 CET

- reply

https://blossom.primal.net/f5a3e30d8d3dcf6196121bf112b84ede90f4922eb866f9c6a534a91d6146453a.gif

2026-01-22 17:08:56 CET

- reply

For sure, makes sense

2026-01-22 17:08:39 CET

- reply

For sure, makes sense

2026-01-22 16:53:47 CET

- reply

ETFs seem to follow an existing rally, very rare that you actually see them initiate or front-run one. Getting big momentum here is helpful in sustaining a trend but I think the spark has to come from somewhere else

2026-01-21 16:27:05 CET

- reply

Probably more of a Green River guy tbh

2026-01-21 13:49:17 CET

A good talk for anyone who can’t figure out why geriatric central bankers who can barely turn on a computer are stacking atoms instead of sats
https://youtu.be/Z6qzEYxBYcQ

2026-01-21 12:27:37 CET

- reply

Believe in something
https://blossom.primal.net/8fa45541bd7bf45ed2c8d00bce5e98a9efba6274a9bb7af75a50701e273a22db.jpg
#nevent1q…gkmq

2026-01-18 13:53:41 CET

- reply

“So true”
“Anyway, back to scrolling”
#nevent1q…g3lc

2026-01-17 12:38:30 CET

You can rest assured that Trump, like any politician, will often get many things wrong, perhaps even catastrophically. But if your only mental model for him is that he’s a uniquely impulsive moron with no plan, you are going to be in for (at least) three more years of befuddlement

2026-01-16 16:07:12 CET

- reply

Addendum: Read this while groggy and just realized you wrote “private” rather than “pirate,” which makes more sense but is a significantly less entertaining image

2026-01-16 10:14:07 CET

- reply

Haven’t listened yet, just shitposting. I don’t agree with the premise of this reply (CRQC not inevitable + disagree with the subjective judgment that some “pirate VC” getting the coins is net worse for bitcoin long run than a preemptive seizure) but you and I went back and forth on this a couple weeks ago so prob no need to re-litigate here. I look forward to listening to the full rip.

2026-01-15 19:56:52 CET

- reply

https://blossom.primal.net/2e3f367b46f048fd91f4800e9a1ac2596fa621495e50169cab0fa24a1ff9fb6a.png

2026-01-14 18:28:18 CET

- reply

You can’t put a price on a quality shitpost

2026-01-14 12:57:20 CET

Never forget what they took from you
https://blossom.primal.net/19ee0d847c96bd915a8200ff5a5e02f16339ae1a07c43757ffb18d864bca7848.mov

2026-01-12 14:01:48 CET

- reply

He has stolen so much of my money this way. Maybe one day I will learn

2026-01-11 10:56:45 CET

- reply

Gotta be really exhausting for Current Thing supporters

2026-01-07 12:45:21 CET

- reply

FWIW the path of much less resistance seems to be financial (as usual). The public rhetoric on both sides is probably just kayfabe while they negotiate the final price.
https://www.wsj.com/politics/national-security/rubio-tells-lawmakers-trump-aims-to-buy-greenland-downplays-military-action-5c94e05c

2026-01-07 01:42:35 CET

- reply

*taps sign*
https://www.azquotes.com/public/picture_quotes/96/99/969991d89d98d731deef4ed0df0fa24d/c-s-lewis-349305.jpg

2026-01-06 03:05:58 CET

- reply

Applicable to a wide variety of topics

2026-01-05 14:21:40 CET

Whenever you read “let’s be clear” or some variant at the top of a post you just know you’re about to read one of the worst takes of all time

2026-01-04 17:34:51 CET

One of my key takeaways from this weekend is that Fortunate Son is way more of a banger than I remembered

2026-01-04 11:23:25 CET

- reply

https://x.com/JohnArnoldTen31/status/1997750793739305291

2026-01-03 19:48:54 CET

- reply

I am just some internet moron, but I think it’s only about oil in a limited sense
https://x.com/TMTLongShort/status/1982190436677792021

2026-01-03 14:46:12 CET

- reply

Real ones know that’s what this is actually all about

2026-01-03 14:08:06 CET

Important reminder for all you war experts today (of any persuasion)
https://unewsonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Screenshot-2024-04-02-at-6.12.55%E2%80%AFPM.png

2026-01-03 11:56:13 CET

- reply

Worth reading as this escalates:
https://medium.com/@mcnai002/the-venezuelan-drone-crisis-313dad18497d
#nevent1q…q4vv

2026-01-02 16:57:25 CET

I’ll take Headlines That Are So On the Nose They Sound Fake for $1000, Alex
https://nypost.com/2026/01/01/us-news/mamdani-fans-disappointed-by-disastrous-block-party-inauguration-with-no-food-bathrooms/

2026-01-01 12:23:12 CET

- reply

We did it boys
#nevent1q…68tp

2025-12-31 14:18:12 CET

- reply

https://external-preview.redd.it/TcloND5smg6Fy1fCNQ4jXuXN8-z1YpTaownM7NDOd_k.jpg?auto=webp&s=3083591e7ffa92300400c3748f40bf077a296973

2025-12-31 13:09:00 CET

- reply

More bitcoiners should actually read Buffett’s copious writing and research his career instead of being butthurt that a 90 year old didn’t understand the corn. You’ll find he’s largely the antithesis of the high time preference fiat world.
#nevent1q…mzk8

2025-12-31 01:46:25 CET

- reply

I think you mean the “strongly worded letter” party

2025-12-29 12:17:33 CET

- reply

If you set the over / under at 20 years, I would take the over

2025-12-26 18:09:54 CET

- reply

https://youtu.be/6_uVswLeLW4

2025-12-25 12:06:13 CET

Now ye need not fear the grave
Merry Christmas ✝️
https://youtu.be/GE4PH_Kjy0I

2025-12-24 20:34:58 CET

- reply

Democracy in action

2025-12-22 19:25:50 CET

- reply

I’ve seen enough, time to shut it all down
#nevent1q…v2kk

2025-12-21 22:39:23 CET

- reply

Source?

2025-12-21 14:36:34 CET

- reply

Think there are a couple things getting lost in translation here:
1) Re the 5%, I was going off your closing comment about “an extra million coins,” which I took to be your approximation of total coins immediately vulnerable to a CRQC at rest (very old P2PK addresses etc). I’m not sure where the latest estimate stands on that, but that delta (which you cited in your post) is what I’m responding to. But even at a 10, 20, 50% etc difference between forks, the credibility point still seems more relevant to me in the long run than the absolute number.
2) I absolutely grant that suddenly reawakening a large amount of supply at once would impact the price in the short run. I think there are reasons to be skeptical that that’s actually how it would play out, but even granting that that happened, I don’t think it’s ideal to optimize critical design questions around short-term price dynamics (Bitcoin is not a company, but any company that makes material changes to strategy to avoid temporary declines in its stock price is one you want to avoid). The future I’m imagining is one where PQC signatures / quantum-safe options exist (obviously TBD but that’s it’s own question, and pointless to worry about freezing old coins if we can’t figure that out), so “stolen” coins could only be stolen once (presumably they would quickly end up in quantum-safe addresses, even if their thieves immediately dumped them on the open market), and the price of original bitcoin therefore wouldn’t be permanently impaired. That we should look into developing quantum-safe options to make that possible is a different conversation than what we should do or not do with vulnerable coins.
3) I’m not making any philosophical claims here about Bitcoin’s nature, though I have some objections to the way you frame your comments. My point was simply about how “the market” (as you framed it) would evaluate the two hypothetical chains, and I’m saying a) that evaluation would focus more on supply credibility than just absolute number of circulating bitcoin and b) it seems there’s good reason to believe it would find the original chain more credible in its supply schedule guarantees than the other.

2025-12-21 13:21:03 CET

- reply

Some bitcoin becoming dormant because of user-side key loss (which in at least some cases could in principle be recovered, e.g. landfill guy) or voluntary user-side burning is not comparable to some bitcoin becoming forever unspendable at the network level

2025-12-21 13:16:01 CET

- reply

>”Ultimately the free market will decide”
Agree, and that’s the point I’m responding to. My view is that “the market” will value credibility of supply schedule over an absolute number of outstanding bitcoin. Maybe Matt is right that the fork would retain sufficient credibility and would ultimately win out, but I don’t think that will be on the basis of having a marginally lower supply.

2025-12-21 12:51:49 CET

- reply

Re: the point about what the market will prefer, it seems the relevant question is not just one of absolute magnitude. At the end of the day, a total supply difference of <5% is basically irrelevant if both are thought to have credibly fixed supply, but a fork with a demonstrated history of changing bitcoin’s key economic schelling point (even if it’s “just once, we swear”) arguably weakens the forward credibility of that fixity. You know more than I do about how justified that view would be wrt bitcoin’s mechanics, but IMO “the market” values the unchanging supply schedule more than the absolute number, particularly when the difference would be so small.
Much less important, but kind of related: “there will only ever be 21 million bitcoin” is a much cleaner economic coordination point than “there will only ever be 19.87 million [or whatever fractional number] bitcoin”

2025-12-20 14:37:02 CET

https://blossom.primal.net/53862913695f6d20ac49a7be3cc461192e5cd17ecb0c27cc44f527b5edea2a83.png

2025-12-19 21:05:02 CET

- reply

That’s all just engineering details

2025-12-19 19:49:22 CET

- reply

https://blossom.primal.net/41ad4d84ffe225b8ee04c8d87609fd2e6806792059fbe1d0876062ce2e3169ad.png

2025-12-19 18:55:16 CET

- reply

https://blossom.primal.net/53312c841c8cca3b4b19ed997b0139a895edbf73273198c8d6598ee38d18e704.gif

2025-12-19 16:38:52 CET

- reply

Just some yahoo on nostr who has thought about this too long

2025-12-19 16:22:40 CET

- reply

If you were the USG and wanted to build a material bitcoin position with the following constraints, how would you do it?
https://blossom.primal.net/12f2f4a2c2ea6db1e4064fecdf21400f0f05c94d90e2048c9f5ec2d2a405c61b.png

2025-12-19 10:53:17 CET

- reply

Haven’t updated since early this year but here are some thoughts.
https://www.ten31.xyz/insights/quantum-computing-bitcoin-security

2025-12-18 20:09:15 CET

- reply

Not so fast - didn’t you know we’re about to get a de minimis capital gains* tax exemption?
*on stablecoins

2025-12-18 13:50:17 CET

- reply

https://blossom.primal.net/71ad26a679b2a463a1a6a089720c7cc3f58825fba8b5cbafed7e05ff697523db.gif

2025-12-17 20:27:16 CET

I am begging y’all not to base any quantum opinions on what a random TA guru says

2025-12-16 13:51:35 CET

Perhaps one of the only useful pieces of advice I have is that if you see a chart that seems to show some absurd decline / spike in any metric in a short amount of time, it is very, very likely the result of data error or some kind of reclassification in the data series.
Doubly true if a) the chart relates to a complex and thorny topic with multivariate inputs and b) the direction of the chart plays to your confirmation bias.

2025-12-16 02:49:28 CET

- reply

Men will come back to nostr for the first time in over a month to drop a stale joke instead of just going to therapy
#nevent1q…0s9k

2025-12-12 04:13:31 CET

- reply

Sounds like something a spook would say

2025-12-09 17:08:52 CET

- reply

@nprofile…fau3 I’m mostly looking at you here

2025-12-09 17:08:27 CET

- reply

I regret to inform you all that the bull market will not actually recommence until we stop posting updates about <5% moves to random insignificant prices
#nevent1q…nj2v