<unnamed>

Public Key

npub1f3kunckqzmsxud2df6qh8c6pft00wqhla6c8yl358md4eu70825s4nh3pr

Profile Code

nprofile1qqsycmwfutqpdcrwx4x5aqtnudq54hhhqtl7avrj0c6rak6u708n42gpzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhgqg5waehxw309aex2mrp0yhxgctdw4eju6t0qyxhwumn8ghj7mn0wvhxcmmvpnnmzl

Publishing to

relay.primal.net

relay.damus.io

nos.lol

Last Notes

2026-02-24 16:50:29 CET

- reply

I was going to argue that you are confusing the defenders with the attackers... But then I remembered that you are MrHodl and have proven to be unable to understand that or acknowledge any argument. There's no point in wasting my time. All I'm going to say is that maybe, just maybe your'e just an economically iliterate stubborn opinionated pigheaded jerk and not a malicious corrupted actor. I decide to give you the benefit of the doubt. We will see.

2026-02-24 03:09:00 CET

- reply

It's a permissionless system. You dont have to like it and you dont have to run BIP110 and you dont have to mine there. Why are you such a Karen about what other people run in their nodes dude?. It's PER MI SSION LESS! If it's a silly dead on arrival idea as you have said 1000 times then it'll never activate. Dont worry! And if it does... Then remember that you are free to GFY + URSF = GFURSF

2026-02-22 03:19:06 CET

https://blossom.primal.net/00b50d504a53bbfcd1e58f72a63e748405e44e999ac40a7c92a8c1e3406c5ed5.png

2026-02-21 22:20:26 CET

- reply

I agree.
But not for the reasons you might think.

2026-02-21 22:08:05 CET

Friendly reminder that in the Bitcoin hierarchy nodes are at the top. The nodes are the boss, not the miners. The nodes are the ones who decide the changes NOT the miners. Nodes set the rules and miners obey those rules. The nodes PAY the miners. The miners are the node's employees. Never forget that because there is now an attempt by spammers, corrupted influenzors, to psyop plebs, to subvert this very healthy hierarchy and to portray miners as if they can oppose BIP110 and decide if it activates or not. THE TRUTH IS THAT MINER'S CAN'T. DONT FALL FOR IT, ITS A PSYOP. If the nodes want BIP110, then the miner's will obey because they are not stupid. They know who's paying them 3.125BTC/block. They know who gives Bitcoin value. They wont risk that to earn pennies mining big OpReturns.
https://blossom.primal.net/54d6bae7e67e93212f73ad5038acf4137e682d153f343ec980d15a81a8d1f926.png

2026-02-21 21:23:10 CET

- reply

Sí caray... justo en eso estoy ahora mismo volviendo a echar a andar mi nodo LN para poderlo conectar porque desas carteras de custodia me salen ronchas jaja! pronto pronto 😉 Mira de información te recomiendo de entrada este sitio https://bip110.org/ es un buen hub de información acerca de la propuesta.
Pero en general y en resúmen: La idea es que Bitcoin está siendo explotado como depósito de datos arbitrarios como si fuera una nube distribuida. Esa es una distorsión de su objetivo inicial, de su ethos y de su función y diseño que desde el principio ha sido la de ser dinero. BIP110 se propone restringir los datos aleatorios uqe se pueden subir en las transacciones y arreglando los bugs de taproot que están siendo explotados para subir jps, ordinales, etc. y codificar en las reglas de consenso que Bitcoin es DINERO y sólamente dinero, NO UN DEPÓSITO DE DATOS ARBITRARIOS. Tiene un componente técnico muy bien armado y complejo pero en mi perspectiva no es una propuesta esencialmente técnica sino filosófica. ¿Qué es Bitcoin en esencia y en qué debería de utilizarse los recursos de los nodos? La respuesta de BIP110 es: DINERO Y SÓLO DINERO.

2026-02-21 20:24:34 CET

- reply

Si no entiendes bien la historia detrás del conflicto, el problema que se propone corregir y los detalles de la propuesta BIP110 (lo cual es completamente comprensible) lo mejor es no tomar partido aúny comenzar por entrarle esos temas. Este problema lleva más de dos años cuajándose y mucha gente no hacía más que voltear la cabeza a un lado, minimizar el problema, burlárse, acusar de ignorantes iletrados, y gaslightear a quienes lo señalábamos. Ahora que la el softfork comienza a agarrar fuerza y popularidad y ven las muy reales posibilidades de que se active, AHORA ENTONCES sacan las uñas y nos acusan no solamente de pendejos sino de malaleches, atacando la red, etc... Son puras patadas de ahogado de quien no quería ver el problema ni enfrentarse a los argumentos y le reventó el problema en la cara. Odell es un amigacho y colega inversionista de muchos de los peores estafadores shitcoineros y spammers en el "ecosistema". Está entre la espada y la pared y todas sus opiniones acerca de BIP110 hay que entenderlas con el filtro de todos sus intereses. Esta crítica nisiquiera es una crítica, es una vil y descarada falacia ad-hominem. Yo a la orden para compartir información y perspectivas contigo cuando quieras. Saludos.

2026-02-21 18:55:09 CET

- reply

For you own reputaion's sake, I sincerely hope that you will take the time to engage in good faith with his arguments (and the BIP11O's arguments and rationale in general) and the things he responds to you here. In the meanwhile, this post is just another cheap ineffective ad-hominem.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5_aOb0Mru28

2026-02-21 15:26:12 CET

- reply

Every single new rule, law, in every governance system ever didn't have "consensus" when first proposed or conceived. Every. Single. One. Ever. That's not a problem for BIP110 nor a valid argument against it. The consensus for BIP110 is being built and looks promising.

2026-02-21 15:19:58 CET

- reply

Didn't you read what I just said? You are also stuck in the nirvana/strawman double fallacy. Honest question. Have you even read the BIP documentation?

2026-02-21 03:03:51 CET

- reply

#nevent1q…3p6h

2026-02-21 01:13:13 CET

- reply

You are fighting a windmill Matt. "Wont stop spam" is a strawman/nirvana double fallacy. BIP110 's purpose has never been to stop spam. It RATE LIMITS spam as a bonus good to have second order effect. But its real purpose is that by activating it Bitcoin will assert in the clearest strongest way possible (which is set it in consensus) that it's only valid usecase is to be MONEY and not arbitrary data storage. This has been repeated ad nauseum. Don't you agree with the premise?

2026-02-20 03:19:12 CET

- reply

Hey long time non-coder client here. Is there a reason why you haven't implemented the loan rollout option?

2026-02-20 03:03:11 CET

- reply

BIP110 proposes to fix incentives and screw the scammers but even though you re so soul hurt about the problem you somehow have found a way to justify not supporting it while being close friend of some of the worst scammers. Can't you see the performative contradiction?