<unnamed>

Public Key

npub198auqkkwueclk4u3st9r8v8yrdz4hv0e2e9epg7c7teemm3lyausht0p3g

Profile Code

nprofile1qqszn77qtt8wvu0m27gc9j3nkrjpk32mk8u4vjus50v09uuaacljw7gpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduqs6amnwvaz7tmwdaejumr0dsmje2q4

Publishing to

relay.damus.io

nos.lol

Last Notes

2026-03-04 11:05:23 CET

- reply

Wassssup?

2026-02-25 19:29:06 CET

- reply

Congrats

2026-02-25 11:39:22 CET

- reply

BIP110 will fail from preventing a chainsplit. But if you think bitcoin is really broken then you shouldn't fear a chainsplit. You should champion a chainsplit.
#FiltersUp
#BIP110

2026-02-25 11:12:34 CET

- reply

The data you made up in your head maybe.

2026-02-25 10:58:28 CET

- reply

I didn't say they did spook.

2026-02-24 17:28:02 CET

- reply

🫂

2026-02-24 17:27:24 CET

- reply

No need. Go find a local Banya.

2026-02-24 15:28:48 CET

- reply

Are you at the gym? You must be at the gyms sauan.

2026-02-24 15:21:57 CET

- reply

Im not wrong. But yes. #FiltersUp #BIP110

2026-02-24 15:01:54 CET

- reply

... thats what the blocksize limit is for. Its impossible to fight spam in a decentralized system. Satoshi knew that. Now go buy some fucking bitcoin ffs.

2026-02-24 15:00:29 CET

- reply

😂😂😂😂😂

2026-02-24 14:59:04 CET

- reply

AI agents don't chose anything. The human behind the AI bot is in full control. Stop being a retard

2026-02-24 12:47:33 CET

Two moments in Bitcoin actually had me sweating bullets.
First: Coinbase announced that basically every major exchange was ready to fork to Bitcoin Classic (total lie, but I didn't know that yet). I'd only been in for 3–4 years. I genuinely thought the network was already captured. My head wasn't fully wrapped around things.
Second one hit even harder: UASF (BIP148). I was staring down the barrel, thinking I'd have to sit my family and friends down and explain: "Hey, your wallets are connected to my BIP148 node. If things split on Aug 1, you'll hold coins on both sides at first... But after that? Any future buys, deposits, or whatever comes in...they'll be BIP148 Bitcoin, not the legacy chain the miners were trying to keep cucked under Jihan & co."
When it comes to BIP110 chmaps..there might be 2 or 3 guys the truly grasp the danger of forking without enough support. The rest are just useful idiots going for a ride.

2026-02-24 12:24:22 CET

- reply

Core doesn't answer to plebs. You're going to need to fork.

2026-02-24 12:18:48 CET

- reply

Sounds like you don't like bitcoin. That's a perfectly fine opinion to have. Countless of shitcoiners didn't like bitcoin either. So what did they do? They changed the consensus rules that fits their morals.
#FiltersUp
#BIP110

2026-02-24 12:15:12 CET

- reply

1200x? What are you talking about? The limit of OP_RETURN was always the blocksize limit. The default was set in bitcoin core, not Bitcoin. Learn the difference.
Bitcoin Core authority is powerless when it comes gatekeeping. Sub sat tx fees prove that to be true.

2026-02-24 12:12:19 CET

- reply

Are you a Craig Wright dick sucker? He kept pointing at the whitepaper.
Satoshi described bitcoin way more on the mailing thread/bitcoin talk then he ever did with the whitepaper.
But never the less... #FiltersUp #BIP110

2026-02-24 12:07:40 CET

The guy has been here for probably 10 years and has no idea that OP_RETURN was part of Bitcoin since inception. In bitcoin it has always been uncapped.
Bitcoin Core is NOT Bitcoin.
#nevent1q…8htv

2026-02-24 12:05:49 CET

- reply

Bitcoin's blockchain ( a decentralized inefficient database) takes advantage of "the nature of information being easy to spread but hard to stifle."
The blocksize limit is what prevents the chain from being to cumbersome to do the IBD.
This was always Bitcoin. The problem is your brain never had the power to grasp what this is. You needed someone to tell you what Bitcoin is.
Bitcoin isn't for everyone.

2026-02-24 11:59:25 CET

- reply

Its permsionless. Yes. Attackers will try to attack. And i wish them nothing but ill will.

2026-02-24 01:47:29 CET

- reply

60% do not support RDTD.
Liar

2026-02-24 01:46:58 CET

- reply

The entire reason you have a 55% threshold is because you know it doesn't have enough support you toothless midget.

2026-02-24 01:34:43 CET

- reply

https://image.nostr.build/38d6012208205c13dc4749675c22a1e9e2bceca6492dbddfbdeb84051f07732a.gif