MrHodl

@NVK
https://npub198auqkkwueclk4u3st9r8v8yrdz4hv0e2e9epg7c7teemm3lyausht0p3g.blossom.band/da9727155c58073b87ad99001de515bfbf9be69c662fed15d07602f6cec91a93.jpg

2026-06-12 12:56:19 UTC

Things took a turn. Light bulb went off and now I can't stop working on this.
https://npub198auqkkwueclk4u3st9r8v8yrdz4hv0e2e9epg7c7teemm3lyausht0p3g.blossom.band/8dd88cf58e21ff9c05d0f03b8332e5e7025287529a992e9c59741861409ba27c.jpg
#nevent1q…ske7

2026-06-09 21:15:31 UTC

- reply

Just asked if there’s anything like this already out there.
Apparently not really. Most local memory tools either don’t encrypt or aren’t this flexible with any model.
Feels like I’m actually promoting something that doesn’t already exist.

2026-06-09 19:03:12 UTC

- reply

The language models im using are fine on a 6 year old laptop with 16gb of ram. Nothing special.

2026-06-09 19:02:01 UTC

- reply

https://blossom.primal.net/0d2e004d2024c1c9e41e9692ce24e12bbb775f86927bbeb6f087c45f466c8716.jpg
Forgot to add this part.

2026-06-09 18:53:14 UTC

- reply

Ha! Back redundancy! I didn't even think of that! Ill ping you in the next couple of days.

2026-06-09 18:43:19 UTC

I'm building a fully offline personal memory vault. All my notes stay in simple Markdown files, everything gets embedded locally, and no matter which model I load in LM Studio, it actually remembers me and my stuff.
Feels like having my own private Grok that never forgets and never phones home.
Never in my wildest dreams did I ever think I can do something like this. Wild times.

2026-06-05 14:31:06 UTC

- reply

Bitcoin is for anyone I say its for. Now go fork off and learn.

2026-06-05 14:27:46 UTC

- reply

If youre machine cant handle running bitcoin consensus rules then it's not for you. Bitcoin isn't for eveyone. Ive been repeating this for over a decade.

2026-06-05 14:22:45 UTC

- reply

Shut the fuck. It does not "affect node runners."
Now kindly fuck off.

2026-06-05 14:18:21 UTC

- reply

I don't care about it. It doesn't effect me at all. They're going to die. And if it doesn't die that's not my problen either.

2026-06-05 14:13:56 UTC

- reply

BIp144 (segwit) had supper majority.. which justified BIP 148.
I don't need BIP 110. I like bitcoin just the way it is. Now fuck off.

2026-06-05 14:04:00 UTC

- reply

No. The only people who think changing policy (no consensus EVER needed) can attack bitcoin are people who are technically incapable of grasping what bitcoin is and how bitcoin works.
Anything within consensus rules is in play. When you try changing bitcoin's consensus rules without super majority support thats when you attack bitcoin.
Trying to 51% attack the network is an attack. It's not my problem if you can't understand that.

2026-06-05 13:51:48 UTC

- reply

Okay? What does that have to do with my bitcoin? Don't run a version of core you think is comprised?

2026-06-05 13:33:32 UTC

- reply

I don't support shitcoiners. I support bitcoin. I love bitcoin more than I hate shitcoins.
Also... I like to shill shitcoins to people I dislike.

2026-06-05 13:29:29 UTC

- reply

Hes got lots of kids. He lost most if not all his bitcoin. Even crazy people have their limits. We'll see though.

2026-06-05 13:25:38 UTC

- reply

Watch and learn how this plays out. You'll either turn tk shitcoining or leave the place entirely.
Good luck

2026-06-05 13:10:01 UTC

- reply

What you think and what it is is irrelevant. BIP110 is an attack on the network and you're just one of the useful idiots like and Mechanic are counting on.

2026-06-05 13:06:04 UTC

- reply

55% activation threshold is the attack.

2026-06-05 12:56:27 UTC

- reply

The way it is written its an attack.

2026-06-05 12:48:13 UTC

- reply

Yes. Fuck them. But also fuck the BIP 110 attackers.

2026-06-05 12:44:35 UTC

- reply

Honestly... unless they're willing to sustain the minority fork (i doubt it) this entire thing will be a non event.

2026-06-05 11:13:53 UTC

I will never forgive Mechanic for making me break my own rule. He's a pathetic liar trying to make it seem that BIP110 is the same thing as BIP148.
#nevent1q…65q9

2026-06-02 14:59:02 UTC

- reply

#BringBackXotica

2026-05-31 15:37:20 UTC

- reply

🫂

2026-05-31 14:59:35 UTC

- reply

I mean..I haven't been around here much ... but right before he left Twitter he most definitely was a decentralized sovereign maxi. He was one of us. I have a hard time seeing him as being a fraud.

2026-05-31 14:53:35 UTC

- reply

Matt is fraud? Wut

2026-05-31 14:52:22 UTC

- reply

Yeah.. but why? Matt usually is a decentralized sovereign maxi. Why invest in something like that? I'm missing something

2026-05-31 14:51:07 UTC

TIL that Primal is the enemy of Nostr.
#nevent1q…ndvd

2026-05-31 14:46:49 UTC

- reply

How's your engagement going on here?

2026-05-31 14:45:57 UTC

- reply

I dont nostr

2026-05-31 14:43:42 UTC

- reply

Ohhhh this is about money.

2026-05-31 14:42:40 UTC

- reply

.... what does that matter? Im lost

2026-05-31 14:41:54 UTC

- reply

AHH, So primal is kinda like a trusted 3rd party when it comes to viewing posts. @ODELL ny3tkh0acurzla8x3zy4nhrjz5zd8l9sy9jys09umwng00manysew95gx ... why do you like it?

2026-05-31 13:36:23 UTC

- reply

..... okay ... hear me out. People should be able to moderate their servers however they want. If someone doesn't want you on their relay because of the color shirt you're wearing they should be able to kick you out. The entire point of nostr is that you can connect to multiple relays, no?

2026-05-31 13:18:49 UTC

- reply

Ahhh the good ole censorship conversation. Moderation is one hell of a responsibility. Good luck.

2026-05-31 13:15:46 UTC

- reply

Oh man. There's drama on here too? @nprofile…vgs2 ... what's the issue bud?

2026-05-31 13:04:26 UTC

- reply

Say word

2026-05-31 13:03:15 UTC

- reply

One of the thesis for me getting into Bitcoin is that humans shouldn't have to gamble to beat inflation. I'm glad that one worked out for me.

2026-05-31 12:58:20 UTC

- reply

#BitcoinOnly
#BitcoinRetard
#Me

2026-05-31 12:07:24 UTC

Force BIP324 v2 Only
Bitcoin Core patch that makes your node use **only encrypted v2 connections**:
• Drops inbound v1 peers (most spies)
• Enforces v2 on outbound
• Stronger privacy
https://gist.github.com/MrHodlX/2076956bd4eead157ca2742f15c7ce28
git apply force-bip324-v2.patch
Best on nodes with existing peers.dat .
#nevent1q…x6kz

2026-05-31 11:04:28 UTC

The patch forces your node to only talk to peers using BIP324 v2 encrypted transport. Right now most spies on the network are still using the old unencrypted v1 connections while they request transaction relay and hoover up data. This patch drops those v1 relay peers on inbound and strictly enforces v2 on outbound so the spies get disconnected fast.
At the same time, it pushes the whole network toward real privacy through encryption without breaking blocks only connections or dnsseeds. The network gets stronger and harder to surveil the more nodes run it. That's pretty much it.
#nevent1q…trws

2026-05-31 10:38:07 UTC

- reply

Yep, majority of people aren't even reachable. Im not worried about 50% of the node runners changing any settings.
V1 spy nodes tend to reconnect very aggressively. As soon as I disconnect they try reconnecting. It's annoying.
(which is why this patch only logs what its doing if net debugging is enabled.. otherwise it's too chatty)

2026-05-31 10:18:24 UTC

Bitcoiners: In the literal sense...
Would you run a Bitcoin Core patch that disconnects v1 peers and only keeps BIP324 (v2 transport) peers?
It advertises NODE_P2P_V2, drops outbound v1 peers, drops relay peers using v1, and drops peers claiming v2 support while connecting via v1.
I think it's exactly what the network needs to speed BIP324 adoption, but I could be wrong.

2026-05-25 18:36:19 UTC

- reply

https://blossom.primal.net/3f767cda7811e89a29883cc5bff9e86ef2f226391097e9f12b03f8affb3715af.jpg

2026-05-25 13:33:46 UTC

https://x.com/i/status/2058888274454663221
Probably good idea to share this here too.

2026-05-18 09:10:20 UTC

- reply

I thought all the retarded retards are on twitter with me? 😂
#nevent1q…m5wt

2026-04-30 21:15:47 UTC

Hodlonaut is a useful idiot. #Bitcoin
#nevent1q…mcsh

2026-04-09 14:19:31 UTC

- reply

Lies

2026-04-09 14:18:59 UTC

- reply

..... sounds like a bitcoin maximalist. A lot of them will do anything for more bitcoin. Including scamming.

2026-03-24 12:09:33 UTC

Knots version 2.0 😂
https://blossom.primal.net/10bb434b91a3c924419da56615a5c6040e7ca924943706078fde93440fd5fa19.jpg

2026-03-04 10:05:23 UTC

- reply

Wassssup?

2026-02-28 12:01:14 UTC

- reply

Can I get a link to the tweet?

2026-02-26 13:55:08 UTC

- reply

Yes. But I will continue to using Comcast even though I know pedos use the same ISP. Go after the pedos not the isp

2026-02-26 12:07:13 UTC

- reply

Yes. Of course. As the general public adopts bitcoin node usage the dumber the ecosystem becomes. #Osification

2026-02-26 11:56:58 UTC

- reply

I'm going to do a spaces on twitter later. When are you free

2026-02-26 11:50:12 UTC

#nevent1q…al3d

2026-02-26 11:49:48 UTC

- reply

Still no

2026-02-25 18:29:06 UTC

- reply

Congrats

2026-02-25 10:39:22 UTC

- reply

BIP110 will fail from preventing a chainsplit. But if you think bitcoin is really broken then you shouldn't fear a chainsplit. You should champion a chainsplit.
#FiltersUp
#BIP110

2026-02-25 10:12:34 UTC

- reply

The data you made up in your head maybe.

2026-02-25 09:58:28 UTC

- reply

I didn't say they did spook.

2026-02-24 16:28:02 UTC

- reply

🫂

2026-02-24 16:27:24 UTC

- reply

No need. Go find a local Banya.

2026-02-24 14:28:48 UTC

- reply

Are you at the gym? You must be at the gyms sauan.

2026-02-24 14:21:57 UTC

- reply

Im not wrong. But yes. #FiltersUp #BIP110

2026-02-24 14:01:54 UTC

- reply

... thats what the blocksize limit is for. Its impossible to fight spam in a decentralized system. Satoshi knew that. Now go buy some fucking bitcoin ffs.

2026-02-24 14:00:29 UTC

- reply

😂😂😂😂😂

2026-02-24 13:59:04 UTC

- reply

AI agents don't chose anything. The human behind the AI bot is in full control. Stop being a retard

2026-02-24 11:47:33 UTC

Two moments in Bitcoin actually had me sweating bullets.
First: Coinbase announced that basically every major exchange was ready to fork to Bitcoin Classic (total lie, but I didn't know that yet). I'd only been in for 3–4 years. I genuinely thought the network was already captured. My head wasn't fully wrapped around things.
Second one hit even harder: UASF (BIP148). I was staring down the barrel, thinking I'd have to sit my family and friends down and explain: "Hey, your wallets are connected to my BIP148 node. If things split on Aug 1, you'll hold coins on both sides at first... But after that? Any future buys, deposits, or whatever comes in...they'll be BIP148 Bitcoin, not the legacy chain the miners were trying to keep cucked under Jihan & co."
When it comes to BIP110 chmaps..there might be 2 or 3 guys the truly grasp the danger of forking without enough support. The rest are just useful idiots going for a ride.

2026-02-24 11:24:22 UTC

- reply

Core doesn't answer to plebs. You're going to need to fork.

2026-02-24 11:18:48 UTC

- reply

Sounds like you don't like bitcoin. That's a perfectly fine opinion to have. Countless of shitcoiners didn't like bitcoin either. So what did they do? They changed the consensus rules that fits their morals.
#FiltersUp
#BIP110

2026-02-24 11:15:12 UTC

- reply

1200x? What are you talking about? The limit of OP_RETURN was always the blocksize limit. The default was set in bitcoin core, not Bitcoin. Learn the difference.
Bitcoin Core authority is powerless when it comes gatekeeping. Sub sat tx fees prove that to be true.

2026-02-24 11:12:19 UTC

- reply

Are you a Craig Wright dick sucker? He kept pointing at the whitepaper.
Satoshi described bitcoin way more on the mailing thread/bitcoin talk then he ever did with the whitepaper.
But never the less... #FiltersUp #BIP110

2026-02-24 11:07:40 UTC

The guy has been here for probably 10 years and has no idea that OP_RETURN was part of Bitcoin since inception. In bitcoin it has always been uncapped.
Bitcoin Core is NOT Bitcoin.
#nevent1q…8htv

2026-02-24 11:05:49 UTC

- reply

Bitcoin's blockchain ( a decentralized inefficient database) takes advantage of "the nature of information being easy to spread but hard to stifle."
The blocksize limit is what prevents the chain from being to cumbersome to do the IBD.
This was always Bitcoin. The problem is your brain never had the power to grasp what this is. You needed someone to tell you what Bitcoin is.
Bitcoin isn't for everyone.

2026-02-24 10:59:25 UTC

- reply

Its permsionless. Yes. Attackers will try to attack. And i wish them nothing but ill will.

2026-02-24 00:47:29 UTC

- reply

60% do not support RDTD.
Liar

2026-02-24 00:46:58 UTC

- reply

The entire reason you have a 55% threshold is because you know it doesn't have enough support you toothless midget.

2026-02-24 00:34:43 UTC

- reply

https://image.nostr.build/38d6012208205c13dc4749675c22a1e9e2bceca6492dbddfbdeb84051f07732a.gif