mouhead3000
Mouhead

Freedom is the sea.
Individuality is the course you set.

Public Key

npub12wzlyxdcgtmtk7z6wsa9fty7fyu0kqzd5w7vdfrs0l0fy6pmj09szpept8

Profile Code

nprofile1qqs98p0jrxuy9a4m0pd8gwj54j0yjw8mqpx680xx53c8lh5jdqae8jcpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduq32amnwvaz7tmjv4kxz7fwdehhxarj9ehx2aqpp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqpzdmhxue69uhhyetvv9ukzcnvv5hx7un8qyf8wumn8ghj7ur4wfcxcetsv9njuetnqythwumn8ghj7cmjv4shgu3wdehhxarj9emkjmn95jc3ms

Publishing to

Author Public Key

npub12wzlyxdcgtmtk7z6wsa9fty7fyu0kqzd5w7vdfrs0l0fy6pmj09szpept8

Show more details

Last Notes

2026-01-11 22:44:05 CET

A boat can't carry everything you love.

2025-12-16 01:09:28 CET

The yearning for freedom is anti-structural.
Individuality is creative.
Freedom creates space.
Individuality fills it.
Freedom is the sea.
Individuality is the course you set.
Many people have individuality without freedom
→ they decorate their prison.
Others have freedom without individuality
→ they drift.
Still others have neither.
I am both.

2025-12-13 00:46:38 CET

Vastness without demands
No counterpart who wants something
Movement without a goal

2025-12-07 15:42:59 CET

- reply

Nothing has value. You give value to things.

2025-12-05 13:28:33 CET

I will not let any unlived opportunity die.

2025-11-30 11:51:13 CET

- reply

or something you have a need for and would have bought anyway on that day

2025-11-30 11:26:17 CET

- reply

A group's identity arises from internal commonalities and external perceptions of the enemy. This is why a collective cannot structurally establish genuine peace.
An individual, on the other hand, interacts with others without this automatic boundary mechanism. Peace is a decision made by one person toward another. As soon as you place it in the hands of a collective, peace becomes a tool of power and harmony a pretext for conflict.

2025-11-29 14:51:18 CET

Property means risk. Freedom means isolation. Sovereignty means you can't blame anyone else if you fail. That's precisely what most people don't want.

2025-11-29 11:54:29 CET

- reply

Religions fail to achieve peace because their claim to absolute truth automatically creates boundaries, competition, and therefore conflict.

2025-11-04 22:40:51 CET

I always invest your sats in beer.

2025-10-28 20:01:46 CET

https://blossom.primal.net/124d5aebe60afe349190807fb5bd0f344be8fd30321ccb0976879eed7e36df0a.jpg

2025-10-28 09:43:51 CET

never fall in love with any asset

2025-10-18 02:19:40 CEST

People flee from themselves as if their ego were a predator.
They call it morality, duty, love, responsibility, but in truth, it is only fear of facing themselves.
https://image.nostr.build/c5d371b5d04376508b2e19a8d5f5273226c6b00b20cc24ee1f123ced4b8883be.gif

2025-10-04 01:02:39 CEST

it goes much further down than up
https://image.nostr.build/eaf5bbcab2eaca91713bdfffc799fa9e354cdad01c375352b98fee1320f226b0.gif

2025-10-04 00:24:03 CEST

- reply

https://image.nostr.build/6a87b4ead06a4f7ce4e1e5a98bbcf4ff6962a0167d247890b19898d9e9a613eb.gif

2025-10-03 23:48:43 CEST

homo sapiens is the enemy

2025-09-19 23:27:19 CEST

- reply

name characteristics that indicate that an action is truly selfless.

2025-09-19 23:21:53 CEST

- reply

even if not

2025-09-19 23:17:33 CEST

There is no altruism. Every action is essentially selfish. The dead no longer notice anything. Suffering exists only in the survivor.

2025-09-08 12:57:24 CEST

The collective is like an invisible parasite that only lives because people consider themselves its organs.

2025-08-26 23:09:47 CEST

you can still say altcoin
https://image.nostr.build/4246f91f37a9713efc540b185324e8d2de4073d62d9447a54a721a46d05c0369.gif

2025-08-26 11:44:51 CEST

Without defining value for myself, I’d just live someone else’s definition.

2025-08-20 16:23:50 CEST

Anyone who was truly free would never have believed in the revolution, but would have enriched themselves in the rubble or left the farm.

2025-08-18 12:29:17 CEST

Communist art is vomit for the people. True art is the cry of the individual.

2025-08-17 01:56:18 CEST

Because it is 'family',
it seems like a law of nature,
not a power play.

2025-08-05 12:33:29 CEST

what is the next smallest step?

2025-08-04 19:55:49 CEST

https://image.nostr.build/b0c23c39b7242652a3d1684635dd5fb784f08585f0645cc6f6b8fef2f0a9ad40.gif

2025-08-04 19:50:13 CEST

Finding yourself
is much harder
than losing yourself.

2025-08-03 11:01:52 CEST

- reply

I like the things you do,
more than the words you say

2025-08-03 00:18:42 CEST

https://image.nostr.build/5b211ffd0b8870f5b9e0f546e4de5eae266ad0dda154033ab870947ac54e6f8f.gif

2025-08-02 20:17:55 CEST

- reply

I agree.
For me, Le Bon analyzed the character of the masses most precisely.

2025-08-02 19:57:58 CEST

- reply

Max Stirner said that earlier and more beautifully.

2025-08-02 19:40:23 CEST

- reply

Systems need equality.
Individuals are inequality.
Doesn't fit.

2025-08-02 01:51:51 CEST

Then I am body
and thought rests within me
like a sleeping child.

2025-08-02 00:07:55 CEST

https://blossom.primal.net/b632079f6d861227766797d1fc14ffcc277e32fa9f78605b8d959b7754abe32c.jpg

2025-08-01 23:29:31 CEST

NAP requires equality. A communist dream

2025-08-01 13:28:41 CEST

The world,
you,
the pain,
the understanding
they dance within you.
And this dance is not meant to be
understood.
It is meant to be danced.

2025-07-31 23:36:47 CEST

Being free is the saddest and most beautiful thing at the same time

2025-07-31 00:57:21 CEST

I hate harmony
I love violence

2025-07-30 02:51:32 CEST

- reply

you are exactly the sort of loser I like to kill

2025-07-30 02:39:54 CEST

- reply

No.

2025-07-30 02:34:03 CEST

- reply

I'm talking about subjective value theory, and you?

2025-07-30 02:31:22 CEST

- reply

what's your point?

2025-07-30 02:20:55 CEST

- reply

https://image.nostr.build/e722faf9385f15adf79e44d825aa751170fce76a57194af31bd7fa4dbd516a2b.gif

2025-07-30 02:12:30 CEST

- reply

https://image.nostr.build/186bcf3045c80efb17a8ce866f0c73d752c28d736a8af29848d01173f72500ae.gif

2025-07-28 12:51:07 CEST

Concept of freedom is a product of your biochemistry. Women always have this kind of Ayn Rand individualism. Men tend to dominant Stirner individualism. Evolution has given both a reason. Biology knows the difference.

2025-07-28 00:43:45 CEST

https://blossom.primal.net/86ae14c30a1ce477b88d6abf3c0b346400818eb6d8c2613c8de2d8dbe802877c.png

2025-07-27 00:51:23 CEST

I usually use manipulation skills and physical weapons to get you to hand over your Butcoin.

2025-07-27 00:27:36 CEST

https://blossom.primal.net/62eedce18a9e79ec7e12da14fc7d029f0b975e16c1ffe3aee53ef71450741b8d.jpg

2025-07-26 22:43:16 CEST

If I see value in something, it has high marginal utility. What I'm willing to sacrifice for it is my marginal cost. The potential gain from sacrificing it for something else is my opportunity cost. There's nothing more to it.

2025-07-26 21:18:16 CEST

https://image.nostr.build/fad4c4534134ea06ce7517faa196a1a9c45b3fa881e4a22b5a928b8e35523045.gif

2025-07-24 16:09:19 CEST

when you stop translating yourself
silence becomes a language

2025-07-21 14:07:44 CEST

Until at some point you no longer say
"Soon."
But:
"Now."

2025-07-20 11:54:40 CEST

no one can free humanity

2025-07-18 00:04:18 CEST

He who loves does not possess.
He who wants to possess does not love.
Everything else is a lie.

2025-07-11 20:22:18 CEST

Belonging to yourself is the most beautiful violence I know

2025-07-07 00:32:44 CEST

You can accumulate a lot of tools without being a craftsman.

2025-06-27 11:32:58 CEST

Democracy means two wolves and a sheep voting on what to have for dinner.
But it also means two sheep and a wolf voting on it. The wolf is then simply forced to eat grass.

2025-06-14 21:07:43 CEST

- reply

Mises, Hayek and Rothbard rejected government monetary expansion, which means keeping the money supply constant or decreasing.
Rothbard was against the state and didn't know about crypto, so gold was money for him. With a natural upper limit.
Hayek wanted currency competition and was in favor of deflationary currencies becoming dominant in the market.

2025-06-14 20:09:07 CEST

- reply

https://image.nostr.build/4ef061f9e002cda603ff47925b3f3e042e6b219e31f889bc722c9645288dfa19.jpg

2025-06-14 19:12:17 CEST

- reply

No saving = no capital.
No capital = no investment.
No investment = no growth.
No growth = stagnation & poverty.
Consumption alone doesn’t build wealth. It burns it.

2025-06-14 18:46:39 CEST

- reply

Exactly, no coercion.
The saver enables capital formation by delaying consumption.
Without savings, those ventures you speak of wouldn’t have capital to operate.
Calling that a free ride is like calling oxygen a parasite for feeding fire.

2025-06-14 17:33:22 CEST

- reply

If hoarders just sit on their stack, how exactly does the purchasing power of their money increase without others voluntarily producing more goods and services?
Who is forcing anyone to produce for them?

2025-06-14 17:15:55 CEST

- reply

You confuse doing nothing with deferring consumption.
Savings provide the capital that makes production possible - no capital, no entrepreneurship.
The helmet is for those who think you can have investment without prior savings.

2025-06-14 17:06:03 CEST

- reply

There’s never a guaranteed return in a free market. The risk is real: time, uncertainty, technological shifts, and opportunity cost.

2025-06-14 01:06:16 CEST

- reply

Savers take risks - the risk of opportunity costs, future uncertainty, and deferred consumption.
Without savers, there is no capital to deploy. Entrepreneurs rely on deferred consumption to finance production.
Calling voluntary exchange "structural redistribution" is absurd - it's basic market coordination, not socialism.
Socialism is forced redistribution.

2025-06-14 00:54:45 CEST

- reply

This is closely related to the marginal utility and marginal costs of the individual.

2025-06-14 00:39:57 CEST

- reply

Ayn Rand is a woman who loves harmony. I believe in Darwinism and survival of the fittest.

2025-06-14 00:29:09 CEST

- reply

You're based, fren. For me, there's nothing negative about the amount of money going down. Most people don't even understand money.

2025-06-13 23:53:36 CEST

- reply

because you are a marxist and do not understand subjective value theory

2025-06-13 23:50:04 CEST

- reply

who is in the kage to create added value for others

2025-06-13 23:30:42 CEST

- reply

creation of value

2025-06-13 23:18:47 CEST

- reply

No, capital and money aren’t the same.
Inflation steals purchasing power via dilution, deflation rewards patience as others voluntarily increase production.
Deflation doesn’t siphon - it reflects higher output chasing stable money.
Inflation misallocates capital, deflation corrects it.

2025-06-13 23:05:07 CEST

- reply

The saver earns purchasing power because they delayed consumption and allowed capital to be allocated by others who took the risk.
Without savers, there is no capital pool to finance production at all.
The increase in purchasing power is the market reward for patience and for not consuming scarce resources prematurely.
That’s called time preference, a term in austrian economics, long before bitcoin.

2025-06-13 22:44:58 CEST

- reply

Deflation doesn't deprive anyone of capital. No one is expropriated, no one is exploited.
Well, maybe tortured at some point.

2025-06-13 22:34:40 CEST

The opposite of sovereignty is hell.
Because the loss of self-determination tears people apart.
Foreign rule is not just a lack of freedom - it is the dissolution of one's own being.

2025-06-13 22:09:57 CEST

- reply

No. You’re confusing incentive with entitlement.
In a deflationary system, holders earn increased purchasing power because they delay consumption, which is itself a form of economic discipline, not parasitism.
Investors have no guaranteed nominal growth. they must create real value, otherwise they simply don’t earn capital at all.
The fact that unproductive capital fears deflation proves its fragility.
Permanent mild deflation driven by productivity is not a bug - it’s the healthiest form of wealth distribution.
And please stop whitewashing Keynes: he was the pioneer of government monetary control, even if today's MMT supporters are now even surpassing him.
You’re not debating Bitcoin maxis - you’re debating economic reality.

2025-06-13 20:53:45 CEST

- reply

∑(hate) = Σ(hateable objects × hate intensity) ⇒ finite
∑(love) = Σ(objects × forms of love × reinterpretations × reproductions) ⇒ potentially infinite

2025-06-13 20:45:18 CEST

- reply

This is Keynesian thinking. Deflation only disadvantages investors who rely on debt and credit-financed expansion, because falling prices increase their fixed cost burden and real debt burden.

2025-06-13 19:53:50 CEST

- reply

Rothbard said the size of the money supply is not important as long as money production follows the market process. He was therefore implicitly in favor of a naturally limited money supply whose growth is extremely slow.
True, no one called for artificial deflation. But he viewed productivity-driven deflation as healthy.
Why do you view maximally deflationary environment so critically?

2025-06-13 19:27:42 CEST

- reply

Rothbard advocated a fixed money supply and saw deflation as a consequence of economic growth.

2025-06-13 19:08:55 CEST

- reply

💯

2025-06-06 14:54:06 CEST

- reply

individualist

2025-06-06 13:42:57 CEST

The only legitimate focus is the self.

2025-06-06 11:42:44 CEST

Objectivity is a useful fiction, a methodical approach to intersubjective understanding. But it is not a metaphysically existing entity. Those who claim to be objective either ignore their own blind spots or exercise domination through apparent neutrality.

2025-05-30 10:33:49 CEST

- reply

buy high sell low

2025-05-29 23:03:55 CEST

- reply

I just wanted to say that freedom does not depend on whether heart, mind and soul are aligned

2025-05-29 21:26:19 CEST

- reply

What you worship will shape your destiny - whether it is god, money, power, love or your own reflection.

2025-05-29 20:41:54 CEST

- reply

no government is useful

2025-05-29 20:29:38 CEST

- reply

Give me madness in freedom instead of order in bondage.

2025-05-29 20:17:24 CEST

- reply

The desire for inner harmony is often nothing more than a fear of inner conflict. Truly free is someone who doesn't fear their fragmentation, but rather lives it consciously.

2025-05-29 20:09:08 CEST

- reply

The idea of a soul mate is a culturally cultivated placebo against existential emptiness.

2025-05-29 18:21:07 CEST

who does not understand himself will not understand subjective value theory

2025-04-20 12:58:54 CEST

it is a weakness to want to be liked by others

2025-01-07 12:58:08 CET

- reply

Self-sufficiency does not mean that I do not form connections, but that I form connections that are appropriate for me, not out of a lack. Self-love does not have to be enough, it just has to be strong enough to protect me from dependence and self-abandonment.

2025-01-02 23:44:06 CET

- reply

bitcoin and monero serve different purposes

2024-09-05 01:25:51 CEST

#nostr is an iq test
#bitcoin is an ego test
Or was it the other way around? From now on, both simply apply to both.

2024-09-04 01:20:49 CEST

#nostr
https://m.primal.net/KcwZ.jpg

2024-08-30 19:51:01 CEST

- reply

strong individual does not inevitably lead to a strong society

2024-08-27 21:06:40 CEST

finally decided to join the cool kids