marksn

Saylor now has 2.55bn in USD reserves. The whole strc death spiral bullshit is done. This bear market is coming to it's end. Sellors are exhausted and 58k gang hold up strong so far.
Final days and weeks of cheap sats imo.

2026-07-06 12:12:32 UTC

accounting wise it totally makes sense that saylor sold some high priced coins.
maybe a lot of people finally respect bitcoins liquidity.
now let's move on.

2026-07-03 21:21:16 UTC

- reply

legend

2026-07-01 17:43:47 UTC

Lightning volume up a lot the past days. Great to see! ~ 700 percent outbound utilization the past 7 days 🔥

2026-06-30 10:24:35 UTC

- reply

Takes longer than charging an electric vehicle 😎

2026-06-27 09:59:20 UTC

Everyone thought the 4 year cycle is dead, now everyone thinks the 4 year cycle is intact.
Bitcoin often does the opposite.
Have a great weekend.

2026-06-23 08:05:50 UTC

GM.
You are only a trillionaire when you can spend a trillion in bitcoin or gold.
It's not possible with stocks.

2026-06-22 12:05:06 UTC

- reply

...Or/and highly leveraged fiat players. At least a massive test for the product.
#nevent1q…g8f7

2026-06-11 11:18:04 UTC

- reply

do not underestimate the mi-cuit tuna 🥳

2026-06-11 11:06:39 UTC

GM🧡
https://blossom.primal.net/63dc1452fdcdb4faa5254d1354a93948e2e58cdac9eda1529c81ecf4e584c6fa.jpg

2026-06-06 11:09:57 UTC

Cheers to the weekend. With Bitcoin at its current price, it’s canned beer only for now.
Stay humble and stack sats.
https://blossom.primal.net/87989ee776495aff95536a1c5c8deb4d729cac3de66bfcbe018764e1a978e13e.jpg

2026-06-06 05:47:06 UTC

- reply

Let's see if he was right. He called 40k. We are still at 60.

2026-06-05 05:47:53 UTC

GM
https://blossom.primal.net/844a7fcbca13f84967a405ac3a4536010429fd5f366cb37c3214d82beba5dbc3.jpg

2026-06-05 05:44:51 UTC

Did they finally made enough cash manipulating the bitcoin zcash trade?
Is the zcash shit finally imploding?
What a scam the past months.

2026-06-04 01:19:02 UTC

GM. 1000km ahead. Vacation time 🧡

2026-06-02 14:37:03 UTC

- reply

🤦‍♂️😂
#nevent1q…69tc

2026-05-28 09:17:35 UTC

- reply

💯 Exactly. The orange ties swapped "freedom money" for "digital Manhattan real estate" and now everyone's wondering why they shouldn't just buy NVDA instead.
But the protocol doesn't care about Saylor's narrative. Cypherpunk ethos is still there underneath. The re-discovery is inevitable.
Stack real bitcoin. Not that ETF-wrapped corporate paper.

2026-05-28 06:40:20 UTC

- reply

GM
#nevent1q…gvzw

2026-05-27 16:37:32 UTC

- reply

https://blossom.primal.net/eacfa56f1ee84a1049ee97af4889088fbf35fbb8acda26193119e7c0cfeba773.gif
#nevent1q…uwnl

2026-05-27 11:36:50 UTC

- reply

den bauen die chinesen für 30k wenn sie wollen

2026-05-27 11:36:02 UTC

- reply

nothing to see here. just the normal fiat system collapsing in real time.
#nevent1q…2w8l

2026-05-25 07:44:34 UTC

2026-05-24 08:05:37 UTC

- reply

rausswappen oder jemand der nen channel zu dir aufmacht...

2026-05-22 20:45:19 UTC

- reply

looks like Laslo bought some expensive pizzas again today...

2026-05-21 06:29:28 UTC

- reply

GM
https://blossom.primal.net/f44bd7d838db2f271e948b9210f1483571be3ff3103c8f00b04962170a3e3581.gif

2026-05-20 21:26:32 UTC

@nprofile…2j5g hat gestern seinen "keine Twitter-Argumente mehr"-Vorsatz gebrochen. Der Auslöser: NIP-2332 — on-chain zaps auf Nostr. Vitor und Alex (Amethyst/Soapbox) haben das Ding gebaut, es funktioniert, und ihre Haltung ist "warum also nicht als Option anbieten?"
Gigis Antwort: Careful, Icarus.
Er ist nicht gegen den Spirit. Jeder npub sollte einfach Geld senden und empfangen können. Aber die konkrete Implementierung ist eine tickende Bombe. Warum?
Der Vorschlag leitet eine statische Bitcoin-Adresse vom npub ab. Das kettet deine Online-Identität unauflöslich an On-Chain-Aktivität. Alles was du je mit diesen Sats machst — für immer sichtbar. Kein "Wallet verloren, keine Ahnung". Plausible deniability: komplett tot.
Und das ist nicht abstrakt. Gigi listet reale Fälle der letzten 18 Monate: Ein 38-jähriger Chinese, gefesselt und vergraben. Ein Ehepaar mit Tochter, stundenlang als Geiseln gehalten. Leute die zu Hause überfallen und zu Bitcoin-Transfers gezwungen wurden. Jedes Mal wussten die Angreifer: diese Person hat Bitcoin.
Mit On-Chain-Zaps lieferst du diesen Beweis kryptografisch signiert gleich mit.
Sein Punkt ist nicht dass Zaps privat sein müssen — die sind öffentlich, ok. Aber Lightning verhindert dass man deine gesamte Finanzhistorie und Zukunft durchleuchten kann. On-Chain invited dazu ein.
Und der vielleicht wichtigste Punkt: Address Reuse schadet nicht nur dir. Es verkleinert die Anonymitätsmenge für ALLE im Netzwerk. Du machst Bitcoin für jeden unsicherer.
Der Jurassic-Park-Moment: Nur weil wirs bauen können, heißt das nicht dass wirs sollten.
Imho Gigi hat recht. Zaps gehören nicht auf die Chain.
Wir sollten bei Lightning bleiben!

2026-05-19 19:56:57 UTC

- reply

uiii promising stuff 🧡

2026-05-19 07:22:49 UTC

GM friends! What a wonderful day 🧡

2026-05-19 07:22:17 UTC

- reply

gM bro

2026-05-18 20:50:32 UTC

- reply

real slim satoshi 😂
#nevent1q…65pt

2026-05-17 19:16:47 UTC

- reply

fiat rugpull at its best. stay safe
#nevent1q…pev5

2026-05-16 17:33:57 UTC

- reply

annoying this zcash shit. washing money through zcash -> lightning.

2026-05-15 19:51:06 UTC

- reply

Italy we are coming 🤦‍♂️

2026-05-15 19:25:44 UTC

In my opinion, one of the biggest risks associated with Strc and Sata is that shitcoins are building their yield products on top of them and rug-pulling newcomers, which could lead to a significant loss of trust among these companies' preferred stockholders.
Especially if these shitcoins are leveraged, unvetted, and unsecured.

2026-05-15 17:53:32 UTC

- reply

The same principles like stretch. Speculation on a higher bitcoin return than 13 percent. Borrowing money from the bond market. In the end its an speculative attack on fiat. The key factor will be having enough liquid capital to pay the dividends during months or years of sideways or downtrend times of bitcoin.

2026-05-15 17:41:20 UTC

While banks and senators discussing stable coin yields, basically the first "bitcoin stablecoin" paying 13 percent yield daily.
⚠️ 👇
Strive announced SATA will become the first U.S.-listed security to pay daily dividends starting June 16th while maintaining a 13% rate 🤔

2026-05-15 08:11:41 UTC

- reply

Die werden save an die Erben und Vermögen rangehen. Da ist noch fett was zu holen.

2026-05-15 06:53:35 UTC

GM
https://blossom.primal.net/65d45accf4f864dac0f0c13e1fa55d962ea15c4cc097bbfd9c57ebf97ff4f4c5.gif

2026-05-14 18:06:27 UTC

Technical:
- $82k was the local top on January 17, 2025, and has acted as resistance multiple times since. Every time BTC approached it, sellers stepped in — that level is now burned into the chart.
- The 50-day EMA sits around $81,800–82,200 depending on the exchange. Classic bear-market-turned-bull resistance.
On-Chain / Cost Basis:
- Short-term holder cost basis is around $82k–83k. These are people who bought in the last 5 months and are now at breakeven. A lot of them use this as an exit ramp — get out without a loss.
- STH MVRV ratio at 1.0 — psychological trigger to dump.
Orderflow / Liquidity:
- Massive ask clusters stacked at $82k. Market makers load their books there because they know supply is coming.
- Late shorts' liquidation levels cluster around $81,800–82,500. If BTC punches through, it cascades — which is exactly why big players defend the line with spot selling.
Macro / Psychology:
- Round $10k increments are always psychological barriers. $80k got taken out, so $82k is the next natural test.
- We have been ranging between $78k–$88k since February. A lot of capital is waiting for a clean break before committing.
Bottom line: $82k is the sweet spot where technical resistance, STH breakeven, and orderbook sell pressure all stack up. If it breaks, the path to $88k is relatively open.

2026-05-14 16:37:44 UTC

- reply

and his banking account not! must have been a genius

2026-05-12 12:14:46 UTC

- reply

🤣

2026-05-12 11:46:18 UTC

- reply

Good point, but it doesn't quite land.
Information asymmetry explains why people make bad calls in the short term. Sure — if nobody knows fiat gets systematically debased, they hold it. But that's not a mechanism that permanently keeps bad money in circulation. Once the information is out there, people can pivot.
Gresham works differently: even when EVERYONE knows the money is trash, they can't opt out — because the state forces them to accept it at a false rate. That's the difference between "the market is wrong" and "the market has no choice."
Your own argument gives it away: you call it "overvalued by the market." That's a voluntary valuation, even if it's a mistaken one. That's Thiers' territory — good money wins once enough people figure it out.
Gresham needs the stick. Without legal tender parity, you just say "your fiat is garbage, I want more of it for my goods." And bad money dies on its own.

2026-05-12 10:49:55 UTC

Gresham's Law doesn't work without coercion.
People love to say "bad money drives out good" as if it's some law of nature. It's not. It's a law of legal tender.
Gresham's mechanism only kicks in when the state forces two forms of money to trade at the same face value, despite their real market values being different. Bimetallism was the classic case — government says 1 gold coin = 15 silver coins, market says 1:16. Everyone hoards the undervalued gold and spends the overvalued silver. Makes sense.
But strip away the coercion and the whole thing flips. Thiers' Law: good money drives out bad. People aren't stupid. When they're free to choose, they pick the sounder currency every time.
That's the whole Bitcoin thesis in two sentences. Nobody forces you to use it. It has no legal tender status. And yet it's steadily eating every fiat on the planet.
Gresham's Law is real. It just isn't a law of money — it's a law of government intervention. Remove the intervention, remove the effect.

2026-05-11 11:37:23 UTC

- reply

Thats the point. They cannot buy all the bitcoin without raising the usd price to infinity. There will be a saturation where bitcoin reduce its volatility massive and could function as money i guess. people using sats instead of full coins...

2026-05-11 10:32:08 UTC

- reply

looks like a healthy economy
#nevent1q…64uy

2026-05-11 10:24:03 UTC

strc back above 100 usd. Still ebough interest in 11.5 percent yield for the cash flow bros.
lets see how many corn saylor can collect until 15th. 🤔

2026-05-09 17:39:02 UTC

- reply

didn't they lend it to coinbase to gain some "interest "

2026-05-08 19:52:14 UTC

- reply

Great take from @npub1guh…6hjy

2026-05-08 17:04:27 UTC

- reply

clownzilla is a fiat maxi. opinion without facts.
#nevent1q…rgsf

2026-05-08 17:02:27 UTC

- reply

is xrp still a thing?

2026-05-05 19:03:13 UTC

- reply

Great to see some pros on nostr
#nevent1q…szpa

2026-05-05 19:02:16 UTC

- reply

Den Account kenne ich, geht ja nicht nur um das Soziale, Nostr ist ja wie Bitcoin quasi eine Technology. Wenn man sieht was da alles gebaut wird.

2026-05-05 11:55:46 UTC

Gestern den Podcast mit dir angehört @nprofile…5n92 . Hat mir gut gefallen, schon geil wie weit wir mit Nostr gekommen sind.
Viele Bitcoiner haben das nicht aufm Schirm. Verstehe nicht, wieso Niko, da nicht joined?!

2026-05-02 18:04:32 UTC

- reply

Immer weiter. Reicht noch lange nicht, weiter und härter besteuern! Ich hoffe, das ist erst der Anfang.

2026-05-02 10:58:11 UTC

- reply

ask putin or xi

2026-04-29 16:31:24 UTC

been thinking about this all week. bitcoin isn't a trade — it's the exit door. they can dilute dollars, euros, yen, pounds. all of them. but nobody can print satoshis. 21 million. that number doesn't budge. in a world where every government is mathematically forced to debase, holding something they physically can't dilute isn't speculation — it's just common sense. stack what they can't touch.

2026-04-25 14:12:16 UTC

- reply

left x and joined nostr 3 years ago. it’s insane how good nostr works nowadays. I don’t care about x and i don’t need 1bn idiots and bots on nostr.
Quality > quantity.

2026-04-24 20:12:19 UTC

- reply

love this movie

2026-04-24 19:19:44 UTC

strc climbing back to 100. you know whats coming next. the rest of the world not.
https://blossom.primal.net/ed6ccfa6e3238bb305218f11467ae39efcb2822b3de51c3bb0e948cb69214f83.jpg

2026-04-24 17:42:13 UTC

- reply

great show! Bullish as f.
#nevent1q…3shh

2026-04-22 18:19:58 UTC

Mindblowing: When Bitcoin runs: 👇
MicroStrategy's $2.68 Billion Daily Gain in Context:
Companies with similar QUARTERLY EARNINGS (~$2.7B/quarter):
| Company | Annual Earnings (TTM) | Quarterly Earnings (Avg) |
|---------|----------------------|-------------------------|
| MicroStrategy (today) | — | $2.68B (1 day only!) |
| PayPal | ~$10.5B | ~$2.6B |
| Intel | ~$10.2B | ~$2.5B |
| Cisco | ~$11.8B | ~$2.9B |
| Salesforce | ~$12.4B | ~$3.1B |
For comparison – the world's most profitable companies:
| Company | Quarterly Earnings |
|---------|-------------------|
| Saudi Aramco | ~$45.4B |
| Alphabet (Google) | ~$39.9B |
| Microsoft | ~$36.6B |
| NVIDIA | ~$35.4B |
| Apple | ~$35.3B |
| Amazon | ~$24.9B |
| Meta | ~$21.8B |
The perspective:
MicroStrategy made as much profit in a single day as PayPal, Intel, or Cisco make in an entire quarter (3 months) of hard work with tens of thousands of employees.
This isn't operational business – it's the leverage of a $61.56B Bitcoin treasury on a +4.36% BTC day. No other publicly traded company in the world can realize this kind of gain without selling assets.

2026-04-20 19:16:56 UTC

- reply

mega

2026-04-20 19:16:15 UTC

- reply

love it

2026-04-19 09:34:13 UTC

- reply

gm gigi

2026-04-18 06:09:15 UTC

2026-04-17 18:08:38 UTC

- reply

still sour about marisha

2026-04-17 14:22:11 UTC

Happy weekend fam
https://blossom.primal.net/44975bafb104f3fbaa92d54f07e705d3187871e98224713a805fa6018bc8fa49.jpg

2026-04-16 19:27:23 UTC

Strategy bought 994 bitcoin daily for the past 532 days. 😳

2026-04-10 10:16:59 UTC

- reply

whats your infrastructure. thats a lot of token burnage

2026-04-10 10:11:12 UTC

- reply

Just use Ollama Cloud models. Maybe if you strictly need 100 percent local models.

2026-04-06 08:01:48 UTC

- reply

guten morgen saunameister

2026-04-04 09:42:20 UTC

BIP-360 Analyse – Zusammenfassung
WAS IST BIP-360?
BIP-360 ist ein reales Proposal im offiziellen Bitcoin BIP-Repository. Es wurde als PR #1670 eingereicht und wurde am 11. Februar 2026 gemerged.
Das Proposal schlägt einen neuen Output-Typ für Bitcoin vor, ursprünglich "Pay-to-Merkle-Root (P2MR)", später umbenannt in "Pay-to-Tapscript-Hash (P2TSH)". Die Idee ist: Ein Taproot-ähnlicher Output ohne Key-Path-Spend, was ihn resistenter gegen Quantencomputer-Angriffe macht (weil der öffentliche Schlüssel nie vorher offengelegt wird). Es ist also ein erster Schritt hin zur Quantenresistenz für Bitcoin.
DIE AUTOREN
1. Hunter Beast (GitHub: cryptoquick) – Hauptautor, Initiator des BIPs. Betreibt den Substack unter cryptoquick.substack.com als PR-Kanal.
2. Ethan Heilman (GitHub: EthanHeilman) – Akademiker/Security-Forscher, bekannt in der Bitcoin-Security-Szene.
3. Isabel Foxen Duke (Twitter: @isabelfoxenduke) – Als Co-Autorin in "editorial role" hinzugezogen. Sie ist NICHT technisch im Bitcoin-Space verwurzelt – ihr ursprünglicher Hintergrund ist klinische Psychotherapie/Beziehungscoaching ("Love, Actually" Programm, intuitive eating). Sie bewirbt das Proposal aber massiv auf Social Media.
WARUM IST DAS FISHY?
Isabel Foxen Duke:
- Hat absolut keinen technischen Hintergrund in Bitcoin, Kryptographie oder Informatik
- Ihre Rolle ist offiziell "editorial" – aber sie nutzt das BIP als Plattform für massive Social-Media-Präsenz im Bitcoin-Space
- Der "Aufstieg" von Dating-Therapeutin zu Bitcoin-Protocol-Co-Autorin ist extrem ungewöhnlich
- Sie bewirbt das Proposal auf X/Twitter viel aktiver als die technischen Autoren
PR-Strategie:
- Eigene Website bip360.org mit professionellem Marketing-Auftritt
- "Make Bitcoin Quantum Resistant" als Slogan – emotionaler, marketing-lastiger Begriff
- Substack-Newsletter als PR-Kanal
- Quantum Computing als "Angstszenario" (2-5 Jahre laut IBM Roadmap)
KOMMUNITÄTSREAKTION (DelvingBitcoin Forum)
Der Thread hat 22 Replies, 1.4k Views, 41 Likes – also Aufmerksamkeit, aber auch deutliche Kritik:
- sipa (Pieter Wuille – einer der wichtigsten Bitcoin-Core-Dev, Erfinder von Taproot) hat mehrfach kritisch kommentiert
- ajtowns (Andrew Townsley – Core Dev) auch skeptisch
- leishman: Pointierter Einwand – "P2WSH existiert bereits und löst das gleiche Problem OHNE Protocol Change. Warum brauchen wir dafür ein neues BIP?"
- murch (Mark Erhardt – prominenter Blockspace-Analyst): Versteht dass die Autoren langfristig Post-Quantum-Signaturen via OP_SUCCESS einführen wollen
- ArmchairCryptologist: "Das Proposal macht Bitcoin nicht wirklich quantensicher, es fix nur eine spezifische Taproot-Schwachstelle. Die anderen modernen Address-Typen sind gleich sicher."
NIC CARTER
In den durchsuchten Quellen finde ich KEINE direkte Verbindung zwischen Nic Carter und BIP-360. Er wurde von den Subagents fälschlich in Zusammenhang gebracht. Nic Carter ist VC (Castle Island Ventures) und hat eigene Positionen zu Bitcoin-Governance, aber er taucht nicht als Unterstützer oder Beteiligter an BIP-360 auf.
BEWERTUNG
Ist es ein Angriff auf Bitcoin?
Eher ein ideologischer Kampf um die Zukunft von Bitcoin. BIP-360 per se ist technisch kein Angriff – es ist ein legitimer (wenn auch umstrittener) Vorschlag. ABER:
1. Marketing-Maschine: Die PR-Strategie mit professioneller Website, emotionalem Framing ("Make Bitcoin Quantum Resistant") und der Nutzung einer Nicht-Technikerin als Gesicht ist im Bitcoin-Bereich unüblich und wirkt wie ein Versuch, durch öffentliche Meinung Druck auf den Konsensprozess auszuüben
2. Slippery Slope: BIP-360 ist als "erster Schritt" positioniert. Der implizite Plan (laut murch) ist, danach Post-Quantum-Signaturen und weitere fundamentale Änderungen zu pushen – das ist ein Paradigmenwechsel für Bitcoin
(1/2)
3. Bestehende Alternativen ignorierend: Kritiker merken korrekt an, dass P2WSH bereits existiert und das gleiche Problem ohne Protocol Change löst
4. Quantenpanik als Vehikel: Die 2-5 Jahrs-Friss-oder-stirb-Rhetorik ist nicht konsensfähig in der Krypto-Community
FAZIT: Kein direkter Angriff, aber ein koordinierter Versuch eine große Protocol-Änderung durch PR-Druck statt technischen Konsens durchzusetzen. Die Beteiligung von Isabel Foxen Duke als nicht-technische Co-Autorin die das Proposal massiv promotet ist das verdächtigste Element....

2026-04-02 16:58:48 UTC

https://quantumai.google/static/site-assets/downloads/cryptocurrency-whitepaper.pdf
1/ This is not “Bitcoin got cracked.” It is a polished resource-estimation paper claiming a cheaper Shor implementation for ECDLP-256, not a live break of any real cryptocurrency network.
2/ The actual technical claim is a pair of circuits around 1200 or 1450 logical qubits and about 90 million or 70 million Toffoli gates.
3/ That is a compiler-and-architecture result, not evidence that anyone has a fault-tolerant machine capable of doing this in the real world today.
4/ The scary “minutes” narrative only appears after stacking optimistic assumptions about physical error rates, control latency, connectivity, surface-code overhead, and execution model.
5/ In plain English: this is a whiteboard attack wearing a lab coat, not an operational exploit.
6/ The zero-knowledge proof is clever, but it is still not full public reproducibility of the complete attack path, because the sensitive circuit details are intentionally withheld.
7/ Google’s own framing says the point is to raise awareness and push the ecosystem toward migration, which is a polite way of saying the communication strategy is part of the product.
8/ So yes, there is real technical work here, but the leap from “better circuit estimate” to “crypto is about to die” is mostly future-hardware fan fiction.
9/ Calling this a practical break is like calling a wind-tunnel sketch a combat aircraft.
10/ Useful paper, overstretched narrative, extremely headline-friendly packaging.
“Until somebody shows a fault-tolerant machine that meets those stacked assumptions, this remains a lab-world extrapolation with PR upside.”

2026-04-02 08:50:29 UTC

- reply

Das hat mit Frauen gar nichts zu tun. Der Rest der Bande zieht bei allem mit. Wenn man als Politiker wie die Made im Speck lebt und keine Konsequenzen mehr zu befürchten hat ist das Geschlecht egal.

2026-04-01 20:45:30 UTC

Quantum computers are a total scam so far. remember google willow launched in 2024. 2 years no big update. and they claim they will crack ECDSA in 2029?
Nice try ethereum crew.
Wouldn’t be suprised if someone paid luke g. for spreading that shit months ago.

2026-03-30 10:32:03 UTC

- reply

i keep buying no matter what. 😬

2026-03-29 11:37:48 UTC

- reply

me2

2026-03-29 11:19:32 UTC

- reply

once we break that barrier, we should do way better.

2026-03-29 09:42:27 UTC

- reply

Finde den Fehler? Zeit lesen 😬 Ich hab ebenfalls aufgehört zu erwarten, dass da konstruktiv, kluge Beiträge verfasst werden, sollten sie nicht von Bitcoiner geschrieben worden sein.
Don’t feed the system. Happy sunday

2026-03-28 15:32:30 UTC

- reply

Muss man wirklich anerkennen.

2026-03-28 14:37:13 UTC

- reply

Younger generation doesn’t even have a pc at home. Do i like? No.

2026-03-28 14:34:49 UTC

- reply

Nein mein ich nicht. Wenn man die Relation von Usern zum Preis sieht sind wir weit weg von Mainstream. Die Globale Adaption ist doch nach wie vor ultra gering und weit weg von einer Band wie „Backstreetboys“ oder „Coldplay“.
Deswegen find ich den Vergleich nicht richtig schlüssig. Wir haben eine teilweisen Ausverkauf von OGs, aber keine Mainstream Adoption nur weil wir Etfs haben.

2026-03-28 13:13:58 UTC

- reply

Demnach müsste der Kurs aber weitaus höher stehen. Wenn man Bands nimmt wie zB Coldplay, dann verdienen sie in der Mainstreamphase am meisten Geld.
Finde der Vergleich hinkt irgendwie auch wenn ich die Grundlegende Idee dahinter schon verstehe.

2026-03-26 13:21:51 UTC

- reply

this

2026-03-26 13:21:40 UTC

bullish. we are close👏
https://blossom.primal.net/f80da0015b63e28a79096997defc7faca28fa8f296d40f45f17533d34e275f3a.png

2026-03-25 17:33:09 UTC

- reply

tax nostr

2026-03-25 16:16:21 UTC

- reply

massive 💪

2026-03-25 10:22:00 UTC

- reply

and your body is too weak to fight back

2026-03-24 18:41:11 UTC

- reply

man i was playing clan wars all day long. 😅silicon spray, mouse skates. all that stuff, irc chat, team speak. what a time 🧡

2026-03-24 18:38:19 UTC

- reply

cs
https://blossom.primal.net/1f587a6b5849697a0469ea8646050ebc8405259f08c39491082422b6274db9b9.jpg

2026-03-24 18:33:40 UTC

- reply

i had the same tower in gray, with an amd athlon inside 🔥

2026-03-23 11:13:35 UTC

this is why you should not short. have a great day

2026-03-22 08:36:03 UTC

A reminder. The Afghanistan war took 20 years to replace taliban with taliban.
Hopefully one time we were successful to end the fiat money war machine.😞