Chucky 🫂

Public Key

npub17vhnjkt04m6thytr8dna67v2pa4tjk7uh3ut40eq9wy8d28u0kvq7qnhkq

Profile Code

nprofile1qqs0xteet9h6aa9mj93nke7a0x9q764et0wtc796huszhzrk4r78mxqpz3mhxue69uhkummnw3ezummcw3ezuer9wcq3gamnwvaz7tmjv4kxz7fwv3sk6atn9e5k7qgdwaehxw309ahx7uewd3hkcqg4waehxw309ash2arg9ehx7um5wgcjucm0d5q3samnwvaz7tmjv4kxz7fwwdhx7un59eek7cmfv9kqz9nhwden5te0wfjkccte9cc8scmgv96zucm0d5r3jqmg

Publishing to

Author Public Key

npub17vhnjkt04m6thytr8dna67v2pa4tjk7uh3ut40eq9wy8d28u0kvq7qnhkq

Show more details

Last Notes

2026-01-23 01:13:35 UTC

- reply

That's how you really let it rip

2026-01-18 23:56:18 UTC

Palantir software is helping ICE by "populating a map with potential deportation targets, bringing up a dossier on each person, and providing a “confidence score” on the person’s current address."
So, is this a joke or we're full on in the Orwellian world?
https://archive.is/2026.01.15-141320/ https://www.404media.co/elite-the-palantir-app-ice-uses-to-find-neighborhoods-to-raid/

2026-01-15 14:48:43 UTC

Bitcoin is a Human Right

2026-01-03 16:29:42 UTC

@npub1yxd…3ylt
@npub1yxd…3ylt Congratulations 🎉 looking forward to hear what you have to say about the latest developments.

2025-12-26 20:31:16 UTC

- reply

Lol who cares about that xitter trashcan

2025-12-26 20:27:08 UTC

- reply

Another thing that never happened

2025-12-18 19:16:34 UTC

- reply

This Nick guy is either a giant troll, or a intellectually crippled individual, or a total lunatic/ psychopath. Either way, it's embarrassing to see such uneducated and arrogant youth.

2025-12-02 19:41:55 UTC

- reply

Guys, I stopped listening after the first 3 minutes. Cannabis has been decriminalized in Czech Republic since 2010 and recreationally legal starting in 2026. Anti communism propaganda law info is factually incorrect as well. Everyone talks shit these days having no clue about the subject. sigh
https://fountain.fm/episode/41EUmFuUGLlsGiczGANY

2025-10-30 01:58:21 UTC

- reply

Everything looks great apart from the plastic chopping board! Upgrade time

2025-10-28 23:43:30 UTC

- reply

I read what you said and it is open to many interpretations. My question was about the communism in particular. I would appreciate if you could take time to expand your thoughts. Thanks

2025-10-28 21:39:18 UTC

- reply

You didn't answer my question

2025-10-28 21:28:22 UTC

- reply

Where did you see communism here?

2025-10-15 12:16:36 UTC

- reply

Thank you for taking time to respond

2025-10-14 12:20:11 UTC

- reply

Sounds like social media in a nutshell

2025-10-14 01:18:40 UTC

- reply

You might have missed the part about consent given under the wrong pretext. Context matters.

2025-10-14 01:16:25 UTC

- reply

Another day, another victory ✌️

2025-10-13 21:18:49 UTC

- reply

How did it go?

2025-10-12 15:59:54 UTC

- reply

Saying "Hopefully it was worth it for them" about an open source software project is dishonest. Another bucket of slop.

2025-10-11 16:25:23 UTC

- reply

Pretty sure soon enough apple users will start getting reported for using anonymous market places.

2025-10-07 02:52:04 UTC

- reply

Thanks for sharing. I always enjoy navigating your philosophical landscape even though I don't always agree with you. Respect.

2025-10-06 13:46:34 UTC

- reply

More slop

2025-10-06 13:15:50 UTC

- reply

Latest 8-K
https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/0001050446/000119312525230977/d49048d8k.htm

2025-10-06 12:58:40 UTC

- reply

For anyone interested:
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1050446/000119312525165531/d852456d424b5.htm

2025-10-06 12:03:46 UTC

- reply

That's good, thanks

2025-10-06 12:03:14 UTC

- reply

Burn

2025-10-06 12:00:40 UTC

- reply

@npub1pm5…xe07 what are your thoughts on this: #nevent1q…qkwh

2025-10-06 11:58:23 UTC

Can anyone suggest a good breakdown of Strategy's $STRC Stretch dividend offering? So little info out there. I would love to know the inner mechanics and the cash flow, particularly where are the dividends coming from? Videos/podcasts, anything. Thanks!

2025-10-05 17:42:25 UTC

- reply

Yeah not seeing anything

2025-10-05 16:25:06 UTC

- reply

What if rights are actually entitlements?

2025-10-04 20:07:43 UTC

- reply

Hola calle. I am not sure whether I understand the nature of your request. However, here is a poem you asked me to write for you:
Cashews gleam like golden moons,
Velvet curves, the sweetest tunes.
Walnuts sit with wrinkled frowns,
Heavy crowns from autumn towns.
Cashews melt, a buttery cheer,
Walnuts crack, but feel austere.
If taste decides which nut should reign—
Cashews dance, while walnuts plain.

2025-10-02 15:24:51 UTC

- reply

Tell me more. I can see the intellectual potential in you, it's awe inspiring.

2025-10-02 15:18:20 UTC

- reply

Thank you for your empathy, I am feeling much better now, knowing that you, Anon, are sorry for us, brainless people. I can see how smart, intelligent, non manipulated you are and frankly, quite a hero we all need. Tell me more.

2025-10-02 15:11:19 UTC

- reply

I do, I always do. And you?

2025-10-02 15:10:07 UTC

- reply

Matthew, is that you?

2025-10-02 15:04:29 UTC

- reply

Slop

2025-10-01 11:35:45 UTC

Time is Bitcoin.

2025-09-30 22:14:37 UTC

- reply

He's too busy saving Bitcoin
https://image.nostr.build/81056d5a05ecd2d9d5752363dddb8a8524ffa396a41f127efbaafc6374a16a38.jpg

2025-09-29 18:27:51 UTC

- reply

Stop scaring the plebs 😁

2025-09-29 18:26:44 UTC

- reply

It's preaching only at this point. Not sure what happened to him

2025-09-29 13:22:01 UTC

- reply

Great point, now go ahead and "just find ways to discourage all spam". I'm sure everyone will be excited to know more.

2025-09-29 00:02:16 UTC

- reply

US is a very young country. Give it another 200years and then we can talk.

2025-09-29 00:00:48 UTC

- reply

Basically an impossible task.

2025-09-28 23:59:00 UTC

- reply

I'm sure at some point the cultish knots supporters will vote for a centralized anti cam committee claiming their moral superiority. You're absolutely right, it's eye opening and shows how easy people can get manipulated out of the set of decentralized values.

2025-09-28 23:41:46 UTC

- reply

To be fair, entire conversation regarding the matter is available for everyone to read on GitHub.

2025-09-28 23:40:27 UTC

- reply

Just read the post ffs

2025-09-28 01:17:51 UTC

- reply

I assume you're judging by yourself? Sorry I'm straight but I have no issues with your homosexuality.

2025-09-28 00:39:01 UTC

- reply

Anon you are so brave wow wow wow..you know Calle. Show us yourself.

2025-09-27 13:58:25 UTC

- reply

Lmao

2025-09-27 02:58:27 UTC

- reply

Laundered misdirection? Wdym?

2025-09-26 15:08:50 UTC

- reply

Matthew has basically become an ignorant rage baiting influencer.

2025-09-26 12:23:33 UTC

- reply

Xitter is perhaps the most toxic place in the Internet. Deleted my accounts well over a year ago, best decision

2025-09-26 01:54:19 UTC

- reply

Who needs data when you're dealing with a cult?

2025-09-26 01:50:29 UTC

- reply

Next executive order will be about obligatory praying during pregnancy and Sunday church visits.

2025-09-26 01:42:15 UTC

- reply

He is too busy trying to save Bitcoin.
https://image.nostr.build/81056d5a05ecd2d9d5752363dddb8a8524ffa396a41f127efbaafc6374a16a38.jpg

2025-09-26 01:39:20 UTC

- reply

True to Bitcoin. Oh, so like.. Bitcoin the way satoshi intended it? Like Satoshi vision?

2025-09-24 13:03:49 UTC

Can someone please confirm whether this statement is also correct? Knots is incompatible with lightning and whirlpool?
https://image.nostr.build/89f9c78696a511f2ad5ad46973019d616481ab6bba9fc3ff96c0237bbf7d3f52.jpg

2025-09-24 13:02:45 UTC

Can someone please confirm whether this statement is correct? Knots affects lightning and whirlpool functionality?
https://image.nostr.build/387c762c94fe3fb3a98e4e0724d18911912dc567e564ec097b239c9a73aa1006.jpg

2025-09-23 22:07:01 UTC

- reply

The trend of adults running around in bright colored costumes is somewhat ridiculous, if you think about it.

2025-09-23 22:05:49 UTC

- reply

Whats ppi sayin'?

2025-09-23 18:40:57 UTC

- reply

Uneducated have always been the primary base

2025-09-23 13:11:33 UTC

- reply

"Protect the ponzi by all means possible. I repeat, by all means possible."
https://saifedean.substack.com/p/anatomy-of-the-milei-ponzi

2025-09-23 13:09:05 UTC

- reply

It was all planned all along? But yeah, I think you're right.

2025-09-23 12:45:50 UTC

- reply

It's as if Miles was full of shit and actually did nothing but enrich himself and his cronies. Populists, incompetent people that are the loudest.

2025-09-22 20:24:32 UTC

- reply

What is this screenshot? Looks ugly, not gonna lie

2025-09-18 16:27:54 UTC

- reply

Hence why he said he would mute. I don't see any issues with a person requesting to respect others.
When you shit on the street, others may ask to do it in a toilet instead.

2025-09-18 16:09:35 UTC

- reply

Lmao you're outing yourself as a normies. Did you never eat trash out of the bin?

2025-09-18 15:23:46 UTC

- reply

They probably are. Social media algos are quite literally social programming algos. We will look back at this point in the future wondering "how did people not see it?". We've had a few of these periods in the past already.

2025-09-17 23:49:55 UTC

This is such a joke lmao! Full authoritarian mode.
https://www.nbcnews.com/pop-culture/tv/disneys-abc-pulls-jimmy-kimmel-live-fcc-chair-blasts-hosts-charlie-kir-rcna232033

2025-09-17 15:57:19 UTC

- reply

Agreed

2025-09-17 15:19:30 UTC

- reply

Illusion of free will

2025-09-17 15:04:02 UTC

- reply

2025-09-17 11:47:09 UTC

- reply

Crazy to see no route failures of lightning, after all these years

2025-09-17 02:47:51 UTC

- reply

Uhm what did I just watch?

2025-09-15 23:16:45 UTC

- reply

There is a particular part of the population that think he's a god sent messiah on top of the btc president.

2025-09-15 11:42:30 UTC

- reply

Material 👌

2025-09-14 23:36:32 UTC

I really enjoyed this conversation with Allen Farrington. Thanks @npub1h8n…rpev
https://fountain.fm/episode/M6Jlu7NffqUg2kCPTfoT

2025-09-14 20:36:01 UTC

- reply

You guys are spoiled. One quickly gets used to the good.

2025-09-14 17:33:12 UTC

- reply

I would argue Europe is the actual free world these days

2025-09-14 12:11:26 UTC

- reply

Can you tell us which pools switched to knots?

2025-09-14 11:52:05 UTC

- reply

If you're in the US, it is probably coming even sooner

2025-09-13 19:43:32 UTC

- reply

@npub1s33…252p fyi

2025-09-13 02:19:11 UTC

- reply

You must be using embedded node. Try using your remote lightning node for zeus

2025-09-13 02:17:00 UTC

- reply

You can use your Nostr list as contacts in Zeus.

2025-09-13 02:14:58 UTC

- reply

Adam Whale is somewhat of an epic name 🤣

2025-09-12 21:38:31 UTC

- reply

Will do, thanks

2025-09-12 20:23:46 UTC

- reply

Good point
https://image.nostr.build/8c0697d5e4dc3529048b0cc24e468d0517ac285795aa43aec14c13b9af99052a.jpg

2025-09-12 15:29:29 UTC

- reply

Thanks for the reply. Pins were pushed all the way in, power cycling usually works for 5 mins or so. I am back to seeing power fault on one and low voltage warning on another unit (hashing at 300Gh) with 64.62 J/Th.
https://image.nostr.build/eb625860e822e1568a8dd65bc469e70b84f909b4513523c6f8c6076e747dbe77.png

2025-09-11 20:52:11 UTC

- reply

💯 people without a college degree simply can't get it.

2025-09-11 20:50:37 UTC

- reply

Controversial for some, but truth for others: if you ever worked and had close relationship with a person that never got a proper education, you can see it, always. No matter how hard people try to rationalize the proll.

2025-09-11 19:44:57 UTC

Hey, @npub1k8s…6y88
@npub1k8s…6y88
Both of my gamma bitaxes have the same issue displayed in the dashboard.
Are there any known issues with the power supplies? Thanks!
https://image.nostr.build/5892eae77453f36b467a16db3ca63e4c17b08739584e06c55d80b21d276ced96.jpg

2025-09-11 01:00:13 UTC

- reply

Oh man... Totally agreed!
What if it's an inside job?

2025-09-10 12:26:09 UTC

- reply

they still drink, elsewhere.. shady expensive booze

2025-09-09 23:04:18 UTC

- reply

but does anything actually get stored? or do you just prune opreturn as unspendable outputs?

2025-09-09 23:00:10 UTC

- reply

oh yeah so we now believe what russkis say

2025-09-09 22:08:28 UTC

- reply

This PR, replacing #32359, doesn’t remove the -datacarrier or -datacarriersize options. Contrary to what many are saying, the PR does not force the user to accept larger datacarrier transactions in transaction relay. Setting -datacarrier=0 still turns it off, and -datacarriersize=83 gives you the original default (the same amount of data but across 1 or more outputs).
Some developers still believe the option should be removed, but there is consensus for waiting at least 1 release like we did for -mempoolfullrbf. No timeline is set for removal.
read more: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32406

2025-09-09 20:44:20 UTC

Seriously good nostr clients from @nprofile…twc2 ! Both mobile and web clients are superb!

2025-09-09 20:42:17 UTC

For those who are actively raging over the whole OP_RETURN saga, I thought posting a quote from Gloria Zhao might be helpful:
After weighing the technical arguments for/against this change and considering the objections [0], I believe this is ready for merge. Below is my handwritten summary outlining why I think so. I’m including (non-exhaustive list of) links where possible, so if you’d like to analyze the same sources without my personal bias, please do.
The concept was discussed here, #32359, #28130, #32381, the mailing list / google group [1], delving [2][3][4], stacker news [5], twitter, etc.
The primary motivation for this PR is to correct a mismatch between the harmfulness and standardness of data storage techniques. It makes the (prunable) OP_RETURN option available so that data is not stuffed into unprunable outputs. While proponents of the PR aren’t enthusiastic about data storage as a use case, the existing standard methods (e.g. bare pubkeys) involve bloating the UTXO set, representing a long term cost to the network. This concern is not merely theoretical, as there are examples of designs and transactions that utilize the more harmful techniques [1].
Another motivation is to support Bitcoin’s public, decentralized market for blockspace, by not making transaction relay policy stricter than what is reliably mined [14]. The OP_RETURN limits are among very few policy rules that exist solely to discourage use. These restrictions push people - e.g. ones who don’t want to bloat the UTXO set - towards direct-to-miner submission, which harms mempool utility and creates centralization pressure. This is consistent with the rationale to change the default value of -mempoolfullrbf to 1.
To elaborate, the PR helps avoid a world in which an economically relevant volume of transactions is sent using direct submission. We move closer to that world when large economic actors (L2s, exchanges, etc.) choose to build direct relationships with large miners in order to get nonstandard transactions mined. If widely used, central submission services undermine the permissionless design of PoW-based consensus, hurt the censorship resistance and privacy of transaction broadcast, and destroy the fast block propagation our network has enjoyed for many years… all while not preventing the nonstandard transactions we dislike. Such services exist and are in use today; it is worth trying to reduce reasons to use them. [6][7]
These are strong motivations to change the default. I also believe all of the objections have been adequately addressed [0]. Summarized below:
(1) Some users want options to control what kinds of data-carrying transactions they allow on their nodes.
This PR, replacing #32359, doesn’t remove the -datacarrier or -datacarriersize options. Contrary to what many are saying, the PR does not force the user to accept larger datacarrier transactions in transaction relay. Setting -datacarrier=0 still turns it off, and -datacarriersize=83 gives you the original default (the same amount of data but across 1 or more outputs).
Some developers still believe the option should be removed, but there is consensus for waiting at least 1 release like we did for -mempoolfullrbf. No timeline is set for removal.
The options are deprecated in this PR, meaning they remain usable without any extra steps, but are discouraged through a warning message. This discouragement comes from the development philosophy that all user options should either come with clear recommendations for how to use them or, if no recommendation can be made, they should not exist or be discouraged. In essence, “don’t offer users footguns”. It seems that not all frequent contributors agree with this philosophy, but I think the conversation can be deferred until there is a proposal for removal of the option.
(2) Disapproval of the “arbitrary data storage use case” on the Bitcoin network (there are many many tweets that I am not linking here, but yes I did see them) [11][12][13]
(2a) Belief that Bitcoin Core default policy should be used to prevent certain kinds of use cases.
It is not possible for Bitcoin Core to prevent certain kinds of transactions from being mined. It is software run only voluntarily by users (which may include miners). Demanding that Bitcoin Core prevent certain transactions from being mined reflects a misunderstanding of the relationship between open source software users and developers.
In earlier years, mempool policy helped shape wallet behavior proactively when miner and user software was more homogeneous. Once transactions are regularly mined, restrictive policy has the effect of blinding nodes to transactions that are later included in blocks. This rationale was used to change the default of -mempoolfullrbf in #30493.
(2b) Even if Bitcoin Core cannot prevent certain use cases, it should still not relay transactions that are not in service of its monetary purpose to discourage them.
First, there is nontrivial harm in blinding a node to transactions that are likely to be mined, as described above.
Other Bitcoin clients consider filtering non-monetary uses of Bitcoin in transaction relay as one of their development priorities, which is their prerogative. Some people have also opened pull requests to “fix the filters” within Bitcoin Core (e.g. #28408, #29520, #29187).
The reactions to these pull requests did show that, in general, using mempool policy to “filter” transactions is controversial amongst contributors.
Briefly summarized: these kinds of policy rules are impossible to implement comprehensively, are not appropriate for protocol-level code, and cannot compete with economic demand. The “spam” applications operate on hype cycles and can change storage methods instantly; policy changes take at least 6 months to be deployed and even longer to be widely adopted (if they are at all). Ultimately, people who work on Bitcoin to enable censorship resistant payments likely don’t want to work on code that judges transactions based on their use case.
While Bitcoin Core aims to have no central authority directing it, the project’s direction is decided by its contributors, and the vast majority of them don’t seem to hold this priority. [14].
Similarly, another Bitcoin client could focus on hyper-optimizing for performance on specific hardware and drop support for others; Bitcoin Core’s contributors might not pursue that due to their priority of making node running highly accessible. Another project might prioritize rapid response to security vulnerabilities and build in auto-updates; Bitcoin Core’s contributors would likely reject this kind of developer-user relationship. (There aren’t collective statements about these beliefs, I’m just giving examples that I personally think are plausible).
(2c) Concerns that this encourages more arbitrary data storage, either because it is made cheaper, standardness represents what is “kosher,” or there is an ulterior motive to purposefully enable it. “The filters work, so don’t remove them.”
The purpose of this PR is not to encourage people to flood blocks with OP_RETURNs, just as changing the default of -mempoolfullrbf to 1 was not a signal that people should try to cheat zeroconf merchants. The commentary across all platforms is overwhelmingly in favor of Bitcoin’s monetary use case, even amongst those who think that arbitrary data storage is useful. Software users should look for projects whose developers demonstrate commitment to the monetary use case through their work, not through social media virtue signaling.
The on-chain cost has not changed. OP_RETURNs are more expensive than non-Bitcoin perpetual storage methods. Within Bitcoin, OP_RETURNs cost proportionally more than typical payments that benefit from the witness discount. While it is true that the (small) additional cost of using private mempool services may be saved, as summarized above, it is important that miners don’t make significant extra money from mining these transactions.
(3) Belief that large OP_RETURNs are spam, harmful, abusive, or dangerous to the network and should be discouraged in transaction relay on those grounds [15].
There are categories of transactions that policies should discourage: upgradeable fields, security and DoS problems, and transactions that make it too difficult to assess incentive compatibility [16][17]. OP_RETURN isn’t expensive to validate, doesn’t impact incentive compatibility assessment, has no potential for UTXO set pollution, etc. which is why it does not meet these criteria. Instead, people seem to use the term “spam” as an inaccurate name for undesirable transactions [18].
The introduction of the limits was indeed intended to protect network resources at a time when these outputs were not prunable, blocks were mostly empty, and 1sat/vB was almost free [19]. Contrast that with today’s environment, where prunable outputs represent a relatively low cost to the network and there exists a substantial economic deterrent to filling blocks with OP_RETURNs.
One significant cost to Bitcoin is reputational (many of us dislike the association with popular uses of OP_RETURN). But this is far outweighed by other goals like compact block reconstruction and mempool utility.
(4) Consideration for the approach of only raising the limit slightly, for example to the threshold at which OP_RETURN becomes more expensive than inscriptions [20][21].
Going back to the primary principle of not restricting policy further than what miners are confirming (unless there is another reason like DoS), a small increase would not achieve this PR’s intended purpose [22].
[0] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7282#page-7
[1] https://groups.google.com/g/bitcoindev/c/d6ZO7gXGYbQ/m/mJyek28lDAAJ
[2] https://delvingbitcoin.org/t/addressing-community-concerns-and-objections-regarding-my-recent-proposal-to-relax-bitcoin-cores-standardness-limits-on-op-return-outputs/1697
[3] https://delvingbitcoin.org/t/op-return-limits-pros-and-cons/1645/6
[4] https://delvingbitcoin.org/t/a-comprehensive-op-return-limits-q-a-resource-to-combat-misinformation/1689
[5] https://stacker.news/items/971277
[6] https://x.com/mononautical/status/1920221641948246081
[7] https://x.com/oomahq/status/1930401993341776173
[8] https://stacker.news/items/971277?commentId=971285
[9] https://delvingbitcoin.org/t/addressing-community-concerns-and-objections-regarding-my-recent-proposal-to-relax-bitcoin-cores-standardness-limits-on-op-return-outputs/1697#p-5007-the-datacarrier-option-should-be-kept-on-bitcoin-core-regardless-of-whether-the-default-is-changed-26
[10] https://x.com/GrassFedBitcoin/status/1921219038430015758
[11] https://groups.google.com/g/bitcoindev/c/d6ZO7gXGYbQ/m/-QPhqSMwEQAJ
[12] https://x.com/wk057/status/1917235710781690171
[13] https://x.com/GrassFedBitcoin/status/1921219038430015758
[14] https://bitcoincore.org/en/2025/06/06/relay-statement/
[15] https://groups.google.com/g/bitcoindev/c/d6ZO7gXGYbQ/m/yoSAe-aaDgAJ
[16] https://bitcoinops.org/en/blog/waiting-for-confirmation/#policy-for-protection-of-node-resources
[17] https://bitcoinops.org/en/blog/waiting-for-confirmation/#network-resources
[18] https://delvingbitcoin.org/t/the-spam-problem-of-bitcoin-and-unpermissioned-broadcast-networks-in-general/1692/2
[19] https://groups.google.com/g/bitcoindev/c/d6ZO7gXGYbQ/m/GRKe8kq-EgAJ
[20] https://groups.google.com/g/bitcoindev/c/d6ZO7gXGYbQ/m/6PYyNG6UAQAJ
[21] https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/122321/when-is-op-return-cheaper-than-op-false-op-if
[22] https://groups.google.com/g/bitcoindev/c/d6ZO7gXGYbQ/m/lP69f0KaAQAJ
Thank you to sipa for helping review this.
* you can read the wntire thread on github: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32406

2025-09-09 12:23:19 UTC

- reply

Nice, thanks for sharing.

2025-09-09 11:58:28 UTC

- reply

Congratulations, such a wonderful story. All the very best to you all.

2025-09-09 01:00:51 UTC

- reply

Survivorship bias