<unnamed>

Public Key

npub1a3zsznmhrtuw6qnweghz8r6dydqxm9p39rc3kpwu4h7ke4xaf7sq55fayd

Profile Code

nprofile1qqswc3gpfam3478dqfhv5t3r3axjxsrdjscj3ugmqhw2mltv6nw5lgqpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduqs6amnwvaz7tmwdaejumr0dsf6q93d

Publishing to

relay.pocketnostr.com

relay.damus.io

nos.lol

Last Notes

2025-05-18 18:24:13 UTC

- reply

I agree we should do the path of harm reduction. I also agree that harris was the better candidate. But I question where the blame should be placed.
I blame democrats for not having an anti genocide stance. If the issue of the genocide was important enough that they might loose the elections over it to a fascist, they should have campaigned against the genocide.
People who abstained from voting gave up on the system. Given the choices, that some people, even an important number of people, would give up was inevitable. I can't be angry at someone who despairs so hard they give up.
But I can be angry at those who, having the power to give up on the genocide, did not care at all, and after they lost to the fascist, they decided to collaborate with him.
Absteiners are not the same as MAGA, and the Democratic leadership deserves much more hate than the people who did not vote at all.
Political leaders are the ones with power, they gave the choices. They should face criticism for the choices they gave

2025-05-18 18:00:58 UTC

- reply

I don't think this is the right approach. Like, I don't think you should blame people for not voting for a genocide enthusiast. You should blame the party for keeping genocide as a political promise, instead of making an explicit promise to *stop* it.
Like, I hope this is not mean, but this position sounds like "imperialism and genocide will happen either way, so you should choose the option that maintains our local infrastructure in place"... can you really blame people for not wanting to participate in that position?

2025-05-12 01:05:30 UTC

- reply

oh yeah, then it is a veiled threat. After all, you go with God when you die.

2025-05-12 00:58:27 UTC

- reply

In latin america it's a very neutral thing to say, it's literally just a "goodbye" stock phrase. Why would a whitey want to tattoo themselves "goodbye" on their arm... well, it sounds like a passive aggressive thing to say to a latino while you shoot them. Is that flag related to white supremacy?

2025-03-27 01:50:03 UTC

- reply

I can't decide if the article using an ai generated image undermines their point or not... They mention it in the story, so it's intentional, at least