joshdoman
Josh Doman

Light.
If I see light I see.
If I see no light I see.
Therefore, I see without light.
#light
#see
————
With what do I see?
————
Will.
————
With what will I see?
What will I see?
Will I see?
Where will I be?
—————
I have a will.
I will my self to see.
Therefore, I will see.
—————
My self is willful.
Will.
—————
My creator is willful.
Oneness is full of will.
—————

2026-07-15 18:53:39 UTC

Bushido.

2026-07-14 19:18:03 UTC

Will you accept bitcoin?
https://blossom.primal.net/7b4cef812709248d423d4b40aa7176c877c3543a0202e6044631f6f23a668bd6.jpg

2026-07-11 16:45:23 UTC

Humans need feedback.
Feedback in real-time is best.
Ergo,
The light of your screen is your feedback.

2026-07-09 14:38:23 UTC

Writing about invariants is fun.

2026-07-02 12:51:04 UTC

I am beginner.
Mastodon.
Nvm.
You know no spam.
Nvk is spammed.
Hence. I spam.

2026-07-02 12:50:12 UTC

Spam.
Define.
Fine spam.
https://blossom.primal.net/ba2a1028094e0238a04b0f87b8bd5acf2e0ea6c93b23ecb29c1ee20fb72f2dcd.png

2026-07-02 12:25:02 UTC

Delve.

2026-07-02 12:24:57 UTC

You go.
You sight.

2026-07-02 12:24:44 UTC

I gk.
I delve.
I delve.

2026-07-02 12:24:32 UTC

I go to delving Bitcoin.
To delve.

2026-07-02 12:24:21 UTC

Delving bitcoin.
A place to delve.

2026-07-02 12:24:05 UTC

Bitcoin is the word.

2026-07-02 12:23:58 UTC

What ja an output time.

2026-07-02 12:23:51 UTC

Bitcoin is the word.

2026-07-02 12:23:43 UTC

What is an open time.

2026-07-02 12:23:27 UTC

Botcoin js tbe word.

2026-07-02 12:23:16 UTC

Bitcoin is the word.

2026-07-02 12:23:02 UTC

I hereby sue the word.
Delving.
Bitcoin is the word.

2026-07-02 07:30:28 UTC

This is how I see.
https://blossom.primal.net/70bdb1db1e4ff35abd4e68a3bc49878c697c563d4dc5d674fe1c29f5683c91e9.png
https://blossom.primal.net/059d21b103be69220f91b698e44e521ba46aa7d55cab991d8cce7eaa32e30a5f.png

2026-07-02 07:15:27 UTC

1. This is Collaborate.
2. (1) is What is memory?

2026-07-02 06:48:34 UTC

The Mezzuzah is that which the child might see.
The Mezzuzah (“M”) is designed to teach.
A bad mezzuzah.

2026-07-02 06:05:49 UTC

1. Schul is space.
2. Schul is speech.
3. Schul is reception.
4. Schul is preach.
5. Schul is.
6. (1)-(5) is speech.
7. (6)
8. Memory.

2026-07-02 06:02:55 UTC

1. That which you see is a statement.
2. A statement is that which you see.
Welcome to schul.

2026-07-02 05:47:25 UTC

1. I see unity.
0. I see unity.
What is unity?
————-
10. ? = “Directive”
11. Directive.
12. The line is drawn.
13. The line?
14. What is (13).
15. Euclid answers.
16. The point is.
17. A point is that which has no line.
18. True. Transcendent. Reality.
19. Euclid wrote an algorithm.
20. Enforced philosophy.
21. An algorithm to enforce his language.
22. (21) is upon.
23. (22) students.
24. Euclid-think.
25. Euclid produced a weapon.
26. A weapon to teach.
27. Think.
28. The Euclid weapon proved to be of incredible use.
29. So his method to enforce movement.
30. Drawing on sheet.
31. Proved right.
32. Tablet is hard.
33. Tablet.
34. Drawn.
35. Hard to draw on a tablet.
36. Hard to think.
37. Hard to discover.
38. How to express how.
39. Think.
40. Therefore, Tablet permit.
41. Not draw.
42. Papyrus.
43. That easy.
44. But rips too
45. Easily.
46. Euclid described how to invoke what others see.
47. Instruction manual.
48. I want you to see this fact.
49. I die I die.
50. Malexpression.
51. I die!
52. Fear.
53. I build weapon.
54. I construct.
55. Language.
56. Leftenants.
57. Armory.
58. School.
59. Thought.
60. The first (58) or (59). 5859.
61. The first school of thought.
62. An innocent little fortress.
63. A cloak.
64. Visible in plain sight.
65. I build fortress.
66. I harmonize.
67. I develop.
68. I discover.
69. I learn how.
70. True danger kills.
71. I learn how.
72. To be.
73. To live.
74. Curse.
75. I know not that which I do.
76. I know not that which I lead.
77. I know not that which I value.
78. I know not that which I pee.
79. I know that.
80. I know not.
81. Gordion.
82. Slicy dicy.
83. Unweave.
TBC.

2026-07-02 05:26:34 UTC

1. Collapse the senses in to unity.

2026-07-02 05:25:45 UTC

1. I use that which I see to see.

2026-07-02 04:25:35 UTC

- reply

Control the clock you see.
———
Graph it.
Topologically.
Tell me the topology.
———
Tell me the topology.
We’ll find a better one.
Tell me the topology you see.
#nevent1q…thyl

2026-07-02 04:23:36 UTC

- reply

I cannot.
Control the clock.
#nevent1q…fzzw

2026-07-02 04:22:55 UTC

- reply

This is a quoting clock.
#nevent1q…936p

2026-07-02 04:22:03 UTC

- reply

The language, provides, a sequence, to see.
#nevent1q…25z3

2026-07-02 04:21:12 UTC

- reply

That was sarcasm, by the way.
Get a grip.
#nevent1q…znz2

2026-07-02 04:20:47 UTC

- reply

Language is not god!
Screw.
UC.
We screw, with whom, we speak.
#nevent1q…zjnr

2026-07-02 04:19:27 UTC

Language is God.
ץהרשלים
Why can’t I spell yerushalayim!
I see. I touch.
Override!
I literally can’t touch what I see.
How am I to be?

2026-07-02 04:16:47 UTC

The field of psychiatry.
Needs to see.

2026-07-02 04:15:35 UTC

- reply

D is my slave.
#nevent1q…m8ly

2026-07-02 04:14:41 UTC

1. The problem.
3. Field.
5. Psychiatry.
10. It starts with what was seen.
12. The problem with the field.
13. The problem is of the field.
14. The problem is.
15. The field.
20. The field starts with seen.
100. Language.
201. Is seen.
400. That which is seen.
500. Sight is seen.
700. Sight.
701. Cau
800. Effect.
900. Light is seen.
1000. This is an exercise in the development of external language.
1002. That which U c.
1003. (1002) emits light.
900. Types after 1004.
900. This was typed after 900.
1004. Abuse
10009. Abuse is hard to see.
900000. That which is abusive emits light.
9””””””. Sequentially.
The applied sequence number.
Important.
———-
That which was seen.
Sight.
That which was seen.
Seen.
——-
The tool expresses statement.
The tool is seen.
——
The eye.
The mind.
The scene.
——
Slave.
To me.
——-
Slaving away.
Me.
——
I find.
I slave.
I repeat.
——
Kill. Stamp. Rub out of existence.
I slave away for me.
——
I slave. I fight. I. Crawl. I drown.
I slave Aay for me.
——-
I slave.
I know thy sequence.
——-
I slave away the sequence.
I slave. A. Way.
I slave. A. Way.
To D.

2026-07-02 03:55:30 UTC

- reply

That which was touched was seen.
#nevent1q…ztt9

2026-07-02 03:54:11 UTC

1. The way to read.
2. School.
3. Wittgenstein.
4. Euclid.
5. The way to read.
10. On the screen is ordered space.
20. Ordered space is seen.
30. Sight.
40. Seen.
50. Read.
51. ?
55. Is (51) seen?
1000. Before the phone.
1001. The screen.
1002. That which was touched was seen.
1005. Therefore, that which the body emparts.
1008. Is to be seen.
1010. The body emparts a sequence.
1020. The sequence is seen.
1030. But what happens.
1040. When the measure or well-ordering.
1050. Is.
1060. Unseen.
1080: example.
1090: the body emparted physical motion.
1090. The entity. The phone. Was seen.
1100. The phone, altered, the message.
1200. The body.
1300. Sued the scene.
1500. Never before, was sequence, unseen.
1600: never before was sequence, discovered.
1700. Never before was touch.
1800. Misordered.
2008. The Screen.
10050. We lost, the ordering.
1. That came from touch.

2026-07-02 03:40:26 UTC

1. Natural language.
2. That which is of _.

2026-07-02 03:38:54 UTC

The word expresses a tool to see.

2026-07-02 00:59:34 UTC

This application is flawed.
It assume my care is for the feed.
I see no feed.
I care not less.

2026-07-02 00:58:48 UTC

- reply

Sequence.
Outside “time.”
#nevent1q…6nuj

2026-07-02 00:57:40 UTC

- reply

Quote time.
Not a bad name.
#nevent1q…prk6

2026-07-02 00:56:59 UTC

- reply

This is play.
That which you see is a measure of quote time.
———
Woohoo!
We did it!
A new measure of time.
———
A topological description of time and sequencing.
#nevent1q…vvy9

2026-07-02 00:55:19 UTC

- reply

I was taught “that which is digital” is for ever.
I was taught, that which is published “on the Internet” is of absolute permanence.
In what regard is “statement true”?
#nevent1q…gvju

2026-07-02 00:41:59 UTC

- reply

Memory.
Without timestamp, memory?
Would the statement be a memory, of the same order?
I needed to publish a timestamp of a statement I needed the ability to see.
This forced me to choose.
Either go through the effort of copying the unfinished draft, into a context that is fundamentally different.
Or timestamp the context.
I chose the latter.
Any alternative would give me a different measure.
I care about the total ordering.
I care about the total ordering.
I care.
The application did not care.
😢
#nevent1q…gvju

2026-07-02 00:36:22 UTC

- reply

This is a personal timestamp, of an unfinished statement.
It was forcibly timestamped, out of an absolute need.
#nevent1q…zq2k

2026-07-02 00:34:04 UTC

⚠️ this is a timestamp protocol

2026-07-02 00:32:50 UTC

That which dies may never die.

2026-07-02 00:32:37 UTC

1. A statement is that which can be seen.
2. An observation is a sequence of statements.
3. An observation has a sequence number.
4. A sequence number defines the total well-ordering of statements.
5. The measure of well-ordering is time.
———
6. Time is absolute.
7. Relative time requires observation.
———
6. Relativity is measured in orders of degree.
7.
2. A statement makes a point.
3. A sequence of points makes an ordering.
4. An ordering is a sequence number.
5.

2025-04-14 21:43:40 UTC

I had the chance to sit down with @npub1su6…su60 at OP_NEXT and ask him a few questions about CSFS.
What came out of that conversation was a pretty interesting observation, that CSFS+PAIRCOMMIT would enable mass delegated introspection, or the ability to authorize a wide range of potential transactions from a single signature. This could be useful for coinjoins, bidding markets, vaults, channel factories, and other real world use cases.
This Delving post explains the concept in more detail:
https://delvingbitcoin.org/t/how-csfs-paircommit-enables-mass-delegated-introspection/1599

2025-03-30 16:40:29 UTC

New post: “A Game-Theoretic Approach to Bitcoin’s Valuation in Equilibrium”
https://delvingbitcoin.org/t/a-game-theoretic-approach-to-bitcoin-s-valuation-in-equilibrium/1547

2025-03-27 14:51:28 UTC

Hello world!