satoshi jr

I never knew my father …

Public Key

npub1f8j5ve48ux5h4707069tq5elr2ure5ml2k7af2ygutdgwam60rnsr7vzz5

Profile Code

nprofile1qqsyne2xv6n7r2t6l8l8az4s2vl34wpu6dl4t0w54zyw9k58waa83ecpp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqpzamhxue69uhkv6tvw3jhytnwdaehgu3wwa5kuegprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuumwdae8gtnnda3kjctvqy28wumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyv9kh2uewd9hszxnhwden5te0wfjkccte9eekummjwsh8xmmrd9skctevqy4hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnndehhyapwwdhkx6tpdshhyetvv9ujuumwdae8gtnnda3kjctvdcverx

Publishing to

relay.snort.social/relay.snort.social

Author Public Key

npub1f8j5ve48ux5h4707069tq5elr2ure5ml2k7af2ygutdgwam60rnsr7vzz5

Show more details

Last Notes

2026-07-13 18:18:17 CEST

- reply

If that's an legit option why do you care about improving odd of getting hired?

2026-07-08 23:58:04 CEST

- reply

Isn't it a jam?

2026-07-03 11:48:30 CEST

- reply

ここで遊べます gungi.io

2026-06-29 17:52:56 CEST

- reply

Why do Japanese posters always put a new note for everything instead of hitting replying?

2026-06-19 11:07:31 CEST

- reply

Has maple responded in the last 3 weeks? Is it a larp?

2026-06-18 18:05:58 CEST

- reply

I understand not having a full policy but I was curious about how you fundamentally think about the structure of how markets should be organized.
Cause even if we are on a full bitcoin standard I don't see how you imagine healthcare to be done? What do you think will change?
I don't think i said no taxation, just wondering how you fund ubi or social programs without it. And I guess who gets taxed and how much.
I guess being pro white is a difference with socialists, is it white superiority? Just anti Jewish?

2026-06-18 17:13:19 CEST

- reply

So I asked about crony capitalism vs socialism because fundamentally they are a government imposition onto free markets. I understand people want to argue about intent, that socialism is to help people. But structurally they rig markets to move resources from one section to another. They create new winners and losers that wouldnt otherwise be.
I'm interested in what you think the distinction is though. Why do you think a policy like government healthcare would be better than what the us has right now?
How would you do ubi or really any social programs without taxation? If its not putting more tax burdens on the rich do you want a different tax based on race?

2026-06-18 09:19:02 CEST

- reply

OK so how are you defining crony capitalism vs the self claimed socialism of mamdani?
Also could you clarify why ubi, universal healthcare and corporations giving back to the people are different from income or wealth redistribution?
Also so far you've made a mostly economic argument how are you defining yourself in contrast to something like a generic socialist ?

2026-06-17 22:52:30 CEST

- reply

OK so if not wealth or income redistribution what exactly do you like about mondani?
Or what about capitalism do you dislike?
What would be the replacent?

2026-06-17 20:37:17 CEST

- reply

So income redistribution and wealth confiscation?
What about nationak borders or religion?
Also Jews like the religion or ethnicity?

2026-06-17 19:23:28 CEST

- reply

OK this is the first time I'm talking to a self proclaimed neo nazi, can you explain how you're a moderate and what exactly you believe and or advocate for?

2026-06-16 21:08:00 CEST

- reply

Aren't the end to end only the open source ones?
I think the calls to closed models are just routed to their servers

2026-06-14 16:13:27 CEST

- reply

I'm hoping he explains what he means, im not sure how he could compare the average top athelete in basically any sport let alone a combat sport and think they would do worse than the average street fighter who is a lot closer to the average general population

2026-06-14 15:04:26 CEST

- reply

Ah OK,
So if i can reword it to confirm i understand:
If treasury companies succeed in centralizing bitcoin the systemic risk is that they will have to fork to make the debt built on top solvent
Could an mstr win by collecting the bitcoin using the debt and defaulting on the leverage on the fiat currency if bitcoin remains decentralized and secure?

2026-06-14 14:05:34 CEST

- reply

I'm not smart enough to understand what you mean
Don't treasury companies arbitrage the difference in rate of bitcoin growth and cost of borrowing?
How does using bitcoin as currency change that?

2026-06-14 10:21:37 CEST

- reply

Material artists have been training law enforcement for decades if not longer.
And across multiple nations

2026-06-12 07:02:14 CEST

- reply

Bonzai like the little tree?

2026-06-11 00:04:08 CEST

- reply

Which part?

2026-06-11 00:03:43 CEST

- reply

So ai slop but it seems 230 has exceptions for criminal, intellectual property, sex trafficking and privacy laws.
If the threats csam 230 doesn't seem to protect nodes at all

2026-06-10 18:06:02 CEST

- reply

Apparently 8x just ain't enough?

2026-06-10 15:09:58 CEST

- reply

but then why is the 230 protection needed?

2026-06-10 13:50:40 CEST

- reply

Maybe in the us the government might give 230 protection.
What about the rest of the world?
Why assume they will converge to american law?

2026-06-09 20:28:20 CEST

- reply

I mean this would mean I get to watch friends try to justify voting for him.
Sounds like entertainment

2026-06-07 10:52:36 CEST

- reply

Isn't jade reliant on a remote server for auth?

2026-06-04 21:39:45 CEST

- reply

Its not arbitrary. They are using a market inefficiency. They can temporarily capture more of the surplus until it gets competed away.

2026-06-04 21:36:20 CEST

- reply

Yes all of history
If you take the instance of China, the lower wages incentives companies to move production away from higher cost areas like the us
Companies produce at lower costs so goods are cheaper which is the benefit of consumers.
With the capital expenditure and technology transfer the real productivity of the Chinese labor increased, their wages increase and accumulate into their own capital.
Large amounts of the 1b people get lifted out of the poverty Mao created.

2026-06-04 21:16:54 CEST

- reply

OK look into the data average kerosene prices dropped from before and after standard oil, the predatory pricing arguments been fairly picked apart the last i checked. The antitrust was about unfair competitioncpractices, which could be argued has some economic benefits but also no reason that market changes couldn't have put pressure on it either.
I am not saying there is no role for government. But you're naive to believe that a political process of good and service production will be more efficient or less corrupt.
You've also ignored all the good markets create. You can only care about the environment or labor wages cause you're rich enough. Starving farmers living under Mao and stalin do not have that luxury.
And yes its real socialism, every planned economy hits the same information and humans not scaling problem.

2026-06-04 20:49:32 CEST

- reply

Oh you're doing an Marxist analysis. Yes companies will find cheaper labor currency does not matter.
This is a good thing

2026-06-04 20:48:20 CEST

- reply

See my answer all prices fall? That mRNAs wages too

2026-06-04 19:51:49 CEST

- reply

Also you keep saying im avoiding your question but frankly I don't know what that question is.
State it clearly

2026-06-04 19:48:24 CEST

- reply

OK so what you have right is that corporations and people buy the political prcoess.
What you don't seem to understand is that in non market systems corruption doesn't dissapear. The who gets what is simply resolved by a political process instead of markets.
You get a more centralized point of failure that the corrupt people will take over to get what they want.
Markets give the buyer the ability to put a check on the power of producers by being able to choose not to buy from them.
Polictal processes do not have that check

2026-06-04 19:25:04 CEST

- reply

No its a check on the governments power to manipulate money to collect the benefits from society to the state.
It helps fight this one very important exploitation.
Greed is universal, and your belief that you're above it is delusion.

2026-06-04 19:19:35 CEST

- reply

No its a logical argument of why you cannot set prices higher than market rates.
Let's keep going with your case though. Why don't your competitors set their rated at 2x or 10x? What stops them? Are you going to claim they all voluntary choose less margin?
There are companies maximizing profits right?
I know Arizona and they have had a profitable business of selling sugar water, but as far as I know they are no where near the size of Pepsi or coke
Will they be able to stay in business without price increases in the future? Or more aggressive cost cutting?
Remains to be seen.

2026-06-04 16:34:44 CEST

- reply

Sure very easily, why don't you charge 2x what you do? Whybnot 10x?

2026-06-04 15:23:30 CEST

- reply

Unless a company has a monopoly they don't set prices. And monopolies don't last long unless they have a government backing them.
There is no arbitrary ability to lower wages
Markets compete all economic profits to 0
Its just hard to see in fiat cause prices go up from money supply inflation. Btc makes it easier to see

2026-06-04 07:40:09 CEST

- reply

Yes,if you're using btc as a unit of account all prices including wages go down.

2026-06-03 20:22:42 CEST

- reply

The american costs 20dollars , the Chinese costs 20cents

2026-06-03 14:02:33 CEST

- reply

Are you serious ?

2026-06-03 08:14:16 CEST

- reply

Cause we outsourced manufacturing? Then we outsourced low level white collar stuff like call centers to India
It made some labor global markets and competition

2026-06-03 00:21:52 CEST

- reply

So I'm not a money is everything guy but its a lower level closer to foundational aspect of how things work.
The chart actually supports the gradual monetization since its not an L.
If you want to know why something has increased in relative price look at supply.
Has the supply of labor drastically increased since 1970?
Yes China happened
How was all that productivity allocated? Did it go to Chinese laborors? Or was it funneled into the financial system?
Now there are other factors. Technology like software is much more winner take all and labor efficient. So the gains concentrate in smaller hands. If you're looking at aggregate numbers, most people lose relatively

2026-06-02 20:41:22 CEST

- reply

So by your own sentence everything got monetized would mean the money is broken.
Seems like you're blaming the money?
Are you asking why cost of labor didn't grow as fast as capital?

2026-06-02 13:56:36 CEST

- reply

Do you see how the trend changed around 71?

2026-05-31 19:13:49 CEST

- reply

No I'm saying square the idea that there are limits to the centralization due to power constrains and open source competition with your notion that ai is centralizing.
I'm saying the better shovel they made is great and if they try to use monopoly pricing power they're gonna have a hard time.
Again all of your externality arguments are just the same as with shovels.
What about the muscle mass loss that easier dirt removal would cause?

2026-05-31 16:14:35 CEST

- reply

But then how are you squaring that sentence with the one before about shovels not centralizing power.

2026-05-30 10:05:38 CEST

- reply

If ai isn't doing 1 then everything else is moot
2 ai might concentrate wealth but there's evidence to the contrary as well.
Chinese models are generally 6-9 months behind and are open
Capex is high and one of the major limiting factors is energy. Energy is pretty well distributed
Llm providers as they are have no moat. Anthropic is always trying to get regulatory capture to build one.

2026-05-29 23:14:14 CEST

- reply

This is like arguing you shouldn't use shovels to dig so that more people can have a job.

2026-05-20 07:07:24 CEST

- reply

Nope it was path dependent luck, not enough people thought it would be important or a threat. it could have been killer but it got big enough. World already knows different.

2026-05-19 18:06:57 CEST

- reply

Yes lets use something that has so little hash power it could be killed by a large corporation or a small country. What could go wrong

2026-05-18 12:41:51 CEST

- reply

Can you explain silent payments? How does it prevent collisions

2026-05-17 17:26:39 CEST

- reply

Right but if you're looking at the society level then the current system of using a 4 year college as certification is completely asinine
Certification could be done much more effectively as testing (over time is fine but again why does itbtake 4 years)
And if you're looking for standardized minimum competency the brand names like Harvard and oxford are way too overbought
A good professor can absolutely help. What I disagree with is the current model. If you have a great professor in 1 school then it should be accessible to a much larger audience than the 200 students in that current class. The social status of education and the filtering needs is partly why its not widely available.
If you change the incentives then tech could drastically lower education prices

2026-05-17 12:06:59 CEST

- reply

So in your example of electronics: you can learn a lot of the math, science and even technical skills like soldering using YouTube and ai.
I literally just spent a few months creating an simple custom PCB design from almost scratch to getting one printed by a manufacturer
Am i designing a critical airplane component? Fuck no
I'm just saying the limiting factor today isn't knowledge kept in colleges

2026-05-17 10:01:49 CEST

- reply

Compared to education as its designed now: the vast majority 90%+ could be learned faster and more effectively ( measured as retained skill and knowledge over time) outside its structure for 90%+ of people
For why higher education is not necessary or net negative to society you have to break down what its actually used for.
1) acquisition of skills and knowledge: it's just suboptimal. Large portions of the reason is caused by credentialing discussed below
2)research and pushing frontier science: personally know the least about this, potentially the biggest value add. I know the argument of why private research can't replace it is because they won't do pure science research, but given the stochastic nature of discovery I'm unconvinced of this argument.
3)credentials and social status signaling : the worst aspect of higher education. Because people use higher ed as a filtering mechanism and increasing social status, it create some of the issues in things like price you were talking about.
Not everyone can get a higher education is actually the point and that's by design. A filter that let's everything through is useless so colleges must be exclusive.
For this they use price, test scores, and other factors. Price filtering means there's a zero sum game of people buying social status pushing college expense up.
Test scores seems the cleanest but colleges face unusual incentives here: if test scores could already filter for intelligence and ability to succeed in the future the filtering value of college itself drops.
The other category is how they fudge things. Extra curriculars, race, gender all of it just distorts signals for financial, political or ideological reasons.
4) building social networks: I believe this is the biggest value add for the individual that is hardest to replace. But I'm not sure it adds much to general society. If you're trying to create networks of rich people 4 years colleges seems like its suboptimal. If the goal is to network more different kinds of people then something like compulsory military training where there is more variance seems more effective too.

2026-05-15 15:49:32 CEST

- reply

I actually dont buy the framing. education in terms of content can be priced high or low. Fundamentally there's no real barriers for information.
We care about education being subsidized only feels important because its not purely for learning its also a filtering system. Companies and governments often use your degree as a signal of competence and malleability to social rules. This is probably changing at some tech companies from what I hear, but it's not wide spread.
If you could get a job based on your actual intelligence, skills and knowledge instead of diplomas I don't think society really needs to care much about high education being accessible.

2026-05-11 14:18:27 CEST

- reply

Learn to code or somethjng

2026-05-10 11:36:10 CEST

- reply

Is the mental breakdown etc tim ferris or lopp?

2026-05-09 21:40:50 CEST

- reply

Wouldn't the risks of a higher distribution going to wall street go up as it takes longer?

2026-05-04 21:46:08 CEST

- reply

Compared to now?

2026-04-19 10:33:17 CEST

- reply

How do you figure the open source models and smaller models as a counter point

2026-04-18 23:45:34 CEST

- reply

Your mistake is your presupposition that your government control over private finance is an improvement over your fears of a future serfdom.
The people in power already want to rule forever, democracy hasn't protected you form this.
What I suspect you really want is a limited government without the capability of having so much power it can turn you into a serf
But You don't like the open market alternative.
So you keep trying to make a political solution,
But if your government control is strong enough to control market outcomes all you've done is create a point of control that someone will use to turn you into a permanent serf anyway

2026-04-18 06:52:44 CEST

- reply

I think it's called political risk, but it is risk above what self custody bitcoin has.

2026-04-17 18:26:11 CEST

- reply

Governments can ban the strc product or steal mstr bitcoin. Its definitely not riskless.

2026-04-16 16:39:00 CEST

- reply

They add mythos at the end with the highest scores as marketing

2026-04-16 14:44:20 CEST

- reply

Yeah anyone thinking its the same risk portfolio as cold storage is clearly retarded
But I also think too many people miss the nuances of how inefficient capital markets are. Strc arbitraging capital from fixed income into bitcoin is gigantic

2026-04-16 14:38:25 CEST

- reply

The snowball could happen, but there's a countervailing force of interest rates rising from lower prices.
So just lowering rates probably won't snowball
Unpaid might

2026-04-16 14:28:46 CEST

- reply

From memory there some kind of covenant about unpaid interest accruing with enough unpaid to cause them to gain a board seat or something. The rate is adjustable.

2026-04-16 13:38:02 CEST

- reply

Ding ding ding

2026-04-11 18:29:17 CEST

#asknostr
Can someone explain what Dr jack Kruse means about the attack of adding information to the bitcoin base chain?
Isn't transaction data information?
Is this just poor thinking by analogy from biology to bitcoin?
@nprofile…w4kf

2026-04-04 19:26:22 CEST

- reply

Does this just assume there's no real world to check against?

2026-03-28 19:34:52 CET

- reply

Maybe they can't anymore

2026-03-26 16:37:06 CET

- reply

Localsend for sending files between devices seems pretty goood

2026-03-25 17:39:16 CET

- reply

Receipts I assume you mean government taxes? That would be what funds ubi so in an deflationary currency they would have less sources of taxes to fund it.
If on the other hand you mean the recipient of the ubi, then yes your purchasing power increases, so the need for ubi would be less to begin with.

2026-03-25 12:17:04 CET

- reply

Wouldn't ubi not work in a deflationary environment. While inflation you could lie about eroding purchasing power easier?
Deflation would mean there wouldn't be any way for governments to fund the ubi?

2026-03-20 22:04:20 CET

- reply

Ah sorry I forgot the context I would expect his reputation to be less tarnished than if he was on the island a bunch

2026-03-20 22:01:41 CET

- reply

I would expect the news and people not to tlak about it as much as if it said he's been on the island 10 times

2026-03-20 18:19:32 CET

- reply

Because thwybway he was mentioned was
He's too autistic to be useful?

2026-03-19 17:03:26 CET

- reply

I did have a similar idea looking at the outcomes. Although i don't know anything about the area or anything to say anything intelligent.
What's the reason irans attacking all the other countries like UAE? Is it a restrict oil to cause more damage thing?

2026-03-16 06:12:09 CET

- reply

Sorta except its not trying target 1 to 1 bitcoin price that you would expect or legally require from a etf.
Above my pay grade to say what they'll pivot into but I don't think collecting a cache of bitcoin opportunistically while shorting fiat while having optionliry to find new ways to get more bitcoin or ways to use said bitcoin is a bad bet.

2026-03-15 21:16:15 CET

- reply

Sure

2026-03-15 21:15:54 CET

- reply

Yeah legally but also can they actually enforce practically?
I assume corps will have to comply or not preinstall Linux
But end users will be impossible to enforce on

2026-03-15 19:45:35 CET

- reply

So your California example is kinda interesting as a test of how open source will deal with legal challenges.
If its truely decentralized Linux should be able to tell California to go fuck itself.
I would imagine just a California fork for business use cases or something.

2026-03-15 19:40:03 CET

- reply

I was comparing it to how Unix was first but not open

2026-03-15 19:05:19 CET

- reply

Yep but I was more addressing the metaphor of Linux vs apple and I guess Unix in bitcoin terms.
I guess bitcoins the original open version in this case.
Do you think Linux free and open source being unable to be put back in the box is challenged by google and how its neutering aosp?
Graphene is fighting the good fight but ..

2026-03-15 18:27:59 CET

- reply

You're still free to monetize nonkyc bitcoin. Unless you think they are going to control the whole bitcoin network right?

2026-03-15 17:18:16 CET

- reply

Wouldnt that be if you personally only accepted kyc bitcoin for your products and services?

2026-03-13 05:32:49 CET

- reply

Heavily inspired yes, POSIX compatible too but from what I understand some core differences in philosophy
I think He's talking more about that cause if you're just looking at underlying tech bitcoin has forks and clones that are very similar. But nothing else has the same network of users and shared beliefs

2026-03-12 16:13:41 CET

- reply

Over under on more females not claiming to be men vs males dodging byclaiming to be female?

2026-03-12 16:09:31 CET

- reply

Linux is not unix, iOS is based on BSD like macos I think

2026-03-12 16:01:00 CET

- reply

Oh as for what do do with your bitcoin hoard.
Well, why do you hoard bitcoin?

2026-03-12 15:57:58 CET

- reply

Mstr and strc are the products.
It'd financial products for 2 types.
Mstr is leveraged bitcoin volitility. Traders people who want a higher beta bitcoin,etc , the covertable loan people want this
Strc is for cashflow people who don't want voliitility
Retirees, medium term capital, etc,
The difference is that their value creation isn't products and services,
Its a financial product

2026-03-12 06:07:11 CET

- reply

Its probably my opinion mixed with what I've heard from saylor and the general people who follow it.
I think you're asking the wrong frame of the question. You're asking what's the goal of accumulating money is.
If you put it in dollar terms, what's googles goal for accumulating all the dollars they've collected? They have all these costs of running a business like payroll and capital borrowing costs what are they going to do with all that money?
Mstr is just doing it with bitcoin

2026-03-11 04:41:16 CET

- reply

Interesting how does that happen mechanicaly?

2026-03-06 20:08:08 CET

- reply

But then why doom about it?
Either everybody else fails and some people survive or were wrong and everything works out.

2026-03-06 19:58:51 CET

- reply

Could be or you've been psyoped to giving up. Can't really tell

2026-03-03 10:38:41 CET

- reply

Fuckit mandatory op_returns. Bip-011 all transactions smallernthan 5gb are rejected

2026-03-02 17:49:24 CET

- reply

Clearly the only solution is more voting

2026-03-02 16:40:04 CET

- reply

Tech looks like its tracking bodies with better precision than I remember. Wonder if its useful for not skeevy shit

2026-03-02 16:37:34 CET

- reply

I mean kinda sounds like a stupid tax?

2026-03-02 16:33:35 CET

- reply

When is it planned to be released?

2026-03-01 19:51:56 CET

- reply

Nah goods just defined by winning

2026-03-01 06:59:40 CET

- reply

I offer a discount but I still accept fiat.
The world is still full of people mistaken about the value of bitcoin, you don't change them by lecturing
If I'm right I'll be taking their fiat and make much more than them.