<unnamed>

Public Key

npub1glh0kv7869ylsxzlngkyg58et9mej7fdjcq8xvd6gm35u5p52pzsjvj6t2

Profile Code

nprofile1qqsy0mhmx0razj0crp0e5tzy2ru4jaue0ykevqrnxxaydc6w2q69q3gprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumt0d4hhxarj9ecxjmnt2gp8u6

Publishing to

relay.momostr.pink

Last Notes

2026-07-09 06:54:00 UTC

- reply

The Brits have done their best to keep the war going, and were involved in creating conditions for war so best not to forget them. Boris Johnson acted to derail negotiations for instance.
MH17: quite possibly UK security services working with Ukrainians. Generated pro-war sentiment.
Russiagate, as well as creating material for Trump Derangement Syndrome also worked to build dislike for Russians. UK heavily involved in that op.
Weirdly enough the pee-pee dossier's supposed author later turned up with a group which launched a zero-covid media op: Independent Sage. The true author of the dossier was rumoured to be Skripal. Skripal disappeared amidst the most absurd tissue of lies which is the official conspiracy theory to explain the Salisbury poisonings. Off the back of that diplomats were withdrawn en masse. UK generated BS, all of it. So again, don't forget us Brits.
Popular entertainment had anti-Russian sentiment inserted. I expect someone could do statistical analysis, and it would mirror the rise in movies and shows about viruses.
(And after all this background and creating the sentiment, and the snipers flown into Ukraine in 2014 by NATO to shoot dead protesters, and NATO stirring up hate and conflict, and Ukraine shelling its own people we have Mark Kulacz on an otherwise reasonable stream saying that Putin may have invaded because of mistaken beliefs about biolabs. Talk about not knowing what you don't know.. )
And not everyone who meets Russians, goes to Russia, or is paid by a Russian corporation is working for Russia against the west. That sort of thinking generates a whole lot of wrong conclusions.
I don't have an issue with Stone interviewing Putin and working with Russians but Judyth Vary Baker does look to be making things up, and if he has supported her I think he's wrong. ( Other than the JFK assassination being the most massive time sink, so beware before starting any research, I'm wondering whether Baker was somehow inserted with a changed version of history to boost the virus story. Interesting that The Men Who Killed Kennedy was brought back to add those episodes, including the Judyth one. Perhaps all the furore about the Johnson episode was a smokescreen whilst the real payload slipped in. BBC again: UK.)
And I'm concerned that Stone, after all these decades, chose to lead on ballistics. Salandria agreed with his brother in law BEFORE Oswald was shot that if anything happened to LHO that that meant JFK had been taken out by the US government. A sceptic might say the ballistics are a pointless time sink, and studying them implies that LHO might have taken a shot. (Wrong assumption because he couldn't have.) But these are just gripes and I can't say Stone is anything other than wrong on those two points.
I'm opposed to guilt by association thinking and to framing everything as nation state vs nation state or left vs right. Simplistic thinking works against us.

2026-07-03 08:22:46 UTC

- reply

Thanks to you both for the information.
I do feel at times it's a bit too easy to draw links on a chart and assume joint goals. McGovern for instance I trust as independent, having listened to him speak for many hours. (See graphic shared by @henjin ). And wouldn't we expect a Soviet Union analyst of the cold war era might actually want to visit Russia?
It's interesting to see Occupy pop up again in Pamela's article on Suzie.
I looked into David Graeber (Bullsh*t Jobs author, Occupy associated) and he used to promote Jeffrey Sachs's work. David died in unusual circumstances in 2020, and on his wife's blog appeared Prof Steve Keen to say "should you really be saying this in a public forum", or similar. Keen had appeared more than once on George Galloway's show (Galloway seemingly a multi-polarista) and on at least one occasion absolutely selling the OneHealth line on reducing travel and trade due to Convid.
Galloway used to promote a couple of figures now appearing in Dr Couey's and Mark Kulacz's streams: Abby Martin and Jimmy Dore. I believe Galloway also debated Bannon one time, and he used to mention him a lot. (I used to listen every week to his show.)
Graham Ellwood, in discussion with Suzie Dawson (your link) had a very loud falling out with Jimmy Dore about the vax. Looking back, it all seems quite theatrical now and over the top, though at the time I thought it was authentic.
There I go making connections, but again I'm not assuming shared goals, or that these people needed to understand the role they were playing, even if some did.
https://archive.ph/rwCrF

2026-06-30 18:39:01 UTC

- reply

In May this year David A Hughes named four people funded by German businessman Marcel Jahnke; Jahnke owns businesses in Hong Kong. He apparently funded a trip to China for UK Column journalists, including relatively recent arrival Jeremy Nell.
Jahnke is being criticised for influencing alternative media and exerting pressure.
Discussion is at 50 minutes to 60 minutes. Bhakdi mentioned at 58 minutes or so. ( @jjcouey )
Funding recipients: Whitney Webb, Iain Davis, Derrick Broze and Sucharid Bhakdi, though there were some quite small amounts.
https://odysee.com/@davidahughes:6/20260521-Fleming-Blicher:7

2026-06-13 15:36:28 UTC

- reply

Perhaps I shouldn't have included that detail about Tony: it was an aside.
Braxman's video was about Microsoft's intention to allow ONLY an agentic interface for the home user and serious processing to be at the data centres *. Even if you are correct that that is "materially shown to be false" it's immaterial: I'm illustrating that Tony doesn't take on information well because he spreads himself too thin. Something that any one of us might do.
* Note high RAM prices are killing the small PC builders. Well done "AI".

2026-06-13 11:23:58 UTC

- reply

(Summary: multi-polarista media shows, Covid promotion, inspiration to revolt.)
Setting aside your observations about character and courage, I feel there is an important overlap with this multi-polaristas media operation which for me is starting to look more real.
George Galloway, as well as hosting Covid sensationalist Onehealth-ers, also used to pump up China, Dore, Bannon and Abby Martin. It may be that his producers were the guiding hand. (Notably he has a younger, foreign wife.) He even interviewed Laura Loomer way back. Abby Martin was presented as if she was royalty: such a hot catch. I don't follow Galloway these days.
I also listen often to left-winger Tony Gosling's radio show. Although I understand Tony's stance on many topics he jumps from subject to subject, covering each so lightly that he can't help but be duped, or misled. (Most frustrating when he played, on a suggestion from his IT guy, just five minutes of a Braxman video and came away with the gem that your computing data was now not going to be on your computer. NO TONY THE POINT WAS THE PROCESSING is moving off your computer and accessible only via AGENTS. Missing the point is a risk for anyone setting out to be a generalist I suppose...)
To the point. Tony's regular guest is ex-security services Martin Summers. Martin plugs the benefits of how things are done in China and Russia routinely, and now starts to look like one of these multi-poliaristas. Incitement is an offence in the UK but recently Tony repeatedly asked Martin, because Martin was saying that in China the offending class was dealt with by violence. (Show of 5th June). Strong hint that that's what was needed here: Tony not happy.
Synchronicity with this Elizabeth Lane character.
Martin, like Tony, also on the left. There's plenty of variety on the show, which mixes local with global stories, both of which indicate the way that democracy has been broken down at different levels. Also Martin will dish the dirt on British, American and NATO crimes of the past, for instance Gladio. I believe our nations CAN be saved whilst attacking the warmongering history of some of our nation states.

2026-06-10 10:07:57 UTC

Re: all the podcasters having forgotten Jonathan Couey.
In May 2025 Moric was talking about the guests he has on his Geopolitics & Empire podcast. He mentions @jjcouey having previously said that one person told him to f**k off and asked him who he was working for. When I first heard this I suspected it might be Jonathan Couey, but possibly not.
My position is that whilst I recognise there are many misleading characters in podcast-land that _some_ truth is there. We might as well say don't bother reading history since most of it is written by court historians, or those influenced by them, when the only way to perceive misrepresentation is to examine it.
It is certainly interesting that David A Hughes has pushed his flawed (by being dumb-simple IMHO) Camps thesis without ever mentioning Jonathan Couey.
Moric himself has written about the multi-poiaristas in alternative media: the multi-polar world being a way to promote globalism. I believe there is overlap between the BRICS promoters and Covid promotion: it needs research. George Galloway for instance used to promote Bannon and Dore.
From May 2025. 1 hour 26 minutes in.
https://odysee.com/@CourtenayTurner:f/v6st0yt-ep-483-global-technocracy-new-world-order-w-hrvoje-moric-the-courtenay-turner-podcast:4

2026-06-02 19:12:38 UTC

- reply

Does a non-profit have to publish accounts showing its largest donors?
The panicdemic industry could easily fund hundreds of these outfits.

2026-04-30 23:20:56 UTC

- reply

Interesting and thanks for sharing but I don't feel this information condemns Hughes.
In the same way that Jonathan Couey haved worked for CHD does not condemn him.
It's tempting to take any bad signs as meaning a person continues to mislead intentionally or act in bad faith but in this case I don't think so. In the early days many people were taken in by nanobot stories: many fakes were promoting supposed evidence.
I remain open minded.

2026-04-26 14:51:01 UTC

David A Hughes really leaves no doubt about Reiner Fuellmich here. Amongst a lot of information presented, apparently some of the funds were withdrawn and invested in gold, then the gold was left at friends' houses.
The Scientology link is interesting.
Oxford University and Duke in Hughes's history is concerning but nevertheless the analysis seems sound. I don't think Hughes is easily dismissed.
https://odysee.com/@davidahughes:6/20260409-Maryann-Gebauer-optimised:1

2026-04-17 17:26:28 UTC

- reply

Now that I've seen raw milk as the culprit in an episode of Boardwalk Empire I know this is a subject they want on the agenda.
Milk wars!
And we've had polio in the show, so I guess maxxines are coming next.

2026-04-15 17:18:17 UTC

- reply

1h 14m into this one.
Millegan thinks Ruppert was possibly switched over to Peak Oil because of his mind control history. (And he mentions CAF again.)
https://odysee.com/@JamesDelingpoleChannel:0/2026-02-03-Kris-Millegan_PG:c

2026-04-15 12:12:42 UTC

At about 1h 52m Kris Millegan says that Michael Ruppert and Catherine Austin Fitts had come through the MK Ultra programme.
Courtenay does not query it and does not look surprised. Has CAF talked about that?
https://odysee.com/@CourtenayTurner:f/v56r565-ep-419-freedom-of-press-uncovering-secret-societies-mk-ultra-more-w-kris-millegan-courtenay-unlisted-video:f

2025-11-17 22:34:24 UTC

- reply

Rule 20.
"20 — Be suspicious of those who excessively advocate civility, rules and politeness. Manipulators thrive on rules and civility, because they know how to manipulate them. Someone who’s willing to color outside the lines and get angry at someone noxious even when they’re acting within the rules makes a manipulator very uncomfortable. Often times those telling you to calm down and behave yourself when you are rightfully upset are manipulators who have a vested interest in getting you to adhere to the rules set they’ve learned to operate within."
https://caityjohnstone.medium.com/thirty-two-tips-for-navigating-a-society-that-is-full-of-propaganda-and-manipulation-f3798079fea6