Kirtai 🏳️‍⚧️

AuDHD Transgirl with OCD who is a fan of personal dynamic computer systems like Smalltalk.
Also likes playing piano.

Pronouns: she/her
Codeberg: https://codeberg.org/Kirtai

Public Key

npub1hu9np9tkf38h795r8hanfnh67lp2f7zqq2qwu50e9yuhpdaa0u6qgtqelz

NIP-05 Address

[email protected]

Profile Code

nprofile1qqst7zesj4mycnmlz6pnm7e5ema00s4ylpqq9q8w28ujjwtsk77h7dqpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduqs6amnwvaz7tmwdaejumr0ds4frpx2

Publishing to

relay.damus.io

nos.lol

Author Public Key

npub1hu9np9tkf38h795r8hanfnh67lp2f7zqq2qwu50e9yuhpdaa0u6qgtqelz

Show more details

Last Notes

2026-07-26 21:05:08 CEST

- reply

Quite the indictment of modern systems tbh.

2026-07-24 07:43:00 CEST

- reply

It was originally only 20 years, with another 20 if you registered it

2026-07-24 00:27:18 CEST

- reply

Hmm, a quick search doesn't show anything but I'll keep an eye out.

2026-07-24 00:21:21 CEST

- reply

What Lua/SDL system is that?

2026-07-24 00:08:40 CEST

- reply

It's hard to finish software when the substrate keep shifting like quicksand.

2026-07-23 22:50:28 CEST

- reply

"Terabytes" of chat logs.
From *Signal* of all places.
In other news, the Easter Bunny is real.

2026-07-23 03:07:08 CEST

- reply

iirc they're used to generate parts of the XCB library so might be useful to generate a skeleton of the X11 server protocol handler.

2026-07-23 03:04:46 CEST

- reply

Would the XCB XML protocol description files help?

2026-07-20 22:01:15 CEST

- reply

Oh, how does mine read?

2026-07-20 20:06:08 CEST

- reply

Yeah, I was curious but everything I read about it makes it ever more repulsive.

2026-07-18 00:18:57 CEST

- reply

I just checked and TCC just says "approaching C99" while [cproc](https://sr.ht/%7Emcf/cproc/ ) for QBE seems to be mostly C11 plus a lot of C23.

2026-07-18 00:10:43 CEST

- reply

How close are TCC and whatever front-end QBE uses to C23 support?

2026-07-16 23:56:32 CEST

- reply

Can macrology deal with the boilerplate?

2026-07-14 22:59:37 CEST

- reply

Well yeah, I meant more noting stuff that's been deprecated.

2026-07-14 22:31:10 CEST

- reply

Oh well. Thanks anyways.

2026-07-14 22:05:57 CEST

- reply

Is there a good tutorial or book on learning C23 idioms without worrying about the older versions?

2026-07-03 10:03:38 CEST

- reply

This is partly why I tend to look at older systems for inspiration.

2026-06-09 01:13:00 CEST

- reply

So sad :neocat_cry:

2026-06-03 03:16:35 CEST

- reply

Wow. Seriously. :neocat_o_o:

2026-06-03 01:54:32 CEST

- reply

UXN in *shellscript!?*
Wow.

2026-06-02 00:48:45 CEST

- reply

For some reason I'm reminded of how TeX uses digits of Pi and Metafont uses digits of e.
I know they're not the same but I find it interesting :neocat_3c:

2026-05-22 21:57:22 CEST

- reply

Will you be making an editor?
Also, would that format handle the Xerox Smalltalk font? (Cream I think it's called?)

2026-05-22 15:31:24 CEST

- reply

That's because you have been taught and internalised arithmetic precedence.

2026-05-22 15:29:52 CEST

- reply

*Screams in Smalltalk* :neocat_angry:

2026-05-22 15:09:32 CEST

- reply

Oooh, very cool.
Are the vector fonts a new file format?

2026-05-19 16:32:16 CEST

- reply

I didn't want to look into Standard ML but I failed my saving throw.

2026-05-13 22:20:14 CEST

- reply

If the characters name is Frieren is ever chest a mimic?

2026-05-13 09:28:19 CEST

- reply

It's surprising how important the type of sand you use can be.
e.g. Concrete needs sharp sand for strength, using the smooth sand you get on beaches is much weaker. The grains need to interlock.

2026-05-13 01:11:50 CEST

- reply

Double crap.

2026-05-13 01:10:18 CEST

- reply

Oh crap.

2026-05-13 00:41:22 CEST

- reply

Oh no, who is it *this* time?

2026-05-11 18:43:34 CEST

- reply

Yikes! :neocat_0_0:

2026-05-10 06:13:38 CEST

- reply

Well shit, I failed to dodge this one.

2026-05-07 03:22:44 CEST

- reply

*Interesting*
...
No, no more lesser used languages for me to obsess over :neocat_laugh_sweat:

2026-05-06 21:03:59 CEST

- reply

Ah, was this in response to the wrong message?

2026-05-06 20:31:18 CEST

- reply

Which one was it?

2026-05-06 01:45:33 CEST

- reply

In that case I don't know of any. Sorry.
Though I do understand the plugin thing. It shields the yt-dlp devs from legal liability.
It's like how Kodi allows third party plugins but won't provide plugins for pay sites. They don't want their heads to be in the firing line.

2026-05-06 01:20:55 CEST

- reply

Yeah. I dunno about gallery-dl but yt-dlp wants a javascript engine like deno and sometimes something else for Youtube.

2026-05-06 01:19:35 CEST

- reply

In that case you may want to try a rocket sled.
Coilguns and railguns are two different types of linear electric motor.

2026-05-06 01:17:34 CEST

- reply

I don't think so.

2026-05-06 01:12:44 CEST

- reply

[gallery-dl](https://codeberg.org/mikf/gallery-dl ) works on webtoons.
I have seen others but can't remember them.

2026-05-06 01:08:22 CEST

- reply

Like a railgun or coilgun?

2026-05-03 18:28:59 CEST

- reply

Pfft, anyone who believes that should try listening to the music that was made on the Amiga.

2026-05-01 16:31:50 CEST

- reply

It's also a *fuckton* of work each and every day and night.

2026-04-30 20:00:46 CEST

- reply

About time Ada got a bootstrap compiler.
It's the main thing that deters me from it.

2026-04-30 18:55:35 CEST

- reply

Well yeah. No amount of stability of the base technology can make up for having to track a moving target like HTML.
Did I ever mention that I hate the very concept of a "living standard"? Because I hate the very concept of a "living standard".

2026-04-30 18:38:26 CEST

- reply

I so wish that hardware vendors would *follow the damn specs* when making stuff.

2026-04-30 18:33:26 CEST

- reply

I would love a system with a secure microkernel written in something like Ada, with servers written in a powerful, secure language like some kind of Lisp and the user shell written in something like Smalltalk.
Chances of getting one is zero but it's nice to dream of.

2026-04-30 18:31:01 CEST

- reply

Well yeah, but I was specifically referring to Linux history here.

2026-04-30 18:21:47 CEST

- reply

Ugh. A situation where even Common Lisp's stability doesn't help :neocat_angry:

2026-04-30 18:20:09 CEST

- reply

I can't help but remember that a *very* big part of the disagreement between the monolithic and microkernel people was "but muh performance" on the monolithic side.

2026-04-28 18:16:08 CEST

- reply

It's unsurprising that qemu uses 9p for the host folder functionality.

2026-04-26 19:00:13 CEST

- reply

That *is* strange. Not even for a microcontroller?

2026-04-26 11:11:37 CEST

- reply

iirc the developer of vdirsyncer studied a lot of webdav implementations and concluded that they're all shit.

2026-04-26 11:06:26 CEST

- reply

Doesn't 9p work over those connections?

2026-04-26 10:59:25 CEST

- reply

FTP uses reserved ports?

2026-04-22 21:54:26 CEST

- reply

All the esoteric computing stuff you post :neocat_3c:

2026-04-22 12:16:26 CEST

- reply

One of these days I will understand this.

2026-04-18 10:58:21 CEST

- reply

Well, at least it's not CORBA.

2026-04-17 20:42:33 CEST

- reply

Oh, sorry, macros are *not* the only way to do metaprogramming. Macros are just the most common way to do it in *Lisp.*
Smalltalk uses normal methods and objects to do it.
And building a class system in Lua *is* metaprogramming. Lua is just good at that sort.
You are, after all, changing Lua to be an object oriented language.
Compare doing the same in C.

2026-04-17 20:28:13 CEST

- reply

Another thing is that metaprogramming covers a *huge* range of things.
Here's another example.
Adding an object system to C required a *huge* amount of work to produce C++ and Objective-C.
Adding an object system to Scheme or Forth is a students afternoon project.
The difference? C has very very weak metaprogramming.
Scheme and Forth have very strong metaprogramming.

2026-04-17 20:07:25 CEST

- reply

Consider things like boilerplate, patterns and conventions.
In a language with weak or no metaprogramming you just have to write those out every time.
In languages with strong metaprogramming, you can wrap them up, name them and then they're just another part of the language.
e.g. consider opening a file, doing something with it then closing it, using exceptions to ensure that it's always closed no matter what.
In many languages you have to either hope that the language creators provided it or you'll have to write that out yourself every time you do it.
In Common Lisp, you just use the *with-open-file* macro.
The key point is that you can create these things yourself. There is no *with-open-socket* macro in Common Lisp but unlike many languages, you can *make your own*.
You can define your own *with-open-socket* macro and use it in exactly the same way as the built in macros. It becomes part of the language under your control.

2026-04-17 04:01:35 CEST

- reply

One thing is does is massively reduce boilerplate.
Instead of writing lots of repetitive code you can fold it into the language itself.
Another thing is it allows you to create a language specific to your application domain.
Regarding adding more control structures, did you know that Smalltalk doesn't have *any* control structures in the language itself? They're all based on metaprogramming.

2026-04-16 21:52:48 CEST

- reply

Maybe it now needs you to be logged in or something?
Hope it's not gone, I was just going to set some up.

2026-04-13 00:44:03 CEST

- reply

Of course Scotland isn't mentioned.

2026-04-12 00:42:04 CEST

- reply

> “Just because someone's a member of an ethnic minority doesn't mean they're not a nasty small-minded little jerk.”
> ― Terry Pratchett, Feet of Clay

2026-04-09 18:56:06 CEST

- reply

Like KeyKOS et al?

2026-04-09 17:08:09 CEST

- reply

I've heard that webdav server implementations tend to be pretty terrible across the board.

2026-04-09 13:20:40 CEST

- reply

Hmmm, what about MIPS?

2026-04-06 22:16:42 CEST

- reply

UUCP and FidoNet are other interesting options along those lines.

2026-04-06 20:24:22 CEST

- reply

Hmm, why not run Fusix on it? :neocat_3c:

2026-04-06 19:51:56 CEST

- reply

I just want something I can build myself that can run a modern Smalltalk-76+ at a reasonable speed.

2026-04-01 23:44:58 CEST

- reply

Oh true, but those are the places where it's important enough to offset the additional complexity.

2026-04-01 23:25:29 CEST

- reply

Also, aren't pauseless collectors really only meant for interactive and/or real time systems?

2026-03-30 17:14:31 CEST

- reply

Funny, I was recently wondering which GUI toolkits had servers you could control remotely.
/me goes to look up gtk-server

2026-03-26 11:31:13 CET

- reply

I like to read trans-harry fics, because I know the Chief Terf would hate them.

2026-03-21 09:47:07 CET

- reply

Eh, the unix philosophy works fine on the machines it was built for.
The problem is that modern systems are not what it was built for.

2026-03-20 06:00:20 CET

- reply

For some weird reason I also don't see who you're replying to. :neocat_woozy:

2026-03-20 05:08:04 CET

- reply

Nope.

2026-03-20 05:06:38 CET

- reply

hmm, all I saw was
[Post Content]

2026-03-19 07:02:14 CET

- reply

I am very annoyed that tagged hardware never became the mainstream.

2026-03-17 07:39:50 CET

- reply

Wouldn't surprise me if trucks had already been robbed for them.

2026-03-13 20:50:09 CET

- reply

"Let's you and him fight?" kinda thing?

2026-03-11 18:00:02 CET

- reply

I do wonder sometimes why tooling doesn't get improved.

2026-03-08 01:22:14 CET

- reply

Maybe switch to a byte code interpreter with an extremely dense encoding? This can be smaller than native code.

2026-03-06 20:42:09 CET

- reply

*Are* they though?
Threads have a lot more problems than memory issues :neocat__w:

2026-03-06 20:38:06 CET

- reply

I recently read that Rust uses pretty much the same thread model as C++.

2026-03-06 17:17:04 CET

- reply

Are they using ropes or are they going to have to rewrite everything for large files? :neocat_3c:

2026-03-05 13:36:59 CET

- reply

I've started thinking that they're the first real cognitohazards we've encountered. If not the first memetic weapons.

2026-03-01 14:08:56 CET

- reply

Why Alan Sugar specifically?

2026-02-28 16:22:15 CET

- reply

I didn't know that still existed.

2026-02-28 12:50:13 CET

- reply

True.
...
Come to think of it, *is* there any accessible filesystem designed for at-rest data?

2026-02-28 12:47:46 CET

- reply

Don't know about filesystems themselves but I'd add a par2 integrity set over them if I had space for it.

2026-02-27 10:37:17 CET

- reply

And what if ed(1) called Lisp to assist it with parsing.

2026-02-25 09:21:19 CET

- reply

Doesn't help if you're on a non-glibc system either.

2026-02-24 09:01:29 CET

- reply

Have I missed something about KeepassXC?

2026-02-22 03:51:43 CET

- reply

Money?

2026-02-20 06:27:47 CET

- reply

Oh for fucks sake :neocat_scream_angry:

2026-02-20 06:23:16 CET

- reply

Oh no, what happened?

2026-02-20 04:45:16 CET

- reply

We need more done in *actually* high level languages.