<unnamed>

Anything not voluntarily is coercion.
Anything not voluntarily is coercion
Anything not voluntarily is coercion
Anything not voluntarily is coercion
Anything not voluntarily is coercion

2026-09-06 01:32:49 CEST

- reply

Both equally hold weight in the destruction of foss, privacy and self sovereignty.

2026-09-03 03:16:03 CEST

Ranting, but its not a coincidence the powers that be have sent the samourai devs and Roman Storm to the SDNY. DEN OF SNAKES!

2026-09-03 02:33:46 CEST

- reply

Everyone saw this coming

2026-08-29 16:20:58 CEST

- reply

Timeline is cool, chart is ass

2026-08-29 16:11:07 CEST

- reply

No kyc is the best kyc

2026-08-29 16:06:39 CEST

- reply

I know monero and the reply wasn't for you

2026-08-28 19:18:58 CEST

- reply

https://blossom.primal.net/d6d749686fedff8c13fd7eee2c00e6ec2b0a755d40a4e937e87c7108e37b3c67.gif

2026-08-28 18:57:15 CEST

- reply

Blake2b doesn't fix anything you listed

2026-08-28 18:51:55 CEST

- reply

Blake2b doesn't accomplish whatever you think it does. Switching to it will not magically make more people run nodes. Mining would just centralize again if the value is there. Bot even going to touch the stupid core dev opinion.

2026-08-09 00:43:05 CEST

- reply

512 blocks would reduce lag, but a few realities remain. Variance is still high with only 512 samples. Difficulty would swing more on pure luck than the current window. Isolation and timestamp attacks become somewhat easier the shorter the window gets.
Any change requires a hard fork and actual consensus. Just lower it to 512 is easy to say and hard to coordinate without creating more drama than the current system.

2026-08-09 00:32:34 CEST

- reply

Monero’s every block adjustment is more responsive and keeps block times tighter under normal conditions. The cost is more algorithmic complexity and it still lags significantly after sudden hashrate shifts. Both designs work, Bitcoin prioritizes stability and simplicity over tight short term control. That’s why a near zero hashrate minority chain can sit almost frozen for a long time before difficulty can drop enough to recover

2026-08-08 23:30:52 CEST

If you fell for the luke and mechanic purity test, you're ngmi

2026-08-07 05:21:00 CEST

Nobody wants to hear it, but people who actually understand Bitcoin, didn't have a coldcard. It was an IQ test, and its unfortunate that people got scammed by a fat jew in Canada.

2026-08-07 04:54:45 CEST

- reply

Coldcard and the honey pot lmfao🍌
#nevent1q…gtd6

2026-08-07 04:53:15 CEST

2 days till the orphan chain

2026-08-03 22:48:03 CEST

Now is a great time to learn how to buy non kyc bitcoin. The coldcard debacle ruined alot of people's privacy. People with non kyc bitcoin (no identity attached to coins) were somewhat spared.
https://learn.robosats.org/

2026-08-02 01:37:16 CEST

https://blossom.primal.net/898ac4ed34466dc44c355fa98c3495bafe25bfc46c8d9ac6fa96e806d438ef55.jpg

2026-07-30 23:51:10 CEST

https://blossom.primal.net/c05bf6bccd24dc2a32dafec9e356ab57960028f8dd64d71d1d72a71f020291ed.jpg

2026-07-30 05:56:18 CEST

- reply

Both are complete trash

2026-07-30 05:55:18 CEST

Billandkeonne.org #PardonSamurai
https://blossom.primal.net/1399c88e4816cfd766d4eb9eb4e5030637da712b1bbaa43c08547f46323996ac.jpg

2026-07-30 05:50:28 CEST

- reply

https://x.com/i/status/2070634970708836807
https://x.com/i/status/2073428350488440902
https://x.com/i/status/2071749938082685250
https://x.com/i/status/2051848488644714518

2026-07-30 05:43:54 CEST

- reply

So now Saylor is an attack on bitcoin. It wasn't when he called it digital property. It wasn't when he declared it a store of value. It wasn't when he said strategy turns bitcoin into money. What about the cyber hornets or digital Manhattan?
Nope, it was only when he didn't agree with the dumbest bip and narrative since bcash.
10 days until these people fade into oblivion.
#nevent1q…hkh0

2026-07-28 05:26:49 CEST

https://thegatalog.com/

2026-07-21 01:34:38 CEST

- reply

You didn't acknowledge the screenshot. What he said is a factual lie. I dont care what Gloria said in either of these videos. The modern maxi is an idiot who doesn't understand Bitcoin technical discussion and absolutely gate keeps.

2026-07-21 01:26:26 CEST

- reply

That goblin has done nothing but shit on everyone who actually understands and contributes towards bitcoin.
https://blossom.primal.net/cac327c00e0386c2637b953868cb4eaf2dfe12159799e0bd82e553bbba388835.jpg

2026-07-21 01:23:04 CEST

Remember this piece of trash when bip110 comes crashing down.
https://blossom.primal.net/cac327c00e0386c2637b953868cb4eaf2dfe12159799e0bd82e553bbba388835.jpg

2026-07-20 05:03:20 CEST

In a democratic welfare state, open or uncontrolled immigration creates forced integration. -Hans Herman Hoppe
https://blossom.primal.net/775bc2e3f96f9ce35a1fa49db8d486152c171d558d474a0d3c0f6efac6c54197.jpg

2026-07-19 20:04:29 CEST

Blockader, White lightning
No urbanite can understand Appalachian/southern culture because they have no culture.
https://blossom.primal.net/f249fe137cec497cbd10e3b4525d260b3f4557337929659c521192796ab53ddb.jpg

2026-07-19 15:40:28 CEST

#gm #nostr
https://blossom.primal.net/267229cff6679f5ec8618e459a58a1d35e1bebe2825c91718bb3b2b17bcb347c.jpg

2026-07-18 16:51:14 CEST

Nature will outlive your concrete behemoths and man made structures. #gm
https://blossom.primal.net/5d7cb1daa2869a1211aab2aa962c85a1f7d707d346b09811534f78cd691b1723.jpg

2026-07-15 13:08:00 CEST

#gm #nostr
https://blossom.primal.net/ce738f736e6cfe5cd2382d544f564c83565ac283c112ed335ca116dca5346177.jpg

2026-07-15 04:44:20 CEST

https://blossom.primal.net/7c8395ce2de0879f94a6f6e5e8f75eab69e4c7d79ac10d1b398787f39646e313.jpg

2026-07-15 04:34:09 CEST

- reply

Thats my next one I wanted to watch after the masterpiece obsession. Highly recommend?

2026-07-14 23:49:02 CEST

The surveillance apparatus isn’t as effective as the narrative suggests, and users have more power to protect their privacy than many believe, which aligns with #Bitcoin’s original design.

2026-07-12 15:11:38 CEST

- reply

Its neat if you have other bitcoiners in your contacts that you transact with. I would always keep signal tho because they could always reject these forks in the future.

2026-07-12 14:47:59 CEST

#gm #nostr
https://blossom.primal.net/a4e31d750444bff225d9b92f054ad874e850584247e8c77440449311348cfa9c.jpg

2026-07-05 03:39:43 CEST

Black markets are patriotic af

2026-07-05 02:27:24 CEST

Hate your government, happy 4th of July #nostr
https://blossom.primal.net/dfa83f104d5b304d391e3dd4b693251ddcaa328ae1531f8b44bc1052d1e102a0.jpg

2026-07-04 17:27:23 CEST

The irony of BIP-110 is that in trying to stop efficient spam, it pushes remaining data embedding toward less efficient workarounds that often waste more block space per byte.
By restricting large contiguous data pushes, big opreturns, and common Taproot inscription patterns (OP_IF + oversized witnesses), the proposal forces spammers into chunked formats using many smaller 256-byte pieces. Those workarounds add overhead from extra transaction structure, inputs/outputs, and potential utxo churn.
Early demos (including Peter Todd’s) and Ordinals’ planned envelope updates show this is already happening. with claims of only 1% cost increase for some protocols. We may reduce the volume of certain spam, but what gets through can bloat the chain less efficiently than before. This is what Bitcoin development culture has become in 2026, fighting spam with temporary consensus changes that spammers adapt around, while the fee market was already the real limiter

2026-07-04 16:49:28 CEST

Understanding BIP110
1.What it claims to be
BIP-110 is a proposed temporary one-year soft fork (bit 4) that adds new consensus rules limiting how much arbitrary data can go into Bitcoin transactions. ScriptPubKeys mostly capped at 34 bytes, data pushes and witness elements at 256 bytes, plus restrictions on certain Taproot constructions and opcodes during the window. Pre-activation UTXOs are grandfathered. After a year the rules auto-expire. Proponents say it fights “spam” that bloats the chain and distorts fees, and that it refocuses Bitcoin on being money.
2.Why I’m against it
The execution is the problem.
It uses a low 55% miner signaling threshold for early activation plus a mandatory signaling period starting at block 961,632 (projected ~August 7, 2026). At that point, nodes running the bip110 software will start rejecting blocks that don’t signal, even if the vast majority of hashpower never supported it. Miner signaling right now sits at roughly 0.3%. This isn’t broad consensus, it’s a small group trying to force a rule change with a mechanism explicitly designed to create pressure and potential chain friction. Bitcoin’s strength has always been its conservatism and the fact that changes require real, broad agreement. A contentious soft fork with a low bar and mandatory enforcement risks a messy, temporary (or worse) split at the exact moment when stability matters. We’ve seen how even short periods of uncertainty ripple through exchanges, services, and user confidence. That cost falls on everyone, including people running privacy tools that depend on a reliable base layer. More importantly, this approach treats consensus rules as a blunt instrument to police use cases. Once you open that door “we’ll temporarily make this data invalid because we don’t like how it’s being used” you create precedent. Future groups can argue for the next restriction “for the good of Bitcoin.” Fee markets, relay policies, and node operators already have tools to deal with unwanted traffic. Using softfork COERCION!!! instead feels like the wrong direction for a system built on permissionless, voluntary participation. Spam and data storage have real costs (yes, the 2023 fee spikes were annoying). But they’re also symptoms of demand meeting limited blockspace. Solving that by rewriting consensus to ban certain data feels like treating the symptom while risking the patient. Temporary or not, it still diverts energy, creates division, and puts sovereignty at risk for users who just want to run plain Bitcoin Core without being pressured into signaling.
3.What actually matters right now
The date to watch is early August 2026 (block 961,632). That’s when the mandatory signaling phase hits for anyone running the patched software. If you’re against this, the simplest and most sovereign move is to keep running standard Bitcoin Core (or Knots without the BIP-110 patch) and do not signal. Let the chain follow the majority hashpower that has shown no interest in this. Verify everything yourself. Read the BIP, look at the activation client code, watch the actual signaling numbers. Don’t outsource your node or your principles. The best discussions are happening on Nostr anyway. The X outrage cycle doesn’t move the protocol, running nodes and refusing bad changes does.
Bitcoin doesn’t need more top down attempts to define acceptable use cases through consensus. It needs a reliable, decentralized base layer that people can build real privacy and sovereignty tools on top of without wondering if the next “temporary” rule change will complicate their UTXOs or their node. #bip110 #knots #privacy #bitcoin #nostr #grownostr

2026-07-04 15:45:32 CEST

- reply

The thread you posted earlier literally says OCEAN made changes “just for the sake of privacy” after the issue with how these transactions were being handled under the old Knots setup.
If no one ever treated CoinJoin as spam, what exactly needed fixing?
You are a dunce

2026-07-04 15:36:58 CEST

- reply

The part that actually matters here is this. Even according to the history you posted, OCEAN recognized the impact on privacy transactions and made a unilateral change to support them anyway. That’s the correct priority when these conflicts come up. The real issue isn’t old pool defaults or who ported what between Core and Knots. It’s whether node software and relay policies make strong, non custodial on chain privacy tools meaningfully harder to use. When patterns associated with effective CoinJoin get treated as spam to deprioritize, while other data-heavy transactions don’t face the same friction, that’s a policy choice worth examining. Spam bloat is a real problem for node runners and long-term decentralization. But privacy-enhancing transactions that improve fungibility and reduce surveillance aren’t the same thing as arbitrary data. We should be able to handle both without one undermining the other.
You dunce

2026-07-04 15:24:28 CEST

https://blossom.primal.net/61c33940b454cfaf82b9d0de1f45e38ec98e784304b30eb861f408a664325407.jpg

2026-07-04 15:19:03 CEST

- reply

Go to x for that shit. I posted enough explaining the technical details for people l. I learned that its just a ideological battle at the end of the day and most people are technologically illiterate.

2026-07-04 15:05:33 CEST

Happy 4th #nostr
https://blossom.primal.net/25d5102242ec5cea67272c7fdcb31743cd7422fe6034626d7bf77956f0bff0ae.jpg

2026-07-04 14:35:01 CEST

- reply

This was before now and you're missing the point entirely.

2026-07-04 07:43:23 CEST

Luke says Bitcoin becomes a CBDC if BIP110 fails. But when Whirlpool CoinJoin hit his Knots 42-byte OP_RETURN limit, Ocean and Knots treated the privacy transactions as spam to be deprioritized.
He didn’t fight to make real privacy easier, he defended the filter.
You can’t claim to be saving Bitcoin from centralization and surveillance while making the best on chain privacy tool harder to use.
Pick a lane.

2026-07-04 07:40:59 CEST

Meanwhile, back when Samourai’s Whirlpool CoinJoin used a 46-byte OP_RETURN (Knots default was 42), his Bitcoin Knots node software and Ocean mining pool made those privacy transactions harder to relay and get mined. He called it bad design and spam, not something worth accommodating. So how exactly does making on-chain CoinJoin privacy more difficult protect Bitcoin from becoming centralized and surveilled like a CBDC?
Real privacy tools like Whirlpool are one of the best defenses we have against chain analysis and the control CBDCs are built on. You don’t fight fake decentralized money by kneecapping the actual privacy that keeps Bitcoin fungible and sovereign.
The “Bitcoin dies without my rules” crowd keeps revealing their priorities.
https://blossom.primal.net/2ac5220057314e8d470e59a71d3a69a62a75080105d1e129acda0b596d28557a.jpg

2026-07-03 23:57:20 CEST

One of the best TFTC episodes
#nevent1q…9ua4

2026-07-03 23:46:47 CEST

The time is now anon
#Courage #Freedom #Liberty #MementoMori Nostr #Quote #Wisdom #Art
https://blossom.primal.net/d7efe1499a250f58ff68ea6b735d13c7af7357be047ee4cdaa8cc39575360c6e.jpg

2026-07-03 23:21:38 CEST

- reply

Whirlpool especially

2026-07-03 23:09:43 CEST

There is no peaceful revolution, voting doesn't work anon. You must speak a language that only they understand.
https://blossom.primal.net/ec45d06a5544316b1cd57dba27d28499c0fafd363c26fcb0befef77fefb605a0.jpg

2026-07-03 22:42:21 CEST

Happy 250th #nostr https://blossom.primal.net/90640a448c645fc5f5c9aefdfbe84ba6e40ffbe0d8c7035a7fc4911fe560eeae.jpg

2026-07-03 21:56:17 CEST

The point for someone who values privacy and self-reliance is having a parallel monetary system where the base rules can't be changed unilaterally by a small group, and where you can opt into stronger privacy and sovereignty practices if you want. It doesn't require mass adoption of cypherpunk habits to function as a store of value or medium for those who do. In a world trending toward more surveillance (CBDCs, expanded financial monitoring, platform deplatforming), having one major asset where the protocol itself doesn't force trust in custodians or issuers is rare. Most alternatives either have explicit controllers (many altcoins, traditional finance) or weaker track records of resisting capture. Bitcoin's value accrues to those who actually use the decentralized features, self-custody, node verification, coin control, and privacy techniques, not to passive holders waiting for statistics to improve on their own. The network doesn't "decentralize for you." It gives you the tools and incentives to do it yourself, while making it expensive for others to stop you. #bitcoin #nostr

2026-07-03 04:59:38 CEST

On-chain privacy exists, you just gotta learn anon.
https://ashigaru.rs/docs/ashigaru-terminal-overview/
https://blossom.primal.net/b2fa1d1dc4c3cc0477775263eb581820d9697ac686c05e41b666d166f5f1f966.jpg

2026-07-03 04:51:18 CEST

- reply

Love it, also donating to the cause is based

2026-07-03 04:20:16 CEST

DeFlock the world #nostr
https://blossom.primal.net/730c91a67322adc4dcd22260b4f9dcb17bb54f32e089487f742da1e89dcefd2d.mp4
https://blossom.primal.net/4be3bf0720e01e7701624533aa4604c3b24f1b78f8266491723631c77c083df3.jpg

2026-07-03 04:15:41 CEST

USD is proof of war

2026-07-03 04:09:14 CEST

- reply

This is coercion

2026-07-03 04:08:53 CEST

- reply

This is coercion
#nevent1q…pznn

2026-07-03 03:58:17 CEST

Tribalism is a sad state of affairs. People in cryptography, bitcoin, xmr, zano etc and precious metals would rather fight instead of work together. We have a state putting surveillance cameras on every street corner. They bomb women and children everyday all while treating us like animals in a tax farm to fund said bombing. We have thr people, ability and tools. Do not squander this opportunity. #nostr #grownostr #bitcoin #monero #privacy
https://blossom.primal.net/721a45e8fe90ca65710e5293703a8476669fe4a7dd36341912e8a8f4017378c4.jpg

2026-07-03 03:46:13 CEST

Finally decided to take a break from X. The bitcoin talk has gotten so bad that I just couldn't do it anymore. #nostr only for awhile.

2026-07-03 03:14:46 CEST

Nostr is much more lade back compared to X.

2026-07-03 01:20:49 CEST

BIP 110 is just religious zealots obsessed with purity. Bitcoin isn't pure. Its has always been a grimy black market money. Literally created by a person nobody in the world knows, during the great financial crisis, in the far most cypherpunk corner of the internet. #nostr #bitcoin

2026-07-03 01:09:09 CEST

Do your country a favor.
Build anti flock and anti surveillance clubs. Go out, have fun!
https://blossom.primal.net/03199157b35b81ff2af49174b388819e698eb4580e1268a28d7874baaee52289.jpg

2026-07-02 22:05:12 CEST

- reply

Android

2026-07-02 19:33:45 CEST

- reply

You, I bought premium pro and still dont have it?

2026-07-02 13:50:46 CEST

- reply

New update?

2026-06-30 05:35:03 CEST

- reply

Is it better to donate through the app or do you also accept zaps? Loving the app so far, wanna support.
Open Source Everything
Privacy matters

2026-06-30 04:33:06 CEST

One of the best podcast episodes I've listened too. I recommend everyone check it out.
https://www.wiredforenergy.org/bitcoin-climate-villain-or-solution-with-daniel-batten/

2026-06-29 17:44:18 CEST

- reply

Monero is obviously growing and for good reason

2026-06-29 13:36:20 CEST

- reply

https://www.chainalysis.com/blog/2025-crypto-crime-report-introduction/
Stablecoins even being used on dnms is wild. Guess another reason they're constantly getting frozen. But xmr is becoming the dominant dnm currency and for obvious reasons.

2026-06-29 05:37:55 CEST

- reply

Having trouble with family members joining my circle.

2026-06-29 04:39:59 CEST

Bitcoin remains the dominant crypto on darknet markets powering 98% of transactions due to liquidity. In 2024, DNMs saw $2B in BTC inflows. 2025 estimates near $2.6B. Markets resilient despite takedowns.
https://www.chainalysis.com/blog/crypto-drug-sales-darknet-markets-2026/

2026-06-28 14:41:16 CEST

- reply

BIP110 and knots is malware

2026-06-28 14:38:59 CEST

BIP110 is an IQ test and alot of people failed.

2026-06-28 05:27:37 CEST

- reply

GN Silas

2026-06-28 05:27:09 CEST

- reply

Privacy helps fungibility
#nevent1q…pa7z

2026-06-28 02:11:44 CEST

The knotzi cries out in pain as he strikes you. Nothing about knots or bip 110 is about spam. They hate samourai wallet and its developers. They hate the true complexity of privacy and sovereignty. They hate that bitcoin isn't this clean and pure technology. In fact bitcoin is truly a cockroach. Born in a grimy corner of the internet, born from libertarian thought and anarchist philosophy. At the end of the day, these people are just saying "govern me harder daddy" #nostr #bitcoin
https://blossom.primal.net/7ddf07cb7f02f9e7234574136a1d077311a022d814a330ec2050a233fb13beeb.jpg

2026-06-27 23:49:40 CEST

- reply

Blasphemy

2026-06-27 23:49:22 CEST

- reply

Got to see Hoppe himself! Thats really cool!

2026-06-27 23:13:26 CEST

- reply

I've met people who hold Bitcoins in hot wallets and encrypted USB's

2026-06-27 23:10:59 CEST

Your BIP 110 king!
https://blossom.primal.net/4edbaf3ce049a1b7943018c3570249ecb8caec112532169c0b0e6a3ac431a3d1.jpg

2026-06-27 23:01:19 CEST

Your node your rules, bitcoin knots is malware.

2026-06-27 22:58:39 CEST

https://x.com/i/status/2070933019624419667

2026-06-27 01:20:09 CEST

- reply

Spam in the digital universe is inevitable. If we want to keep the majority of spam off bitcoin, it has to be used like people use dollars!

2026-06-27 00:32:31 CEST

As long as block space has any marginal cost below what some people are willing to pay for non-monetary uses, some amount of spam will find its way in. Consensus rules can raise the friction on specific techniques, but they can't remove the underlying incentive. #bitcoin

2026-06-27 00:28:06 CEST

- reply

Bitcoin company?

2026-06-27 00:27:44 CEST

No real anarcho capitalist supports bip 110.
1. Coercive rule imposition: Even though it's a soft fork, it relies on nodes enforcing new validity rules that make previously valid (and paid-for) constructions invalid. This is collective action redefining what counts as legitimate use of the protocol, rather than pure market discipline.
2. Changing the rules after the fact: People built businesses, collections, and protocols on top of Taproot's data-carrying capabilities. Using protocol changes to restrict that retroactively (or prospectively during the window) feels like ex post facto interference.
3. Precedent for control: Once you accept using consensus to "protect" Bitcoin from disfavored uses, the door opens to future interventions justified by the greater good or true purpose. Ancap theory is deeply skeptical of any mechanism that lets a subset of participants dictate terms to others via enforced rules.
This goes beyond the existing block weight limit + fee market. It is an attempt to dictate the character of block space usage, to declare certain paid transactions illegitimate at the protocol level.

2026-06-26 22:59:37 CEST

@nprofile…3lp8 do you still sell the whipped tallow creme? Trying to reup today but didn't see it on the list.

2026-06-26 12:57:56 CEST

- reply

Andy back looking like the zombie he is