Archiesta

I'll never understand how someone can actively mock another worldview without having done even the slightest bit of research.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=BnhBW_tSkJY&list=PLZMnFbsIJPHib4SnTCbI-9UcnHzodarr6&index=1&pp=iAQB
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=97BYSdKhldA

2026-05-04 07:16:13 UTC

- reply

It works fine even with tor and GOS, 🫩

2026-04-12 09:44:20 UTC

- reply

Appeal to authority and false dichotomy fallacy.

2026-03-19 12:14:35 UTC

- reply

I would buy it for sats but not with E-Mail requirement. You don't have a Bitcoin checkout.

2026-02-22 10:40:53 UTC

- reply

Whats wrong with his thumb?

2026-02-17 19:23:25 UTC

#naddr1qq…cjh2

2026-02-13 17:57:57 UTC

- reply

Dachte es ist etwas bitcoin spezifisches. Noch nicht mit home assistant beschäftigt. Danke für die info

2026-02-13 10:35:55 UTC

- reply

Das sieht sehr elegant aus. Welche Software ist das?

2026-01-30 13:42:18 UTC

- reply

Well said

2025-12-30 09:45:09 UTC

- reply

I completely agree with you. My moral compass was given to me by God through my family and my intuition.
I also don't think there should be no leaders at all. In my opinion, each individual chooses their own leaders or not. A group of people should never impose a leader on an individual.
I am happy to follow a leader if they are worthy and have proven that they can solve problems morally and efficiently.
And if he no longer does it this way, I must have the right to say no.

2025-12-30 09:24:59 UTC

- reply

My moral compass tells me that it is fundamentally wrong for a group of people to be able to determine the life and property of an individual through elections (or birthright, etc.) and enforce this with violence. I cannot provide any proofs for this. Probably no one can.
However, there are enough anecdotes from history, the principle of non-aggression, the golden rule...

2025-12-30 09:04:06 UTC

- reply

The argument here is that the majority of today's problems can actually be traced back to the naivety of women.
The argument would be somewhat valid if history had shown that without women's suffrage, power-hungry, egomaniacal sociopaths would not have ruined society.
It distracts from the fact that voting on the property and life of another human being is fundamentally wrong, regardless of whether it is a woman or a man who votes. Men vote just as unfairly as women in other areas.

2025-12-23 15:00:05 UTC

- reply

I like your content except the take on Bitcoin 🥴

2025-11-29 08:10:24 UTC

- reply

At this point I bookmarked so many of your posts that I need a new organisation technique to not be overwhelmed

2025-11-29 08:03:11 UTC

- reply

Never mind. I had to change some configurations because lnd doesn't work properly atm.

2025-11-28 07:45:28 UTC

- reply

Bitcoin is a one-way street leading deeper and deeper into the bowels of all the other conspiracy theories. One after another, they turn out to be true.
There is no turning back once you have crossed a certain threshold. The overton window shifts so far that there is no hiding. The truth wants to be free.
This is propably the point where they kill everyone and start the orphan trains and insane asylums. But, maybe not 😀

2025-11-27 13:04:19 UTC

- reply

When normies plus institutions control more bitcoin than real bitcoiners, we have a problem.
But, will normies self custody? I don't think so.
My hope is that normies can transform into die hard bitcoiners and the truth will set us free.

2025-11-21 09:08:22 UTC

- reply

I can't believe that your Analysis isn't being discussed across the board. Total silence

2025-10-24 10:53:54 UTC

- reply

And you are the noise

2025-10-24 06:23:50 UTC

- reply

You are signal in a lot of noise. Thank you. Keep pushing

2025-10-15 06:42:11 UTC

- reply

Most buildings of this type have huge underground cellar systems or crypts. How does the gradual expansion of the buildings fit in with this fact? In addition, the buildings often have completely symmetrical patterns. These patterns cannot be created by patching things together. They have to be planned in advance.

2025-10-09 16:16:00 UTC

#nevent1q…f27n

2025-09-21 18:58:30 UTC

- reply

I must admit that I am not capable of such sophisticated logic and reasoning. Many of these concepts are completely new to me, yet I intuitively feel they likely describe reality well. Therefore, I do not wish to refute your conclusions.
However, I believe an important aspect is being overlooked: it seems to me that good is fighting evil—freedom versus slavery.
One must ask: what is the morally right thing to do?
If evil is capable of such plans, then good can always counteract them. I feel that now, more than ever, people are seeing through a lot of BS.
These extremely complex plans only succeed as long as they remain hidden in darkness, away from the bright light of truth that exposes them.
We should expose and reject them with all our might, refusing to support them with our time and energy or any resources, regardless of potential profit.

2025-09-13 08:02:48 UTC

- reply

I never thought that way. But it makes so much sense

2025-08-19 18:56:12 UTC

- reply

How's that? I don't get it. When all the money is created by lending and every borrower must pay back more money than initially created then where does the difference come from? Only from new bigger lending, right?

2025-08-18 08:54:25 UTC

- reply

I don't know if I'm wrong, but I think the main reason for the deflationary collapse is the process of money creation.
Money is created through the process of lending by banks. But only the principle is the new money. Where does the money for the interest come from? Over the term of the loan, the borrower must always repay more money than the principle.
The banks suck up the money via interest rates until it becomes scarce across the board because there is simply not enough to service both principle and interest. The music stops, a new bailout (bigger loans) for the well-behaved, inflation an bankruptcy for the public. A perpetual cycle until you change how money is created.

2025-07-22 15:13:11 UTC

- reply

Well said. So many arguments are full of logical fallacies. But I get it. I was the same way until I really tried to disprove the other side. When you stay humble and truthful you will discover so many inconsistencies that you know the ball must be a lie

2025-07-11 09:07:58 UTC

- reply

At this point it feels too obvious. What do you think of the papal bloodlines (Borgia, aldobrandini etc.) and the Vatican? Are they the puppetmasters of the Jews?

2025-06-28 07:24:59 UTC

- reply

Wise words that are extremely difficult to put into practice

2025-06-27 08:21:40 UTC

- reply

How would you recommend to use lard/tallow? Where do you get it from?

2025-06-23 06:18:19 UTC

- reply

#nevent1q…nr6j

2025-03-16 09:26:32 UTC

- reply

No. I mean the content you post. Often it gave me new perspectives. Thx for that

2025-03-16 08:56:40 UTC

- reply

I really like your clips 🤙

2025-03-12 13:53:44 UTC

- reply

#nevent1q…dfms

2025-02-22 10:02:08 UTC

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tlnacn7WsIw

2025-02-19 10:44:09 UTC

- reply

Here is the explanation for this situation.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TzhZ6wbyekk

2025-02-19 10:41:08 UTC

- reply

Witsit explains here the antartica situation. The video of him vaping was manipulated. I think they went to Antartica. But that doesn't prove anything.
There are so many inconsistencies with the globe model. I don't know if it's flat or something else but the official globe model doesn't make any sense.
https://rumble.com/v65dif4-antarctic-trip-recap.html?e9s=src_v1_upp

2025-02-17 07:52:53 UTC

- reply

I think the globe model is complete BS.
https://rumble.com/v5kj7rf-middle-ground-1-the-copernican-principle.html

2025-01-12 19:46:07 UTC

- reply

What do you think triggers the wave of illness in winter every year? How do more toxins develop at this time (possibly due to lack of sun)? Why does it feel like people are infecting each other? If viruses only carry toxins, then I shouldn't be able to pass them on to someone else without also carrying the underlying toxin with me?

2025-01-08 12:51:59 UTC

- reply

Mit diesen Guides bin ich ganz gut zurecht gekommen. Habe es auf einem Dell Optiplex installiert mit ähnlichen Anforderungen für unter 500.
https://community.start9.com/t/known-good-hardware-master-list-hardware-capable-of-running-startos/66
https://docs.start9.com/0.3.5.x/diy/diy-x86

2024-12-08 17:49:28 UTC

- reply

Andrzej Sapkowski - Witcher Saga (best fantasy books ever in my opinion)
R.A. Salvatore - Drizzt Saga

2024-11-09 07:34:25 UTC

- reply

I like ZEN Browser
https://github.com/zen-browser/desktop

2024-04-17 08:24:47 UTC

- reply

#nevent1q…wrec

2024-03-10 12:46:16 UTC

- reply

I think that as a good uncorrupted soul it is incomprehensible why this extreme evil exists.
The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was to make people believe he didn't exist at all.

2024-03-10 09:11:31 UTC

- reply

What do you think satanists do in their free time if not something like this?

2024-02-04 09:28:09 UTC

- reply

When the political elite is with you at a demo you know you are wrong and have become a victim of a psyop.

2024-01-11 21:15:45 UTC

- reply

1. A mathematical model can never represent reality, but only a simplification or an approximation. If the mathematical model predicts a physical barrier and you obviously don't see one in reality, then there is something wrong with the model. So there is no mathematical proof of you and you want to explain the situation by a mirage. This issue is described in this video better than I could (the Fata Morgana (Mirage), reflection and bending). But I know you will not look into it.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=nJenY3zKWLs
2. How can a physical barrier that should conceal an object not be visible and not conceal the object? In this example, the horizon should lie in front of the oil rigs (as in the mathematical diagram) and cover the lower part. In the globe model there should be a visible physical horizon, the reality shows that there is no physical horizon, but an optical convergence of sky and earth.
 If „P“ earth has a radius of 3959 miles,
Then „Q“ every geometric horizon can be 1.22 miles x square root of observer height in feet
Not „Q“ We do not have a geometric (physical) horizon at that distance
Not „P“ the earth is not a globe of 3959 miles
3. I had used a different calculator for the calculation, but the video uses the correct one!
I know that this is not the correct angle as the graphic in the calculator is not true to scale. It should just be a diagram for the description. However, it doesn't change the fact that you should experience a curve in the horizon at some point. But no matter how high you go, it's always completely horizontal.
In my opinion, the bases of the oil platforms are clearly visible, the rear platform is optically higher than the front one and you can see more water behind it. No physical barrier to see. This is not a mirage.
https://m.primal.net/HXaG.png
However, this discussion is completely pointless and I will not invest any more energy in it. I don't want to be called a liar or anything else.

2024-01-10 20:20:54 UTC

- reply

My aim was not to convince you, but to explain the problems with the globe model.
I'll try to describe my thoughts again in more detail
1. The only thing you have proven mathematically is that the bases of both platforms should be covered by the physical horizon. The video clearly shows that this is not the case. You can even see water behind the platforms.
2. If the physical horizon can be seen at 2.74 miles (which is not the case because the horizon is behind the platforms), the horizon should also have a curve. It is supposed to be a sphere and not a big rolling pin. However, the horizon is always „horizontal“ no matter how high you go (fisheye lenses excluded of course).
3. To see the horizon, you always have to look down a little or a little bit more. The higher the altitude, the further down you have to look. But the horizon is always at eye level, no matter how high the altitude is.
This is not a fight to defeat someone. We are not enemies just because we debate.
https://m.primal.net/HXRk.png

2024-01-10 09:39:55 UTC

- reply

It's not a Fata Morgana. The next thing you come up with is refraction.
There are laser experiments and countless observations that we can see too far. As I said, I don't want to convince you and this argument is bullshit in my opinion. You can believe in your cgi balls in the sky. I really don't care.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZsnmX0XRNTk&list=PLEzivhxtxgbsRfA1jEZsHFDJ3JJNeQkkB&index=15&pp=iAQB

2024-01-10 09:05:34 UTC

- reply

Explain how you come up with 2.74 miles. The platform is 9.41 miles away (59.05 ft). The base should not be visible and you should not see any water behind the platform for miles.

2024-01-10 08:45:11 UTC

- reply

Distance plarform 1: 6.21 miles
Distance platform 2: 9.41 miles
How do you come up with 2.74 miles?
you can clearly see the base of both platforms and a lot of ocean behind it. So you can see much further. This is not possible on a globe
Btw. in this video the height of the observer is 5ft. and the calculation takes these into account.

2024-01-10 08:35:16 UTC

- reply

I don't trust google on this topic or any topic. To be clear, I don't want to convince you. The truth remains the truth, even if you don't like it. Besides, I don't think you're being honest with me.

2024-01-10 08:08:01 UTC

- reply

Come on. He stands at the shore. The curvature should be 54 feet at 9 miles

2024-01-10 07:59:57 UTC

- reply

maybe it is.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Egb2Kjzs-dA&list=PLEzivhxtxgbtoArGXybRuYwX4QPO4SEb0&index=6&pp=iAQB

2024-01-10 07:37:05 UTC

- reply

If you really did the math you would have concluded that something is really off. How is this video possible on a globe?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bhmo0B-hMts&list=PLEzivhxtxgbsRfA1jEZsHFDJ3JJNeQkkB&index=11&pp=iAQB

2024-01-10 07:29:26 UTC

- reply

how is it possible to see Venus by night? Venus is the 2nd planet and should not be visible in the globe model by night?! I have used a telescope. Have you observed the shape of the stars on your own? They look totally different than the cgi in the internet.

2024-01-09 15:35:49 UTC

- reply

did you really look into the moon landing and the experiments to prove the globe and the math behind the curvature?

2024-01-09 14:23:55 UTC

- reply

I think I'm going through all 7 staged every 2 weeks. The globe is bullshit. I can't believe the lies are that big

2023-12-14 10:39:01 UTC

- reply

I don’t think it’s only money. The controllers obfuscated the model so that the people don’t understand the world around them. When you don’t know where you are it is easier to enslave you without realizing it.

2023-12-14 08:19:38 UTC

- reply

And it would perfectly match with the moon cycles if I’m not wrong. But why did the controllers change the model?

2023-11-29 15:30:25 UTC

- reply

You can calculate the drop in the globe model via geometry. Gravity is a theory. There are no proofs for it only hypothesis. You can explain everything with buoyancy and electromagnetism. There is a lot of material which describes this in detail better than I can.
https://earthcurvature.com/

2023-11-18 20:20:56 UTC

- reply

When lightning?

2023-11-11 19:22:14 UTC

- reply

Yes. That is the assumption and that is what I see when the sun shines through clouds. This video shows a lot of the problems with the globe model. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qEaHjPF47_E
This channel has a lot of answers to any question.
https://www.youtube.com/@flatearthclock

2023-11-10 20:56:13 UTC

- reply

No. On flat earth model the sun is local and not 93mio miles away. I don’t know the shape of our earth but I believe the globe is a big lie. https://youtu.be/IS9cCvHk26E?feature=shared

2023-11-10 09:50:35 UTC

- reply

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLEzivhxtxgbuR9Zr6NR6oys_k6ZqA9gGk

2023-07-18 18:19:07 UTC

- reply

Do you have a link?

2023-06-20 19:23:52 UTC

- reply

Maybe this?
There are two different types of deflation. The credit death spiral, of which one should be afraid. This occurs when the money supply is massively expanded and then contracted again. The feature of Fiat money so to speak.
Bitcoin will not lead to such a scenario because of the constant money supply. The deflation that Bitcoin will cause is that all goods and services will become cheaper over time. The productivity of humanity is thus passed on to everyone equally and not just to governments, large corporations and cantillionaires.

2023-06-16 10:28:23 UTC

- reply

Can you create your own store, or will it be like a platform?

2023-05-26 08:44:04 UTC

- reply

VJLAAPuiPqYs2cn9n8NbW9uYiUbVMykxB6HddvjY1BJKCi3JxCfqF7dAGwzsnHznE3j5LuHFTdVXRcsD

2023-05-23 09:55:16 UTC

- reply

Do you have too many sats? 😄

2023-05-17 16:05:53 UTC

- reply

Well, we will see 🤷🏼‍♂️

2023-05-17 16:04:11 UTC

- reply

lets go mises

2023-05-17 09:02:01 UTC

- reply

what about Switzerland? will they comply?

2023-05-17 08:58:41 UTC

- reply

I think they will try to licence the ability to use the AI in software so only certified Corporations can build. If not they would lose too much control. What do you think, is this even possible?

2023-04-12 15:19:18 UTC

- reply

I think it works. Thanks for the motivation

2023-02-21 08:04:19 UTC

- reply

How do you ship physical objects without private Infos?

2022-12-27 21:04:50 UTC

Its alive