DarrelXero
Darrel Xero

Public Key

npub1q3aen2jdmglxjtcr9p8jtuu2r29h4ztkg6fnmrascsr65nsgypqq5ula5h

Profile Code

nprofile1qqsqg7ue4fxa50nf9upjsne97w9p4zm639mydyea37cvgpa2fcyzqsqpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduqs6amnwvaz7tmwdaejumr0dsasgdjv

Publishing to

relay.damus.io

nos.lol

Author Public Key

npub1q3aen2jdmglxjtcr9p8jtuu2r29h4ztkg6fnmrascsr65nsgypqq5ula5h

Show more details

Last Notes

2026-05-19 15:09:32 CEST

Throw some hashrate at 'em for the cause https://blossom.primal.net/29cf85d13a63c80e2666a04bb241a3515d2700aa2d81c9b59ef9fab10d91a00a.png https://www.256foundation.org/telehash

2026-05-04 14:12:40 CEST

- reply

Whoops, and Krux. Maybe the old Foundation.

2026-05-04 14:11:43 CEST

- reply

Jade classic/plus. Coldcard Q/MK4/MK5/Tapsigner. SeedSigner. Specter DIY. That's the whole list. Everything else is a shitcoin wallet.

2026-05-04 14:04:21 CEST

- reply

Use it stateless. No need for the key to persist and force you to unlock via blind oracle connection. Just import your seed via QR, use it fully air gapped and then it wipes on shutdown.

2026-05-04 14:01:35 CEST

- reply

Why would a shitcoin wallet be on the list?

2026-05-03 06:04:32 CEST

- reply

Come on guys, stop with the horseshit. We get it, you have a new product coming out. Stop with the salesmanship and just fucking announce it already. If the form factor is sufficiently cool, we'll buy it. If the efficiency is enticing, we'll buy it. This act just make you look desperate and shady.

2026-05-03 01:40:27 CEST

- reply

There was a presentation on the topic at bitcoin++ villain edition couple of weeks ago you might be able to find a recording of.

2026-05-01 17:13:22 CEST

- reply

But did you signal BIP-110 with your temporary and unsustained hashrate tho!? Take one for the team you spammer! /s

2026-04-28 05:34:37 CEST

- reply

That was just a small part of the question/problem. The world already has a Core fork controlled by a religiously motivated individual on a power trip that only offers a few extra tweaks to filters. Why the fuck would we need another one? Seriously, I'm honestly asking.

2026-04-28 04:39:10 CEST

- reply

Do I have to watch the whole thing to find out why it's necessary to have another Core fork with religionist maintainers and additional ideological baggage?

2026-04-25 05:31:26 CEST

- reply

Fantastic article, as was your knots vs. core article at the time.

2026-04-24 21:19:05 CEST

- reply

Very, very badass!

2026-04-22 17:15:37 CEST

- reply

Tell that to the Knots crusaders. Actually that is probably why you posted this huh?

2026-04-22 17:11:33 CEST

- reply

Literally the plot of Idiocracy.

2026-04-15 15:30:56 CEST

- reply

Decreasing Core nodes by forking Core and calling it something else?

2026-04-13 19:15:20 CEST

- reply

You are still a nasty bastard. Get it right: https://a.co/d/05lipL9N

2026-04-12 04:58:57 CEST

- reply

Looks like the site had been slashdotted...

2026-04-08 04:08:11 CEST

- reply

From what I can see Trump agreed to something Pakistan said that Iran would maybe do for a 2 week window. Guessing it falls apart shortly and Trump looks like the useless bitch he is.

2026-03-14 21:33:58 CET

- reply

Pretty sure even a slingshot would do more damage.

2026-03-14 16:13:49 CET

- reply

The framing is wrong and it matters. This has been debated to death and has been very clear for a long time. Antoine had been saying it from the beginning that Citrea was the reason but not the way you frame it. Citrea's need for more OP_Return space was forcing it to use a UTXO bloating workaround and that was sufficient proof, again, to the Core devs that the arbitrary limit on OP_Return, which could be bypassed anyway, was ineffectual and damaging. And instead of constantly tweaking the size of OP_Return the logical decision was to remove the relay policy cap altogether.
It's not a conspiracy, it's all been explained and out in the open. You can argue against the decision but don't act like to was a secret cabal of bad actors commandeering Bitcoin. It wasn't and it isn't.
Do better.

2026-02-24 03:38:53 CET

- reply

Yeah, Kratter is the picture of principals with his incessant videos of Gloria Zhao and her sex life. Real peach of a guy and Christian. Spends all his time thinking and posting about child porn and who Gloria is sleeping with.

2026-02-21 21:51:54 CET

- reply

Man that's rich in relation to Kratter. I guess you're taking Kratter to task for his personal attacks on Gloria Zhao and making video after video about her personal life?

2026-01-06 18:52:47 CET

- reply

As in drop everything and listen to the raving lunatic ramble on about conspiracy theories for an hour and a half...

2025-12-20 06:06:10 CET

- reply

Apparently it's a smart contract impersonation of what it is like to have a multisig wallet...

2025-12-17 20:49:18 CET

- reply

Frustrating that Kagi clearly considers Linux and Android users as second class citizens... Delay on Linux and literally no information whatsoever for Android.

2025-12-17 20:46:11 CET

- reply

Care to elaborate?

2025-12-06 16:26:15 CET

- reply

I'm saying you are overlaying your moralistic viewpoint and assigning words to something unrelated. Nowhere did the white paper mention the word "fraud".
Satoshi’s purpose in preventing double spending was to make purely peer-to-peer electronic cash possible without trusting a central authority.
If you want to call double spending "fraud" that's fine but there is nothing moral about it. You could as easily just call it theft if done intentionally. In order for a permissionless peer-to-peer payment system to operate there needs to be mechanisms in place to prevent it. At no point is it necessary to bring feels into it.

2025-12-04 18:09:01 CET

- reply

Dude, you are reaching hard. Fraud, inflation and honesty in the context of Bitcoin have absolutely nothing to do with morality. The only word in that list that could even possibly be misconstrued as moralistic is "honesty" but the way Satoshi used it was in a game theory perspective.

2025-12-04 00:59:21 CET

- reply

https://blossom.primal.net/c6d4d2a04f11abbabbbcdfb5347d18a5b501c5d3b1d15c88f20b9ef39015d3f0.jpg

2025-10-29 06:00:07 CET

- reply

Are y'all kidding me with this shit?
#nevent1q…9tps

2025-10-09 15:59:42 CEST

- reply

Better you than me.

2025-09-21 17:09:15 CEST

- reply

Pixel, for the reasons given by others. GrapheneOS compatible. Also doesn't run any of the UI crap that Samsung and others do. Pure, unadulterated android.

2025-09-20 17:37:47 CEST

- reply

What drove you away from GrapheneOS?

2025-08-20 19:32:22 CEST

- reply

Badass! Thanks for the info, helps me understand it a ton!

2025-08-20 14:45:55 CEST

- reply

How is it possible to know what the setup and hashrate was? I've always wondered how people know this from the outside.