WonteetZebugs
Wonteet Zebugs

Freedom-loving Bitcoin and Nostr pleb. No bugs, no pods.

Public Key

npub1ugtcn9u9qj8wzhdxd2cugcemseuazs0fd3fxq974u7cej889sjusynxyvc

NIP-05 Address

Profile Code

nprofile1qqswy9ufj7zsfrhptknx4vwyvvacv7w3g85kc5nqzl270vvernjcfwgpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduq3kamnwvaz7tmwdaehgu339e682mnwv4k8xct5wvhxxmmdwgsu53

Publishing to

relay.damus.io

nostr1.tunnelsats.com

nostr-pub.wellorder.net

relay.nostr.info

nostr-relay.wlvs.space

nostr.bitcoiner.social

Author Public Key

npub1ugtcn9u9qj8wzhdxd2cugcemseuazs0fd3fxq974u7cej889sjusynxyvc

Show more details

Last Notes

2026-02-18 11:59:31 CET

- reply

Disgusting.

2026-02-14 03:04:01 CET

- reply

Absolutely not. There's waaaayy too much "building" happening already. That's the problem, as v30 shows us.
We need rock solid digital gold which can be privately teleported worldwide and into the future.
We need something to buy that will hold value and increase in value, to get Freedom Go Up.
We DON'T need all that scammy "building" which ruins bitcoin for what we really need it to be.

2026-02-10 13:41:25 CET

- reply

Yeah, I'm not doing that. Nope.

2026-02-10 13:37:23 CET

- reply

He "had to". Even with all of his millions, he still felt like he "had to". He'll do anything for money.
I know many who lost their jobs because they said no. And those people had much less, and needed the money much more, than this guy does.

2026-02-08 03:08:56 CET

- reply

I've been concerned about chaincodelabs under Newberry for a long time.
These guys have been playing the long game.

2026-02-08 02:42:26 CET

- reply

You're missing the point.
The point is : now we have an extra hypothesis as to why some of the devs and "influencers" we're pushing for the crazy v30.
It's not about their personal disgusting depravity, it's about the code. Their personal disgusting depravity is relevant to the extent that it's part of the reason behind the push for the crazy code.
Some like to say that Bitcoin is only software. But it's more than that. It's a social phenomenon. The software itself means nothing unless people adopt it and use it. So the social aspects are relevant.
v30 is a socially suicidal change to Bitcoin. The fact that some of those who pushed for those changes are part of a very small minority of depraved maniacs helps explain why they might not even *see* why it's socially suicidal. They're just not normal.
All that means that, going forward, we must be even more cautious about anything they promote.
That's why the Epstein scandal is relevant concerning those devs and influencers.

2026-02-07 06:00:30 CET

- reply

and it seems like it might weaken the bad influence from many pro-v30 devs and "influencers". That's great news.

2026-02-07 05:18:27 CET

- reply

Gloria's out and it pumps. Looking good.
Just a few more rage quits from the pro-v30 and bitcoin might be back on track.
Fingers crossed.

2026-02-07 05:12:55 CET

- reply

I was uneasy, for a long time, about Blockstream having an office in Israel. Didn't know what to make of it. It was the first strike.
I was looking up to Adam for a long time. His take on v30 was disappointing to me but it was only the second strike.
Epstein is definitely the third strike.

2026-02-07 04:42:57 CET

- reply

Or even better: never use exchanges. Buy p2p.

2026-02-07 04:13:01 CET

- reply

Which is why we must convert as many people to self-custody as possible. Bitcoin can avoid gold's paper fate only if people actually take custody themselves.
#nevent1q…fnz4

2026-02-07 04:10:55 CET

- reply

The nuance to that is v30 and what happens going forward.
Gloria leaving has been instantly bullish for the price and I hope a few more of the pro-v30 crowd rage quit.
I'm seeing bitcoin's immune system in action and it's a beautiful thing.

2026-02-07 03:44:48 CET

- reply

Whether the pro-v30 like it or not, plebs complaining on social media is also a part of bitcoin's immune system.
“eternal vigilance is the price of liberty”

2026-02-07 03:22:46 CET

- reply

I'm celebrating her departure because I like bitcoin and because I see that the pro-v30 are dangerous to bitcoin.
So you're clearly part of the problem.

2026-02-05 23:46:22 CET

- reply

Haha, absolutely. At the end of the day, real estate is subject to whatever local mafia you have to deal with.

2026-02-05 23:44:01 CET

- reply

I'm grateful that she left.
Has the Core team come to their senses on op_return yet, or does the bitcoin price need to go further down?

2026-02-05 23:41:31 CET

- reply

Exactly. v30 makes me want to sell, but for what? Basic real estate would be the obvious choice but it seems overpriced in most places.

2026-02-05 23:28:16 CET

- reply

I can smell the cancer from across the screen...

2026-02-05 23:04:42 CET

- reply

If you liked it before v30, do you have to like it after v30?

2026-02-05 02:08:24 CET

- reply

You might have thought about that before you fired the Bitcoin Free Volunteer Marketing Department with v30.

2025-12-28 17:01:07 CET

- reply

Ginger, ginger, ginger. Grate frozen ginger (lots of it) and pour boiling water on it. Breathe in for a couple of minutes and then drink. Repeat a couple of times daily. Watch the miracles happen.
Also, Xlear ( = saline + xylitol + grapefruit seed extract) is your friend.

2025-12-25 22:33:09 CET

- reply

Yes... but we're just a small part of the funding. The actual funding is the money printing.

2025-12-25 21:48:50 CET

- reply

He's also worried about... climate change... So he might be a contrarian signal. : https://www.marc.cn/2025/01/2025-the-year-ai-will-start-changing-the-world.html

2025-12-24 04:28:18 CET

- reply

The *one* person in government who's actually earning his keep.

2025-12-24 01:50:36 CET

- reply

I heard about this really cool internet magic money and it's all open source. But I wouldn't touch it because I hear it was made by a pseudonym and we don't know who it was ...
/sarc

2025-12-23 16:35:40 CET

- reply

Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.

2025-12-22 23:50:13 CET

- reply

My understanding is that, normally, you now have to give biometrics for Europe.
But your friend Peter Thiel might be able to help you bypass that ;-)

2025-12-22 23:47:17 CET

- reply

Just make sure to also go to a european non-schengen country : https://visaguide.world/europe/non-schengen-countries/

2025-12-22 17:36:06 CET

- reply

OGs bought into bitcoin as money but Core with v30 wants bitcoin to be a jpg relay network.
On a completely unrelated note, gold and monero pumped.

2025-12-21 09:31:04 CET

- reply

Aunt Voula: "What do you mean he don't eat no meat? ... ... Oh, that's okay. I make lamb."

2025-12-20 22:41:58 CET

- reply

I agree 100%. If the btc gets stolen, so be it. No preemptive stealing.

2025-12-20 22:24:44 CET

- reply

But since it'll take years to have a good solution implemented, we better start now.
I don't want any quantum solution to be replacing our current elliptic curve, just added to it. That way, any btc sent to a quantum-resistant address would require both signatures to be spent. The btc in old addresses, should never be consfiscated and always usable with the same old signatures.
We would get a choice : pay more fees to use an additional (big) signature or go cheap and cross your fingers.

2025-12-20 22:14:42 CET

- reply

I understand how your face might look like that if it's her right time of the month... but how did she manage that? That's some flexibility right there.

2025-12-20 22:05:40 CET

- reply

If he had simply invested all the money he got from his Dad in the stock market, he probably would have had more money than he does now and he wouldn't have had to kick all of those widows out of their cheap apartments.

2025-12-20 21:47:21 CET

- reply

And after getting used to linux, I suggest also taking a look at a systemd-free linux distribution. Artix linux is looking good.

2025-12-20 21:42:35 CET

- reply

I'm not worried about the 10$ in my bank account being stolen by quantum.
I'm not worried about quantum for sha-256.
I am worried about the quantum risks for the elliptic curve for my only asset (btc), which can not be insured and no one would ever pay me back, no matter how many lawsuits I file and no matter how blue in the face I get.

2025-12-16 23:26:54 CET

- reply

Men have higher sex drives than women do. Just learn to accept that.
You think you found the cheat code? Maybe for a while. But over time, you'll see. Women's sex drives fluctuate. Ours is at 11 on a permanent basis until we die.

2025-12-16 03:05:48 CET

- reply

Strong (really really strong) ginger tea. You freeze the ginger and then grate it. Pour boiling water. Breathe it in for a couple of minutes and then drink it. Three cups a day. Works wonders.

2025-12-08 20:33:14 CET

- reply

A little bit of baking soda does the trick. Wet the tip of a finger, slightly touch baking soda powder with it, rub it under your armpit, and voila!
#deodorant #bakingsoda #armpit

2025-12-08 16:50:53 CET

- reply

Is it even open source? They talk about being open and all, but I can't find the link to download it. They also talk about licenses?
Plus, it uses systemd. I'm trying to get out of systemd, not more into it.

2025-12-05 20:42:42 CET

"Mark Carney’s De-Risking Scam: How He’s Getting Filthy Rich Off YOUR Pension
The utterly calculated influence of a professional Investment Banker who leveraged Policy and relationships in order to create and Anchor Limited Parter with PSP and Ontario Teacher Pension Plan Funds to attract Private Investors. Only to then use Federal Capital to fast track his enormous carried interest bonus's. "
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1DonknT3aVA
#carney #canada

2025-12-04 17:22:58 CET

- reply

You're right, I have no interest in smart contracts.
I'm only looking for freedom money.

2025-12-04 17:03:05 CET

- reply

But again, I'm not even suggesting that we stop using ECC. I'm only talking about adding to it (optionally, for those who want to).

2025-12-04 03:44:02 CET

- reply

That's how I had read it.
Also, I have the same opinion as you do about the death jabs.

2025-12-04 03:42:07 CET

- reply

On (1) : absolutely, and I wouldn't want bitcoin to replace ECC with PQ algos. I would want PQ algos added. So, if I choose to transfer to an address that also uses a PQ algo, I would then need to sign with ECC *and* with that PQ algo. For big amounts, I wouldn't want to risk it being at the mercy of a technological advancement.
On (2) : higher fees : if bitcoin Core wants to consider that, there is a lot of work to do in making it harder for spam data to price out actual monetary transactions. The higher fees argument might have hit harder last year but v30 changed that (on top of what taproot and segwit did). They even changed the definition of bitcoin to make it into a jpg network instead of p2p money.
On (3) : on killing cheap nodes : again, same as with (2), v30 pretty much affirms that Core doesn't care about that. They'll have us relay whatever spam spammers want to spam us with. Pruning is not an interesting option because it kills archival nodes and kills electrum servers.
If we fix the bad incentives to spam the network with non-monetary transactions (thereby limiting the undue competition for blockspace), we can afford to protect the network by giving the option (for those who prefer that) to also have a PQ algo in addition to ECC.
That might actually make blockspace more competitive, while keep bitcoin a p2p money network, and might be good long-term for the network when the mining needs to run only on miner fees.
Many serious people are saying that quantum will be a threat. I'm not technically competent enough to know one way or the other. But giving what's at stake, adding an optional (additional) PQ seems to be the way to go.

2025-12-04 01:13:44 CET

- reply

I see that he's starting his own shitcoin : https://dark.fi/
"DarkFi is a new Layer 1 blockchain, designed with anonymity at the forefront." https://codeberg.org/darkrenaissance/darkfi and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amir_Taaki
So bitcoin is not good enough for him, monero is not good enough for him.
I remember how he just abandoned his darkwallet project. I'm not holding my breath for anything to come out of this either.

2025-12-03 22:54:23 CET

- reply

I listened starting at 49mns for a couple of minutes and he's just rambling that the lightning guys were lying, and he keeps repeating that. I was waiting for a little bit more meat on those argument bones. He says now he'll just challenge them to fight him physically... That didn't convince me of anything.
In my book, he's insane.
He went to fight ISIS, which to me indicates that he understands very little of what is actually going on in the world.
And in went to Rojova to do that. Rojova = Kurds. Kurds still do excision (female mutilation).
That this guy (Amir Taaki) would still be considered even remotely relevant blows my mind.

2025-12-03 21:39:54 CET

- reply

I'm trying to find your gpg pub key and a signed file with sha256 hashes for the releases on github. Do you have that available somewhere? I want to try your desktop app on linux.
Thank you!

2025-12-03 20:08:33 CET

- reply

> However, historically, Bitcoin had an inflationary bug, while Monero does not. Therefore, this argument is not particularly compelling.
An inflationary bug in bitcoin can be spotted. In Monero, it could go unnoticed.
> The Lightning Network was a crooked crutch in 2017, and it remains so to this day, as even the biggest hypocrites in the Bitcoin community have acknowledged. Well, I don't see any "mass adoption" as a currency.
I must confess that I'm not really fond of the lightning network. It has failed many times for me. Many "unroutable" payments. And to get the best experience possible, you basically need either a custodian or a very well connected node, which basically means the NSA nodes in Virginia.
I prefer to use Liquid, which is basically a half-custodian. I'm not very happy about it. But it works well, without fail (until it doesn't).
> This problem will be solved in the near future.
What direction is monero planning to go on the ASIC issue? Could you tell me more about that?

2025-12-03 18:50:27 CET

- reply

From my understanding :
- the crypto used for extra privacy makes it harder to audit the total supply of coins,
- the coin emission schedule (inflation),
- frequent hard forks, which increases the dependency on the main devs (although that fear for monero feels a little overblown comparatively since bitcoin core v30),
- limited options for second layers, which presents a problem for future scaling in case of massive adoption, and
- the choice of preventing ASICs which limits the total hashing power of the network, making reorgs more likely.
Those are the main concerns that come to mind right now.

2025-12-03 17:46:39 CET

- reply

Impressive!
I do hope she uses organic paint. I can't even begin to imagine what all the chemicals would do to one's health.

2025-12-03 17:12:27 CET

- reply

v30 -> OG maxis lose faith -> gold and monero pump.
But keep on telling yourself it's not related.

2025-12-03 16:58:13 CET

- reply

> A cryptographically-relevant quantum computer is physically impossible
Lord Kelvin : "Heavier-than-air flying machines are impossible."
As bitcoiners, we can't be bearish on tech.
Why not simply ADD quantum resistance? Not removing the current scheme, just adding quantum resistance as an optional extra for those who are willing to pay the extra fee.
For small amounts, I'm okay with receiving and sending a hot potato.
But when moving sats to my cold storage "pension fund", I'd be more than willing to pay more in fees to cover the extra quantum resistance.
As a bitcoiner, I don't feel like risking my family's financial future on your mathematical assurances of impossibility of the quantum threat.
#quantum #bitcoin #btc #QC

2025-12-02 01:39:15 CET

- reply

I agree with very close to 100% of that. I would just beg to differ on the part that says "Incentives > ideals. Full stop. "
I think the blocksize war proved that this is not always the case. The other side had the vast majority of the mining and almost all of the VC money.
The UASF crowd was okay with the price going to zero rather than submitting to the dark side.
We see that also with religions. Truly religious people are very willing to sacrifice their interests for their ideals. Faith in bitcoin can be almost religious, if the ideals are aligned. But v30 disaligns those ideals for many maxis, and thus undermines the "faith" in bitcoin.
#nevent1q…3yd8

2025-12-02 01:14:31 CET

- reply

Same here.
There's nothing major that I want to buy and that I feel is worth the price.
Real estate is overpriced (in most countries) as far as I'm concerned and "owning" it means paying rent to the State (property taxes) and increasing one's attack surface (State, lawsuits, etc).
Physical metal is hard to hide for more than small amounts. Custodied metal and ETFs are a joke.
But what you can easily do is what I would call "DCA out" : educational presents for the kids, better day to day items, life experiences for the family (trips, etc), small investments to incrementally boost your business, and working less by just partly living on sats if the time you buy allows you to do more of the things you want to do (be with family, hobbies, etc).

2025-12-01 23:11:26 CET

- reply

It's the first time the Core devs are on the wrong side. Including my "bitcoin childhood heroes" like Adam Back and Greg Maxwell.
The blocksize war didn't faze me. And I dumped Bcash as soon as I could.
It's the first time I'm actually concerned about the future of the project. And it's because the Core devs in power seem to be woke shitcoiners. That changes everything.
I'm not selling, yet. I'm still hoping for a third implementation.

2025-12-01 22:26:51 CET

- reply

The dump matches up pretty nicely with v30. Lors of maxis are into bitcoin as p2p money, not as a p2p jpg network.

2025-12-01 20:27:19 CET

- reply

Whether I'm still here or not in 2033 will depend a lot more on the software than on price.
Will Core regain their senses? Will we get a third implementation? That's more important to me than price on a certain timeframe.
If the project goes in the right direction, price will inevitably follow. If they keep being crazy, all bets are off.

2025-11-28 17:07:33 CET

- reply

Put your foot down for no. And if the kids themselves absolutely want to go and get brainwashed, let them pay for it.
The only alternative would be some kind of online university where the damage might be less.
Maybe there is a unicorn country out there where the university people are still normal, but I'm not sure.

2025-11-28 04:42:28 CET

- reply

Wow! Excellent. Thank you!!

2025-11-28 02:06:43 CET

- reply

The poor cats obviously don't have EMF meters.

2025-11-28 02:05:15 CET

- reply

But is it easy to have many profiles in the app? Because " ID + Wallet " seems is too close to a potential future Digital ID if it's not easy to change profiles. Defaults and ease of use matter a lot for privacy.

2025-11-28 00:50:20 CET

- reply

I prefer to use desktop so I'm looking at keychat. Have you had any experience with it?
I put everybody I know (and then some) on simplex but told them from the get-go that it was a stop-gap measure until we got smth working on nostr. Are we there yet with keychat?
I'm trying to gather some feedback about it before pushing it on all of my unsuspecting friends...

2025-11-27 17:12:10 CET

- reply

That math don't math.

2025-11-27 17:11:11 CET

- reply

You forgot the /sarc tag.

2025-11-27 17:06:05 CET

- reply

More than an ethernet cable.

2025-11-27 17:04:39 CET

- reply

Yes, that works.
Also what works : cut the wifi and use cables.
For android, you can usually use a usb-ethernet adapter.

2025-11-26 18:59:01 CET

- reply

That image is really good. And so timely for me. I'm printing it on putting it on my wall.
Thank you.

2025-11-26 18:41:29 CET

- reply

What's the issue? Why do you want to "censor" my 500 MB gifs? You should download them for free and relay them for free for me.
/sarc

2025-11-25 03:28:55 CET

- reply

I would expect nothing less from an ethereum promoter.
Why even put a 100k limit? Let's go big! Let's do 1TB op_returns. Or even better, let's put infinite size op_returns.
If an op_return limit is censorship, we've had censorship for a long time in bitcoin.
The pruning argument is really bad too. That means no archival nodes. That means no electrum servers too.
Really bad takes. But he's been doing those for a long time now.

2025-11-25 02:25:10 CET

- reply

Just a coincidence, surely. No relation to v30 at all.
/sarc

2025-11-24 21:37:25 CET

- reply

4. No contest.

2025-11-23 23:35:03 CET

- reply

If it's too expensive, I would move. If there's an ex, I would move even more.

2025-11-23 22:22:29 CET

- reply

I say we make it go way below 50k, even if only to teach Core a lesson.
https://blossom.primal.net/778a08af869e01baebfb26ddc66b2253ecbfeb3baebf80c4908f57bb77f787f4.png

2025-11-23 05:16:27 CET

- reply

Mostly desktop

2025-11-22 13:15:45 CET

- reply

I ' member.
But don't worry, v30 has nothing to do with this. It's just a big "coinciditis".

2025-11-22 13:11:58 CET

- reply

Plus bitcoin core has been making unprovoked mistakes for a while now.
Is anybody working on a third implementation, a conservative one? I would love to support that.

2025-11-21 11:49:38 CET

- reply

I'm currently on a very old version of Core and will never upgrade to 30.
I'm more conflicted on running Knots or not because Luke seems pro-covenant, and I'm not. I want the tinkering to stop.
I'm hoping for a third implementation. A very conservative one.

2025-11-21 11:11:59 CET

- reply

I don't see it as a Knots vs Core debate. I see it as an internal problem to Core.
I see the current anti-filter and pro-shitcoin Core devs and supporters as disconnected from reality and in love with their own intellect.
I think Nick Szabo is the one that is making sense on that debate:
@NickSzabo4 Oct 22
https://xcancel.com/NickSzabo4/status/1980891636197740733#m
"Arbitrary content on blockchains makes them far more risky, legally and morally, to operate, than with blockchains confined to financial transactions. Running a node where one cannot selectively delete unacceptable content without wider functional disruption is also far riskier than running data services where one can selectively delete unacceptable content without causing wider functional disruption.
There are a wide variety of moral and legal categories of arbitrary content, and many of them are radically different from each other. CSAM/CP, other kinds of obscenity, copyrighted material, censored political content, trade secrets, classified material, and many other such categories are treated in extremely different ways from each other by morality and by law. What's more, each of the 100s of jurisdictions over which a blockchain runs has its own wide variations. Some legal prohibitions, such as those against CSAM/CP, have extremely high popularity and involve highly motivated enforcement.
Government response to one kind of content is an extremely poor predictor of its response to another kind of content. The response of one government to a kind of content is often a poor predictor of a response to another government to the same content.
Nodes on blockchains that, through means such as escalating fee schedules, byte limits, format enforcement, etc., discourage arbitrary content, are far less risky to run than nodes on blockchains that encourage arbitrary content."

2025-11-21 09:44:19 CET

- reply

Do we have any third implementation that would simply be conservative?
Just a v28 with only patches in case of network-threatening bugs?
I'd like to support that kind of third implementation. Might as well use those sats while they still hold some value...

2025-11-21 09:40:14 CET

- reply

Still feeling good about that analysis?
How much more selling by OGs do you need before you start to feel different?

2025-11-21 09:08:29 CET

- reply

Nah, with v30, it feels different. It's now the part where I wonder if I seriously miscalculated when I decided to be all in.

2025-11-21 09:01:57 CET

- reply

Maybe you could give a try with this : a phone number (DID) with voip.ms (and then an eSIM if needed, possibly with : lnvpn.net )

2025-11-21 08:55:22 CET

- reply

Normally, I would just be happy for the cheaper sats. But with v30, I'm not sure those sats are cheap.

2025-11-21 08:52:01 CET

- reply

I don't know about that. v30 changed a lot of things. OGs are selling, for good reason.

2025-11-09 18:04:10 CET

- reply

> You sell as much as you need to.
Or as much as one wants to, according to one's risk appetite for what the Core team is doing.

2025-11-09 03:36:56 CET

- reply

I agree with most points you mentioned. I would be very tempted to define it simply as :
- No changes unless to fix an existential bug or problem (possibly quantum at some point).
A third implementation that is extremely conservative would be wonderful in my opinion. It would probably have to start with Core version 28 (no later than v28).
Adam Simecka seems to feel that way too and he has a fairly substantial presence on X, but I can't find him here on Nostr.
https://xcancel.com/AdamSimecka/status/1985405874031194290#m

2025-11-08 18:45:14 CET

- reply

I don't see how that can be enforced. The only real option in my mind is to have other implementations.

2025-11-08 16:37:56 CET

- reply

Yes. It shocked me when I heard him say that.

2025-11-08 02:11:50 CET

- reply

You need to hug the tree, not stare at it.
You need to find an old one. At least 400 years old.
If you don't feel calmer after touching a 400 year old tree, I don't know what to tell you.

2025-11-07 18:25:59 CET

- reply

No. What a bad take.
I use wired headphones to have less radiation. Not to be niche.

2025-11-07 18:10:10 CET

- reply

I was really interested in what Calle was doing until I heard him (multiple times) talk about having KYC mints. I'm not interested and I question anything produced by someone who can think and say those things.
As long as cashu is usable for privacy with small amounts, it has a role, in my opinion. The only point of cashu is the extra privacy.

2025-11-07 17:59:17 CET

- reply

Well said. Excellent video.

2025-11-07 01:25:11 CET

- reply

There are still lower wattage incandescent bulbs out there. I buy those. More expensive, but worth it.

2025-11-06 23:03:44 CET

- reply

Some don't care. Their reward for writing code is elsewhere. They don't need many users.

2025-11-05 01:36:25 CET

- reply

Cool story, except that's not what Satoshi said : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=12.msg79#msg79

2025-10-31 16:48:06 CET

- reply

But I'm also talking about afterwards. I've lost trust in Core. So, even with a soft fork, I feel we need a third implementation going forward. We have to make sure this can't happen again.

2025-10-31 16:11:35 CET

- reply

Who do we have who's working on a third implementation?
Core has gone rogue and Luke is pro-covenants, which I'm not.
Is there any third implementation that would simply be conservative? Just keeping bitcoin the way it was before the horror of v30 (and possibly v29) ?
We just need good stewards to be there in cases of dramatic bugs that could mess up the network (and potentially something for quantum down the line).
#core #knots #node #bitcoin #btc

2025-10-31 16:04:48 CET

- reply

I don't understand why open source projects are still using github. It blows my mind.

2025-10-30 05:28:43 CET

- reply

The chat feature is what I find the most important right now.
Thank you for all your work!