Clout Chaser 🗿

I am looking for an instance with:
>3 Column PleromaFE
>High character limit
>Will be around for more than a few weeks
for desktop use, because Soapbox sucks on desktop.
DO WE HAVE ANY CONTENDERS?

2023-09-04 21:23:21 CEST

- reply

Why is everything you say so random? Where did this even come from?

2023-09-04 20:57:19 CEST

- reply

It’s getting better, a lot of the people there are sick of crypto. It’s not just bot anymore.

2023-09-04 20:51:11 CEST

- reply

I can't wait for Nostr to be good so these retarded instance politics are gone forever.

2023-09-04 20:50:00 CEST

- reply

Can you imagine relying on a piece of software maintained by a schizo faggot like Pete? Even if it's decentralized, he'll still be hardcoding some bullshit into it. I wouldn't use Revolver if it was the best software on earth.

2023-09-04 20:46:25 CEST

- reply

By the time he's in a nursing home he'll admit brown people commit more crimes than British natives.

2023-09-04 20:43:23 CEST

- reply

Maybe she would have IF I COULD SEE HER POSTS!!!

2023-09-04 20:40:45 CEST

My forever friendship with FSE is over.

2023-09-04 20:20:35 CEST

- reply

I can't read this because of your faggot admin and I don't care enough to open another instance just so I can.
Kill. Yourself. To. Death.
Or join another instance, and everything will be fine.

2023-09-04 20:17:21 CEST

- reply

Yes, you do know what it's about. If you're going to gargle Pete's balls all day, at least have the decency to untag me and kill yourself.

2023-09-04 20:08:01 CEST

- reply

At least Graf is straightforward. He's proud of protecting his cunny crew from criticism. P is underhanded with the way he manipulates content.

2023-09-04 19:27:03 CEST

- reply

It’s funniest with you because our federation is broken with your Seal Cafe account too.
Me and Colonel are forever parted 😭

2023-09-04 19:20:19 CEST

- reply

Yep, he’s an idiot. It’s unbelievable that he ever had clout. I deserve that clout.

2023-09-04 19:14:53 CEST

- reply

All their text posts are invisible on certain clients, and he did this on purpose, to try to force other people to use Pleroma’s original frontend.
In reality it just means he’s defederated his instance from most of the network.

2023-09-04 09:23:21 CEST

- reply

There’s no point in replying to me. I can’t see it.

2023-09-04 09:07:21 CEST

His entire community is just sex perverts. I'm sure he cares a lot tho
#note1frw…qyfu

2023-09-04 06:32:47 CEST

- reply

I'm pretty sure it is, it's encrypted and has an open source client. But even if it isn't, Idgaf. I'm using it to plot crimes against Satan, not the United States government.

2023-09-04 06:24:29 CEST

- reply

I did meet one girl on there though and she was schizo. She said she wanted to murder a bunch of Mexicans and then have sex with me on their bodies.

2023-09-04 06:24:12 CEST

- reply

Telegram is for me and the bros to talk about Lutheranism, and also for Kiwi Farms news.

2023-09-04 06:20:32 CEST

- reply

Telegram gang

2023-09-04 06:14:51 CEST

- reply

The correct way to write the name is YHWH. The correct way to pronounce it is to substitute "Lord."
That's how we've always done it. The original Christians weren't stupid, we received this tradition because it's correct. If it wasn't correct, we wouldn't have received it. You don't need crackpot secularist scholars rewriting history to "fix" it.

2023-09-04 06:09:25 CEST

- reply

>Where did he get this from?
Most likely, he conflated John Chrysostom's exegesis of its significance with something native to the text itself. It does come up in the Septuagint sometimes, but I'm not familiar enough with how often to apologize for it.
>one reason "Yahweh" was not previously used as much is because "Jehovah" was more popular
He addresses this more in the original thread. I edited it out because it was irrelevant. Jehovah is also an incorrect rendering that should not be used, but it's not as explicitly malicious.

2023-09-04 03:53:27 CEST

- reply

If you’re just going to be pedantic just to defend evil then there’s no need to respond. Obviously I know that. I’m sorry I didn’t give you a full introductory course on the Aramaic, Hebrew writing system. The point remains that “Yahweh” is not the Hebrew name. It’s an artificial construction created with the explicit intent to harm Christ’s body.

2023-09-04 03:35:04 CEST

- reply

If that pronunciation is based on a lie that solely exists to discredit God's revelation, then no, it's not a good thing.
It can't be an attempt to better understand Hebrew because it's not Hebrew. The Hebrew doesn't have vowels.

2023-09-04 03:17:13 CEST

- reply

I was friends with one of the queen bee femcels, so about half of my Twitter timeline is lower tier femcels having emotional breakdowns because they hate men and feel gross about themselves.
It’s actually really sad. But even if you try to help them, they won’t listen.

2023-09-04 03:04:31 CEST

- reply

It’s the genealogy of the idea.
It was explicitly created by a crackpot to libel Christianity and undermine the historical consensus, and only became popular again when the churches began adopting radical social liberalism.
Why would we ever allow such a thing to be accepted?

2023-09-04 02:48:39 CEST

- reply

The immediate response to MW’s book was summary dismissal and ridicule. The entire premise is quite clearly antithetical to Christianity, MW’s own personal intentions notwithstanding.
Unfortunately, even more apostate men than MW quickly stumbled across his blasphemy. John Thomas and the Christadelphians, a Unitarian sect was thrilled with MW’s “new Christology” as it helped them amplifying their own proto-Zionist dispensationalism.
The publication records show MW’s “Yahveh” spelling took off in the 1880s, peaking around 1890, and then rapidly falling off again by 1900. The trivially variant spelling “Yahweh” which we take for granted today lingered in the background, until exploding this century.
So what are we to make of all this?
Firstly, the behavior of un-translating God’s “I am” back into some particular ancient sound has at most six centuries of history. The idea of replacing the Word with some specific noise is a novelty without theological warrant.
Secondly, the specific genealogy of the <2 century-old “Yahweh” is 100% evil. A philologist briefly flubs an unimportant academic question. A man who denies the Inspiration of Scripture uses that error to read back into Scripture words that are literally absent. But of course these tactics always appeal to indolent Christians who revel in snatching shiny baubles off the ground and carrying them into their churches and hearts, where they are baptized as sound doctrine, against all reason, history, or Scriptural warrant.
Nobody cares what they meant when they came up with a plainly novel, extra-Christian idea.
“Oh that sounds nice, and isn’t it pious! Why this just feels so authentically Judeo-Christian”.
Yes, yes it does. And that is the real root of the problem.
https://media.gleasonator.com/5fb7844662c15bcd1feb921ea5d7e97d2c4993896855b6c3a142de607677ec5a.jpeg
https://media.gleasonator.com/adb64a06cef2a70586c54e1b019f5549781d9369f710465ebeb1648ac77e4f20.jpeg
https://media.gleasonator.com/0d2193f4ed134a4cd7f50d2d365e5d3c88b65142d5182e943046699d4fad9a60.jpeg
https://media.gleasonator.com/5f3c287dc459e5cf3e8dcc1104ba50761bb8232d4333354ee94d7b93f9863a54.jpeg
https://media.gleasonator.com/191f5565e45b518db1cef79e9a74f2170d37d62fdf0179a45d6d013f59f6d846.jpeg
https://media.gleasonator.com/78c79b9fe48bc88f8f5d6a895f42e083a3990d1c5abbb81a6bd09977135229c6.jpeg

2023-09-04 02:41:07 CEST

- reply

In 1856/57, Alexander MacWhorter III was himself inspired by discovering Gesenius’s off-hand speculation. What was all but a footnote in one man’s work became another man’s passion. MacWhorter (MW) did not simply treat “Yahweh” as a pronunciation; he reinterpreted all of Scripture on the basis of his exegesis of this new word.
MW published a 179 page book2 titled “Yahveh Christ, or, The Memorial Name” dedicated to his “new Christology” which reimagines all of Scripture in the context of “I am” being a demonic lie intended to conceal a future* promise. MW rejected “I am” out of hand as pagan superstition, the result of the corrupt & unreliable LXX.
Not only did this put him at odds with four thousand years of believers, but most importantly with Christ Himself and the NT which quote it as Scripture. Having opened the door to apostasy, MW springboards from Gesenius’s careless aside to transform “YHWH” from God’s eternal “I am” into a fundamentally opposed phrase in the future tense– something that doesn’t even exist in Hebrew –“He who will be”! Even while in places railing against his contemporaries who questioned Scripture, MW’s entire thesis rests on DH and the JEDP theory which nullifies Mosaic authorship of the Pentateuch.
It is also notable that while LXX is filled with “Theos” or God, MW is passionate that referring to God as God is actually a pagan philosophical trick which could only possibly exist due to the very translation Jesus used but MW condemns out of hand.
(Stay tuned for part 3)
https://media.gleasonator.com/e55a91341300acfaa4cf2a4b398ff0e8bffed90a476e7601f348d30c060590ec.jpeg
https://media.gleasonator.com/a92123cb13782a88140c4a6f6811785b03fb49b4fb21a1d353acd50fbd19670f.jpeg
https://media.gleasonator.com/9e0b93250628d0b29c86baa97450833884a54e1e4e1a6227de64632def43ad07.jpeg
https://media.gleasonator.com/ec3b095b375e75008f2011834cfaf2f717d11e0a84077a552707f9b341e4c581.jpeg
https://media.gleasonator.com/c1313314b8a9dc1b76e897492d0588ff1feef375fe1b9fbc5a8f14c95e0a3f1f.jpeg
https://media.gleasonator.com/d86e7993b6f3a374cff53d7bd53b193e9aedad903e202b4209aab695961e7417.jpeg
https://media.gleasonator.com/43efca878b3639d97dbb7db518ee878213a040a6d649d9123ec97f83717c350f.jpeg
https://media.gleasonator.com/1fa91bcb26e3e43efc6ab1e0f3bd8fcd755e0f4ece9bf3f3f8d5ad5857918319.jpeg

2023-09-04 02:30:58 CEST

- reply

Here’s the thread (slightly abridged):
Have you ever heard someone refer to God as “Yahweh”? That’s just the English for His revealed name in the OT, right? That must mean it’s the ancient Christian practice!
N.b. this thread is not about “the secret name of God,” or YHWH, or Jehovah, or vowel pointing, or any other such debate. It is solely focused how & when the six letters “Yahweh” came into common use in English.
A friend asked this week whether a CPH commentary that insists on translating Lord as “Yahweh” is subversive.
My first instinct was “yes, absolutely.” But what do I know? So I turned next to Google Ngrams, which searches over 8M books going back centuries. Ngrams showed just what I imagined: the term was invented in the last two centuries, and took off in popularity very recently. Neither of these are what you want to see when you’re considering sound doctrine. An unchanging God does not engender fickle beliefs.
Ngrams also lets you drill down to any date range to see precisely which hits are represented on the graph. After some spelunking, metadata errors, lots more googling, and hours of reading original source material, here is how we were tricked into saying “Yahweh”.
For thousands of years, there has been debate over the pronunciation of “YHWH”–the name “I am” which God gave Himself from the burning bush in Exodus 3.
Written Hebrew of course has no vowels, so with only the text, there are numerous possibilities for any consonant set.
The Greek Septuagint (LXX) is the Old Testament that was commonly used in Jesus’ day. Hebrew was already a dead language in the 1st century, meaning it was no longer spoken conversationally and most couldn’t read it. Jesus quotes the LXX, as does the NT hundreds of times. So it is relevant how the LXX treats the YHWH “I am”. What we find is that the word is simply and naturally translated “ego eimi”–“I am”. The 4th century Latin Vulgate also faithfully translates it simply as “ego sum”. Zero interest in it as a proper name, vs. a declaration.
This fact is crucial to the question because it ties directly to Christ’s Divinity. When Jesus said, “Before Abraham was I am” He said ego eimi, and the jews tried to murder Him on the spot for blasphemy. He didn’t use some special Hebrew utterance, but “I am”–God’s Name.
For over 14 centuries, every Christian believed that God’s revealed name to Moses was “I am”. In the middle ages, “Jehovah” was invented as a speculative translation of YHWH, a stark departure from treating it like the real word that it is, rather than a magic incantation.
In 1833, a German linguist & theologian named Wilhelm Gesenius joined this more modern trend of speculating on those sounds. In a later edition of his Hebrew & Latin Manual Lexicon, he (admittedly) theorized that “Yahweh” was perhaps the original pronunciation. Gesenius invented his “Yahweh” theory as one possible pronunciation based on his hypothesis that Hebrew had been influenced by the same ancient root that produced Jove & Jupiter. It appears that he retracted within a few years. It is vital to notice that this particular speculation is only possible if one denies the Inspiration of Scripture. The “Documentary Hypothesis” (DH) had taken root by the early 1800s, and informs everything that happens in the rest of this post. Look it up.
https://purebibleforum.com/index.php?threads/gesenius-theorizes-that-yahweh-came-directly-from-egypt-tregelles-rips-to-shreds-g-thoroughly-retracts-something.566/
(The rest will be a 2nd post, as it sources a particular book extensively and images are required.)
https://media.gleasonator.com/4541685f3c2fb5f64f074acbbeca190e832b1f219c443e29158749bf08d2fac6.jpeg

2023-09-04 02:15:25 CEST

- reply

I don’t mind if you’re misinformed on a topic, but don’t then go and push the Devil’s doctrines in my replies.

2023-09-04 01:48:52 CEST

- reply

https://media.gleasonator.com/6948a1a79aa033b8a7b7ebd65a3e855bc4c62e9e886e96b0e44507aac12143b4.jpeg

2023-09-04 01:11:33 CEST

- reply

Tell Pete that he broke federation. All FSE text posts just show up as blank.

2023-09-04 00:33:18 CEST

https://twitter.com/treblewoe/status/1681719103071846400?s=20

2023-09-04 00:28:59 CEST

- reply

Hopefully starving to death from lack of attention

2023-09-04 00:28:07 CEST

- reply

Unless someone is following you from Minds, your post won’t go through. Also tags don’t work like this on Minds, it has to be a reply or they won’t see it.

2023-09-04 00:25:25 CEST

https://media.gleasonator.com/340525bbff03597737d88364503641933161061e841f0079c4d1f6961b370d6d.jpeg

2023-09-04 00:15:43 CEST

- reply

Nostards don’t care about anything except Bitcoin.

2023-09-04 00:04:53 CEST

- reply

This is an exceptional case. Abby’s feet are worth more than diamonds.

2023-09-04 00:04:08 CEST

Good show. https://amerikaner.org/the-godcast-episode-257-how-to-ignore-jesus-by-reading-only-jesuss-words/

2023-09-03 19:22:50 CEST

- reply

I think people are just degenerate. Jewish influence has allowed it to be tolerated in polite society when it shouldn’t be, but people would still be doing gross things even without porn.

2023-09-03 19:16:53 CEST

- reply

They want a Catholic ethnostate and they also want to have twink slaves in their basement.

2023-09-03 19:12:37 CEST

They are lots of openly homosexual White nationalists on Discord.

2023-09-03 18:20:16 CEST

Gargron is Sonic the Hedgehog and Alex Gleason is Shadow the Hedgehog.
Neither have colored arms.

2023-09-03 07:53:54 CEST

We are $34 away from Ralph leaking images his pristine penis.

2023-09-03 07:46:06 CEST

Ethan Ralph promising to share his dick pics if he hits the goal. Calling himself an "exhibitionist."

2023-09-03 07:21:43 CEST

Ralph is letting some idiots troll him on his stream.

2023-09-03 05:11:46 CEST

- reply

I would be interested. It’s ok if you don’t though.

2023-09-03 04:26:52 CEST

- reply

I think it's random for them. They're just guessing based on the smells.

2023-09-03 04:24:54 CEST

- reply

They'll also accuse us of not seasoning our food in the next breath. I don't think black people even have taste buds tbh.

2023-09-03 04:23:09 CEST

- reply

When certain ethnicities call us mayo monkeys they're actually expressing jealousy that they don't know how to make it.

2023-09-03 04:18:11 CEST

- reply

I have to follow you to keep Voldemort on her toes.

2023-09-03 04:16:01 CEST

- reply

You won't be, I think I've already passed over your account.
I'm keeping pretty much everyone who posts anything worthwhile.
If I've never seen them before, they're gone. If all they do is post about tech, they're gone. If it's no original, they're gone. If they haven't posted since July or earlier, they're gone. If they're overtly degenerate, they're gone.
That's really my only criteria.

2023-09-03 04:10:45 CEST

- reply

It was closer to 4.5 thousand.
About 75% was just because I wanted follow backs for clout (it did work but I only got about 250.)
The other 25% were Minds accounts, I was trying to force their stuff to federate more, which was a waste of time, because out of 800 or so people, I found less than 10 who do anything other than steal memes or link spam.

2023-09-03 04:06:23 CEST

Got rid of almost 2 thousand follows. Needed a break.
Gotta divide this crap into sessions. I'm never doing this again lol

2023-09-03 02:04:45 CEST

It is time.

2023-09-03 01:43:37 CEST

We need multiple emoji reacts so I can send every bad emoji at someone when they say something stupid.

2023-09-03 01:08:21 CEST

In January 2023, the LCMS released a new revised teaching resource called Luther’s Large Catechism with Annotations and Contemporary Applications. The volume includes a translation of Luther’s Large Catechism, one of the Lutheran confessional documents, bound together with dozens of essays, some of which import radical social agendas. After reading the essays, I published my critique online to Twitter on Jan. 21. I focused entirely on the theological content of the catechetical essays, pointing out their contradiction of the LCMS’s conservative reputation.
One essay argued that self-defense was immoral and that Scripture does not support a people’s right to bear arms. Another essay, the most infamous of the lot, twisted Matthew 7 to declare that sodomy, pornography, pedophilia, polyamory, and transgenderism were simply “specks in our neighbor’s eye” while (heterosexual) fornication was the log in our own. The essay on “God as Creator” attempted to bypass creationism, denigrating fundamentalists as simply discussing “scientific theories.” A couple of other essays explicitly focused on incorporating social justice theories and ideas about “economic and societal privilege” into Lutheranism. One essay declared urban gentrification to be a sin because whites moving into poorer neighborhoods and indirectly raising property values is, according to this new catechism, theft—due to the increased tax burden. Another asserts that social justice is a Christian necessity; even though perfect social justice is unachievable, we must aim for “proximate justice” (“proximate” being determined, apparently, by the author of the essay and his friends).

2023-09-03 00:26:34 CEST

- reply

Lutheranism isn't really "American Christianity." It's very similar to Roman Catholicism, when compared to other Protestant groups. It's a dying tradition though. I'm not aware of any traditional synods left in the West, though many of the younger laity are as far right as you can get.

2023-09-03 00:24:16 CEST

- reply

https://open.spotify.com/episode/7BcGlfvqGu8UzOwmhJyun7?si=d442d54ba89d4338

2023-09-03 00:08:51 CEST

The average age of a LCMS parishoner is 60 years old.
That's the average.
Which means half of them are older.

2023-09-03 00:06:28 CEST

https://media.gleasonator.com/ad04f580149fdb7bc69b457055b7ae453dbbcf13b4cae45803a5bb9c6a0a137e.png

2023-09-02 21:54:39 CEST

Help him feel better, anon.
https://media.gleasonator.com/f48dac3977153edc56c98e315c6d48938059c29d998542f61a182fbfc0edc50a.png

2023-09-02 21:52:59 CEST

- reply

Idk who that is. I got it from the "boys with daddy issues" meme.

2023-09-02 21:48:05 CEST

- reply

Why?

2023-09-02 21:45:17 CEST

- reply

idk

2023-09-02 21:44:27 CEST

- reply

Who?

2023-09-02 21:43:34 CEST

A lot of my posts get small traction in the pedophile community on here.

2023-09-02 21:42:34 CEST

How many of my followers are MAP’s? Serious question. Reply below with your story. My friends will encourage and support you.

2023-09-02 21:14:50 CEST

- reply

2023-09-02 21:13:41 CEST

- reply

I also give a small bow when I meet important people before the handshake and always have.
Guys I think I might be Japanese.

2023-09-02 21:09:04 CEST

- reply

If culture stems from genetics how come I like anime?

2023-09-02 20:46:02 CEST

- reply

That’s not even true. The King wanted an annulment, which the Pope literally did all the time for other Kings, but he didn’t want to this time, so Henry got the Archbishop of Canterbury to do it instead, which he had every right to, by tradition.
He also killed the bitch so he didn’t even need to do that lol

2023-09-02 20:29:03 CEST

- reply

I believ u

2023-09-02 20:07:37 CEST

- reply

Believe the meme if you want to. The reality of the situation is, most churches built after the 50’s are ugly, whether they’re Catholic or Protestant.
It’s not even exclusively a church thing. We’re just in a bad era for architecture.

2023-09-02 20:02:17 CEST

- reply

They are populated by faggots, but a lot of their buildings are hundreds of years old and built to be beautiful. Same as the mainline in Europe.

2023-09-02 19:59:34 CEST

- reply

I’m only grouping them because the Episcopalian churches look better than both.
Catholic buildings are much worse than Orthodox, but the Orthodox aren’t great either, though they do at least try to decorate the interior.

2023-09-02 07:12:35 CEST

- reply

Do they actually adopt liberal praxis?
Anglican Communion is in an odd situation where they're the most lib denomination in the world in the USA and Britain, but in Africa they're traditional, even though it's theoretically the same church.

2023-09-02 07:08:35 CEST

BASED
#note1j6e…q07g

2023-09-02 05:58:55 CEST

This girl has singlehandedly sold me on women from India.
https://media.gleasonator.com/1d77be5fbcf2e0db8ed24627e5d36081adae95a1720846d555688dccb8c83272.jpeg

2023-09-02 05:31:40 CEST

- reply

Rome, on its most corrupt day, never claimed you could buy your way into Heaven, only the Pope had the means to ease the temporal consequences of sin, and would do so for money.
It’s still a scam, but I don’t like letting lies stand.

2023-09-02 04:28:34 CEST

I don’t understand people who convert to Eastern Orthodoxy over Roman Catholicism.
Eastern Orthodoxy makes no promises of salvation. It gives you a general praxis that can move you in the general direction of theosis, but even if you live the perfect life, you can still be deceived and fail after you die with the whole tollhouse idea.
If you’re going to buy into the trad propaganda, at least pick the tradition that actually claims it can get you to Heaven, as long as you don’t fall into mortal sin.

2023-09-02 04:16:55 CEST

- reply

Nevermind.

2023-09-02 04:06:49 CEST

I’m going to try a different lectionary starting today.

2023-09-02 01:38:05 CEST

- reply

This is the future of male revitalization. Charging ports.

2023-09-01 21:48:52 CEST

- reply

Ironically enough, your reply actually does contain multiple straw mans. But I’m not interested in addressing them anymore. I’m tired. It’s a spiritual issue. You hate God, so you disobey him. It really is that simple.

2023-09-01 21:46:01 CEST

- reply

I don’t think you know what those words mean.

2023-09-01 21:23:13 CEST

- reply

America isn’t that religious outside the South, and that’s because we’re a virtuous people. But even in the South, there aren’t many actual Christians that practice anything resembling the historical religion. It’s all restorationist cults.

2023-09-01 21:20:04 CEST

- reply

You said it was a strawman, but it isn’t. Most of this response doesn’t really address the problems, either, so I’m not going to bother responding. It’s the same old script.
I just want anyone who comes across it to know that there is a counterposition.

2023-09-01 20:55:14 CEST

- reply

Jungians reproduce through pure mitosis.

2023-09-01 20:32:36 CEST

- reply

Are you familiar with the actual Protestant arguments against it?
1: It’s ahistorical. You don’t see it references in the early fathers.
2: Any use of images is a violation of the 1st Commandment (2nd Commandment for the Reformed) and God’s judgement matters more than later traditions.
3: The distinction between latria/dulia/proskuneo (veneration and worship) isn’t demonstrable from the early Greek sources.
It’s not a strawman. We actually substantively disagree about what you’re doing, and the actual historical/linguistic evidence is on the Protestant side, which basically all scholars acknowledge.
We know Catholics don’t think they’re worshipping Mary and the Saints, but we think they are doing that by their actions.

2023-09-01 19:26:54 CEST

- reply

No one in there is happy, I promise you. They act tough because they know if they don't they're gonna fucking die.

2023-09-01 19:24:58 CEST

- reply

>I'm convinced though that they can be scared into following the law.
Incarceration is pretty scary, yet most people who end up in there once, go back again, and again, and again, and again. It's not like it's entirely psychological torture, if somebody has a bad day and fucks with you, you might be getting stabbed. You've got to sleep with something sharp under your bed.

2023-09-01 19:20:20 CEST

- reply

An actual attempt at rehabilitation would be ideal, one with enough space that you aren't psychologically traumatized from being locked in a bleak, gray room with almost no sunlight with extremely loud, violent, and volatile gangsters for months or years at a time.
All America's "justice system" does is satisfy the emotional needs of the public. There's no justice in it. If you can't rehabilitate someone you might as well just kill them. There's no point in wasting away some arbitrary portion of their lives until Karens are happy.
Call me a libtard, I guess.

2023-09-01 10:36:31 CEST

- reply

I am a member of the true Israel (LCMS)