SoloMode / SoloMode is on Nostr

"d1377ff0f27339d665442149688bdfcc547df0ebd61149ee561f0530cc3bbf016b9e200f8950b08e4802479edd3e7c89a3c6e43829582256c4f0870611fa5b08"

Last Notes

2026-07-16 19:59:27 CEST

- reply

@nprofile…3x9u: Esto es interesante. ¿Podría ser esta la plataforma que sustituya a Telegram para el grupo «Bitcoin Tuesday»?

2026-02-20 21:06:14 CET

https://blossom.primal.net/3f9f5f7c0becd60dc73001081ac1984c78ac28542ffc611737bc0e7fba663bce.png
An interesting graph came my way from an investment bank's economic report. Nothing new...

2026-01-18 08:50:19 CET

- reply

How has Greenland failed to protect its country?
(Note that I use "its" without the apostrophe because it's a possessive pronoun, whereas "it's" is an abbreviation of "it is" or "it has".)
Greenland is protected under NATO, so the argument that it needs to be owned by the USA to be protected from foreign aggression is false. The irony is that the USA has weakened the NATO guarantee, which strengthens their argument for taking it by force - or "buying" it Mafia-style. The USA's actions towards Greenland remind me of another nuclear power currently attempting to take another country by force to gain access to its natural resources.

2026-01-15 19:33:29 CET

- reply

Can you publish the videos here? I have to verify my age on X to see them, which means I need to subscribe to Premium and upload Id. I'm on nostr precisely to avoid these controls.

2025-12-08 18:47:24 CET

- reply

Comprado! Confieso que tengo el pie en los dos mundos porque también tengo la lotería de la navidad. 🤑

2025-12-07 20:38:25 CET

- reply

Es irónico que Sumar quiera incluir un activo que no tiene valor intrínseco ni económico en una categoría fiscal que incluye los ingresos procedentes de la actividad económica. Es obviamente un ataque a los criptoactivos que se mantienen en autocustodia. Sumar es el epítome de la envidia hacia cualquiera que gana dinero y busca que la población en su conjunto sea lo más pobre posible.

2025-10-19 20:55:24 CEST

Sorry about the spam. I'm trying to send only to my private relay, so if you read this it's because I don't know what I'm doing.

2025-10-19 20:08:17 CEST

Burn before reading. I'm just testing my private relay that I've set up on my new Start9 server.

2025-04-21 00:03:59 CEST

https://www.piratewires.com/p/signature-didnt-have-to-die-either-chokepoint-nic-carter?f=home
This is an interesting article by Nic Carter at PirateWires. It claims that the FDIC closed Signature Bank in order to be able to justify declaring the SVB collapse to be a systemic risk. This allowed it to make whole its uninsured deposits, saving the Biden Administration from the political fallout of ruining a significant part of the tech startup industry.
Or maybe the reason for saving the depositors was that Senator Warren wanted to save her husband's business. In any case, Signature Bank was collateral damage, with the added serendipity of the bank having a significant number of crypto clients. Operation Chokepoint 2 gets a boost.
The article also claims that SVB didn't have to fail because there were several interested buyers. But Senator Warren was against bank mergers so the FDIC had to close it, despite it being solvent.
So what instigated the world's fastest bank run on SVB? It happened straight after Silvergate Bank went into voluntary liquidation due to an anti-crypto shift in FDIC policy making its business model inviable.
Operation Chokepoint 2, a surge in short-term interest rates, nervous depositors and systemic interference in the financial system by a united government and FDIC brought down three banks in quick succession. This is a lesser-known legacy of the Biden Administration.
Another nostr user published this article to https://archive.ph/yvWss to avoid the PirateWires paywall. Perfectly understandable, as you get to read their excellent journalism. I recommend subscribing to it and supporting their work.

2025-02-24 08:23:36 CET

- reply

@npub13lk…lpsy

2025-01-25 09:25:12 CET

- reply

La autora comete el mismo error que Pedro Sánchez y muchos otros políticos típicamente alineados con la política de izquierdas: asume que el gobierno debe desempeñar un papel en el control («regulación») de la expresión. En su lugar, debería buscar soluciones que eliminen a los «oligarcas», es decir, a nostr.

2025-01-23 11:32:59 CET

- reply

Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez's browser history would be an interesting read indeed, unless he deleted it, as he and his Minister of Justice did to their WhatsApp messages to conceal incriminating evidence against the Minister of Justice who is on trial in the Supreme Court. (Can you believe that? A Justice Minister on trial!) His browser history might also show evidence against his wife, who is on trial for corruption, and still more evidence against his brother, who is also on trial for corruption. Oh, and let's not forget his ex-Minister of Transport, also on trial for corruption. Two family members, a Minister of Justice, and ex-Minister of Transport all before the courts on different charges of corruption. All these cases have links to Pedro Sánchez, and they are starting to be revealed. He of all people should want online anonymity.

2024-09-22 23:54:07 CEST

- reply

What did I miss? Why this reply?