<unnamed>

Public Key

npub1ymhdkss82gmy4sg8aer2k4h6azzwn5h3a5ktylgdwlhyuceplzdqswety6

Profile Code

nprofile1qqszdmkmggr4ydj2cyr7u34t2maw3p8f6tc76t9j05xh0mjwvvsl3xsprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumt0d4hhxarj9ecxjmntyz62k8

Publishing to

relay.momostr.pink

Last Notes

2026-08-08 22:45:43 CEST

- reply

Could require pre-paid investment in adequate green energy prior to permitting. Then if the DC's collapse b/c demand isn't adequate to meet the dream we still get the investment.

2026-08-02 20:50:25 CEST

- reply

yes. I sent an infuriated email at the time, as politely as I could. But - ridiculous. - here's a screenshot
"2. It seems your system determining what was wrong with my system thinks that "crypto" means "cryptocurrency". That is nuts. We developers use a lot of cryptography to encrypt things. If you have an AI scanning the logs you really need to make sure it can tell the difference between cryptocurrency and cryptography, and I think your automation messed that up."
https://media.mathstodon.xyz/media_attachments/files/117/027/410/116/162/446/original/1ef6e7d9364bdb3d.png

2026-08-02 20:25:07 CEST

- reply

I had a GCP project suspended by that same team for allegedly mining crypto on CloudRun - and it was really a bug that included the word "crypto" in the error message that got logged. "Crypto" as in CRYPTOGRAPHY. It took me something like 5 days to get it running again. I believe it must have been an AI error - a human could not be that dumb. (It obviously wasn't mining crypto for at least a few obvious reasons: (a) it was a PAYING project - not free compute; (b) it was deployed as the sort of CloudRun compute that turns off except when an endpoint gets hit on the hosted API - useless as a mining operation!

2026-08-01 00:41:36 CEST

- reply

One might reasonably wonder what sort of restitution Hearn should anticipate from the $1.8bn restitution fund for individuals who have been "wrongly investigated or prosecuted"

2026-07-20 15:44:41 CEST

- reply

It's like the Poteidaians on a fateful day
It's a weak ally when a siege is laid
Sparta's sick hoplites put the fight to paid
And who would've fought? It figures

2026-07-11 02:30:28 CEST

- reply

Not hard to figure out why Israel would want Trump to think this

2026-06-28 14:31:23 CEST

- reply

true enough. *if* the founders don't go to war

2026-06-28 14:24:28 CEST

- reply

yeah, or even just "Our company is probably going to implode next week. Have a nice morning."

2026-06-21 15:45:11 CEST

Does anyone else think the distinction between "observable" and "unobservable" entities lacks value specifically for the reason that the category of entity changes as the observer ages?
Like seriously: the ingredients list on a flavor packet for ramen was, 15 years ago, an observable for me - and I could determine whether it was vegetarian, or contained chicken, beef, etc. Now (for me) the text on a nearly-identical packet is an "unobservable" - and what does that do to the epistemic question its vegetarian status? Is it even knowable? What would van Fraassen say?
Does epistemic status of whether the packet is vegetarian fundamentally change if I have to put my readers on to make out the text? What if I use a text-to-speech device?
#philosophy
#philosophyOfScience

2026-06-20 14:59:48 CEST

- reply

Someone posted a link to this article this morning and I think you might find it interesting. Lots about bird colors that cannot be displayed on a screen. I am not sure/curious about what is lost/retained using a digital camera and the mechanism for encoding the data; I suspect the raw files retain data that our screen can't display. https://moultano.wordpress.com/2026/06/19/where-to-find-the-colors-your-screen-cant-show-you/

2026-06-20 14:18:18 CEST

Reading Arthur Fine. Is he as funny in person as he is on paper? If you are not in the middle of reading a phil sci paper this may not crack you up but you have to know the audience, right? He is really very funny in print, with a certain goofy self-deprecation via its opposite.
#philosophyOfScience #philosophy
Some tidbits from The Natural Ontological Attitude:
Thus, let me introduce the acronym NOA (pronounced as in “Noah”), for natural ontological attitude, and, henceforth, refer to the core position under that designation. ... [half a page later] ...But, a “noaer” (pronounced as “knower") is not so committed.
...
Because of its parsimony, I think the minimalist stance represented by NOA marks a revolutionary approach to understanding science. It is, I would suggest, as profound in its own way as was the revolution in our conception of morality, ...

2026-05-10 14:37:38 CEST

- reply

super cool composition

2026-04-10 13:40:31 CEST

- reply

Informative alt text. Also - HA! - on the first one.

2026-03-19 00:08:31 CET

- reply

I was very confused for a minute, but is the gray-winged fellow in the middle of the royal terms a gull, with a term right behind it - the bills overlapping?

2026-01-24 23:53:57 CET

- reply

Yes, we need something like the Ukrainian programs to document Russia's war crimes, from the very early days of the war. WarCrimes.gov.ua

2025-10-25 15:02:22 CEST

An artist in Athens Ohio wrote a song called the soon-to-be-world-famous-pancake-song. You will hear it someday. You all will. That's just the nature of the soon-to-be-world-famous-pancake-song.
Every month or so I re-post my soon-to-be-world-famous work of rogue philosophy. There's a lot of dingbattery about, and even more wingnuttery; and I count wingnuts and dingbats as family and friends. This is not that; but... how would you know that? So: I challenge you to enjoy this in two parts, with two different mindsets. The first half is old-school metaphysics, arguing that, if the universe-writ-large is free from all constraints (be they Gods or Laws of Nature), the reflexivity of identity (i.e., *A=A*) is never instantiated in the physical world.
That's a sort of ontic vagueness - but a very special sort, with a very precise character: that reality cannot exhibit any of the characteristics that entail the reflexivity of identity (i.e., self-identity).
The second half is not old-school metaphysics, but speaks to those physical implications: if reality cannot exhibit the reflexivity of identity, what else does that eliminate? (Meaning, what else is reality NOT like.) In fact, I believe this approach can help us understand why reality appears constrained and provides a possible means to approach some of the fine tuning questions.
That's not the sort of thing one expects in #philosophy these days; it's an unusual approach. I hope every month a person or two will give it a read, and I'll find someone who can help render this soon-to-be-world-famous tangle of ideas into something as digestible as the soon-to-be-world-famous-pancake song.
with love to the fediverse ... Adam
https://zenodo.org/records/14674036

2025-10-04 15:31:39 CEST

If you feel like reading something completely different ... and you have been thinking about quantum mechanics, and wondering ... why should the world be so ... weird? Why isn't it just like Laplace said - deterministic? I invite you to read about what the world *cannot* to be like, if reality as a whole is not *constrained*. It's a very different approach to #philosophy and it's relationship to science; I hope you like it.
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14665746

2025-09-03 20:47:04 CEST

If some days you want to escape *into* reality, instead of escaping *from* reality... My too-unknown-to-be-underrated philosophy short from January is (nonetheless) nearing 1,400 downloads. Open access PDF is here https://zenodo.org/records/14674036. Or on Kindle for practically-free, and with a beautiful cover featuring my daughter, here: https://www.amazon.com/Ontic-Vagueness-Argument-Adam-Weisberg-ebook/dp/B0D8GLNF86
...
Is reality intrinsically vague? If it is, can we set a theoretical limit on the precision with which reality can be described? And if we can, what are the observable, physical implications of that limit?
This essay introduces a new philosophical argument for ontic vagueness, the argument from freedom. As it arises in the argument from freedom, ontic vagueness takes the form of the specific claim that perfect self-identity does not exist in the physical world: there does not exist any feature of nature A such that A=A. I call this claim the unreality of logic and interpret it as demarcating a concrete theoretical limit on the precision with which nature can be described, due to intrinsic vagueness.
#philosophy #writing

2025-09-01 14:25:41 CEST

#WordWeavers Sept 1. Introduce your writing to a stranger using just 5 words.
Philosophy. Suppose reality is free.
#philosophy

2025-08-21 18:08:01 CEST

"Unfortunately this analysis does not hold for cats; I will leave the fullness of that analysis as an exercise for the reader."
Sorry Mastodon. I love my #cats, but they hedonists who seek happiness through acts of destruction.
https://philosophy.stackexchange.com/questions/129798/hedonism-for-animals/129803#129803
#philosophy

2025-08-14 16:38:50 CEST

Mastodon, can you help me share an idea?
`Ontic Vagueness: The Argument from Freedom` (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14665746) hit 1,300 downloads this morning. That's a lot for a work of rogue #philosophy launched on #Mastodon.
Nevertheless, entirely b/c of my generally inadequate and anachronistic style, and a glaring lack of peer review (hey, I'm a union organizer, not a doctor), the ideas I hope to share and talk about need a boost to get over the "that's-gotta-be-wingnuttery-amiright" hill with academic readers, and into the realm of argument/debate.
I would deeply appreciate boosts into #philosophy/#philSci space, as well as argument/discussion/critique/brutal-takedown-attempts/etc. It would be very nice to have a few validators share that there are interesting ideas here that are worth reading. It is not hard to reach me by email.

2025-08-06 16:49:24 CEST

- reply

Yes this is missing Sections 9 and 10 of Article 1. So, also missing:
No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.

2025-08-06 15:56:10 CEST

How to read ¬∃A(A=A)
https://philosophy.place/blog/2025-02/2025-02-25-how-to-read-ul/
#philosophy

2025-07-30 14:39:51 CEST

Posting to #philosophy stackexchange this morning. Any thoughts here?
Looking for better ways to say that increasing the resolution of a measurement means the measurand has to be described to meet the desired resolution.
This is to undergird an argument that even an apparently unambiguous measurand like "the number of atoms in a glucose molecule" can become ambiguous at high resolutions because the measurement is "high resolution" only if you've described what it is to be a glucose molecule (and an atom, and a proton, for that matter) at, minimally, the desired measurement resolution.
https://philosophy.stackexchange.com/questions/129179/how-should-i-talk-about-definitional-uncertainty-in-seemingly-well-defined-measu

2025-07-28 14:49:53 CEST

- reply

Appreciating the new pieces coming out from Israel-based human rights groups, calling out genocide - this one with detailed research.
American and global rabbinical communities need to step up protest.
If you still have a rabbi, please consider talking to your rabbi about bringing more credible Jewish voices to call for an end to this horror.
#judaism #jewish

2025-07-15 03:05:23 CEST

Returning to fedi. Reintroducing self:
Union organizer. Rogue philosopher. Sometimes a dev. Pretty good with data. Math, physics, evolution, ice cream & justice. Also sci fi, worldbuilding, poetry and tennis.
On politics. Most of my focus every day is political, more or less; and I am glad to connect with folks offline about labor and politics. I do not do a lot of political posting on social media principally for my mental health; I find myself attempting to effectuate change and only effectuating depression in exactly one person.
I am appalled by the inhumanity of our world and may occasionally post, especially as a Jew appalled by Israel's war crimes and the unrelenting desperation millions of Palestinian mothers, fathers and children are facing every day as a result; and as an American heartbroken over too much to name.
I "published" (i.e., "posted without peer review") a short book of #philosophy in January, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14665746 - there's also a practically-free Kindle version if you search for it with a pretty cover - "Ontic Vagueness: The Argument From Freedom". It's about the consequences for the structure of reality if we assume that reality is profoundly free.
I enjoy talking about this latter project; and I think the whole project only makes sense to people with some conversation as it's not in the mainline logic-of-language tradition of analytic philosophy.