<unnamed>

Public Key

npub1zhxpr3r9j6x8p6vs30lvjdmlmnavtw84q76j5rh8nqs3r0td9p9q8gdmh9

Profile Code

nprofile1qqsptnq3c3jedrrsaxgghlkfxalae7k9hr6s0df2pmnesgg3h4kjsjspzpmhxue69uhkummnw3ezuamfdejsz9rhwden5te0wfjkccte9ejxzmt4wvhxjmcpp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqrntta2

Publishing to

nostr.wine

relay.damus.io

nos.lol

Last Notes

2026-07-21 07:39:37 UTC

- reply

@npub17w9…wise @npub17w9…cicp @npub17w9…pcim @npub1uwe…y632 @npub18kq…h6yn suya..

2026-07-21 07:39:37 UTC

- reply

@npub17w9…wise @npub17w9…cicp @npub17w9…pcim @npub1uwe…y632 @npub18kq…h6yn suya..

2026-07-10 10:14:35 UTC

- reply

> why can't they statically compile it?
This could be done. You just call the Python runtime from a C program, you feed it all the code it needs, you statically link it against libpython-or-whatever. There are probably some warts somewhere but you could do this.
Arch would break itself way, *way* less often if pacman were statically linked, and it is extremely easy to give ld the `-static` option and there is in fact a static version of pacman and no one ever uses it. If there were something like you've described, maybe it would be in the same boat.