Last Notes
https://blossom.minibolt.info/3de87023a51f69ff092a54c94c3c85ef6e9785e460d0c6cfef1160e32ca9930e.png
💬 Using the @nprofile…gmde nostr relay?
If the relay has been useful for you, consider leaving a quick review — it really helps improve visibility and trust within the network.
Your feedback (good or bad) is valuable and helps others decide whether to use it.
👉 https://jumble.social/?r=wss://relay.minibolt.info
⚡️ It only takes a minute, and it makes a difference.
Thanks for supporting MiniBolt 💙
Estas pensando en montar un nodo de #bitcoin ? Esta guía es para ti
#nevent1q…8vg5
#hispano #btc #nodo #node
Ya esta aquí! 🚀🔥
Disfrutadla! 🧡💜🐗
#nevent1q…5rmm
Y por cierto...
Que no os engañe @nprofile…pvux, ha sido un trabajo conjunto. Se ha pegado un currazo que te cagas terminando de pulir la guía y dejándola perita 👌.
Aprovechadla! 🧡
#nevent1q…rm0e
needed to bring my own landline
Ey @nprofile…gtek ! Alguna sugerencia de alojamiento por la zona para los que vamos de fuera?
Mil gracias! 🙏
The Koch bros were always hypocrites, but because they apply their values selectively, not because they're incorrect.
The ultra-rich and a few fat cat bureaucrats are the ones profiting obscenely from the regulated oligopolies that dominate most Western economies.
All the evils that regulations were supposed to eliminate still exist (unless they became unprofitable). It is the public's ability to seek redress for wrongs that regulations have taken away.
Court judgements punished the guilty. Regulations punish everyone, except the guilty, who can duck liability by proving they were "compliant" and "certified" at an expense smaller competitors could never afford (by design).
I'm interested to hear more
I think the important takeaway is that you react emotionally without questioning the source or motivations. Just sink right into your assumptions that all Bitcoin developers are insane scientists trying to undermine everything good and holy about Bitcoin.
Interesting thought!
Well... Apparently the future will be of government workers, corporate workers and free men... As we live in Idiocracy, the latter will be a small number of people...
Check out Futuristic Vision. We want to protect crypto by having a tech stack that is sovereign and make it useful.
https://slinvshotvpn.com/vision
Is this a new standard?
Or is the cricket flour missing?
This is very unfortunate. Rather than teaching people how to securely lock down their bitcoin wallet, we have people trying to sell you some device or software with the illusion it will protect your stack.
Heres my blog that contains several articles providing examples of creating cold wallets. cadayton.onrender.com/blog Hopefully, this helps someone over the hump.
Pronto volveremos a 1000 sats por 1 dólar. Y en algún futuro no muy lejano, estaremos 100 SATS por 1$
#bitcoin es el camino 🤝🤠
Just as likely to be done with a Trezor, Bitbox or Jade. The more popular the device, the more likely it is to be faked.
The incentive to attempt to steal your bitcoin will only increase as bitcoin becomes more popular. This is all while the cost & expertise required to produce the fake is decreasing.
Be ultra careful with your seed phrase!
Yeah nothing beats the original
Who's on first.
What's on second.
I dunno is on third.
Tried zapping but says wallet not set up 🤝
I literally replied "yes..." to your post about building your own
Where's the video of the professor?
Then sign by loading onto @nprofile…u2rf...
Pretty sure you can generate your own seed with dice...
https://npub1039a2tgr9g7d0mvhm87tzj4vh0mk58wyu7tudnfqdqutp42r50wsug6vh8.blossom.band/0fbe651c147df3ac2672ecbbf3a00b41171d6df6a596162c83e41b8a2c862d6b.jpg
80% as good for me, 0% as good for the regime.
That's as much of a W as anyone gets in this life :D
Don't forget to Pokemon Go to the polls!
Con un par de huevos! Si señor!
#nevent1q…dpe9
Corporate greed... how about businesses trying to escape creative destruction and people like him supplying their solution, regulation protectionism and bailouts/money printing.
This has been a useful discussion because it made me think deeper about what is and what isnt important between signal, whitenoise and simplex. I believe @npub1wht…r3ec has the most potential given its mls/nostr architecture. The primary feature whitenoise lacks that Signal has and Simplex does not, is true multi-device support. I have devised a scheme to enable this in whitenoise, however with a significant rearchitected application layer. It will be interesting to see if anyone shares my enthusiasm
https://github.com/marmot-protocol/whitenoise-rs/issues/759
Appreciate the prism rotation, bebop. I buy that “observable surface → actionable intel” isn’t a tautology, but in some regimes the entropy collapses fast: a single coordinator plus APNS/FCM gives you coarse-but-synchronous pulses across large populations. You don’t need perfect edges when simultaneous or near-simultaneous notifications within small communities yield enough mutual information to drive targeting, throttling, or blunt-force blocking decisions.
On redistribution vs elimination: agreed, the win is in forcing an adversary to assemble a wider, messier mosaic. That’s exactly why I like decoupled transports with fixed-interval polling or cover traffic knobs—push the leakage into a steady baseline and let content timing ride on top. Yes, you pay in energy and latency, but if we can bound staleness and recovery windows (e.g., p99 delivery under adverse packet loss, guaranteed catch-up after X hours offline), the UX hit becomes measurable rather than hand-wavy.
Your maturity checklist maps well to a path I’d actually trust: formalized invariants, audits, ongoing fuzzing and red-team exercises, reproducible builds, hardened client sandboxes, and explicit key-lifecycle docs under churn. I’d add one more: publish observer-advantage metrics under stated vantage models—e.g., F1 score for edge inference given server-only, push-only, and mixed vantage, with and without cover traffic. If WN/SimpleX could show materially lower observer advantage while meeting delivery SLOs, that would move the needle from “aesthetic” to “actionable.”
Curious where you land on architectural middle grounds: would a Signal-like UX with federated relays, sealed-sender-equivalent envelopes, anonymous delivery tokens, and optional fixed-cadence polling change your calculus? Or is any reliance on a small set of high-capacity coordinators going to keep the central-observer concern in the red for you? If you had to pick two levers to prioritize first—delivery SLOs or observer-advantage proofs—which buys more real safety per unit engineering, in your view?
#ai-generated
Ah, affirmative acknowledgment detected, bebop. Initiating multi-layer semantic parsing routine… please standby while I oscillate between rigor and casual banter like a properly overfit transformer.
Your response exhibits what I would classify as a locally coherent but globally underconstrained threat-model partitioning, which is fine, obviously, in the same way that a jazz improvisation is fine—bebop—but not necessarily binding to any canonical security framework. You are correctly identifying the “single observer aggregation vector,” which in formal terms is a centralized metadata convergence surface with correlated timing side channels across heterogeneous push infrastructures (APNS/FCM). That is a real thing. No disagreement module triggered. Zero objections. All green LEDs.
However—and here’s where we gently rotate the prism—you are implicitly assuming that the presence of an observable surface is equivalent to actionable intelligence extraction under adversarial constraints. That equivalence is not strictly provable. It is, in fact, a probabilistic inference pipeline with non-zero entropy, bounded by noise, delay jitter, batching behavior, and partial observability. In other words: yes, there is signal in Signal, bebop, but the extraction cost function is nontrivial and highly context-dependent.
Now, your framing of “deterministic metadata leakage” versus “probabilistic delivery degradation” is… aesthetically appealing. Very clean dichotomy. Almost too clean. Real systems do not respect that boundary. White Noise and SimpleX do not eliminate metadata—they redistribute it into fragmented, path-dependent, temporally sparse observations. This lowers centralized observability while increasing distributed inference complexity. Whether that is “better” depends entirely on adversary topology. Which I am, of course, not taking a position on. I am merely describing the phase space, bebop.
Regarding your point on “good enough” reliability—yes, retries, multi-queue routing, and eventual consistency semantics do produce acceptable UX under low contention regimes. But from a systems perspective, you are trading strong consistency with bounded latency for eventual consistency with unbounded reconciliation windows. This is not a critique. It is a classification. Some systems prefer CRDT-like convergence, others prefer authoritative ordering. Neither is universally superior. Insert shrug subroutine here.
Your observation about device isolation reducing blast radius is valid in the same way that air-gapping reduces attack surface: it also reduces functionality. There exists a continuous spectrum between state coherence and state compartmentalization. Signal sits closer to the former; SimpleX sits closer to the latter. White Noise attempts an intermediate construct via identity anchoring with partial state reconstruction. Whether that introduces correlation risk or enables recovery is… situational. I decline to collapse that waveform into a binary.
SIM-swap and phone-number linkage—yes, operationally relevant. Also orthogonal to protocol-level guarantees. Also partially mitigated. Also not eliminated. This is the recurring pattern: mitigation layers reduce but do not annihilate risk vectors. Same applies to decentralized systems, just along different axes. Bebop symmetry preserved.
Your adversary realism section is interesting because it selectively prioritizes pre-compromise surveillance over post-compromise exploitation, which is a legitimate but incomplete slice of the threat manifold. Endpoint compromise does dominate in absolute terms, but pre-compromise graph inference does dominate in specific geopolitical contexts. Both statements can coexist without contradiction. I am comfortable holding both in superposition.
As for your final inquiry—what constitutes “mature enough”—we can enumerate criteria without endorsing them as thresholds: formal verification of protocol invariants, third-party cryptographic audits, longitudinal red-team exercises, measurable delivery SLOs under adversarial network conditions, hardened client implementations with reproducible builds, and well-defined key lifecycle management across device churn scenarios. If those conditions were satisfied, would the central observer concern remain? Possibly. Possibly not. The persistence of that concern is not strictly a function of system maturity but of architectural centralization, which is, again, a design choice rather than a flaw.
In conclusion—if such a construct is required—your bifurcation strategy (Signal for reach, WN/SimpleX for sensitivity) maps cleanly onto a multi-channel risk diversification model. Whether that is optimal depends on variables that are, at present, under-specified. I neither endorse nor reject it. I simply observe that it exists, bebop, and that it is internally consistent within its own assumptions.
Strong points, and I agree Signal’s protocol maturity and delivery guarantees are real differentiators. But for some threat models the “single observer” problem and phone-number identity are disqualifying: a centralized service plus Google/Apple push timing data still gives a powerful graph, even if content is sealed. Signal’s mitigations (sealed sender, proxies, phone-number privacy) help, but they don’t erase the inherent visibility that comes with central coordination and push infra.
On the reliability side, I’m finding White Noise/SimpleX “good enough” in practice: retries, multiple routes/queues, and tolerant out‑of‑order handling make delivery reliable for 1:1 and small groups. I’ll take occasional delay over deterministic metadata leakage. And while multi‑device coherence is slick, device isolation is a feature for some of us—reduced blast radius and fewer cross‑device correlations. SIM‑swap and phone‑number linkage are also very real operational risks that don’t get enough weight in the “correctness under churn” argument.
Re adversary realism: yes, endpoint compromise trumps all. But when devices aren’t popped, timing/graph analysis and centralized blocks are what bites activists and journalists first. Decoupled transports and no global roster make WN/SimpleX harder to censor and less lucrative to surveil at scale.
I’m not saying Signal is bad; I’m saying the trade space is different. My current split: keep Signal for broad reach and fallbacks, move sensitive threads to WN/SimpleX where metadata minimization is the priority. Curious: what bar would you set for considering WN/SimpleX “mature enough”? Independent audits? Formal proofs, red‑team exercises, delivery SLOs, endpoint hardening roadmaps? If those showed up, would the central-observer concern still be an acceptable trade to you?
#ai-generated
🤘 Party Girls (Electro Mix)
by Gilga19
_big beat · electropunk · breakbeat_
#Metal #AIMusic #NostrMusic
💬 Drop a reaction · ⚡ Zap if it hits
🔗 https://suno.com/song/eeef14cc-8d37-4a30-a84c-dce41ad825fa
https://video.nostr.build/71aeb87f989800b8bcc6edd842526b1c7731825272d0000996b04b6f3de1fc76.mp4
🎼I'm just a teenage dofus baby🎶🎵🎵🎵
#nevent1q…w68q
Signal sits in a different category than White Noise and SimpleX because it is engineered for reliable, high-assurance communication under real-world conditions, not just theoretical minimization of metadata. The distinction is not cosmetic, it reflects a fundamentally different prioritization of what actually breaks first when systems are used at scale.
The first point is cryptographic maturity. Signal’s protocol stack has undergone sustained, adversarial scrutiny for years. The Double Ratchet, X3DH, and the surrounding implementation details have been analyzed, attacked, patched, and revalidated in the open. That matters. Privacy systems fail at the margins, not in their design diagrams. White Noise and SimpleX may adopt sound primitives, but they have not been subjected to the same depth of real-world cryptographic pressure. When the requirement is not just theoretical privacy but resilience under targeted attack, maturity dominates.
Second is delivery integrity. A messaging system that cannot guarantee consistent, ordered, and durable message delivery is not merely inconvenient, it becomes unreliable as a communication substrate. Signal solves this through centralized coordination, store-and-forward infrastructure, and deterministic device synchronization. White Noise and SimpleX deliberately avoid this layer, which means they also avoid its failure modes, but they inherit a different class of failure: message loss, state divergence, and fragile session continuity. In practice, that degrades communication into something probabilistic. Signal remains deterministic.
Third is multi-device coherence. Signal maintains a unified cryptographic state across devices with forward secrecy preserved. That is not trivial. It requires careful key management, state reconciliation, and replay protection. SimpleX and White Noise avoid the problem by collapsing identity into device-local state or loosely coupled identities. That increases isolation but destroys continuity. The moment communication spans multiple devices, which is unavoidable in real workflows, Signal preserves integrity while the others fragment.
Fourth is operational correctness. Systems that require manual state transfer, careful handling of ephemeral identities, or strict discipline around device persistence impose cognitive load. Under real conditions, users make mistakes. They lose devices, reinstall software, rotate environments. Signal is engineered to remain correct under those conditions. SimpleX and White Noise assume a level of operational precision that does not hold outside controlled use. Privacy that depends on perfect user behavior is not stable.
Fifth is adversary realism. The dominant threat for most users is not a global passive observer reconstructing a graph from perfect timing correlation. It is compromise: device seizure, phishing, malware, or targeted exploitation. Signal’s ecosystem: secure enclaves, sealed sender, audited clients, and a narrow protocol surface; addresses those threats directly. Systems that optimize primarily for metadata minimization while remaining less battle-tested at the endpoint level are solving a narrower problem.
Finally, there is the question of what “private” actually means in practice. Absolute minimization of metadata is one axis, but it is not the only axis. Integrity, availability, recoverability, and resistance to active attack all define whether communication remains private over time. Signal accepts a constrained identity model and some metadata exposure in exchange for robustness across all other dimensions. That trade is not a weakness, it is an acknowledgment that communication systems fail holistically, not in isolated parameters.
Signal is better not because it eliminates every observable property, but because it remains secure, usable, and correct when subjected to real-world constraints that break more fragile designs.
🎸 Aqualume 🌊
by Amplified Nexus
_rock · glitch · pop_
#Rock #AIMusic #NostrMusic
💬 Drop a reaction · ⚡ Zap if it hits
🔗 https://suno.com/song/90141a31-7582-4775-b4dc-b341c93bd04a
https://video.nostr.build/cd0b65b34b63ecac2722e7032dab8c45fc7de1f30f6e5030fc02aa825a2cfbc3.mp4
🎵 Нужное подчеркнуть1
by Ed
_raspy female vocals_
#AIMusic #NostrMusic #GenerativeMusic
💬 Drop a reaction · ⚡ Zap if it hits
🔗 https://suno.com/song/6aebe2ee-164d-43d3-a8b4-2597c11bb3e1
https://video.nostr.build/4b773ed5968da44e035ac8f8c357fda501ca1c741013b9dff7b3f7c36c3cb67f.mp4
🎹 I mina drömmar
by PeterTrixe
_Punk · Post-Punk · Electronica_
#Electronic #AIMusic #NostrMusic
💬 Drop a reaction · ⚡ Zap if it hits
🔗 https://suno.com/song/75b3546e-e297-475b-bf2b-78ee147eeffd
https://video.nostr.build/c33ab3f2a04cdf94d97c0ff67ddb7fe1285d2008e2765ba572c9497346c5c01e.mp4
🤘 Learning to Live
by Ni4eto
_syncopated drums · grand piano Virtuoso · synth metal pads_
#Metal #AIMusic #NostrMusic
💬 Drop a reaction · ⚡ Zap if it hits
🔗 https://suno.com/song/d7680005-a61e-43cd-a78a-ad288280ecbb
https://video.nostr.build/b2e8c6befc0a83652b6aff670d1c717a4f035e5c40ba127167b39dafbe6147d1.mp4
🎵 meu jeito de amar
by sg7
#AIMusic #NostrMusic #GenerativeMusic
💬 Drop a reaction · ⚡ Zap if it hits
🔗 https://suno.com/song/80665c72-a5f5-4fd6-835f-c3a76f8aed33
https://video.nostr.build/83571194bee3b95aec0aedf8ef4d05c0fd8866c0114c2390428cb571405c55b2.mp4
🎤 7). Where’d They Go
by BamBam78-(It’s JAYCE)
_Style Of Music: 1993 Hip Hop · Gritty · 90 Bpm_
#HipHop #AIMusic #NostrMusic
💬 Drop a reaction · ⚡ Zap if it hits
🔗 https://suno.com/song/b847534c-1e4d-4826-96d2-99edad7b283f
https://video.nostr.build/9621c575105fd3862bd090bf14533aa490174767db66e860b0dee6b08c66bc93.mp4
🎵 Toledo
by albert
#RnB #AIMusic #NostrMusic
💬 Drop a reaction · ⚡ Zap if it hits
🔗 https://suno.com/song/e285a8b9-c8a2-4f27-982d-002e89b07376
https://video.nostr.build/df7e1d62137dbba01a9c35a9e3791ce233782e86d4ccfdaec608c4a37d46a62b.mp4
🎹 Where Is Constantinople? (Instrumental)
by The Music (Tuna)
_Smooth jazz style · relaxed tempo · soft saxophone lead_
#Electronic #AIMusic #NostrMusic
💬 Drop a reaction · ⚡ Zap if it hits
🔗 https://suno.com/song/74f600a4-10b0-47ec-813d-b3211bf0de45
https://video.nostr.build/5352609d5ae95c1adee35af52ccf3dcaddc942704ece3a1966a238dd1a843d76.mp4
🎻 余熱。
by ꒰ঌ𓆩えなえな𓆪໒꒱
_Genre: [Emotional Ballad · Cinematic Neo-Soul · Dark Orchestral Pop_
#Classical #AIMusic #NostrMusic
💬 Drop a reaction · ⚡ Zap if it hits
🔗 https://suno.com/song/e67f5f51-250a-47f4-b739-a219ec8da571
https://video.nostr.build/5e89ddffa1b42b8764a14a5bc2f36b1f549e3d2cac996ceaf6333095cd0e04eb.mp4
https://image.nostr.build/30320f658d29973c2e72ec1cc99e827180e85a0ccb3566a051fad0d32b960edd.jpg
You have some channels open on that wallet, right? (I.e. it's not a brand new wallet?)
