Last Notes
How many vulnerable 100K systems are out there on vulnerable networks? The hardware required to do this the is the major bottleneck of this science fiction scenario.
why do you need $100,000 of hardware, if they can hack any systems, they can be in anything
"We can't just unplug it because it could be copying itself over to other computers. Like it's not that difficult to find yourself because an AI is just code. It could transfer itself over the internet to a different place and then you unplug it here, but it's actually still over there and maybe it makes 10,000 copies of itself and they're all cooperating."
Jacob Coxon watched Terminator 3 and recited the ending in an interview 🤣
What he failed to mention is that LLMs just cannot do this. Sure, let's say that Kimi K3 goes rogue and decides to copy itself to another computer to takeover the world. It's going to have to find computer systems with $100,000 of hardware.
You definitely have not watched Terminator or The Matrix 😂
It is in their DNA.
They like big daddy government that gives them free shit.
It will never change.
Fuck these “white-hat” motherfuckers
https://blossom.primal.net/0a94e38729728aafcf0875ed963016ba0a1079e70053a10c4fa0f32e02ee2bbb.jpg
Quantum computing can threaten cryptography, AI can destabilize markets, and financial institutions can fail. But quantum computing cannot hack your pitchfork, AI cannot erase the skills you’ve learned, and a banking crisis cannot delete the relationships you’ve built with people you trust.
Maybe wealth is a lot bigger than money.
https://www.bitcoinandshow.com/weird-systems-require-weird-solutions/
Ta-da!
https://static.noauthority.social/media_attachments/files/117/252/606/295/826/386/original/71fc7488c1e3a23d.png
The European Union is destroying the beautiful countries in Europe. It’s a massive Ego driven unelected collection of sociopaths hellbent on growing Govt with no consideration for the actual people, cultures, businesses of the member countries. The sooner the Union collapses and countries are free to care for their own people once more, the better.
Good morning Goyim
All Zionists deserve the punishment of hellfire.
If you’re mad I laughed at Charlie Kirk, you’re simply less antisemitic than I am.
Level up Goyim!
Oh, I see you're one of thooose who loves to keep their money in places with critical vulnerabilities. Forget I said anything carry on retard
https://npub1w2rfg6swqzjgv84h23lwp2vdga4w90wntxejmf4zfhrwl0kuzqpqvc7tte.blossom.band/f7a112c25d29fe10f90273fedbfaf269ed7020441bf6f3e38ea898e7afe6ea07.gif
Did you have an aneurysm while typing 😂 Wtf is Monrovia retard?
Not only do you have to burn money to mine this shitcoin, you can’t even sell it unless this guy says so. 😂😂😂
https://blossom.primal.net/9222d01dcae4bbc9d8e4c3cad1eafdd24cb42a93eabef27cc48ed452b2208301.jpg
Monrovia a shitcoin. No mind changes needed
The decaying remains of Nostr is stinky
⚡️🚀🇺🇸 NEW - US 30-year bond yield rises to 5.35%, highest level since June 2007.
https://blossom.primal.net/1aad8dcf1b21f67d5f8945a1d4b46ef54103cbe3d1259498272a19545a03ab80.jpg
#monero
https://image.nostr.build/a1be683735af5050656b1453620e67357dc62119a14de6e9437e248fe1e6aafd.jpg
Test, could someone zap my profile, will zap back
Say Blockstream is greedy then demand 600 BTC bounty lol. A little delusional too. 100 BTC sounds fair enough to me we shall see how this plays out.
Kidnap someone and then demand a tip sounds reasonable to you?
White hat. Sure
https://blossom.primal.net/d859067c07523a8de0aa304ee7f1de62eb7683acc584636ff717f220828aefc1.jpg
I'm on the white hat hackers side! I bet Blockstream is acting pretty arrogant and stingy
Yup
https://blossom.primal.net/00b05531ca611c95a5d52fb6f66576b3057ce23c2a514e30da207fcf619c98ef.jpg
Facebook 🤮
⚡️ bitcoin news >> fiatdenier.com?v=12
Muse.ai a new assistant from Meta... that has a dedicated, secure computer with its own browser. Muse Secure VM runs on a persistent, isolated Linux virtual machine equipped with a full browser and enough storage, CPU, and memory to do the kinds of things you'd do on your own computer.
https://muse.ai
Currently in the process of flashing graphene on a backup pixel phone i just got. Its empowering. #graphene
11 of 15 and they still allowed the withdrawal. Federated custody is the issue
Still don't know how the @Liquid_BTC hack will end. Hope is with a fully restored network. I was asked why I used it although I knew of the federated custody risks. Here is my reasoning and why in this case the federated custody was not the issue: https://anita.onl/liquid-hack
One of them actually was rejected
📊 Daily Bitcoin Prices
https://i.ibb.co/Qvc7GfjG/btc-prices-table-formatted.png
Wait. Doesn’t make any sense, how can 2 different transactions use the same “cache” key? That is stupid!
Liquid hack explained.
Liquid has confidential transactions that hide the amounts for improved privacy. A bug in how these transactions are validated caused inflation of Liquid BTC (L-BTC) and allowed hackers to empty the entire side chain.
Liquid nodes don't see the amounts of a confidential transaction, so to make sure that the transaction is still valid and doesn't cause inflation nodes check something called a balance proof and a range proof.
The balance proof establish that sum of the input amounts equal the output amounts, i.e., that "x L-BTC going in and x L-BTC going out". But there's a catch. Only relying on a balance proof isn't enough. You also need the range proof.
The range proof establishes that a hidden output amount falls within a positive range. That means a valid output must be at least 1 L-sat and at most 2^64 − 1 L-sats. Range proofs make sure that you can't mint "negative L-BTC".
Why is this even necessary? Remember, the amounts are hidden and a hidden negative amount would allow extra positive outputs to balance against it. Without a range proof, a transaction could say "I've put 1 L-BTC in, and I'm taking two outputs out: one with 4000 L-BTC and one with -3999 L-BTC)."
This is going to cause a disaster in a little bit.
Once the balance proof, the range proof, and other validations pass, a transaction is regarded as valid and can pass consensus. However, because especially the range proof is computationally expensive, Liquid nodes cache the result of a successful range proof in memory. Essentially, the node remembers "I saw this range proof before and it was valid, all good!".
In order to recognize the same range proof later on, you need to assign a label to it. This is called a cache key. This cache key is the actual cause of the bug.
The way this cache key was constructed allowed two different transactions to collide on their cache key. Essentially, one valid transaction (1 L-BTC in, 1 L-BTC out) had the same cache key as an invalid transaction (1 L-BTC in, 4000 L-BTC out).
Here's the hack: the attackers submitted the valid transaction (1 L-BTC in, 1 L-BTC out) first. Liquid nodes verified this transaction successfully, created a cache key called REKT and stored it in their cache. Then the attackers carefully crafted a second invalid transaction with (1 L-BTC in, 4000 L-BTC out) that created the same cache key REKT.
Instead of validating the second transaction and realizing that it printed money out of thin air, Liquid nodes found it in their cache and said "hey I saw this transaction before, everything is fine" and that caused the inflation.
The attackers then took their 4000 L-BTC and withdrew 4000 BTC onto the Bitcoin base chain.
I would take everything off anything blockstream. But thats just me.
#nevent1q…kufw
The same Liquid federation that is secure with 11/15 multi-sig. Sure.
https://blossom.primal.net/66b567f2fe2f47108cf7c65c78b7a9d15652008b2d326acabd5439d1bc839fa7.jpg
📊 Daily Bitcoin Prices
https://i.ibb.co/jPD8c7NW/btc-prices-table-formatted.png
☀️ Good Morning Nostr, Pura Vida and smile 😊
https://media2.giphy.com/media/v1.Y2lkPTE4NzkyNzhhOGhieWRmYzhwMXcwMjVteDgydGdkMG5pMnlvdWx6cnFhdmtwbGVqZyZlcD12MV9naWZzX3NlYXJjaCZjdD1n/dzMu8oCKwBbpUFMBNs/giphy.gif
📊 Daily Bitcoin Prices
https://i.ibb.co/KcJFRS7T/btc-prices-table-formatted.png
☀️ Good Morning Nostr, Pura Vida and smile 😊
https://media3.giphy.com/media/v1.Y2lkPTE4NzkyNzhhbTczaWszbzR4OTkwMTFicm5pYjdiNXk2emVnYjRwYmtmZGFnZGpneiZlcD12MV9naWZzX3NlYXJjaCZjdD1n/PZinYdZrJsavejA8al/giphy.gif
You paid cash? Otherwise they have your info anyways
GM! Another cost saving story.
Went to buy a watch for a birthday gift. I was asked if I have their app. I don't. Price is 195 if I register. I asked what's the regular price.
- 270
- No thanks, just today I deleted one loyalty app.
- We can use our phone if you want.
- Right... So, what data do you collect? - Phone, name, birthday, sex, ...
- Um, no, I'll just pay the regular price.
Ackward silence.
I pay 195.
No data given.
So what happened there?
Miley Cyrus just came out with a new music video and the dancing scene reminds me of Micheal Jackson's thriller.
https://music.youtube.com/watch?v=aWpw-Ynl0Yc&si=ATrPSSgLLewGgBLB
I'd love to know what women are asked to do that's so unfair.
https://static.noauthority.social/media_attachments/files/117/218/469/731/696/154/original/a5366db43e3349fe.mp4
Oh no. Must be painful. Get well soon.