Last Notes
Do we trust the mint to not notice it's the stolen BTC and rug us?
Its not a new phenomenon. In the bull nobody spends because they expect it to still go higher.
The incentives are against MoE usage.
You cant fight the incentives.
Lol
"I told you somewhere else bro, trust me"
You're a fucking LARP and dont have the plums to get into it.
Get the conversations straight.
This thread right here is about RBF
and mempool policy. Where Bitcoin is more unreliable due to RBF.
This here is NOT talk about an adversary being able to attack and reorg the chain.
Which is obviously easier on a Monero than Bitcoin and nobody said otherwise.
👍
random non sequitur FUD is non sequitur and random.
You mean because users will always use new sub addresses and never reuse addresses at all?
Because if they do and it's all out in the open, their address reuse is degrading the entire privacy of the network.
Iow, *your privacy is dependent upon how other people are using the network.
Which is NOT the case if the transaction graph is simply hidden by default.
That is why Monero hides the transaction graph.
I don't care if the government knows that I donated $10 or $10,000 to wikileaks, I don't want them to know I donated to wikileaks at all.
tfw you support somebody elses wrong conclusion just because they agree with you
Neither of y'all have done your research.
Nice FUD there bro.
Corrupting Monero isn't the same as attacking it.
The group that did the selfish-mining-attack, were NOT able to have a sustained 51% attack. There is a paper that has all the data about that incident: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2512.01437
That the attacker abused an inflation bug is complete nonsense. The only inflation bug that was found was many years ago, got fixed immediately and the research trying to check for an actual usage of that inflation bug found basically nothing. https://www.moneroinflation.com/
I don't want to speculate why you're spreading this level of FUD, but maybe do some actual research next time.
Also all Monero devs that have more rights have build trust with the community over years. Ontop of that every major/important code change gets audited from third parties before it gets deployed to mainnet.
A hardware wallet vendor implementation failure doesn't say anything about the underlying asset.
Oh cool. I'll try it!
Had to update Core to 31.1 😖 and waiting on it to reindex ATM