Last Notes
I think we go trad and say 'tip'.
Seems like no one likes it anyway lol
Nostr dms are broken also why are you like this
Some kind of composting worm?
@npub1w4u…0jr5 do you use signal / TG?
Block 949711
1 - high priority
1 - medium priority
1 - low priority
1 - no priority
1 - purging
#bitcoinfees #mempool
because @npub1xts…kk5s is actually competent.
while I disagree with them a bunch about nostr + bitcoin (rereading the DB on every frame should be a crime), they still understand most of this better than the average vibeslopper
Since your nsec/npub are actually bitcoin-compatible keys, you can actually send on-chain transactions to npubs.
Ditto and now Amethyst are adding that as a feature. Some people have opinions about that.
Huh! #Amethyst gave me an on-chain address. GFY and don't send me anything! 😂
I've got lots more pics I COULD share, if only there were some way to chat more privately teehee
Keep the memes coming 😆
@npub1lxk…5xlc has some competition
Hodl diddy I like that lmao
Amethyst's Viktor went Gleason-levels of chaos and added on-chain zapping with a re-usable address. Damus dev is having a no-good, terrible, horrible very time time with it.
They are not only. The problem with decryption is that the signer doesn’t know what kind of event it is decrypting, so a lists app can decrypt DMs.
You could say “let’s send the event to decrypt that is signed”, but the problem there is that the app can:
1. Take the ciphertext from a kind it does not have access to
2. Ask the app to sign an event with that ciphertext and with a kind it has access to
3. Ask it to decrypt that event
The only robust solution is NIP-44 v3
A hundred gets you 3 minutes. These guys are busy.
Block 949710
2 - high priority
1 - medium priority
1 - low priority
1 - no priority
1 - purging
#bitcoinfees #mempool
Block 949710
2 - high priority
1 - medium priority
1 - low priority
1 - no priority
1 - purging
#bitcoinfees #mempool
Didn't know how thicc Yoda was
So we can claim to have sent you “money “, while it is actually the equivalent of throwing in front of someone 10 USD in a country that uses Euros.
Or like those annoying Twitter crypto tipbots
If I had it set up in my studio setting I’d make it look even better 😎❤️🤞🏼
Usually every day too ❤️🤞🏼
i silently celebrated this like it was already a done deal. sounds excellent. my apologies 😅✅✅✅
Does Zeus zap locker have some sort of weird Cashu fallback? Apparently I just received 1000 SATs at my Zeus cashu address alongside 121 sats in my Zaplocker? How is that possibiru? @nprofile…2xhz @nprofile…e55f
https://nostr.download/5e1736aee6581647226e918e2444b4067e43972f7607242447eb709a2b1e1c70.jpg
Block 949710
1 - high priority
1 - medium priority
1 - low priority
1 - no priority
1 - purging
#bitcoinfees #mempool
people are too busy fighting about whether zaps that cost more to send than their value are worth it while ignoring the biggest problem with Nostr right now
“allow decrypting everything” must end just like inputting nsecs into every app
#nevent1q…0fud
so, it sounds like we just need a request to zap protocol, that's a lot like an LN address, and it gives you a different btc address each time cc @npub1xts…kk5s
we really gon let the bitcoin coat-tailers muddle these waters? hehe. maybe. sure. for now.
I know this and count my blessings.
It’s not BS.
Anon zaps / Invoice only: fully private
Private: private to everyone but recipient
Public: visible to anyone
For sender. Recipient detail is always public except for “invoice only”
Block 949710
1 - high priority
1 - medium priority
1 - low priority
1 - no priority
1 - purging
#bitcoinfees #mempool
Block 949710
1 - high priority
1 - medium priority
1 - low priority
1 - no priority
1 - purging
#bitcoinfees #mempool
Block 949710
1 - high priority
1 - medium priority
1 - low priority
1 - no priority
1 - purging
#bitcoinfees #mempool
Yes, I think getting people transacting p2p again is good overall, but I think jb is correct that we need it use silent payments
Okay. That doesn't replace a signer, then. It's just an alternative to storing it as an encrypted nsec in the local storage.
Then it's password-protected behind the Google cloud account, and linked to their email. So, if anyone hacks their Google cloud account, they have the nsec.
Tradeoffs. I can see how that would be less of an initial hurdle, as they are used to storing everything in the Google Cloud or Apple Cloud, rather than exclusively on their machines.
Just wanted to clarify that it entails a possible loss in functionality and security over a real signer. Like the dust-zaps, there is an assumption made that nobody had thought of this, before. We just didn't do it.
all it means is that you may have to scan 1m addresses when restoring from backup
thats it
Satoshi Arepa Tenet Operation.
yes i assumed btc pay did it, so yeah, but this thing you mentiond where none received thats what worries me
Wait till you hear about on-chain zaps. It'll be completely ruined😬😂.
This is my kind of plant. It'll live through my bad gardening 😬🤣
Block 949708
2 - high priority
1 - medium priority
1 - low priority
1 - no priority
1 - purging
#bitcoinfees #mempool
Hi Marcellus
Listened to the podcast with you and @nprofile…qa67 about renting hash power with great interest. How can I get set up? Is there a manual available online?
I'd loooove to receive an onchain zap 🥹
I love bitcooooiiiiiiin
https://i.nostr.build/O0srF6Rmpqdj6UFR.png
https://i.nostr.build/hIWxU2iaewM8EBoj.gif
What is it, and how so? (Genuinely curious)
Zaps are hoooot
https://i.nostr.build/5m9h6uTzGYFjxGY9.jpg
The devs are paying each other for sex or something. Who cares.
how do you think BTCPayServer and every system that does onchain receiving works?
(It’s fine)
I recommend using BIP-32 to derive subkeys.
One thing to be aware of is gap limit. If you have 1K addresses that got issued, but none of them received, some wallets will just give up on scanning by when they see 20 addresses without any action
So, back up the index of the last address issued somewhere, just to make your life easier
betta sit up 🌝⚡ we talkin zaps neah!
Data doesn't lie, but it isn't information. Information requires interpretation.
