gjm on Nostr: Ok, so I am a bit slow and had to sleep on it. Are you saying that because bitcoiners ...

Ok, so I am a bit slow and had to sleep on it. Are you saying that because bitcoiners trust maths for verification of the blockchain, and maths ultimately requires a transcendent mind, they are using a super high standard of verification (probably the highest). Therefore it is not inconsistent to accept that there are other truths that are verified using a different system such as historical evidence, and scholars of history also have a super high standard for verification (even though it is different than using maths), therefore there is no double standard being used by a person who verifies the bitcoin blockchain and then verifies the resurrection of Jesus if they are using the appropriate methods of verification for each subject. Or in other words, both methods of investigation have equally high standards of verification, therefore both forms of investigation end in discovering transcendent truth?