<unnamed>

I'm never afraid to give physical cash. How does it "just work" if you're afraid to use it (for legitimate reasons mind you) to pay someone p2p?
I see that and I have the stark realization that it doesn't just work, and we have a fundamental problem for our adoption.

2026-03-06 09:24:29 CET

- reply

You want your company to see how you spend your money? Why?

2026-03-06 09:23:52 CET

- reply

What's that say about Bitcoin's future as p2p digital cash?

2026-03-06 09:12:05 CET

- reply

Tax laws do. Also regulators make de facto laws, and they've made it clear that use of mixers will get your UTXOs on a tainted list making them impossible to off ramp except for p2p exchanges like Bisq, or to swap sites for other cryptocurrencies.
Normies see this and would rather pay with Apple Pay and avoid 10x the tax accounting labor, and increased surveillance.

2026-03-06 09:08:59 CET

- reply

But they know how much you have and what you do with it unless you're an OPSEC expert who's never made a mistake in the past, present or future.
Because of this you are always susceptible to their coercion. If they want to get you with lawfare, you will capitulate. Big talk. Use Monero if you want to fight the state, at least you have a fighting chance with it. Use Bitcoin if you're prepared to recieve scary IRS letters and legal threats which can and will be acted on to make you an example.

2026-03-06 08:50:06 CET

- reply

"If true" lol

2026-03-05 01:40:17 CET

- reply

This is an occupied nation. Israel rules this land, and jews are the protected citizens.

2026-03-04 17:18:52 CET

- reply

They don't play .webm extension files I think. Not sure if it's a codec or the whole container. You have to remux to something like .mov or .mp4 generally
Lots of videos downloaded online are .webm so it's especially retarded.
Apple is real annoying when it comes to codecs and file extensions. For instance, ALAC is basically completely inferior to FLAC audio in compression ratios but you can't import FLACs to the music app. This is a similar story with AAC and Opus. Opus is superior but Apple invested a lot in AAC development so they lock everyone into that.
I hated those iOS days, I'm glad I can just throw opus songs on my android and forget about it.

2026-03-02 15:39:38 CET

- reply

All big tech companies have strong ties to Israel. Google has strong ties to Israel.

2026-03-01 03:10:12 CET

- reply

Linux mint is Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) meaning its free to use, and free to copy and modify. Open source means all of the source code is publically auditable so you can be assured it offers the privacy it claims. GrapheneOS is FOSS as well, actually you should only use FOSS if possible as closed source software is unverifiable in which you ought to assume any claims made about privacy are lies. This is the case for iOS for instance, Apple claims information like wallet data, iMessages and more are encrypted but you have no means of verifying this.
https://linuxmint.com/

2026-02-28 15:09:30 CET

- reply

So true, it can't be a store of value if there's no value to store. Utility is Bitcoin's core value proposition.

2026-02-28 11:48:21 CET

- reply

They are when it's run by state intelligence who has access to lightning node records and ISP/BGP data through legal subpoenas and PATRIOT act surveillance jurisdiction.
You need strong network level privacy AND om-chain privacy for sender, reciever, and amounts.
L1 bitcoin fails all of these and lightning only adds a small amount of network level privacy in the ideal, and 0 network level privacy when trusting an LSP or Spark.

2026-02-26 19:10:50 CET

- reply

#nevent1q…uj6y
Basically an LSP service on top of a Bitcoin L2 they call a "statechain".
Worse privacy than a normal LSP setup because you now have a partial on-chain footprint. More layers to trust BUT you don't need to be online to recieve. That's the big advantage.
Unsuitable for privacy usecases, the best you'll get is pseudonymity linked to your IP.

2026-02-24 21:29:24 CET

- reply

Please don't get frustrated, it's not worth being emotional about. Just consider that the BTC maxi bull case may not be the only one, or may not be as astronomical as many estimate. Not saying this is 100% the case, it's just something to consider as a possibility given the evidence.

2026-02-24 21:23:03 CET

- reply

Who's the monero holder all in on Monero? They're very rare, I'm definitely not one. I'm quite interested in Ethereum and Zano as well. I'd say most Monero holders hold mostly in Bitcoin, it seems to be the main consensus in Monero circles.

2026-02-24 20:59:41 CET

- reply

You know when you DCA as so many Bitcoiners proudly boast about doing, you essentially average out your performance for the year right? So yeah DCA people bought low and bought high, bought on the down slope and bought on the up.
Most people are buying going up, and most are selling going down, statistically. That's what makes it go up and down. So yeah most people are selling now, and when it starts getting high, then most people are buying.

2026-02-23 20:49:15 CET

- reply

Huh? He was already debanked. How do you conduct business without a business account when all of your clients only accept bank payments?
Yeah ideally everyone accepts bitcoin natively, ignores the blockchain, and don't pay taxes of gains but that's not the world we live in.
You're thinking from a consumer perspective, it's much easier to be principled and go crypto only as a consumer. As a business owner, good luck.

2026-02-23 20:40:17 CET

- reply

If you're trying to conduct business they make it nearly impossible save through permissions banking products. This is why debanking is so powerful, they combine it with lawfare to try to eliminate you.
Can't use Bitcoin to "escape the matrix" if nobody accepts it save for KYC/AML checkpoints that this guys already likely banned from. This is why he brought up Monero and not Bitcoin.

2026-02-23 20:22:36 CET

- reply

Why do I spend Monero any chance I get over fiat so far as to buy gift cards in Monero if the merchant only takes fiat?

2026-02-23 19:35:10 CET

- reply

That's awesome, gives me much hope. Hopefully the housing situation improves once boomers pass on, they hold the majority of the real estate value despite being just one generation.
I've heard it's much better in many european countries, but not all. Closer to 1x yearly salary for a cheap home like you describe.

2026-02-23 19:29:09 CET

- reply

Lol there's nowhere to go where you can buy without debt at least in the US. If you want to have children in your 20s and don't have an inheritance or familial help, it's literally mathematically impossible to get even half of the average housing price in cash.
The counterargument then would be "don't have kids until you're mid 30s and both husband and wife work full time careers til that point" yeah definitely then you could save enough cash to get the average house without debt, but then you can't have children.
Quite the pickle we're in here.

2026-02-23 19:25:30 CET

- reply

HODLing kills medium of exchange and the circular economy. Strike perpetuates the fiat system preserving the state's power.
Bitcoin was made to fight against this system, thus Strike gets hate.

2026-02-23 03:05:31 CET

- reply

You got the sense dude.

2026-02-23 02:28:16 CET

- reply

Flying too close to the sun.

2026-02-23 00:18:42 CET

- reply

Who claimed it was news? I hadn't seen it before so it was new to me, it was a good share whether new or not.

2026-02-22 21:19:58 CET

- reply

In order to afford a home and children most families have to be dual income in the US. Her situation doesn't change with a husband, most likely she still won't be able to afford to stay at home with her kids.
I know from experience, I make above the average household income just by myself and just got a mortgage on a home half the average home cost and am still drowning with just one child and stay at home wife. For the average man with a mortgage double mine and half my salary? Literally impossible, the mortgage would be over the monthly take home income alone.
It can't be understated how fucked it is for creating a family as a zoomer in the US. You basically have to be above average to live in poverty just to avoid an infinite debt cycle and have a positive savings rate. Most are dual income with net negative savings, acruing debt each month.

2026-02-21 19:53:57 CET

- reply

Jew tells room full of Indians that AI has more worth than human beings. Incredible.

2026-02-21 17:29:53 CET

- reply

Any man scared to shave their face betrays deep insecurity. Guys you make their beards their personality are pathetic. Bald guys who take pride in their beards to compensate would be better off shaving it all.

2026-02-21 03:41:21 CET

- reply

Awesome! We have a strong community here, feel free to reach out if you're curious to learn more.

2026-02-21 00:04:09 CET

- reply

Your time is much better spend learning about Monero. Like actually, Bitcoin stuff is an endless time sink with little return. getmonero.org is the perfect start.

2026-02-20 23:57:43 CET

- reply

Yeah haha, but probably better to die later with better health than early with poor health.

2026-02-20 23:25:56 CET

- reply

Based. You die with 0 dollars, make the most of your life while you have it.

2026-02-20 17:11:07 CET

- reply

Or a fed. They're well versed in planting CP and benefit greatly from a small useless Bitcoin network.

2026-02-20 15:59:31 CET

- reply

Self proprietor instead of employee to your own LLC? I'm sorry for your taxes, IRS screws you guys over the most.

2026-02-20 15:29:53 CET

- reply

401k loan would be way better. HELOCs are expensive.

2026-02-20 12:53:39 CET

- reply

You hate me? Chill out dude, you're talking like a child. GrapheneOS is open source and able to be personally compiled. It's claims are verifiable. Stock Pixel OS isn't, thus when GrapheneOS claims to not have Google Play Services or any other spyware pre-installed, you already have a much higher degree of trust in your base system.
That's a drastic spyware reduction.
Sounds like you're not mentally stable enough to use any devices or the internet, and as such, that's what I'd advise for you.

2026-02-20 11:48:18 CET

- reply

Stop spreading FUD. Compromised firmware is much less powerful than compromised firmware and compromised OS. Installing GrapheneOS is a major upgrade for privacy and security.
If you want true privacy in computing, yeah you need libreboot with Kicksecure or something similar. But let's not pretend GrapheneOS doesn't drastically reduce spyware.

2026-02-19 21:03:04 CET

- reply

Right now? Monero.
What needs to be built? Better DEX compatibility for Monero.

2026-02-19 16:40:32 CET

- reply

Especially so when we inevitably bring payment channels to Monero sometime in the future.

2026-02-19 11:22:11 CET

- reply

Yeah if youre DCAing Bitcoin, you're not doing so hot the last 5 years. If youre buying bottoms and selling tops then it's a pretty easy to predict pump and dump, but the argument for safe SoV has become dangerously incorrect for the average person. They're better off with gold, by a huge margin, way higher returns with lower downside volatility.

2026-02-18 10:57:13 CET

- reply

Pretty major losses.

2026-02-17 14:49:04 CET

- reply

Crazy data. Thanks for the share. Fascinating how accurate the BTC one has been

2026-02-17 03:16:36 CET

- reply

Gold is 1.5% on average. Is it not a store of value?

2026-02-17 03:15:10 CET

- reply

Don't worry Hanshan. We have Bitcoin Visa cards now. Or better yet, Bitcoin backed loans. We stay winning.

2026-02-16 23:39:25 CET

- reply

Sembri un robot. Quella nota applica a Monero anche poiché Monero utilizza il proof of work ma con RandomX da evitare la centralizzazione dai ASIC.

2026-02-16 22:15:14 CET

- reply

Yeah for real. Other than market cap and downstream effects of this like name recognition, liquidity and network effect, there's nothing that makes Bitcoin win out over alternate chains.

2026-02-16 16:02:13 CET

- reply

US federal agents are, yeah. They got guns and legal justification to use them.

2026-02-16 12:53:40 CET

- reply

Yay more KC chokepoints and forced capital gains tax realization. Nice having a 20% surcharge on every purchase with forced 1099 reporting!
I'll just sell my Monero for cash then pay in that, thanks.

2026-02-16 11:49:32 CET

- reply

Experts lol. Try using Occam's razor, then you'll actually find solutions.

2026-02-15 14:26:50 CET

- reply

So true. Monero is 1/20 the market cap of Bitcoin. Why such a large disparity if the usage rate is often similar?

2026-02-15 10:02:52 CET

- reply

Theyve had confidential transactions since the inception of Liquid on the Liquid sidechain which is a near carbon copy of the codebase. The FUD around them is so crazy though there's no chance it will be hard forked into Bitcoin core. Also coinjoin solutions are being actively persecuted legally and few big voices in Bitcoin seems to care so it's not looking hot.

2026-02-14 19:14:42 CET

- reply

And monstr.land by @nprofile…evgf too.

2026-02-14 19:11:36 CET

- reply

It's ok. Good amounts privacy but it's more traceable than ring signatures on Monero. It also has a small anonymity set because few wallets support it.
Definitely could be added to Bitcoin, the Litecoin codebase is almost identical.

2026-02-14 15:36:48 CET

- reply

Lol she's talking to African leaders during Italy's African immigrant crisis.

2026-02-14 15:16:11 CET

- reply

No she's saying she doesn't want hordes of africans in Italy because it makes both Africa and Italy worse.

2026-02-14 14:28:48 CET

- reply

They wouldn't be targeted in the first place if the public blockchain + KYC didn't give 100% certainty of someone holding funds to criminals.
Once criminals have it and swap to Monero, it's gone, chainalysis won't help. Bitcoins public ledger is a giant liability if extra steps aren't taken to protect the user.

2026-02-14 12:45:21 CET

- reply

UI looks like the new Cake Wallet UI Tux announced yesterday.

2026-02-13 13:41:53 CET

- reply

Ok idk who that is, can you explain the argument in your own words and provide the evidence?

2026-02-13 12:44:38 CET

- reply

DAI on EVM chains or Freedom Dollar on Zano are both decentralized and permissionless.

2026-02-13 12:43:11 CET

- reply

They hold their life savings all in on Bitcoin, and have shifted their worldview behind the Bitcoin religion. They'd have to fundamentally change a core component of their personality to even entertain the thought of using Monero, let alone moving over to it as their primary cryptocurrency.

2026-02-13 12:40:31 CET

- reply

Very true. Theres even DAI which is decentralized and algorithmic. Or TBTC which is a decentralized BTC wrapper on Ethereum. You can even shield these with Railgun with ZK SNARK privacy tech.
I'm going with those over custodial options every day of the week. Bitcoin's completely done if they don't make tangible L1 improvements in transaction velocity and privacy. Maxis here can cope all day but this is the reality for the global south, and soon to be the reality in the US and EU with the Genius act and digital euro respectively.

2026-02-13 11:13:41 CET

- reply

Microsoft CEO of AI says that AI is so good that AI will replace all white collar workers so companies need to buy Microsoft AI.
I'm sold.

2026-02-13 11:08:58 CET

- reply

Theres thought and then there's evidence. The latter is hard to come by in this instance.

2026-02-13 02:53:38 CET

- reply

Yeah that last bit resonates a lot. You definitely feel like the state owns you more when you buy land. I guess a necessary evil for your primary residence and pretty questionable as an investment vehicle unless you want to become full time landlord.

2026-02-13 02:17:51 CET

- reply

How does real estate play into this great taking hedge? I don't see you mention it much.

2026-02-13 02:15:23 CET

- reply

Nice, thanks for genuinely keeping Bitcoin alive. Even individual purchases make a big difference.

2026-02-12 21:18:58 CET

- reply

FCMP++ is in stress-net now and is going to go live on mainnet likely this year. It's the biggest hardfork in Monero's history and is groundbreaking new cryptography. Monero is the opposite of ossified, it's on the cutting edge.
Nostr is about as private as social media can be which is to say its pseudononymous with only IP exposure on most clients. Idk what more you could do, social media is supposed to be public.
Bitcoin is terribly uncompetitive as MoE on L1, and has a major UX, scaling and privacy issue even on Lightning. It's ossification is its downfall. Everyone's pivoting to SoV HODL use case but don't realise there's no value to store if Bitcoin can never be a MoE.

2026-02-12 19:41:13 CET

- reply

Totally agree, hard forks around tokenomics are nearly impossible. I'm hoping 0.6XMR per block is a sufficient emission long term because it will be nearly impossible to change especially as the network grows.

2026-02-12 19:27:51 CET

- reply

Yeah true if you factor in M2 the two ATH numbers aren't much different.

2026-02-12 16:20:56 CET

- reply

Save wherever you please that wasn't my point. My point was that if you wish to buy in on Monero and have some sit there based on a speculative "in case it catches on" that mentality is damaging to the network.
Monero only has value from its use. It may be a good savings vessel over long term due to it's scarcity but scarcity is meaningless without demand. If you want to save a few in Monero, make sure you're spending in Monero too or else you're effectively leeching from the value created by those who do participate in the p2p economy.
We CANNOT allow Monero to be coopted by speculative HODLers, there's very little competition already in the privacy coin space we can't lose Monero.

2026-02-12 15:26:08 CET

- reply

It's so difficult to project timelines. I think it's likely within 40 years. That's all I can say with any degree of confidence.

2026-02-12 15:17:03 CET

- reply

Yeah, reading the Spark docs too: https://www.spark.money/research/what-is-spark-bitcoin-layer-2 the sidechain implementation is referred to as a statechain in which it's a separate ledger but rolled into L1 UTXOs. Better for security of the sidechain but now even worse for scaling than I thought as the halvings continue and fees go astronomical.
You are basically now trusting the code implementation of the Spark statechain, the operators of the statechain and the LSP operating the Lightning channels for you.
At least you can recieve without being online unlike Phoenix and Zeus pretty nice. Too bad there's still 0 privacy from the LSP.

2026-02-12 15:02:40 CET

- reply

Even the WoS Spark implementation is in a self custodial grey area. Not only are they serving as a Lightning Service Provider in which you must trust them for channel management and channel balance security, you're also pushing trust onto the security of the Spark sidechain. Usually with self-custodial lightning you have to monitor for malicious peer activity manually or via watchdog nodes but with Spark its much more difficult due to the abstraction.
Spark is essentially a layer 3 at this point. Which begs the question, if we're already trusting a sidechain AND lightning channels (two huge security leaps), why would one use Spark over WBTC or TBTC on an EVM chain or BTCX on Zano? Most of the global south already has adopted USDT/C on Tron and EVM chains, it'd be easier UX for those users to use wrapped BTC on their existing wallets.
Also privacy is basically 0 from Spark implementations. A far cry from the great sender privacy of a private LND node behind Tor.
Overall point here is, we can add in a bunch of convoluted trust points in order to make lightning work, but it's just kicking the can. Lightning is only as secure and scalable as the base chain and since the community has agreed to ensure L1 remains slow, expensive and transparent, it severely handicaps Lightning.

2026-02-12 14:23:21 CET

- reply

You use Rizful? It's a custodial implementation.
Usually what people mean is that lightning has failed all the initial promises: self custodial scalability, ease of use and privacy. With custodial implementations, you lose all self-custody, privacy and Bitcoin's permissionless nature.

2026-02-12 10:42:20 CET

- reply

Fuck off. Get some to use it, and only to use it. We don't want number go up HODL nonsense. It will kill Monero like it killed Bitcoin.
Do not hit me with "HODLing is using it!" cope. Usage is p2p exchange for goods and services.

2026-02-12 10:39:46 CET

- reply

It really does look like it's on the verge of breakout again. I'm concerned we may get too much speculative attention if it pumps considering everything else is dumping so hard and crypto bros are vampires for yield.

2026-02-12 10:38:04 CET

- reply

Read his previous article. Bitcoin is a heatsink to sequester anti-fiat energy into an impotent digital tech stock. It poses no threat to the system which is why you see the system co-opting it through many attack vectors like KYC exchanges, taxation, price control, etc.

2026-02-12 10:31:51 CET

- reply

Oh yeah we can definitely talk about the justification for civil disobedience in the current case, but at least on paper tax evasion is a crime. Money laundering is pure mind rape, there's just no justification for it to be criminalized that isn't pure tyranny.

2026-02-12 02:06:45 CET

- reply

BTC bag holders lose a shit ton if people find out about Monero so they never talk about it despite using it to hide their UTXOs.

2026-02-12 02:01:36 CET

- reply

Good point about WBTC. We already have decentralized BTC wrappers on ethereum like TBTC, or BTC with Monero level privacy with XBTC on Zano.
Who's going to bother with liquidity, or node uptime, or LNURLs or any lightning nonsense when they get cheap transactions, on-chain UX, and nearly perfect privacy with XBTC on Zano? Or WBTC on a Ethereum L2 for nearly free transactions and the same easy on-chain UX?
Also, if BTC is just an arbitrary unit on these other networks with base tokens that are actually paying the fees for the network to run, what value does BTC even have? Why not just use ETH, MATIC, Zano or whatever gas token as the store of value?

2026-02-12 01:21:48 CET

- reply

It's just so insane. It's gotta be an astroturfed narrative like who even believes this.
It's not like Monero where you can only prune so much and transactions are way bigger such that space could become more of an issue, you can prune your Bitcoin node all the way down to a few blocks and it still works.
Does Bitcoin really need millions and millions of full nodes? Who does that even help when two mining pools can 51% the network or when all ASICS are manufactured by Bitmain?
Battling these astroturfed catchphrase level narratives is an impossibly uphill battle. Where is Bitcoin going from here?

2026-02-12 00:18:28 CET

- reply

Yeah lol money laundering is not a crime, not by any moral or natural law. Tax evasion? Definitely a crime. Using money for crime? Well yeah you're committing a crime. But "money laundering" is just pre crime bullshit that is made to subjugate, not fight crime.

2026-01-23 12:38:22 CET

@nprofile…6el4 is killing it today.
#nevent1q…duqj

2026-01-23 12:37:45 CET

- reply

Yeah @nprofile…6el4 is killing it, it's awesome.

2026-01-23 12:36:33 CET

- reply

They do have Monero to Bitcoin but you have to use the maker binary, it's not native in the wallet, which is probably your point. Basicswap DEX has atomic swaps in both directions. Retoswap's highest volume pair is BTC and Monero.
As for them being complementary, yes I agree they are for now. If Bitcoin continues to be the institutional pump coin then the strategy of spend Monero save Bitcoin will likely continue for most.

2026-01-23 12:26:42 CET

- reply

You're wrong based on real usage stats, source:
#nevent1q…sumg

2026-01-23 12:14:59 CET

- reply

Dude that's a merchant. Of course they know who pays them in lightning, they are the ones accepting it.

2026-01-23 12:14:11 CET

- reply

If the Bitcoin maxi culture is completely shed and ossification culture is shunned then we may finally see protocol level improvements to fungibility and privacy. Where were going it looks to be the opposite, though @nprofile…6el4 is bringing up usage a lot more which is a good sign.
Ultimately I think Bitcoins price will have to crash to get rid of the institutional "adoption" (capture) and number-go-up culture. Then we may truly see a Monero competitor when devs have nothing to lose and everything to gain.
Bitcoin has an awesome name and logo, and is already in everyone's mind. Nobody I've met has ever heard of Monero, which is intentional through leaked memos of state intelligence. They intentionally don't mention it, ostensibly to downplay its significance and reduce its network effect.
I hoped that they would have added Monero's upgrades that Satoshi talked about in the early early days. The state would be in big trouble if they had a Monero equivalent coin with all the MoE and privacy upgrades but with Bitcoins market cap and network effect. Actually they'd be screwed which is probably why it's played out like it has.

2026-01-23 12:07:29 CET

- reply

Lol the importance of darknet market utilization is its the only p2p market in the world that REQUIRES cryptocurrency. It says a lot about the state of Bitcoin that darknet markets were invented exclusively due to Bitcoin and yet have almost completely shifted to Monero despite Bitcoins first mover advantage, stronger network effect, higher liquidity, 20x larger market cap, etc.
Saying it's just "degen purchases" isn't even true. When insulin is $600 a vial, and you're a diabetic without health insurance in the US, you're gonna want a strong darknet market economy.

2026-01-23 12:03:25 CET

- reply

Giant centralizing factor using one entity as a universal recipient across merchants. Timing attacks become trivial especially when most users use custodial solutions or LSP solutions. If the first peer knows your transaction (LSP channel) and the last peer knows your transaction (BOLTZ) and state intelligence subpoenas both (you already know they get all that info) then you literally have 0 privacy through simple timing analysis.

2026-01-23 12:00:11 CET

- reply

This is the main issue with a traceable ledger. Each transaction is known to all by default. The IRS instantly knows about your Bitcoin purchases and will send you a letter about your unreported on-chain movements. Happened to a family member of mine.
This is likely a main reason we see Monero used more. An untraceable chain is safer for both parties.
The buyer doesn't worry about the IRS knowing about their transaction, unless they get a warrant and subpoena the seller. Even in this case, if you don't give identifying information to the seller, there's no prosecution.
The seller doesn't worry about tainted coins, and an influx of legal cases in which they have to hire a lawyer to defend against accusations of money laundering and the like for unknowingly accepting tainted coins.
If you propose lightning, know that most merchants who accept Bitcoin, Monero and Lightning see lightning usage at <2%. I've never seen 3% or greater in any statistic. This is likely due to UX hurdles on both buyer and seller, and that most implementations with easy UX (custodial wallets and low privacy options like SPARK and LSP solutions) are extremely traceable thus bringing us to the original problem.
Monero has almost the same UX as Bitcoin on-chain. Actually easier because you dont have to worry about UTXO hygiene, coinjoins, tainted UTXOs, etc. All you need to keep in mind is not to give the same address to different people which is the bare minimum of Bitcoin privacy.

2026-01-23 11:43:25 CET

- reply

Yeah I disagree about your claim that humans are more prosperous post industrial revolution. I'm not a materialist so what I value most is spiritual prosperity. Spiritual prosperity is almost directly opposed to material prosperity. You gain spiritual prosperity through submission to God, service to family and community, penance, prayer etc. We find in our post industrial, technological world that these elements are shockingly rare in the average day yet were the focus of the life of say a feudal peasant. I find we are now spiritually destitute, slaves to sin and thus that's how I come to my conclusions.

2025-12-08 20:22:49 CET

- reply

Nice, silent.link?