j bbc xkb

yeesssiiiir

Public Key

npub157vpj5e3n4pv80vdqj4vyurzf6rnfq20atw96kej8m9lgxllxyzs4dq34x

Profile Code

nprofile1qqs20xqe2vce6skrhkxsf2kzwp3yape5s9874hzatverajl5r0lnzpgpzpmhxue69uhkummnw3ezuamfdejsz9rhwden5te0wfjkccte9ejxzmt4wvhxjmcpp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqkkjhlx

Publishing to

nostr.wine

relay.damus.io

nos.lol

Author Public Key

npub157vpj5e3n4pv80vdqj4vyurzf6rnfq20atw96kej8m9lgxllxyzs4dq34x

Show more details

Last Notes

2026-03-27 18:32:07 UTC

- reply

what's the issue with systemd? third thread I red mentioning this and I have genuinely no idea.

2026-02-21 21:08:04 UTC

- reply

i agree with this point of view on a first principles basis. dont you think, that the cost of presumably 0.01% super technically versed bitcoiners to adapt their utxos within 6 months is by far smaller then the opportunity cost on all node-runners in case BIP110 doesnt archieve a majority? did you propose a change in the code, that might mitigate that risk?

2026-02-20 20:38:25 UTC

- reply

damn, i agree this is a bad look -miniscript is kinda essential in trustless inheritance schemes. liana also uses it, but P2WSH is their default

2026-02-19 21:56:56 UTC

- reply

Are you aware of wallet implementations using miniskript+taproot+OP_IF? Even though i might disagree with your POV, I admire your polite and sound rhetorics. all the best :-)

2026-02-16 08:15:47 UTC

- reply

birkenstock german confirmed. also gfy 😂😂

2026-01-27 17:16:30 UTC

- reply

amazing product, enjoying it a lot so far and the AI assistant is pretty decent combined with high quality search. thanks

2026-01-18 22:15:09 UTC

- reply

Not plain observation [em-dash] but thoughtful contemplation there.

2025-12-19 15:51:36 UTC

- reply

thx a lot, appreciate it.

2025-12-18 17:36:45 UTC

- reply

is there already a page where one might find more info reg this? :-)

2025-12-09 22:01:05 UTC

- reply

hahaha that vid is funny as fck

2025-11-30 15:57:36 UTC

- reply

Great - this solves a problem for me as a user… Is there some more material to read regarding this or any way to get involved in the discussion? :)

2025-11-30 00:19:35 UTC

- reply

love the idea - might be a solution for the wallet descriptor / privacy issue with inheritance multisig setups. is there already some thoughts on the architecture?

2025-11-29 10:57:29 UTC

- reply

amazing feature set there, also love the visualizations… any plans to include miniscript like Liana wallet does?

2025-11-23 16:17:32 UTC

- reply

thx for explaining!

2025-11-23 13:15:53 UTC

- reply

Weird take on Ocean - centralized block creation currently is one of the biggest attack vectors on btc. Also - in all respect to your content, that i appreciate a lot - having Citrea as a long time sponsor makes it hard to take your perspective on the OP_RETURN topic as a neutral one…

2025-11-23 09:29:49 UTC

- reply

could you explain briefly, what it does? did you need to sideload it?

2025-11-23 08:54:31 UTC

- reply

Wow, that is surprisingly helpful - thanks for sharing.

2025-11-21 15:18:47 UTC

- reply

Hast du da vielleicht ein Tutorial/Anleitung irgendwo gesehen? Danke für deine Antwort 🙏 Bei Liana steht, das Specter DIY nur beschränkt supported wird, mir ist aber aus der Tabelle dort nicht klar, was geht und was nicht..

2025-11-20 16:00:53 UTC

- reply

would you mind explaining, how? he seems to be a good stoyteller - which for better or worse is a base element to making unknown solutions known and doesnt seem to be Lukes extraordinary strength.

2025-11-20 14:43:15 UTC

- reply

being happy about someone working on decentralized mining considering leaving the ecosystem will be a hilarious footgun in retrospect one day.

2025-11-20 12:27:56 UTC

- reply

ich will nicht mehr malen 😅 - wann gibt es support für miniskript/liana im Specter Shield?

2025-10-29 20:09:13 UTC

- reply

1.) That is the basis of the argument regarding attack surface increase - you cant be liable, if you can‘t tell what a random set of pubkeys stringed together might make - very different from a continouus100kb file.
2.) True, but strawman to the discussion at hand. Same is true after coreV30.
3.) True for Spam - though it has to be saved to drive for non-pruned nodes; wrong for attack surface angle, because miners have policies for turning illicit content down (due to obvious risks).
4.) True but strawman. It isn‘t about the JPEG, it is about the centralization risk inherent due to the noderunners opting out to be file storage providers for the legal risk of the files they store.
5.) True.
6.) Wrong, due to orphanage risk in slower block propagation for blocks including txs from private mempools not relayed by the p2p network.
run corev30 - for me inconclusive at best

2025-10-21 19:36:26 UTC

https://youtu.be/Ie1D-fWR_tY?si=pLQ3WEGGVSwyw7qJ
This is a great discussion showcasing the same arguments now recycled over and over for the knots vs core debate.
cores basic argument (propped up weirdly now even by gmaxwell) and here by peter todd is: it is technically possible, you can‘t stop me - suck it. of course in itself that is true, when you define the standards for the reference client.

2025-09-28 17:47:35 UTC

- reply

welcome back, creator of filtermemes. it was due time after calle said all pro-filter dudes are non-technical centralists (with a lot of tam-tam).

2025-09-27 17:46:32 UTC

- reply

That‘s fair - nonetheless; identifying the biggest risk to a policy change as referencing the attack vector - not the attack vector itself should ring some alarm bells.

2025-09-25 18:43:51 UTC

- reply

„Hey, don‘t tare down that fence!“ -
„Why?“ -
„More dogs will shit on the lawn.“ -
„Well, only because you mentioned it they will.“ -
Wut?

2025-09-13 07:33:50 UTC

- reply

Really like Andrey Arapovs answer below - the trade-off regarding negative impacts of miner centralization, block propagation and fee estimates vs the legal attack vector of running an unmoderated file relay don‘t really add up to Core‘s conclusion. Really enjoyed your book though ;-)

2025-09-12 18:08:56 UTC

- reply

fck this is funny

2025-09-12 09:18:22 UTC

- reply

Really enjoying your positive content - wish you all the best :-)

2025-09-10 21:57:13 UTC

- reply

uuh yuk - bad take

2025-07-26 17:27:19 UTC

- reply

would love to read this - and there is not a lot of people with your depth in knowledge AND historical interest - hit me up, if you need proofreader

2025-07-25 17:45:56 UTC

- reply

just red it - well done - and great drawings. but i was thinking like actual chronicles 500 pages deep stuff.

2025-07-13 22:04:40 UTC

- reply

You should consider pursuing an academical/ historical record of the first years - would be appreciated in some time in the future.

2025-03-15 19:49:54 UTC

- reply

just listened to the episode - what a fantastic vibe and shared vision to tune into… is there a place to read about your current local zap-to-use archive project? i‘‘m intrigued.