<unnamed>

Public Key

npub14f8d8c8zeq899dmwy5mtaauepglezczymw6dj9jmkw7489d4vffsvfyn5r

Profile Code

nprofile1qqs25nknur3vsrjjkahz2d4777vs50u3vpzdhdxezedm802njk6ky5cpqqq3samnwvaz7tm9wdcx2mrgduhxw6tjd9hx7tn0wfnszrthwden5te0dehhxtnvdakqz9nhwden5te0wfjkccte9ec8y6tdv9kzumn9wsq3jamnwvaz7tms09exzmtfvshxv6tpw34xze3wvdhk6qg5waehxw309aex2mrp0yhxgctdw4eju6t04jzjz4

Publishing to

Last Notes

2026-03-13 14:44:50 UTC

- reply

When's the Wednesday night meeting happening?

2026-03-12 04:39:10 UTC

- reply

Sent dm

2026-03-11 21:23:53 UTC

- reply

Nope just your personal economy

2026-03-11 20:45:18 UTC

- reply

Saying all the bitcoiners that promoted etfs treasury companies didnt Care about kyc use custodial l2s are getting what they asked for

2026-03-11 20:03:29 UTC

- reply

Haha stupid corp bitcoin cucks. This is what you had coming all along. Keep begging and guaking for you MoE 🤣🤣🤣

2026-03-11 16:06:41 UTC

- reply

It wouldn't all fit. Thats the point

2026-03-11 04:13:19 UTC

- reply

100%

2026-03-11 04:13:09 UTC

- reply

Ai psychosis inbound

2026-03-11 04:12:04 UTC

- reply

Woman have no certainty because they depend on society and the state

2026-03-10 21:16:16 UTC

- reply

I don't vote

2026-03-10 21:15:35 UTC

- reply

Uhhh Cube worship

2026-03-10 20:16:54 UTC

- reply

Lol look at all the comments. Your community is the laughing stock of Minnesota

2026-03-10 20:15:27 UTC

- reply

Aye yo they got ya mama or is that your sister? Oh wait your wife? All the same? https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=122123078841134800

2026-03-10 20:10:30 UTC

- reply

Your egg head is really working hard to come up with these insults

2026-03-10 19:29:58 UTC

- reply

bot!

2026-03-10 19:07:04 UTC

- reply

Your top ark hits the peek of every cycle but you conveniently left out this last cycle???? What a load of copium

2026-03-08 21:25:40 UTC

- reply

Jew worshiping cuck

2026-03-07 19:29:28 UTC

- reply

Its all Hebraic religions Christians and Islamist included

2026-03-07 16:58:55 UTC

- reply

Makes sense honestly. Its like asking a woman how much she weighs

2026-03-06 16:41:01 UTC

- reply

A bit reductive

2026-03-05 03:15:18 UTC

- reply

Listen to any gnostic informant?

2026-03-04 21:47:20 UTC

- reply

must be nice to be jewish

2026-03-04 21:37:22 UTC

- reply

vpn ip addresses have a low credit score due to abuse by anons

2026-03-03 05:33:34 UTC

- reply

AcKtuaLY. The purpose of language is to communicate and apparently you understood. On top of that errors like that provide evidence of my not being ai so its adding value to my transmission

2026-03-02 21:28:40 UTC

- reply

Slop

2026-02-27 21:38:49 UTC

- reply

An cap tie man is right on both accounts

2026-02-27 02:32:23 UTC

- reply

Forgot to show bobs

2026-02-26 06:49:19 UTC

- reply

1) Falling for what. The advertising rhetoric shows its obviously not for women specifically.
2) the societal double standard is that even if I wrote a book of similar type with opposite gender focus and specifically marketed it to men it would be considered sexist or I would be an "incel"
3) I'm not advocating for female incompetence. Are you projecting incompetence on women that homeschool and are mothers? Read about the wright brothers mother.

2026-02-26 01:35:32 UTC

- reply

here to finish the discussion?

2026-02-25 21:36:30 UTC

- reply

Is She/he ?

2026-02-25 15:15:03 UTC

- reply

super lame top and now the bottom is mid too. wtf

2026-02-25 15:07:26 UTC

- reply

the ruling isn't unenforced your just uneducated about how law works

2026-02-25 06:15:06 UTC

- reply

Regardless of your intention which you yourself seem to be confused about your fallacious statement would still be classified as either an ad hominem, non sequitur or a genetic fallacy

2026-02-25 01:04:54 UTC

- reply

can't argue with ad hominem

2026-02-25 01:00:19 UTC

- reply

turns out that Adam precedes Eve. Women carry to term what actually comes from a mans balls.

2026-02-24 21:39:49 UTC

- reply

Iran should hit the twin cities

2026-02-24 00:00:07 UTC

- reply

who holds the shadowy ban hammer on nostr? i've noticed those who get banned on trad social have "i'm banned everywhere" glasses on.

2026-02-23 20:54:00 UTC

- reply

no adoption and the time it takes to scan the chain for a received payment is substantial. if it was adopted the experience for the sender wouldn't be too clunky.

2026-02-23 13:57:26 UTC

- reply

Tbh I would do it

2026-02-20 18:58:42 UTC

- reply

i'll take this one https://ketobeejay.npub.pro/post/note1v7vwe5r586xvhw8fdtfp7kjd88mckrxhw0d7zh9knp7knc70wvrsvg7kg3/

2026-02-20 16:52:25 UTC

- reply

You say this while you community sucks on the tit of our western government haha. Our generosity has reached its limit. There will be blood.

2026-02-20 16:30:28 UTC

- reply

talking of the conquered peoples? no.

2026-02-20 15:34:35 UTC

- reply

match?

2026-02-20 15:30:16 UTC

- reply

what in the Israeli bot

2026-02-20 14:40:58 UTC

- reply

Listen to some of the bitcoin takeover podcast on the issue if you wanna see the other views

2026-02-19 18:28:41 UTC

- reply

"I’m not sure where the assumption is coming from, but I wasn’t demanding help from you or asking for moderation. I responded to what was said, just like you did. That’s kind of how public discussions work.
If my tone came across differently than intended, that wasn’t me “struggling to collect my thoughts.” Sometimes written conversations lose nuance, and things can read sharper than they’re meant to. That doesn’t automatically mean someone is flailing or needs supervision.
I also don’t think it’s fair to frame disagreement as “insulting strangers.” Disagreeing with someone’s point isn’t the same as attacking them as a person. If something specific I said felt insulting, I’m open to clarifying it — but broad character judgments don’t really move the conversation forward.
I’m an adult too, and I don’t need rescuing or moderating. I’m capable of having a discussion without it turning into a referendum on my ability to function in the “real world.” Let’s keep it about the actual topic rather than each other.
If you’d rather disengage, that’s completely fine. No hard feelings on my end."

2026-02-19 17:59:32 UTC

- reply

"where being kind and engaging in the Socratic rational method. why have you been so mean???" oh stfu and get on with the conversation

2026-02-19 17:58:31 UTC

- reply

this hole thread is your butt hurt deflection from my question because your a nice guy reddit guy

2026-02-19 17:41:12 UTC

- reply

you don't have to be on reddit to embody reddit... “Statistically speaking, romantic relationships are inefficient compared to maximizing individual productivity. And personally, as an atheist, I don’t see a point to the religious institution of marriage. It’s just a socially constructed contract designed to regulate inheritance and reproduction. Long-term pair bonding seems more like cultural conditioning than rational choice.”

2026-02-03 16:08:14 UTC

- reply

Yeah we need to nuke the place

2026-01-31 02:30:43 UTC

- reply

Trump Always Chickens Out

2026-01-28 22:09:46 UTC

- reply

Pro tip you can have a bounty hunter kick the door in so federal agents dont have to open it

2026-01-25 15:46:39 UTC

- reply

Reducing the dollars in the market strengthens the dollar retard. I have inside info for my Venezuela take

2026-01-24 18:03:23 UTC

- reply

Haha we have tiktok and McDonald's I.e. (bread and circus) plus cuckservatives are the ones with the guns and there all on board