SilentWave

For those leaving BIP110 for the "Network Effect" :
The network effect doesn't apply here because Bitcoin (talking bip110 PoW hard fork chain here) doesn't compete/compare with corecoin, monero or any other. The network comes to Bitcoin because there is literally nothing else. "Network effect" is mostly a fiat term for VCs to determine which product from a list is more valuable. There is no list here.
And no, the hard fork does not create a new coin, miner disobedience does, and their corecoin is gonna die out like every other new coin trying to leech on Bitcoin.
Bitcoin is not about concessions, it's about, among other things, being absolutely uncompromising in making sure the 21 million cap is never breached. I don't see corecoin halving in 2028. Core is beyond repair, and the culture defending it completely lost the plot. There is no competition.
#RunningBIP110

2026-08-13 09:04:03 CEST

- reply

PoW change expected for 1st sept. New PoW will be Blake2b, you can follow the Knots discord for mining insights and how to get ready. Meanwhile keep running bip110

2026-08-12 14:15:11 CEST

And another one !
#nevent1q…56us

2026-08-12 07:29:14 CEST

- reply

It's not over
#Bitcoin-Blake2b
#RunningBIP110

2026-08-12 00:18:46 CEST

- reply

I am running BIP110 and will mine w/ Blake2b ASAP. Bitcoin is where its soul lies. Today, that is within the remaining BIP110 node runners.
The other chain has no future for us.

2026-08-11 14:49:23 CEST

- reply

Nope, Bitcoin still doing his thing.
#RunningBIP110

2026-08-11 04:38:35 CEST

- reply

I don't agree, Bitcoin has always been the chain on which its soul resides : the anarchist never gonna give up sewer rats truly decentralized nodes that will die for perfect money. Today those are the rdts nodes. The exchanges don't show its chain yet, but its only a matter of time before they do and its market cap will reveal its true value like every other fork.

2026-08-10 20:34:25 CEST

Here is what I believe:
Bitcoin is NOT over. Core's days, Saylor/Fink & Big Bitcoin's days, disobedient miners and their butcoin's days will soon be over. But Bitcoin's days are NOT over, its soul lives on in the rdts node runners.
The chain is stalling but it won't for long. Bitcoin HAS to win, and it WILL win. Fight with me, we may have lost a battle but we will definitely win the war.
BIP-110 army, do not back down ! Our fight is not over, we may have to face the hardest battles in the history of mankind, but WE WILL WIN THIS WAR !

2026-08-08 16:24:14 CEST

WORD5 #673 2/6* (Hard Mode)
⬛🟪🟪🟪⬛
🟪🟪🟪🟪🟪
https://otherstuff.ai/word5/

2026-08-08 08:37:38 CEST

- reply

Hey Wulfcool ! You can take a look into @nprofile…c7dz and @nprofile…ur8h YouTube channels, hope you'll find what you're looking for there, they covered the subject extensively !

2026-08-02 18:57:52 CEST

- reply

What you think may be a 60-70 bit passphrase may only bet 30

2026-08-02 18:56:52 CEST

- reply

Do not underestimate how bad we are at creating a good passphrase though, learning this the hard way.

2026-08-02 08:56:39 CEST

I got lucky
WORD5 #667 2/6* (Hard Mode)
⬛🟪🟪🟧🟪
🟪🟪🟪🟪🟪
https://otherstuff.ai/word5/

2026-07-26 18:47:04 CEST

- reply

https://luke.dashjr.org/programs/bitcoin/files/charts/services.html

2026-07-24 11:47:41 CEST

Fiat corrupts the soul.

2026-07-23 20:47:34 CEST

- reply

You use your head and DYOR. Miners have no incentive to activate before mandatory activation, that's game theory. Doesn't mean they won't all switch the bit once it's mandatory beginning of August.

2026-04-19 00:07:57 CEST

- reply

Indeed. It's happening. And fast. This is awesome.

2026-04-07 16:11:28 CEST

- reply

Is there 100EH available for rent though ? I see only 2-3EH on Braiins

2026-03-09 15:43:05 CET

- reply

Are we THAT early ?

2026-02-24 18:06:29 CET

- reply

It's funny because I can't see most of your posts since you just repost people I've blocked

2026-02-20 16:37:26 CET

- reply

Impressive answer.
Is it worse than not having it though ?
Could you add in your URSF a consensus level limitation of OP_RETURN ? Or fork BIP110 with your own fix ? There are other less disruptive solutions I believe.

2026-02-20 15:16:22 CET

- reply

How did this happen ? Turbo Knotzi, suddenly misses the plot ? Is this an ego thing with BIP110 not taking your fix ?
Your actions have consequences, you're forcing an unnecessary chainsplit. You know BIP110 will be legacy, why hurt the network like that ? You can still roll back.. for now

2026-02-20 12:34:21 CET

- reply

Yes, more chaos because it will force an unnecessary chain split.

2026-02-20 08:56:21 CET

- reply

That's interesting. So if BIP110 activates on August/September with less then 55% of miners, your URSF won't ? Or do you consider it will have to be the legacy chain ?
BTW, I can't stress enough the fact that doing a URSF here is highly irresponsible. Given your track record as a respectable developer, why not create another UASF that is less constraining than BIP110, maybe simply one that only reduces OP_RETURN ?
You do understand that Bitcoin is under an existential threat until AT LEAST OP_RETURN gets fixed ? And if no other options are proposed, BIP110 will fork off and become the legacy chain.

2026-01-23 22:49:14 CET

Let's win this !
#BIP-110 #Knots
https://image.nostr.build/cc679322e02862816fb5069486f6282197c03f813882d1c4663b67a85db86171.jpg

2026-01-08 20:08:40 CET

https://image.nostr.build/8890eb495d9c74045ef4eeecca46583f7e99b646e7df3fa04b728e3424d93ea8.jpg

2025-12-11 18:31:42 CET

👀
https://github.com/ostromcode/The-Cat

2025-12-04 20:33:23 CET

- reply

I'm more of an orange kind of guy..

2025-11-21 11:09:22 CET

- reply

Agreed.
If I sell Ethereum to buy Bitcoin, am I not legitimate to say that Ethereum is a shitcoin?
Mechanic is literaly putting his money where his mouth is.

2025-11-10 16:11:12 CET

- reply

Could use the Parmanode style :
https://image.nostr.build/d6983146626e5f2252efa2fe6f1ef6b74e5098c693be2ce203b098b2f41eac99.jpg

2025-11-07 12:15:29 CET

@nprofile…shsp tempted me too https://image.nostr.build/facc0494d5cf347148149b3d5ab3238c6cd094fa153bb3152b9fa6553d012e3c.jpg

2025-11-04 18:40:52 CET

- reply

🙋

2025-10-30 03:34:42 CET

Wait what ?!
#nevent1q…kslx

2025-10-15 11:41:55 CEST

- reply

If a group of miners choose to change consensus (e.g. raise the cap), they de facto hard fork and create a new coin.
The new coin could replace Bitcoin. But why would anyone leave the original chain/consensus ?
Miners could threaten to make the original chain unusable, multiplying reorgs and nuisance. The cost would be astronomical and only coordinated pools could, in theory, do this.
But if they do, the individual miners would instantly redirect their hashrate to unaffected pools. The attack would fail within minutes.
Institutions could choose to leave the original chain, but is it that much of a sell pressure ? Maxis would be thrilled by the redistribution. And institutions will have lost everything.
The miners work for the nodes, which are the bitcoin end users.
Run a node.

2025-10-15 08:53:44 CEST

- reply

It's not that simple actually. The miners work for the nodes. Miners can't change consensus, full nodes are the guardians of consensus. 51% attacks can double spend, reorg, or censor transactions but inside consensus rules. So the 21 million cap is actually secured by the full node runners. This is why the OP_RETURN debate is so high stake, if spam makes having a full node too costly, full node counts drop and the consensus rules become fragile. Once again, the miners work for the nodes. As for bitcoin cap decreasing, it actually happens quite often when people lose their coins.
#RunKnots

2025-10-01 12:39:17 CEST

- reply

Should be like the US in EU too.

2025-09-11 13:46:27 CEST

- reply

Read the new testament first. And pray God relentlessly to give you faith, only He can give it to you. May God bless you in your journey.

2025-08-09 17:59:46 CEST

because zaps