Azz

I think the timeline of the Reformation following the printing press is close to what digital fungable money following the invention of the internet will be. https://blossom.primal.net/d514ea4b9d78d4bb307496f2ef3a9ee3aa7ffe3d9522f73d879821907d5fe6bc.png

2026-07-21 21:41:41 CEST

- reply

It affects performance in the same way zombie accounts do. Trying to reach dead relays costs time.

2026-07-21 07:30:49 CEST

- reply

Need one for zombie relays

2026-07-16 03:50:10 CEST

- reply

Focus on feeling your hands and feet.

2026-07-14 08:39:56 CEST

- reply

They, that's flying out of my neck of the woods

2026-07-14 05:09:34 CEST

- reply

Wasn't there a nostr alternative with web or trust filtering on the edits happening?

2026-07-14 05:05:36 CEST

- reply

Same

2026-07-14 02:29:31 CEST

- reply

Yeah, I suck at this. Have always felt like I'm imposing on people.

2026-07-12 12:36:01 CEST

- reply

AI increases state control and surveillance, that's bad for bitcoin.

2026-07-12 08:52:21 CEST

- reply

I need to understand what it enables.

2026-07-11 11:14:25 CEST

Golden hour at the beach https://blossom.primal.net/2fb83c6901e60e8e74f64a12ed3c25f721b7800d29ce8e17bcb507c0c263a83a.jpg https://blossom.primal.net/00d81d091df9e7140e81dfcc16e9a1fdecfc08256e32968722a8ce661fa9b20a.jpg

2026-07-08 04:28:55 CEST

- reply

Dunbar's number.
At the moment there people holding the protocol together as a single community. Newcomers either join the community or post into the void until they give up.
We need to focus on educating community leaders that nostr is a tool that empowers them, and developing the tools to do that in a way that doesn't have the security flaw of corporate platforms harvesting their data and having power over them.
Let nostr grow as thousands of communities.

2026-07-05 12:36:44 CEST

- reply

Way to make the VPN pay for itself

2026-07-05 04:16:10 CEST

- reply

Neither 😂. I'm watching this space because there's still a lot of development.

2026-07-05 04:10:55 CEST

- reply

I am trying to build a client that let's users post in different layers, public ally, to selected read restricted relay groups or into a Marmot group or similar encripted group chat format. - Still researching the best solution.

2026-07-05 03:52:26 CEST

Social media and bank accounts are transparent by default.
Individually, that may not feel like a major risk. The bank that knows your wealth probably is not going to rob you. Facebook reading your messages probably will not create an immediate problem for you personally.
But the risk is at the aggregate level.
A small number of institutions can see liquidity, sentiment, relationships, political energy, social coordination and emerging grassroots movements. They can trade against it, shape it, throttle it or intervene before it reaches critical mass.
That creates an enormous asymmetry of power.
“Private” accounts are not truly private when the platform itself can still see everything. A private Facebook profile is private from other users, not from Facebook.
Nostr needs more read restricted relays and encrypted notes that only the intended audience can see. Something closer to a private social graph, without a Facebook like entity sitting above it all.
Privacy is not just about hiding individual secrets. It is about preventing aggregate surveillance from becoming a control system.
#nevent1q…w893

2026-07-04 14:11:42 CEST

- reply

To worship God and enjoy him forever

2026-07-02 12:16:20 CEST

- reply

Yes, the genesis narratives as Ancient Near East literature flipped, like a meme template reworded.

2026-07-02 12:01:38 CEST

- reply

Amethyst has been smooth amd fast lately

2026-07-02 08:33:03 CEST

- reply

Would you consider only accepting kind 0 events? Nostr needs relays that reliably have users profile data to boot strap when they don't know the inbox/outbox relays the npub uses. Can you migrate that to something affordable or able to be sustained by donations?

2026-07-02 05:04:36 CEST

- reply

Congratulations. Enjoy fatherhood

2026-06-30 10:23:31 CEST

- reply

Yeah, you should add nostr relays to the pubkey indexer and publish it as a nostr indexer relay that treats home servers as inbox/outbox relays.

2026-06-29 12:37:05 CEST

- reply

Ver needs an apology.
It should be pretty clear by now that the divisions in bitcoin are state level bad actors forcing a choice between 2 compromising solutions.
BCHs modest block increase wasn't as reckless as it was made to be.

2026-06-28 01:41:51 CEST

- reply

Memory remains single was the second CD I bought too 😂. I bought Load of a friend for my first.

2026-06-28 01:31:06 CEST

- reply

This is probably the first time since 2017 they bitcoin cashers and bitcointer have united for something.
https://blossom.primal.net/80faa1a9e6b46880626e0d45c0ecc2c7fd622698de420c1beb164d5375e8b5ce.jpg

2026-06-28 01:13:18 CEST

- reply

Its good to see nostr growing out of a bitcoin echo chamber and being used by other coins.

2026-06-27 12:14:32 CEST

- reply

Yeah. It needs to be automatic when you create your profile it creates a fips node for you on the relay you choose.

2026-06-27 10:03:19 CEST

This is interesting. Organise your bookmarks into knowledge projects
#nevent1q…5qka

2026-06-27 09:09:23 CEST

- reply

Love the Nixon moment on the tv

2026-06-27 09:05:29 CEST

- reply

This is great

2026-06-25 05:07:10 CEST

- reply

I think there is scope for an algorithm that is curated to promote material that will create a well rounded and informed person.

2026-06-25 03:59:57 CEST

- reply

That assumes I have spare capacity and that I'm not operating on my limit balancing raising a family with work obligations.
I'm not saying I haven't been prudent with my financial commitments, but imbonly in an OK position because I didn't listen to the bitcoin influencer hype that is aimed at pumping the price of bitcoin at the expense of the community of bitcoiners.

2026-06-25 01:52:54 CEST

- reply

Is this rugging covenants and therefore trustless and permissionless scaling?

2026-06-25 01:42:09 CEST

- reply

Pay off a mortgage

2026-06-24 23:32:03 CEST

- reply

It's literally your available capital to do stuff that is reduced.

2026-06-24 23:28:00 CEST

- reply

Its not called being wrong when you know.

2026-06-23 08:32:36 CEST

Someone make this a skin for @nprofile…07tq
https://blossom.primal.net/9dcf658d630bc6a956614d9cc6ef0bdeea3e27c9dd608c1d4fc14aa144906ca8.jpg

2026-06-19 06:53:16 CEST

- reply

What is it?

2026-06-19 01:16:33 CEST

- reply

Basically the things that make us human

2026-06-19 00:31:36 CEST

- reply

"There is a great thirst in the crypto economy to generate Bitcoin-backed yield... Every dollar that flows into digital credit will flow into the digital capital"

2026-06-18 11:44:37 CEST

- reply

2 should say thinking what they care

2026-06-18 11:41:28 CEST

- reply

Is it available anywhere?

2026-06-18 11:14:17 CEST

- reply

Is that an Android app? Ive started vibe coding one so I can highlight. And see a feed of just highlights. They are the highest signal.

2026-06-16 04:32:27 CEST

- reply

@Grok is this true?

2026-06-15 10:20:51 CEST

- reply

But you did get there

2026-06-13 08:37:48 CEST

Pirate Teddy #yarnstr
https://blossom.primal.net/ca506958b231b0034b3f7dfb4e772606b1331ef898482ed7cea96f2d72b1a6ea.jpg

2026-06-12 14:20:53 CEST

- reply

Works in Amethyst
https://blossom.primal.net/83832251b9483b7bc3c207dcf6915559dfc975aec7f8da5562ee30c8da6abd72.jpg

2026-06-12 12:51:54 CEST

- reply

C, @nprofile…99hm

2026-06-12 12:43:38 CEST

This is a must read.
#nevent1q…4qzu

2026-06-10 22:34:04 CEST

- reply

Thanks, I can install it again

2026-06-06 09:56:04 CEST

- reply

Boom.
I had a better start, bun unfortunately lucked out on the 50:50 #nevent1q…wdep

2026-06-06 09:54:41 CEST

WORD5 #610 3/6
🟪⬛🟪🟪⬛
🟪⬛🟪🟪⬛
🟪🟪🟪🟪🟪
https://otherstuff.ai/word5/

2026-06-05 06:56:55 CEST

- reply

I set up a Linux server relying on AI to help me figure it out.

2026-06-04 10:04:22 CEST

- reply

But if you are attracting buses who you wouldn't otherwise have, charging 3c a note would note would more than cover the marginal storage costs at no additional fixed cost. .

2026-06-04 09:54:53 CEST

- reply

Set your price. If its content I really want to see 50c isntna lot.

2026-06-04 04:40:34 CEST

- reply

I don't do paid relays because I hate subscriptions. I don't know if I will use it or not.
How hard would it be to give users a couple of free posts a week, then make them pay per note? With nwc set up, this could happen automatically, if they give their wallet permission right?

2026-06-04 03:54:36 CEST

- reply

Awesome

2026-06-03 00:06:18 CEST

- reply

Here we are on nostr, and here you are on nostr trying to convince people your tech is better.
I've heard the same story with every shitcoin ever invented. But we are not a blockchain, you don't need majority consensus to function.

2026-06-02 22:33:18 CEST

- reply

Nos2x

2026-06-02 22:27:56 CEST

- reply

Happy Festa Della Rupublica

2026-06-02 12:04:17 CEST

- reply

Submitting a nip >> insisting users use something you have full control over.
Do you see the sticking point from our perspective?

2026-06-02 11:45:53 CEST

- reply

Yeah, but nostr is an open protocol atleast with enough development teams to have a fight. Bridge in and propose a nip to do what you are building. Even if your nip is rejected, run it as a soft fork and if its good other apps will adopt.

2026-06-02 10:22:00 CEST

Social media sold us reach.
Reach more people. Grow your audience. Build a following. Go viral. Be heard.
But the part they left out is that reach works both ways.
Yes, social media gives us reach into the world.
But it also gives platforms, advertisers, governments, data brokers, AI models and manipulation engines reach into us.
That is the trade.
We get a bigger microphone, and they get a bigger window into our lives.
They see who we know, what we care about, what makes us angry, what makes us afraid, what we are starting to believe, and what kind of movement we might drift toward before even we have fully realised it ourselves.
That is why private profiles do not solve the problem.
Private from who?
Private from other users, maybe.
Not private from the platform. Not private from the algorithm. Not private from the ad system. Not private from AI training, behavioural prediction, leaks, subpoenas, policy changes, partnerships, or whoever buys the company later.
That is not privacy.
That is a one way mirror.
And once people know the room is bugged, they change how they speak.
They become guarded. They perform. They self censor. They stop thinking out loud and start managing an image.
Something human gets lost.
Because in real life, we do not speak the same way to everyone.
There are things we say publicly. There are things we say around acquaintances. There are things we say to friends. And there are things we only say in confidence.
That is not secrecy.
That is normal human trust.
Social media flattened all of that into one giant public stage, then built machines to measure, rank, nudge and manipulate whatever happened on the stage.
The result is not just surveillance. It is social manipulation at scale.
The algorithm does not simply show people what is happening. It decides what gets amplified, what gets buried, what gets mocked, what gets normalised, what gets repeated, and what gets injected into the public mind.
So maybe the next social network should not be designed around maximum reach.
Maybe it should be designed around limiting reach.
Fully encrypted social media, shared only with the circles you choose.
Public when you want public.
Friends when you want friends.
Small circles when an idea is still forming.
Confidence when confidence is required.
That would not kill the spread of ideas. It would make them spread more naturally.
A good idea could still move from person to person, friend group to friend group, community to community. But it would move through trust, not through an engagement machine. It would be tested, challenged, refined and approved before spreading widely.
That is how human culture is meant to work.
Not every half formed thought blasted into the open for every scraper, bot farm, journalist, activist group, platform, agency and machine learning system to harvest before it has even had time to breathe.
Inside the trust path, the idea is alive.
Outside it, there is nothing to collect.
That is the missing piece.
Not just decentralised posting.
Encrypted reach control.
Human sized speech.
The ability to speak differently in different rooms without every word becoming raw material for the machine.
#nevent1q…24kp

2026-06-01 10:53:58 CEST

- reply

The longer I watch Nostr, the more I struggle to believe the8 stagnation is accidental.
It reminds me of what Bitcoin Core did to Bitcoin. The project still exists, the language of freedom is still there, but the useful parts get narrowed, constrained, and redirected until only a very specific version is allowed to survive.
Nostr should be much bigger than a Bitcoin social network. Its core design is powerful because it does not need a blockchain. It should be a neutral social and identity protocol that can support any app, any community, and any payment rail. That is the whole point. It is not beholden to one cryptocurrency ecosystem.
Yet in practice, payments are treated as if Lightning is the only serious option. That immediately limits the appeal to a niche market.
And if we are going to have Lightning forced into everything, then at least use it for what it is actually good at.
Micro payments could be powerful because they break the subscription model. You should not need an ongoing commitment just to read one article, access one feature, boost one post, store one file, use one service, or unlock one piece of content.
That is the point. Pay once. Pay per use. Pay for access when you need it. No account lock in. No recurring charge you forget about. No platform sitting between the user and the service provider forever.
A good Nostr app should be able to say: here is a useful service, here is the price, pay however you want. Use Lightning for instant small payments where it makes sense. Use Monero where privacy matters. Use fiat, cards, bank transfer, or anything else where that works better.
The payment rail should serve the application. It should not dictate the entire culture of the protocol.
Instead, whenever people talk about monetisation, everything gets dragged back toward value for value.
Value for value has its place, but it is not the same as charging for a service. It does not reliably fund infrastructure, support, moderation, development, storage, bandwidth, discovery, or long term product work.
The same issue shows up in the apps themselves. They are trying to chase normies by compromising privacy and censorship resistance for convenience. But what normal person is going to accept worse performance, a smaller social graph, and a niche culture just to use a protocol they do not care about?
That is what makes me suspicious. The obvious path is to build real apps that do something useful, charge directly for the service, and use Nostr as the open social layer underneath.
But the path promoted by the influencers always seems weaker: Lightning only, value for value, half baked social apps, and endless appeals to ideology.
Maybe it is just bad incentives. Maybe it is ideological capture. But when the same weak ideas are pushed over and over, and every commercially useful path is treated as impure, it starts to look like containment.
The best way to stop Nostr is to fund and promote versions of it that absorb the dissidents, keep them busy, and never become useful enough to threaten the platforms.
Nostr should be the open social layer for applications that cannot be captured and don't give away more user data than necessary. Right now, it feels like it is being steered into becoming a harmless Bitcoin subculture.

2026-06-01 05:14:20 CEST

WORD5 #605 4/6
🟪⬛🟪🟪🟪
🟪⬛🟪🟪🟪
🟪⬛🟪🟪🟪
🟪🟪🟪🟪🟪
https://otherstuff.ai/word5/

2026-05-31 23:17:57 CEST

- reply

What do you mean? I cant log into substack because it wants my government ID

2026-05-27 12:29:16 CEST

- reply

I can believe that Nostr may be funded, influenced, or promoted by bad actors with their own agendas. I have seen how quickly character assassination starts when someone is building or implementing something powerful.
But I have to admit, turning up like this is genuinely hilarious:
https://blossom.primal.net/a831676de395e2cc08e5337745be66a411168e1672966eb03ff25cde1e42348f.jpg
I can even accept the possibility that Nostr is promoted by some people because they think it is a poor solution, or because they believe it can be steered, captured, fragmented, or used for their own ends.
But that does not answer the harder question.
Why is Pubky better?
Not just rhetorically. Structurally.
Pubky seems to be trying to solve real problems: public key based identity, user held data, homeservers, portable hosting, semantic discovery, and DHT based routing. Those are serious ideas. They may address some of Nostr’s weaknesses around relay discovery, data portability, indexing, moderation, and user controlled storage.
But if the claim is that Pubky is the better path, I would like to see that explained clearly.
Can it scale beyond early adopters?
Can it avoid recreating new gatekeepers at the homeserver or indexer layer?
Does it actually reduce metadata exposure, or does it just move metadata to different infrastructure?
Can it support genuine pseudonymity, private communication, and peer to peer payments in a way that is production ready?
Can it integrate with Bitcoin, Lightning, Monero, and other payment systems without becoming captured by one funding interest?
And most importantly, why should anyone believe the funders are altruistic?
The answer cannot be “trust us”.
The answer has to be architecture.
Show the credible exit. Show the independent implementations. Show how users keep their data. Show how identities survive provider failure. Show how indexers can compete. Show how moderation does not become centralised control. Show how bridges can strengthen existing freedom tech instead of fragmenting it.
There are clearly developers on Nostr genuinely trying to build something useful. So the argument cannot just be “Nostr has bad actors around it”.
A better argument would be:
Here is what Pubky solves.
Here is what Nostr gets wrong.
Here is what Pubky still does not solve.
And here is how Pubky components could bridge into Nostr to fix real weaknesses without demanding that everyone abandon what already works.
If Pubky is genuinely better, explain the mechanism.
If it can scale, explain the scaling model.
If it is less capturable, explain the failure modes.
Otherwise it is not obviously a better protocol.
It is just a different group of people asking for trust.

2026-05-27 04:04:50 CEST

WORD5 #600 6/6
⬛⬛🟧⬛⬛
🟧⬛⬛⬛⬛
⬛🟪🟪🟪🟪
⬛🟪🟪🟪🟪
⬛🟪🟪🟪🟪
🟪🟪🟪🟪🟪
https://otherstuff.ai/word5/

2026-05-27 00:46:14 CEST

- reply

https://blossom.primal.net/ac6534c4e995d0a9099e6fdedc432ebd0e1ab53e5963bdc8ebcf23708870051b.jpg

2026-05-26 22:54:40 CEST

- reply

I played around some more and made this too
https://blossom.primal.net/6ac66ef2a5ce979a7e21ac9ed5d045f7063318660b5a67efd5d9aa1ff9468ba7.jpg

2026-05-25 13:44:43 CEST

- reply

https://blossom.primal.net/f07ab49dbdc52fd3fce20606d8e9b8b14841fc65b84e63d8774c29fbf5a55ea4.jpg

2026-05-25 11:50:17 CEST

WORD5 #598 X/6
⬛⬛⬛🟧🟧
⬛🟧⬛🟪⬛
⬛⬛⬛🟪🟪
⬛⬛⬛🟪🟪
⬛⬛🟧🟪🟪
⬛🟪⬛🟪🟪
https://otherstuff.ai/word5/

2026-05-25 11:50:12 CEST

WORD5 #598 X/6
⬛⬛⬛🟧🟧
⬛🟧⬛🟪⬛
⬛⬛⬛🟪🟪
⬛⬛⬛🟪🟪
⬛⬛🟧🟪🟪
⬛🟪⬛🟪🟪
https://otherstuff.ai/word5/

2026-05-24 14:21:58 CEST

- reply

I still think 2 sat zaps matter. The value is not the 2 sats themselves, it is the ability to make tiny, voluntary payments practical. That can support pay per use, lightweight paywalls, and publishing models that do not depend on subscriptions or centralised platforms.
The use case is powerful. It just has not been implemented with seamless enough UX yet.

2026-05-23 00:46:32 CEST

- reply

That's awesome. Noore turning comments off news articles.

2026-05-22 05:29:13 CEST

WORD5 #595 6/6
⬛🟧⬛🟧🟪
🟧⬛⬛🟧🟪
🟪⬛🟧⬛🟪
🟪🟪🟪⬛🟪
🟪🟪🟪⬛🟪
🟪🟪🟪🟪🟪
https://otherstuff.ai/word5/

2026-05-22 00:23:50 CEST

- reply

4D chess. Kill the protocol so the ops go home thinking they have succeeded, then build something that is actually good.

2026-05-21 22:48:38 CEST

- reply

What about cake? Does it work with their silent payments too?

2026-05-21 07:01:47 CEST

- reply

Yes please

2026-05-21 06:54:29 CEST

- reply

I was thinking to replace tailscale so I don't have the Google login dependency. But want to ensure I don't accidentally give access to my home network to all of nostr

2026-05-21 06:14:01 CEST

- reply

Yeah, I started looking into. Need to read more

2026-05-20 22:43:05 CEST

- reply

Amber or the other ones being developed?

2026-05-20 04:10:40 CEST

On chain zap debate
https://blossom.primal.net/53aea21ecf0fa4607cf3ec0ed830d346ff4796cbb674cc038cc2dc2286c00e6d.jpg
#nevent1q…04dc

2026-05-20 01:52:54 CEST

- reply

Impressive

2026-05-19 13:47:04 CEST

- reply

https://blossom.primal.net/12097e2c0b87ba015a62eed18d630a0f32bb3e1b489d9ef522b2c8ad36cd4040.jpg

2026-05-19 09:11:37 CEST

- reply

Yeah, my idea would be heavier for the clients: You would be in a MLS for each friend, with the rest of their friends. The client would agrigate all the groups so you see a traditional feed rather than a conversation you need to follow.
It would let people share more intimately with an inner circle and progressively more reserved into wider circles or publically. But from the outside all except the public posts are dark

2026-05-19 01:10:31 CEST

- reply

#nevent1q…0vc2

2026-05-19 00:29:32 CEST

Everyone is upset about on chain zaps. But the first thing they do when someone gets in trouble is post a Bitcoin address, and you have to trust that it's actually theirs.

2026-05-18 14:10:44 CEST

- reply

Why not full social app?

2026-05-18 06:32:37 CEST

- reply

#nevent1q…x4cl

2026-05-18 06:01:25 CEST

- reply

You rely on the inate moral perception of humans.
It takes resources to sustain a moral attitude in a population that is contrary to natural law.
Eventually you will win over people who will expose the truth. Similar to the abolition of slavery in the UK.

2026-05-18 05:09:05 CEST

- reply

You do not win that kind of war by matching the enemy resource for resource. Look at the example of early Christianity. Rome had the money, the armies, the law, the prisons, and the power to kill. The Christians had truth, discipline, community, sacrifice, and refusal to become what they opposed.
So the answer is: endure, tell the truth, do not return evil for evil, build something stronger underneath the empire, and make the enemy defeat itself morally.
You win by being harder to corrupt than you are to crush.

2026-05-17 14:57:51 CEST

- reply

That would be the killer app. Definitely a lot of people concerned about data collection.

2026-05-17 13:49:57 CEST

- reply

Why not make it so you can post your regular notes and reactions in a MLS group with friends. Like Facebook restricted profiles, except unlike on Facebook no one can see what is posted except those given permission?
Is it too much work for the client to collate hundreds of MLS groups (for all your friends) into one feed?

2026-05-17 03:37:33 CEST

- reply

Yes! What's the point of Bitcoin identity if you can't receive an onchain zap.

2026-05-14 18:28:13 CEST

- reply

Ouch, gotta bail at that one. Good luck

2026-05-14 12:40:13 CEST

Birds of Tokyo https://npub1wvtljy7rmeeeaqat9hwxwq9g7h90ghavtgpvd2yxk400ndlrf4qsytjhd0.blossom.band/128ce0e76d6c02f462738acc3db9906cdd32fd8e57c0885f08b543d89b7fef99.jpg

2026-05-14 03:10:02 CEST

WORD5 #587 3/6
🟧⬛⬛⬛🟪
⬛🟧🟧🟧🟪
🟪🟪🟪🟪🟪
https://otherstuff.ai/word5/

2026-05-13 17:10:39 CEST

- reply

Beautiful