danestewart
Dane

#nostrangers 🤙

Public Key

npub1t4flj5y7a7myg3a4qv2p3jnlrwh2879w4luvssjshdzh5jcvqpxskm4zxg

NIP-05 Address

Profile Code

nprofile1qqs965le2z0wldjyg76sx9qcefl3ht4rlzh2l7xggfgtk3t6fvxqqngpz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumn0wd68ytnwv46qzrthwden5te0dehhxtnvdakqhflwh2

Publishing to

Author Public Key

npub1t4flj5y7a7myg3a4qv2p3jnlrwh2879w4luvssjshdzh5jcvqpxskm4zxg

Show more details

Last Notes

2025-06-14 22:54:29 CEST

- reply

I only recently came across this song, but I can’t stop listening to it. Maybe it’ll tickle the grunge itch.
https://image.nostr.build/cffc93cc26093826848c53aafb9cfa6a8350a464d2075d24edeefabf31475fbf.jpg

2023-03-26 23:32:35 CEST

- reply

Check out Kogepan. Burnt bread. He’s fun.

2023-02-27 02:47:01 CET

- reply

We’re not ready for ligjt mode.

2023-02-27 02:43:59 CET

- reply

I want to ‘anonymously zap’ you so bad. How ever could I ever achieve this? Are we full circle yet?

2023-02-27 02:26:11 CET

- reply

Seeing this post out of context is what makes all of this worth it.

2023-02-27 01:33:38 CET

- reply

I’ve bookmarked this post because.

2023-02-27 00:57:44 CET

- reply

I think about this ALL the time. Nostr becomes another internet layer, with clients that act as viewers through a specific lens.

2023-02-27 00:47:25 CET

- reply

Are you building or just here for the build?

2023-02-27 00:44:06 CET

- reply

Dude. “Image owner” is sooooo not what’s going on here. Solve that problem in your own time.

2023-02-27 00:37:34 CET

- reply

If it makes you feel any better, I’m probably as old and as drunk as you. Let’s do this.

2023-02-27 00:35:55 CET

- reply

Most of us have yet to appreciate this beautiful, simplistic notion.

2023-02-27 00:33:53 CET

- reply

Why not contribute? The beauty of the Nostr protocol is that there can be a bazillion different clients. One of those could be yours! Now is a good time to learn ‘how to build apps like this’. I believe in you!

2023-02-27 00:23:21 CET

- reply

*the present of finance

2023-02-27 00:19:17 CET

- reply

‘Censorship’ should be user-based. As long as you give us the simplistic block functionality, you’re doing the right thing. Many thanks.

2023-02-27 00:02:04 CET

- reply

Cheers, Avi. ⚡️

2023-02-27 00:01:04 CET

#[0] I get random Wallet of Satoshi posts with no text/content when people zap me. Is this expected behaviour?

2023-02-26 23:54:56 CET

- reply

Are you tempting me? I think you are!

2023-02-26 23:50:32 CET

- reply

Lagavulin is the most loved, no doubt, but it’s still ‘mellow’ compared to Laphroaig. No offence, I’m just really interested in who appreciates what.

2023-02-26 23:43:59 CET

- reply

That’s awesome: Your views on Scottish whisky are based on experiences in the tropics. Goes to show that taste is subjective on a whole other level.

2023-02-26 23:39:57 CET

- reply

Facebook is the only way you can communicate with people of a certain age, and WhatsApp is (surprisingly) the only way Apple/Android people can communicate, unless they know better.

2023-02-26 23:35:16 CET

- reply

Although not a question, this made me consider how am I viewing the world from a different perspective from the year before? If no change, me do the worries.

2023-02-26 23:32:03 CET

- reply

I have to ask, are you particular to smokey? I’m interested in knowing what people accept as the ‘best’ Scottish whisky.

2023-02-26 23:19:33 CET

- reply

Thank you for this. I grew up reading the (formative) Earthsea books without looking into her other works since, although I knew I had to revisit her works at some time. I will look into ‘The Dispossessed’ as a priority.

2023-02-26 23:09:39 CET

- reply

Nike. Just do it. With whisky. [insert swoosh]

2023-02-26 23:07:03 CET

- reply

Appreciated. Let me know when you come to Scotland, and I’ll join you for a dram or two.

2023-02-26 23:01:55 CET

- reply

I see what you mean, as you’re probably best to be optimistic because people usually want to do the right thing for the right reasons. It’s still early days here, and early days = the right reasons. Long may it last!

2023-02-26 22:55:58 CET

- reply

WTF?! Apologies, as your issues could be so easily sorted by locationisation. How can I help inebriate you?

2023-02-26 22:50:14 CET

- reply

Dude, are you Scottish?

2023-02-26 22:45:15 CET

- reply

‘Information’ is so multi-faceted. There is context and sub-context, acknowledged by the party in question. It’s a cypher. The party can see the message. The message is read but it can also be ‘understood’. I honestly believe that the people we ‘see’ are the people we ‘get’.

2023-02-26 22:27:06 CET

- reply

You speak the truth. Giving is literally ‘everything’. Giving is exchanging information. Information exchange runs both ways. Information is exchanged between both parties, often more than we appreciate.

2023-02-25 02:08:26 CET

- reply

With that said, the ability to see the value that others assign to notes via zaps just now feels like a double-edged sword. It’s such a novel idea, but I don’t know how this will play out. One day, I expect a ‘famous’ person to get a full coin from posting a single poo emoji. (I’ll probably be first in line to send some sats.)

2023-02-25 02:04:40 CET

- reply

I absolutely agree that direct value attribution to content is a game-changer. This is great from an open, altruistic view, where one can assign value to something to signify acknowledgement and appreciation. However, I do worry about the paywall mentality that may appear. Giving in appreciation of freely-provided content will hopefully win over the pay-in-advance model.

2023-02-25 01:08:38 CET

- reply

lnbc210n1p3lj5t4pp5ajmd0t725uw3mkt4yruenpacqwlgka3kc8e8p5w7vems9n7qft3sdqu2askcmr9wssx7e3q2dshgmmndp5scqzpgxqyz5vqsp5zq343ntgz0kfys6zmvcl29rqge4zhrjs97gy8evhnht03elhvnss9qyyssqrhxxe3grl4u34np74r488hfr4etqnzsac92avsj02vuhux80whvxatet2dma3s7vrf0a8ru43dz54d80szn7d50yna429pmqhju99mcpzuz4cr

2023-02-25 00:37:25 CET

- reply

Thank you. I believe that this information was meant for me.

2023-02-25 00:20:44 CET

- reply

Darkening?

2023-02-25 00:01:49 CET

- reply

Isn’t that every Friday?

2023-02-24 23:52:44 CET

- reply

*is fixing by example (others are still figuring it out)

2023-02-24 23:41:34 CET

- reply

Alcoding? Alcoholding? Why not both?

2023-02-24 23:35:28 CET

- reply

Perfect.

2023-02-24 23:31:04 CET

- reply

Too right. I’m being a bit contrarian for the sake of it, although memories of my favourite scenes are based on a juxtaposition of visuals and context, sans dialogue.

2023-02-24 23:24:03 CET

- reply

For a director who is famous for the dialogue, his best scenes don’t actually have any.

2023-02-24 23:20:10 CET

- reply

Kids = Klassic

2023-02-21 20:37:03 CET

- reply

Random payee checking in 🤙⚡️

2023-02-21 20:07:22 CET

- reply

lnbc10u1p3l29jepp5ja2jfdd55n2pfn93xt09navwy70yqfc9kq3tjzh02wps53j59c8sdqu2askcmr9wssx7e3q2dshgmmndp5scqzpgxqyz5vqsp5tefxew2r6ys7m3pcz6r4xekla0jdd3ysr574usf0n67e2g8jxhes9qyyssqasxzuxmuj2yca5smdulgdcmlfj97x5hzuc3y6hj4590vm0he7ftqn453qngcecrya30qzksyl3nmtgn0nqa9543q4jxj4kh32ukmvxgq58evn6

2023-02-14 19:00:37 CET

- reply

Dude, this song always gets me so pumped with such a positive vibe. Classic.

2023-02-11 02:27:30 CET

- reply

Hard agree. However, are you not worried about micropayments for everything?

2023-01-25 23:53:10 CET

- reply

Violent Femmes are one of those bands that you need to make a point of revisiting every so often. Their debut album is obviously brilliant, as well as Why Do Birds Sing?, but the others now hit differently as the years have passed, even though I absolutely hated them previously. Surprise yourself!

2023-01-12 20:13:20 CET

- reply

At some point he may become too humble to remind others to stay humble.

2023-01-03 01:34:11 CET

- reply

Nice guide! 🤙🏻

2023-01-02 21:25:44 CET

- reply

+100 🤙🏻