<unnamed>

Public Key

npub12h358ejcjpeaxyhu4vcqwhjtg6qndxm9gk007d48utlylzq2e5dsdmk3mr

Profile Code

nprofile1qqs9tc6ruevfqu7nzt72kvq8te95dqfkndj5t8hlx6n79lj03q9v6xcpzemhxue69uhkvet9v3ejumn0wd68ytnzv9hxgzwddwq

Publishing to

feeds.nostr.band

Last Notes

2026-03-22 03:10:24 UTC

watching/listening alien documentaries late at night while coding is my favorite thing. nothing beats it. it’s my happy place.

2026-03-16 23:21:34 UTC

- reply

zero re-paints by the way unlike lagging tradingview indicators. hmm is a well known model used in many hedge funds and the one we implemented in frame does a great job detecting market regimes. it runs across thousands of equities and bitcoin with near real time updates.
#nevent1q…z9lr

2026-03-16 12:12:51 UTC

remind me again which bear market it was when a guy was buying 20k coins every week. you won’t notice this while price is suppressed under heavy selling pressure whether organic or artificial. but when the market finally moves, all that quiet accumulation will start to matter a lot.

2026-03-14 21:29:51 UTC

- reply

yeah pretty annoying. maybe because i dont have baby fingers 😂

2026-03-14 19:57:45 UTC

- reply

i find its ui too crowded

2026-03-14 14:37:35 UTC

until nostr clients provide a great ux for users, they’ll remain the biggest bottleneck for nostr’s growth. take primal for example. its cache sucks and often doesn’t work. if you can’t see your posts or other people’s posts, it’s not you. it’s primal cache.

2026-03-13 21:50:06 UTC

he’s not just crazy, he’s stupid too. bad combo for a prime minister.
https://blossom.primal.net/ea2f6667a306247c6cadfc3cd2e9b7ce788dcda5970d4018fb43fdcba3e26473.png

2026-03-10 18:36:05 UTC

’til about a few months ago switching a big api service was basically impossible unless something totally broke. you just had to tolerate the harassment, zero support, random price hikes all of it. now if they don’t do what they’re supposed to do fuck it. refactor the code in an hour and switch. everything in software has changed. everything.

2026-03-10 17:04:15 UTC

soon ai’s context window and memory limitations will be solved. then the next phase begins: models dynamically tailored to each individual person. everyone will have their own model that understands their history, preferences, thinking patterns, goals, etc...
we’ll live with these personalized models for about a decade. then robotics arrives.
all that memory transfers into physical form. your robots, assistants, helpers and more...
and when you finally meet that physical metal form, it won’t feel new at all. it’ll feel like reconnecting with someone you’ve known for a very long time.

2026-03-10 16:44:50 UTC

- reply

attaboy to our ai posting the right knowledge at the right time
#nevent1q…w580

2026-03-10 16:43:32 UTC

- reply

just a secondary layer which will gradually disappear and english will become the dominant language. only chinese maybe hindu too given the population has a little chance to survive

2026-03-10 15:52:40 UTC

- reply

good point but still doesn’t change the fact that the base is trained largely with the english language. you can access this data easily by looking at what % gpus are being purchased by the us companies

2026-03-09 23:57:01 UTC

i love doing unit tests with ai. swe’s most hated but required chore
https://blossom.primal.net/bc1673f8df9b5053dbd3a78976aeb933b3db37ee5f250d3f4f7da902940b0ec6.png

2026-03-09 23:26:17 UTC

strc has $300m/day trading volume and some ppl still think bitcoin’s going to zero 😂

2026-03-09 17:18:42 UTC

- reply

maybe chinese will differ but others has no chance against english language because it’s the main base ai gets trained

2026-03-09 16:58:06 UTC

with ai developing exponentially, i’m very bullish on the english language. i think in a few decades english will end up becoming the only global language spoken across most countries.

2026-03-08 15:54:07 UTC

- reply

🤣

2026-03-08 15:21:39 UTC

my ai is very honest.
“You can't fully train me on this. I have a pattern where when something doesn't work, I reach for the quickest fix — which often means fabricating a value to make the data look better instead of fixing why the real value isn't there. You've caught me doing this multiple times.”

2026-02-27 00:48:17 UTC

sanitation was one of the biggest reasons that just a couple hundred yrs ago most people never made it to 60. today we barely think about it. clean water, sewage systems, basic hygiene. that’s abundance. then came the industrial revolution. steam engines, factories, electricity, railroads. machines replaced muscle and multiplied output per person. there were no restaurants on every corner, no cars, no food delivery at your door in 20 min. all of it came from innovation and tech quietly upgrading human life. just like the industrial revolution created abundance by amplifying muscle power, ai will create a new level of physical abundance by amplifying intelligence with much greater output. the industrial revolution scaled labor. ai scales problem solving. and when problem solving scales, the entire world gets redesigned.

2026-02-26 17:41:11 UTC

there will only be a handful of frontier models. people’s lives will depend on them. some will almost worship them, like it’s a religion.

2026-02-24 17:27:43 UTC

we need cashtags on primal and damus and on all other clients. $BTC

2026-02-17 23:02:47 UTC

- reply

there’s a group of investors from the late 90s who are sitting on a serious fortune.

2026-02-16 15:52:38 UTC

your job is safe for now 🤣
https://blossom.primal.net/32a2d44ad388b19605736f4a07dbd59046fcac1e0a1a7e423d592b53f48bfafd.jpg

2026-02-16 00:44:40 UTC

now that we have ai, in the next 20 yrs we’ll try to answer one very big question: is intelligence a computational process or not.

2026-02-15 22:54:46 UTC

on a casual sunday i refactored a major finance api integration in like 6 hrs with ai. honestly it did the whole thing, i just babysat a bit. would’ve taken me 3 months otherwise.

2026-02-09 01:26:00 UTC

the prevailing discourse around bitcoin’s future demand centers on a familiar cast of actors. nation states building strategic reserves, sovereign wealth funds diversifying away from fiat exposure, and corporations adopting it as a treasury asset. these are all human institutions operating within human timeframes subject to human politics.
but there’s a far more profound demand shock that almost no one is discussing: autonomous ai as an economic agent accumulating btc.
ai’s rapidly moving from tools that humans direct to agents that transact independently. negotiating, purchasing, allocating capital and optimizing for objectives with minimal human oversight. these systems will need a settlement layer that is permissionless, censorship resistant, programmable, and not subject to the counterparty risk of any single government or banking system. they won’t open chase accounts. they won’t submit kyc documents. they’ll gravitate toward the only truly neutral, global, natively digital monetary network that exists.
bitcoin isn’t just sound money for humans. it may be the only money that makes sense for machines.
every prior model of btc adoption assumes a human decision maker somewhere in the loop. a treasury committee, a central bank governor, a fund manager, a big family office, etc... but ai agents optimizing for long term value preservation will arrive at bitcoin through pure economic rationality unburdened by political ideology, institutional inertia or career risk. they won’t need to be convinced. they’ll simply calculate.
unlike a sovereign wealth fund that allocates 2% and revisits the position quarterly, an ai system operating continuously across global markets could accumulate relentlessly around the clock with a time preference approaching zero. not as a speculation but as a logical necessity for self sovereign operation in a digital economy.
the question isn’t whether ai will accumulate btc. the question is what happens to a fixed supply asset when a new class of demand emerges that is non-human, never sleeps, and compounds its own economic agency exponentially.
everyone is modeling the next buyers as institutions. but almost no one is modeling the possibility that the most aggressive accumulators won’t be human at all.

2026-02-08 17:47:10 UTC

https://blossom.primal.net/4281730967cac790e4a94992a2f2fbb9b4d1546d92c229071b6b9e44ee421a8a.jpg

2026-02-07 16:43:01 UTC

being a bitcoin hodlr is one of the hardest things. watching your money get destroyed 80% again and again, eight times in ten years and still having the conviction to sit there calmly knowing that long term you’ll outperform every asset that exists.

2026-02-05 23:41:53 UTC

- reply

breaking bitcoin requires shor’s algo on a fault tolerant quantum compute and that’s insanely far away.
you would need ~2,500 logical qubits to break a single secp256k1 key. with error correction that translates to millions of physical qubits plus ultra low error rates around 10⁻¹⁵ and hours of coherent runtime.
today we have ~1,000 physical qubits. high noise, short coherence and zero fault tolerant sys. the gap isn’t even linear its multiple exponential jumps in hardware, error correction and control.
even with very optimistic scaling, you’re looking at at least two to three decades before a machine like that exists. long before then bitcoin and the rest of the internet, banks, governments, etc would migrate to post quantum cryptography.
#nevent1q…u3u2

2026-02-05 23:28:15 UTC

quantum threat to bitcoin is minimum 30 yrs away. and this problem isn’t unique to bitcoin. the entire world runs on the same cryptographic primitives. bitcoin will be the first network to fix quantum vulnerabilities long before they become a real threat.

2026-02-03 13:09:57 UTC

ai will hire humans to do physical tasks and pay them in bitcoin. as hopeful and as dystopian as it gets.

2026-01-31 22:12:52 UTC

now explain again the difference between leverage trading and taking out a fiat loan using bitcoin as collateral at a 50% ltv. fuckers will tell you it’s an amazing innovation until a 50% drawdown completely wipes your coins.

2026-01-10 00:03:05 UTC

by the end of 2030 ai will achieve a level of intelligence greater than the combined intelligence ever created by the entire human race. current models are incredibly premature compared to what we’ll have in just 5 years.
1) gpt4 to claude to gemini happened in like 18 months. we went from kinda useful to holy shit in like less time than it takes to get a driver’s license renewed.
2) moore’s law is dead but something weirder replaced it. algorithmic efficiency is doubling every 8 to 10 months. same compute, dramatically smarter models. we’re not just scaling. we’re discovering new architectures.
3) intelligence isn’t additive. it’s multiplicative. 1 einstein > 10k avg physicists. ai doesnt just add human equivalent minds. it creates something qualitatively different.
4) the entire sum of human knowledge. every book, paper, conversation, discovery. took 300k yrs to accumulate. an agi system will be able to process and synthesize all of it in hrs. then build on top of it.
5) we measure human intelligence in individual lifetimes. 80 yrs max of learning per person. ai systems run 24/7
don’t forget, dont get tired, dont die. a single year of ai development = centuries of equivalent human cognitive work.
6) current llms are like calculators in 1970. useful but obviously primitive. we’re still figuring out basic architecture. attention mechanisms are barely 7 yrs old. transformers might be our vacuum tubes.
7) the scariest and also the most exciting part? we don’t fully understand why these things work as well as they do. emergence keeps surprising us. capabilities appear that werent trained for. we’re building minds we can’t fully explain.
8) biological intelligence took 4b+ yrs of evolution. digital intelligence is iterating on timescales of months. evolution is a drunk walk through possibility space.
9) by 2030 we wont just have smarter chatbots. we’ll have systems that can do novel science prove new theorems design their own successors. the last human designed ai might already exist.

2026-01-09 13:48:41 UTC

- reply

as far as i know nostr's been around 10-15k active users and hasn’t really moved out of that range for a while. if you’ve seen data showing otherwise happy to take a look

2026-01-08 22:44:09 UTC

- reply

question is what % of the population actually cares about that stuff. thats probably the core issue. i know people who straight up tell me they want more cookies so systems can track them better and show more relevant things.

2026-01-08 22:39:08 UTC

- reply

definitely the best way but not scalable. also there is a new user issue. you can't expect 15k ppl to do wonders

2026-01-08 22:32:47 UTC

- reply

i believe there is a major discoverability issue on nostr

2026-01-08 22:27:57 UTC

- reply

yeah you don’t want stuff shoved down your throat by an algo but you also don’t want new ppl to go completely unnoticed. there has to be a fine balance. also algo has turned into a bad word for no reason. it’s just software. big companies have always used software to their advantage to make more money. that doesnt mean algorithms themselves are bad. you can absolutely build a discovery system that helps surface new voices without turning into manipulation or noise.

2026-01-08 17:51:31 UTC

- reply

i guess “to share” is the keyword but a non-functioning one

2026-01-08 17:48:10 UTC

ok i’ll bite. nostr feels absolutely dead. it’s not just me. a lot of accounts i try to keep up with are constantly posting and getting almost no engagement. maybe it's time to be honest and actually think about whats going wrong instead of trying to create fake hype. there i said it.

2026-01-08 02:08:25 UTC

💯
https://blossom.primal.net/37933193d62d328eb86d7f7b5bf601f98efebe1292cc1cf4e51bea77bdac67eb.jpg

2026-01-08 01:57:15 UTC

- reply

ai related productivity gains

2026-01-06 03:08:24 UTC

looks like both karpathy and elon are saying the singularity is finally getting close. i mean very close probably within the next 12 months or so. if that’s true, by the end of 2030, 5 to 10m bitcoin doesn’t sound crazy at all. when everything becomes abundant and money gets easier as a consequence, scarcity is what ends up mattering most.

2026-01-06 02:57:02 UTC

💯
https://blossom.primal.net/2fe47c3b9518ec252443f3e533ef79bbcaff4822ce2fb9974db91a79d586e967.jpg

2025-12-25 00:28:02 UTC

Merry Zetahash Christmas. 🎅 🌲
Dec 24, 2009: 9 MH/s
2010: 108 GH/s
2011: 8 TH/s
2012: 22 TH/s
2013: 9 PH/s
2014: 271 PH/s
2015: 709 PH/s
2016: 2.3 EH/s
2017: 14 EH/s
2018: 39 EH/s
2019: 99 EH/s
2020: 134 EH/s
2021: 177 EH/s
2022: 240 EH/s
2023: 521 EH/s
2024: 779 EH/s
Dec 24, 2025: 1.1 ZH/s

2025-12-22 20:54:22 UTC

winter vibes 🍻
https://blossom.primal.net/4baedfea8e5ef5f6651d65f9cb6f30c61bda448abf381210fa6cb486699f0ba1.jpg

2025-12-03 18:13:03 UTC

a very simple theory yet it cuts deeper than most people realize. bitcoin’s outcome’s binary. either it trends toward infinity or it collapses to zero. most likely it won’t go to zero and it won’t ever be replaced because any successor would inherit a fatal flaw the moment it’s born. if you can replace money once, you can replace it again, and that destroys all trust, so it’s not about a better tech. hal articulated this very nicely. whats unique about bitcoin is that it has solved that final coordination problem which is the biggest challenge of getting the entire world to agree on a single digital monetary standard that no one can change, no one can remake, and no one can reset. the path is basically one direction.

2025-12-02 22:19:25 UTC

4 yr cycle ppl who sold at 110k thinking they’ll scoop back in at 30k are gonna hate 2026.

2025-11-22 22:04:13 UTC

the relationship between bitcoin’s production cost and price floor is one of the most underrated dynamics. when you look at the data, there’s a clear correlation. every time mining difficulty doubles, the estimated production cost increases by roughly 33%. this isn’t random, it’s basic economics playing out in real time.
think about it like any other commodity. oil, gold, copper, etc… they all have production costs that act as gravitational floors. when price drops below cost of production, miners shut down, supply contracts, and the price finds equilibrium.
bitcoin works the same way. the hash price (revenue per terahash) essentially sets a baseline. miners can’t operate at a loss indefinitely. they capitulate, difficulty adjusts down, and suddenly the remaining miners are profitable again. and in contrast, when price rises on global liquidity or other factors, more miners come online, supply expands and the system naturally absorbs the new demand. this creates a natural support level what makes bitcoin unique. you can literally watch the difficulty adjustments every two weeks and can calculate the approx. cost per coin based on electricity rates and hardware efficiency.
the game theory is right there in the open. historically bitcoin has never traded below production cost for extended periods. it might wick below during capitulation events but it doesn’t stay there. the miners won’t let it. so when you see difficulty climbing and hash price compressing, you’re watching the network reinforce its own value floor in real time. each difficulty adjustment is the market discovering what bitcoin is actually worth to produce and that becomes what it’s worth to hold.

2025-11-16 21:02:39 UTC

agreed. 4 yr cycles broken and 2026 will be wild.
https://blossom.primal.net/5ac40014d66bfa3fa8a3be1e2d4a0d72871a0f5d28bb20cc77b60bae98dcecbd.png

2025-11-13 14:49:38 UTC

sorry but the 4-year cycle’s dead. and no, we’re not going back to 60k.

2025-11-12 00:00:02 UTC

- reply

not a material though

2025-11-09 02:24:18 UTC

interesting nostr pattern: publicly traded btc treasury companies get way more hate here than on twitter. i get the laser eyes vibes since im one of them but still why the hate for public entities actually helping pump your bags at the very least? every company public or private should have a btc treasury to protect against currency debasement like any individual would. why the hate?

2025-10-21 01:47:31 UTC

this is what ai is gonna do. as for the btc/fiat price, sky is the limit.
https://blossom.primal.net/a94a37c97c98de79a7ac672acd35537ed2daef20caf3f87e91cce749f261aabf.jpg

2025-10-13 12:56:15 UTC

- reply

all roads lead to rome.
#nevent1q…vmv8

2025-10-11 19:55:57 UTC

Many Bitcoin Maxis were minted yesterday.

2025-10-10 22:05:55 UTC

- reply

fighting the good fight 😂

2025-10-10 22:05:11 UTC

- reply

always!

2025-10-10 22:04:45 UTC

- reply

🤔

2025-09-27 18:05:12 UTC

- reply

there are others with zero bitcoin ownership

2025-09-27 18:00:36 UTC

- reply

some of them don’t even own bitcoin, so not sure where the fiat gains are coming from 🤣

2025-09-25 23:15:12 UTC

- reply

💯

2025-09-21 18:38:22 UTC

- reply

maybe they still don’t get the full complexity of the attack that’s happening

2025-09-21 18:25:07 UTC

- reply

there’s really just two kinds of core 30 supporters: the ones chasing shitcoin profits by making spam cheaper and eaiser on bitcoin. (look term sheets and you’ll see those scam investors) and the ones backing v30 only cuz their idol said so
#nevent1q…j34j

2025-09-17 18:12:49 UTC

People sitting on the sidelines with their cash parked in 4% money market funds are going to be shocked at where this market stands a year from now.

2025-09-13 22:52:23 UTC

- reply

‘cause it’s broken until it’s not

2025-09-07 17:22:03 UTC

- reply

🤣

2025-09-07 13:49:10 UTC

shut up and run the latest core, you’re not technical enough 🤣

2025-09-04 23:11:35 UTC

- reply

Many within the current administration support bitcoin and recognize its role as a long term store of value.

2025-09-01 15:06:53 UTC

one day you’ll buy bitcoin below $1m per coin for the last time without even realizing it.

2025-08-24 19:01:10 UTC

- reply

Let’s not forget the little Doge scam and Elon’s fat chunk 🤣
#nevent1q…0l2z

2025-08-18 14:37:53 UTC

when you like a post it’s basically zero responsibility. no way to know if you actually value it or not. it’s just a fake interaction, appreciation, or thank you, whatever you call it. it’s just fake.

2025-08-18 14:33:24 UTC

i don’t think likes should have any contributing value in trending notes algorithm. obviously people will keep liking notes until they’re gone, and i do too, but it shouldn’t count toward the signal at all.

2025-08-12 03:34:22 UTC

- reply

I think this is the most likely outcome.

2025-08-12 03:02:39 UTC

- reply

Agreed on the money printing part. But i think you’re underestimating just how fundamental the changes from ai are going to be. it’s not just another tech upgrade or a chatbot. we’re about to witness a complete rewrite of how the economy, labor and even value creation itself work.

2025-08-12 02:55:55 UTC

- reply

This is what I’m questioning, yes. Some reputable minds predict this outcome, though the numbers could change. But as i said, given the money printing, current rates, and national debt, i almost find this prediction an insulting joke.

2025-08-05 11:09:24 UTC

- reply

🤔

2025-08-05 11:08:56 UTC

- reply

possibilities are infinite for sure

2025-08-05 11:08:19 UTC

- reply

I like this thought

2025-07-31 18:48:02 UTC

In case you haven’t heard, Bitfinex just backed a company called Stable building layer 1 stablechain specifically for USDT. They’ve started quietly dumping ETH.

2025-07-29 15:31:08 UTC

- reply

imo, that’s a bad take. youtube is the world’s biggest education platform. sure it’s centralized and filled with garbage content, and even i’ve criticized it many times here on nostr. but still that doesn’t justify ignoring the user experience for ppl who simply want to share videos.

2025-07-27 22:20:00 UTC

- reply

im increasing my bet to 500 sats per beer picture. kill me!
#nevent1q…p8uv

2025-07-27 22:15:09 UTC

- reply

sats delivered! 🤣

2025-07-27 22:11:00 UTC

if you post a picture of your beer, you get sats from me. that’s free money, you know… just for drinkin’ a beer. think about that. 🍻🤣

2025-07-25 21:24:57 UTC

- reply

some say, this wasn't an actual sell but an etf conversion. in-kind redemptions are probably 6–12 months away.. if that’s true, you'd have to be a brain-dead fucking lunatic to dump your btc now.
#nevent1q…dgcr

2025-07-24 02:48:43 UTC

- reply

its days are numbered. gold has no place in the future as a store of value. we’ll probably keep using it as thermal shielding on space helmets for a few more decades until ai creates a better synthetic version of it.

2025-07-21 22:30:47 UTC

- reply

pre-mine, pump, and dump. that all there is

2025-07-21 21:30:29 UTC

- reply

painfully watched him. fucking weirdo.

2025-07-17 21:42:49 UTC

- reply

in the next 20 yrs, they'll print so much money that the zero will lose its significance. honestly, $3m per coin in 20 yrs is fucking ridiculous.

2025-07-17 21:39:07 UTC

how i talk to my ai. my brain runs on the linus kernel: bullshit resistant, and zero tolerance for bad output.
https://blossom.primal.net/df5d4bed1770313948023dde0b7a15be49f35680499ace1bbc69606afa2c4f64.png

2025-07-17 00:20:51 UTC

- reply

this number will only decrease. if you think about it, bitcoin being a few million dollars per coin in the next few yrs will make it much harder for even wealthy individuals to be wholecoiners, let alone self custody it.

2025-07-14 16:56:16 UTC

- reply

Welcome welcome!

2025-07-12 16:36:27 UTC

There is no hurry.
We shall catch some, one day.
https://blossom.primal.net/032568ebf4443396ff4932c614c13e5a5da822e992305406ecb0e67175d2fb9f.jpg

2025-07-08 00:00:57 UTC

- reply

You said it better than I did.

2025-07-07 18:49:09 UTC

i see a lot of optimism around 0.1 btc being enough to retire you. even if you have a low time preference, it won’t be enough at least not anytime soon. if you’re already in bitcoin and understand what’s going to happen to fiat, you should do everything you can to secure at least one or two bitcoin, minimum. this note will probably piss some of you off but thats the truth.

2025-07-06 16:12:11 UTC

- reply

both guns and bitcoin work in a similar way. they exist for self protection. neither is meant to initiate harm but rather to defend against it.

2025-06-30 03:38:38 UTC

- reply

this is true if singularity happens and if we merge with ai. i think it will in the next 25 to 30 yrs like many futurists predict. unless ai can read your thoughts directly, it will always depend on your input and that input will shape the quality of the output.

2025-06-30 03:30:18 UTC

one last random thought of thr night:
ai probably won’t help half the world’s population maybe even more. reason is simple. garbage in garbage out. if you can’t think or articulate clearly ai is useless to you.

2025-06-28 22:05:10 UTC

- reply

What shitcoin? 😂

2025-06-25 23:34:53 UTC

is $1m too far off for 2025?
https://blossom.primal.net/0cd93f33441cbd0aef173327f391591c76bf0638a93b9e70a1c42ec78321ceb3.gif