<unnamed>

Public Key

npub16lcw8ytugeh3ug3na93yl0tdf0gnjtduljhn2a852atf6jtvkucs7pruje

Profile Code

nprofile1qqsd0u8rj97yvmc7yge7jcj0h4k5h5fe9k70ete4wn69w45af9ktwvgpzpmhxue69uhkummnw3ezuamfdejsz9rhwden5te0wfjkccte9ejxzmt4wvhxjmcpp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mq9hwfmr

Publishing to

nostr.wine

relay.damus.io

nos.lol

Last Notes

2024-09-11 22:21:26 UTC

Did you know that ⚡️Lightning Network specifications are called BOLTs while 🥜Cashu Protocol specifications are called NUTs?
Nuts and Bolts 🫶
https://github.com/lightning/bolts
https://github.com/cashubtc/nuts

2024-09-11 13:11:36 UTC

I just paid for lunch with #Cashu at a restaurant in Prague and it was amazing!
All I needed was the eNuts - Nutshell - LNbits - LND - Confirmo - Qerko stack 😅

2023-04-19 12:48:56 UTC

- reply

So aren’t Nostr and Bluesky repeating the same mistake by including likes into the product?

2023-04-19 11:09:24 UTC

- reply

Quite often, the following scenario would occur (I know because I've been guilty of doing the same):
You start to write an eloquent response explaining why the tweet you're reacting to is wrong, but suddenly you hit the character limit. You spend a few minutes trying to rephrase your thoughts to fit within the limit, but now your message doesn't make any sense. Frustrated, you delete everything and just post "You are wrong" or "Screw you" instead.
Do you have any indication that factors other than the character limit might be responsible for the poor quality of discussions on Twitter?