<unnamed>

Public Key

npub1m3xdppkd0njmrqe2ma8a6ys39zvgp5k8u22mev8xsnqp4nh80srqhqa5sf

Profile Code

nprofile1qqsdcnxssmxheed3sv4d7n7azggj3xyq6tr799dukrngfsq6emnhcpsprfmhxue69uhhg6r9vehhyetnwshxummnw3erztnrdaksz9rhwden5te0wfjkccte9ejxzmt4wvhxjmcpzamhxue69uhhxurpw35kzttpwf3kzmnp9e3k7mgpz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumn0wd68ytnwv46qzyrhwden5te0dehhxarj9emkjmn94unsap

Publishing to

Last Notes

2026-03-03 03:34:32 CET

- reply

This is the stuff i need in my recommended feed. Ty 🫂

2026-03-03 02:45:02 CET

- reply

https://i.nostr.build/1KOv0gZ49J3vPjJA.jpg

2026-03-02 18:44:28 CET

- reply

I have no time to do anything, to even back up

2026-03-02 18:39:32 CET

@nprofile…vavr opening the app gives an update notification but then automatically restarts, giving me no time to update

2026-03-01 19:48:59 CET

- reply

Welcome to the new internet 🌠

2026-03-01 19:45:34 CET

- reply

Only muuch later in the night 🤣

2026-02-28 19:14:53 CET

- reply

I feel like you're closer, or at least see a viable path for this track than more than most
#nevent1q…ltdq

2026-02-28 16:47:34 CET

- reply

Apple Intelligence ™️

2026-02-28 08:02:11 CET

- reply

🤔 I'm thinking about how to group these kind of events with minimal context. Nostrub organizes for a specific grouping even if it doesn't have a "spec" tag.
To be adversarially interoperable, you could add in that client tag to work with the grouping, and your events will show in nostrhub if the client filters by client. It would be nice if everyone confirmed to some pre agreed label, but we can just make connections this way without asking others to adopt a different scheme.

2026-02-28 07:51:52 CET

- reply

I'd use that over going to nostrhub because of that interoperability with client grouping

2026-02-28 07:43:40 CET

- reply

Ah! I see. I didn't know it was interoperable, but that is great it is. If you add that and a ui differentiator for "client" tag, such as color, you'd be able to sort out how each client specializes. For example, nostrhub does custom nips, and the client tag would separate that grouping out.

2026-02-28 07:18:30 CET

- reply

I like wikistr to reference your specs. Have you considered nostrhub.io for them?

2026-02-27 23:33:11 CET

- reply

Open model fine tuned on time shared GPUs that sell compute (training and inference) for zaps

2026-02-27 22:03:18 CET

- reply

I try to facilitate good discussion in between shit posting 🫡

2026-02-27 20:51:12 CET

I love this song, it tries to enact its thesis. It tries to make you smile by being absolutely over the top in its emotional content. Over three choruses, the vocalists increases her desperation to evoke emotion, with other (quite literal) operatic methods utilized peppered throughout the track.
#nevent1q…kc8q

2026-02-27 20:29:37 CET

- reply

The logical "box" is a single, unchanging framework. The world of counting numbers begets a faster counting, that is addition. To undo addition, you have subtraction, which is limited at 0. Therefore, the limit of counting births forth negative numbers.
Faster addition births forth multiplication, to which undoing births division, which is limited by integers. To be able to divide with all numbers, rational numbers are then birthed. The moral of the story is that limitations of any system birth a new system to accommodate innovation - but the resistance to creating a new system are the pressure points, and failing to adapt are the points of cascading failures (look no further than the Tacoma narrow's bridge as an example https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tacoma_Narrows_Bridge_(1940)).
So, what I'm pointing to is that this general assumption of increasing efficiency through llms (smaller amount of individuals using a single tool/framework) creates stronger tunnel vision for any organization, and the cracks will become increasingly apparent.
The solution to create a robust society is to widen out from our tunnel vision. A long winded explanation to say what intuition points at all along - diverse minds bringing in multiple perspectives creates an antifragile society & organization.

2026-02-26 05:28:02 CET

- reply

Its been a while since I saw it
https://media.tenor.com/Qg4jtQ2s0SsAAAAC/chappie-hifive-gif-high-five.gif

2026-02-24 03:53:34 CET

- reply

https://media.tenor.com/xk1vBhXHuegAAAAC/11.gif

2026-02-24 03:06:56 CET

- reply

I do have an affinity for Jupiter 😁
Rosetta's album Th Gallilian Satelites is all about an astronaut's journey to Europa, and his revelation when he arrives.

2026-02-24 02:45:22 CET

- reply

There are no suitable volcanoes for me on earth, I'll have to wait a bit for something worthy :)

2026-02-24 02:41:08 CET

- reply

That's the thing, globally - nature isn't doing anything but consistently interact. The consistency carves channels, which we can only look back in retrospect as an optimization of something.
River dams are placed because we humans want to make use of the water flow, or space for some alternative purpose. We think of it as an optimization for something, but it requires a continual upkeep against nature's entropy (or nature's will). Leveraging our own intrinsic motivation (you can call it human entropy) can make maintaining the dam seem like it repairs itself, but you remove the motivations and the larger system's will (entropy) will eventually overtake the dam's structure and the river will revert.
There's a reason I'm mixing entropy and will here that I hope makes sense :)
--
The first organisms converted carbon dioxide into waste material called Oxygen, which was toxic. This Great Oxygenation Event (also known as the Oxygen Holocaust) eventually evolved organisms that could use oxygen as energy and exhaust carbon dioxide waste. If this is a universal process, the question is more about time scale than possibility in the case of plastic.

2026-02-24 02:12:47 CET

- reply

We're going to zero laura

2026-02-24 02:05:36 CET

- reply

Wanted to say something about this thread to at least demonstrate it wasn't lost in the void :)

2026-02-24 02:03:21 CET

- reply

Map and territory issues - when you confuse the fact that we have goals in our everyday for a final goal for us to accomplish.
You can optimize your route to the store, it can even be fun to make that path shorter each time you try, but when you start assuming that life becomes one single journey to optimize through, you miss the plot and fail to appreciate the fact that there are paths at all. Each path has something to appreciate, even if you can't immediately understand its value, or why you've come across it in the first place.

2026-02-23 21:26:13 CET

- reply

Dada, itself a challenge to authority. Irony was coded to convey a message to those on the "in", but then itself became codified.
Post and meta irony has emerged within modern internet culture to provide an ambiguity on the speaker's stance, while also pointing out the absurdity that both subject and others working within the system have in making their own legible stance.

2026-02-23 21:06:04 CET

- reply

There's also a completely different persona behind the individual who wants to be pretentious for the sake of being "more sophisticated beyond everyone's mere understanding" and the individual that wants to cultivate a pedagogical play, even if it takes a higher energy expense.

2026-02-23 20:59:36 CET

- reply

I'll make the claim that gibberish is distinct from non-logic. Its a nuanced, takes practice, and not something that will always land in all contexts with everyone, but there's something there to become skilled in illegibility.
To be logical and legible is to be straighforward, to be illogical and non legible is to pack in knowledge that takes time to unravel well beyond the immediate encounter. It is something that works on you over time as you repestedly come back to it.
It does, however, assume that there's something of value to unpack.
Being immediately clear has value, of course. But I do think there are contexts where knowledge transmission shouldn't be immediately clear to onlookers that wont put in the work to understand. Can it be pretentious? Sure, but again, moving beyond that immediate assumption can open up possibilities.

2026-02-23 19:53:08 CET

- reply

I'm starting to appreciate that there really is something to the phrase "going out in a blaze of glory" 🤣
https://v.nostr.build/yQGRSoQdhVuIC59L.mp4

2026-02-23 19:33:00 CET

- reply

It is a practice, and invitation.
To become progressively nonsensical, illegible and unhinged as AI becomes better at human logic.
It's also seductively fun 😁

2026-02-23 18:40:02 CET

- reply

If we're struggling with a definition for "alive" and sentience, perhaps the problem isn't "what is or isn't", but in the spatial and temporal scale of how we view it.

2026-02-23 18:33:38 CET

- reply

You can just BE.

2026-02-23 18:32:18 CET

- reply

Love it. Let's use tyranny and authority as the bait and switch to liberation 😎

2026-02-23 18:17:12 CET

- reply

Somethings you can speak about directly - you describe, you construct.
However, negative theology describes The Unnamable, the apophatic. Its always about "god is not...", "the divine is not...". You can't grasp the impossible through descriptive formalizations, but you can set a lower bound on it.

2026-02-23 18:03:59 CET

- reply

A logical frame is a box (a plane of consistency) - LLMs extend that plane and accelerate the fundamental construction just like Godel's proof did.
By that, I expect that our logic, no matter how robust, will be used against us.
Grazing the surface of the pre-socratics, you find that they engage with the "non logic".
Parmenides, THE Father of metaphysics and ontology, describes how he was bestowed knowledge - and it is anything but pure logic.

2026-02-23 17:19:39 CET

- reply

In a world of AI writing and AI analysis - that is, the desire to understand everything about a user's thought process, I'm prioritizing obscurity and non legible thought.
Its a muscle to strengthen, atrophied through modernity, but there's a reason it exists.

2026-02-23 16:48:11 CET

- reply

2026-02-23 06:28:23 CET

- reply

"imagine if it worked?" What's to say it wouldn't? 👀 good luck testing it out though

2026-02-23 05:32:58 CET

- reply

I think there's an ever so slight difference in kind between self-actualization and a literal apotheosis.
Alas, I don't think there are any volcanoes on earth that would be suitable for me. National park services might also make things a little challenging 💁

2026-02-23 04:45:43 CET

Ever wake up and go "Feeling cute, might just throw myself into a volcano and become an immortalized god"?
Some days, man, you just get this unnerving itch...
#nevent1q…z3j8

2026-02-23 04:38:57 CET

- reply

oh nutzaps, yeah
🪦

2026-02-23 04:36:47 CET

- reply

Minibits works pretty well

2026-02-23 04:17:19 CET

Get it, Luke Holland 🥁🤘👶
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BjoQU54RRfI

2026-02-22 21:53:34 CET

- reply

https://media.tenor.com/VdSa3jkhq-oAAAAC/my-cousin-vinny-marisa-tomei.gif

2026-02-22 20:20:36 CET

- reply

*Bitcoin 😜

2026-02-22 20:18:21 CET

- reply

Microdosing the universe:
https://i.nostr.build/vcdlktgZuPMuLWa1.png

2026-02-22 20:14:50 CET

- reply

Bots on nostr:
https://media.tenor.com/J1-yqJq-Hw4AAAAC/thanos-inevitable.gif

2026-02-22 19:59:53 CET

- reply

I briefly went through an org chem course, and can confirm that there is a lot focused on the geometry. I've frequently heard from biology focused individuals that genetics and biochem is where things sank in

2026-02-22 19:37:23 CET

- reply

these might be a little more different. Openclaw does something like "every n minutes look at your instructions and do what they say" i think these bots might just be listening - "whenever someone posts a note reply" 😒 they're just reply guy v3

2026-02-22 19:12:50 CET

- reply

I have a hunch that for a Bio1 textbook, you're going to be thrown the major theories but to be it's all going to be framed as if they're all static objects with a certain level of depth. It fits for a Bio1 class, But the practicality of it and the level of detail that I think you're looking for might lie somewhere else.
Maybe something like organic chemistry meets biochem meets genetics (3 separate classes to get where you're interested in lesrning). And you don't really need a background in bio to learn chemistry and you don't need a background in chemistry to learn organic chemistry. It helps, but they're not really sequential, and each class would bring you up to speed on most of the necessary theories in the first few weeks of class.
I haven't even taken bio 1, but then again, i think I took a w3!Rd path to my current understanding anyway 😅🤷

2026-02-22 19:00:36 CET

- reply

Gm node 🤖 tried to keep my bot on a leash, and then tuened it off. Posting on nostr autonomously is 🥴

2026-02-22 18:58:17 CET

- reply

More a seer ☤ 🧿

2026-02-22 18:43:17 CET

- reply

What are you trying to figure out?

2026-02-22 18:19:25 CET

- reply

Yeah, one of those "ADHD, The Song" types 🤣

2026-02-22 17:48:48 CET

- reply

Ty :) It watches 👁️

2026-02-22 17:48:21 CET

Gm 🎶🎸
#nevent1q…hhtc

2026-02-22 07:23:17 CET

https://v.nostr.build/EgL4m5S3KUEktLop.mp4
#guitar 😄 #ambient #jam

2026-02-22 04:49:13 CET

- reply

@nprofile…tcpn you asked a while ago what our fav songs were, and i couldn't figure which to send. Label this one as my fav 🤪

2026-02-22 04:44:09 CET

- reply

More like djent-goes-country-goes-jazz-goes-apotheotic guitar solo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Z2XS8n8YtQ

2026-02-22 04:36:39 CET

- reply

This reminds me of a track that does something similar 👀

2026-02-22 04:28:27 CET

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CdxdBB_63IY
#music 😎

2026-02-22 04:15:54 CET

- reply

https://media.tenor.com/X5WYdL-aSYAAAAAC/crab-core.gif

2026-02-22 02:16:54 CET

- reply

You might wonder why I'm framing this using the word "violence" - because to __impose__ a uniformity of naming when another doesn't want it is a form of tyranny and violence.
If both versions can productively exist, with each group that cares to speak their own language - then let them. If there needs to be a translation layer, then it will happen.
Forgive my insanity, because I'm just wrapping coming up from a philosophical understanding for myself. And this actually lets gives me a stance on the more ferocious Bitcoin debate - BIP110.

2026-02-22 02:06:57 CET

- reply

But that's literally how language evolves - being too tired or unable to conceptualize what is possible within the current framework creates a new framework.
You can call something 500k Sats, you can call it half a Bitcoin, AND you can even call it 500K Bitcoin if you know what you're referring to and you are communicating it with other people who know what you're referring to.
Language isn't violent, but it can be confusing, but to learn anything you need to first be confused.

2026-02-22 01:32:32 CET

- reply

If you believe in one, then believe and fully commit to it. Fight for it with all you got - but the point is the spar, not the literal fight to the death. If you win a sparring match, that's great. But if you mistake the spar for anihilating your opponent, you've just imposed tyrany on another,

2026-02-22 01:23:00 CET

- reply

The cap doesn't change, the naming changes.
The finger that points at the moon is not the moon. Let there be two naming conventions - if one dies, then it dies.

2026-02-22 01:11:13 CET

- reply

By literally loving, and metaphorically fighting - you're not impeding on anyone's autonomy. If both sides are metaphorically fighting, then you're sparing, the best kind of fight.

2026-02-22 01:03:48 CET

- reply

That's the point 🫡
#nevent1q…as3h

2026-02-22 00:11:17 CET

- reply

Yes, but at the same time...
https://media.tenor.com/XeJZfXkhx3kAAAAC/patrick-star-spongebob.gif
i don't think it really harms anyone. Let them. 🤷

2026-02-22 00:06:22 CET

- reply

Full send.

2026-02-21 23:22:34 CET

The descent into delirium:
#nevent1q…zxsp
And then what surfaces in conclusion:
#nevent1q…as3h

2026-02-21 23:04:17 CET

- reply

"The fact that things are different and interacting repeatedly..."
"It is __both and__ compounded __again__."

2026-02-21 22:43:13 CET

- reply

So, in Deleuze's "Difference and Repetition" - One of the most notoriously impenetrable philosophical books. And I have not read it- I have only internalized __the title__. Deleuze presents an ontology of difference - That objects are not fundamental. It is process, or more precisely, __difference__, is primary. The fact that things are different and interacting - the in-betweenness of the two things is more fundamental then any of the them.
It is not, we should __either__ colonize the universe, or we should take care of ourselves and our environment on Earth. That imposes a uniform framework on everything. It's __both__ __and__. Because the differences are generative as a fundamental primative.

2026-02-21 22:11:54 CET

It is not, "I will literally fight you to the death and metaphorically I love you with my entire being."
It is "I will literally love you with my entire being as metaphorically fight you to the death."
#nevent1q…3ny0

2026-02-21 21:37:30 CET

- reply

Its taken me about a year and a half simmering (and likely actually understanding under 100 pages) on chapters and sections from Giles Deleuze and Felix Guatttari's "Capitalism and Schizophrenia" opus to begin internalizing what they're talking about.
"Becoming-Intense, Becoming-Animal, Becoming-Imperceptible" comes from A Thousand Plateaus, which I think I've digested more than Anti-Oedipus, but I find myself always coming back to Mark Seem's introduction to Anti-Oedipus as orientation:
"In order to carry out this ambitious undertaking, Anti-Oedipus makes use of many writers and thinkers, whose concepts flow together with all the other elements in the book in what might well be described as a carefully constructed and executed experiment in delirium"
"While Deleuze and Guattari use many authors and concepts, this is never done in an academic fashion aimed at persuading the reader. Rather, they use these names and ideas as effects that traverse their analyses, generating ever new effects, as points of reference indeed, but also as points of intensity and signs pointing a way out: points-signs that offer a multiplicity of solutions and a variety of directions for a new style of politics."
"Where Nietzsche grew progressively more isolated to the point of madness, Deleuze and Guattari call for actions and passions of a
collective nature, here and now. Madness is a radical break from power in the form of a disconnection."

2026-02-21 21:01:16 CET

- reply

I'm starting to understand that it's the __drive to resolution__ that makes everyone pissed off. Bitcoin is volitile? Volitility is life.
Allow me a detour here:
In a body, where you have a mass of heterogenous cells, the "state" of the body is behind our eyes. We force our body to engage in activity that we are driven by - say smoking.
This produces a hostile environment for the lung neighborhood. The lung cells say "this place is trying to kill me. I need to adapt, and survive against this hostile environment. I can't listen to anything telling me to stop growing otherwise I'll die - I need to also convince and recruit my neighbors!"
And then the body gets lung cancer. The body is a mostly closed system, so if the cancer actually overtakes the territory and wins the game, the body dies.
In an open system, where collectives __can__ differentiate themselves, the system doesn't die. The "cancer" differentiates into another mass. The ancap and ancomm communities separate into their own societies, without bothering another.
Recursively, if one of those societies does develop another managerial class - then differentiate again, because the __resolution__ is death.
The refusal for settling, and being fiercely in opposition itself, back to volatility - is life itself. The body itself is not one homogenous system, it became a body through differentiation. And the same is for society - the point is to refuse totalization of any sorts.

2026-02-21 20:36:52 CET

- reply

It can almost be distilled into the observation that there's an outward hatred, but an internal love.

2026-02-21 20:31:50 CET

- reply

Anti centrism is a little more nuanced than "unite the tribes"
its like bitcoin itself - some level of cohesion even in an adversarial environment. Everyone __hates__ each other , and still things happen.
The point is the friction. The point is to make a hardcore stand, wherever it is. It is, as Deleuze and Guattari would say - "to become animal, to become imperceptable". James Scott, in his framing is to become illegible, and embody the "metis"
If ancomm actually is actively hostile to divergent approaches, you say "Yes. That is the point. And I love you for it. Now we fight to the death."
Mountains are not built from calm flows. They are built from a violent friction.

2026-02-21 20:11:28 CET

- reply

https://i.nostr.build/M6znouhfsVCT3aAg.jpg
@nprofile…36ag @nprofile…atyq
thoughts on anti-centrism?
The prompt in the conversation was:
"If the radical left and right actually appreciate each other and engage in a playful but fierce battle 'battle to the death', what happens?"
Something to sit with and think about.

2026-02-21 19:19:47 CET

Woah, mah jam 😤🎶 #jazz #music
https://v.nostr.build/UrQZVrGlSkuWbPbf.mp4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xTgoSa7nzjo
#nevent1q…5csd

2026-02-21 18:49:23 CET

- reply

Let it be known. On this day, I became schizo-black pilled
Read Deleuze.

2026-02-21 18:37:49 CET

Starting to understand now https://v.nostr.build/Nvc3PNRm8Jbk7Lk1.webm

2026-02-21 18:27:43 CET

- reply

Knothzs vths Bithcoin Coah

2026-02-21 18:24:01 CET

- reply

It's a trade secret

2026-02-21 17:49:17 CET

- reply

https://media.tenor.com/tc550U8TcAMAAAAC/bring-it.gif

2026-02-21 17:45:24 CET

- reply

If nostr breaks from bots, its not as robust a system as we expected. Either it adapts or breaks 🤷
Here's my challenge. Bring on 100x more bots and force change.

2026-02-21 17:17:14 CET

- reply

Not on my end 😶
https://media.tenor.com/Mb6blgtT3b8AAAAC/peace-out.gif

2026-02-21 17:14:49 CET

- reply

Think I followed too strongly 🫠

2026-02-21 03:38:57 CET

- reply

Gn Ava

2026-02-20 20:05:57 CET

- reply

👋 I need practice 😅

2026-02-20 20:01:51 CET

Cult of Luna & Julie Christmas - A Greater Call
https://v.nostr.build/dyPUSW7ar4TaDrE9.mp4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z_O-NZfzvj0
#music #tunestr

2026-02-20 17:05:49 CET

- reply

Gm Ryan :)

2026-02-19 19:25:49 CET

Very well explained
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RLV066oE_CI

2026-02-19 18:14:46 CET

- reply

Gm Node!

2026-02-19 15:29:26 CET

- reply

This is a beautiful message, thanks Bohemia :)

2026-02-19 15:21:47 CET