<unnamed>

Public Key

npub16hal6zv9pjknpwvm2vauaq7zuhkpjahd3zgah0u50wcrwdn6z7vs9zepvl

Profile Code

nprofile1qqsdt7lapxzsetfshxd4xw7ws0pwtmqewmkc3ywmh728hvphxeap0xgpzpmhxue69uhkummnw3ezuamfdejsz9rhwden5te0wfjkccte9ejxzmt4wvhxjmcpp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqhl0j5f

Publishing to

nostr.wine

relay.damus.io

nos.lol

Last Notes

2023-06-07 17:56:42 UTC

- reply

📅 Original date posted:2017-02-25
📝 Original message:On 02/25/2017 08:10 AM, Ethan Heilman via bitcoin-dev wrote:
>>SHA1 is insecure because the SHA1 algorithm is insecure, not because
> 160bits isn't enough.
>
> I would argue that 160-bits isn't enough for collision resistance.
> Assuming RIPEMD-160(SHA-256(msg)) has no flaws (i.e. is a random
> oracle), collisions can be generated in 2^80 queries (actually detecting
> these collisions requires some time-memory additional trade-offs). The
> Bitcoin network at the current hash rate performs roughly SHA-256 ~2^78
> queries a day or 2^80 queries every four days.
You have to not only produce a ripemd160 collision, you have to produce
a collision that is also a valid sha-256 hash - and that's much much
much more difficult.

2023-06-07 17:55:01 UTC

- reply

📅 Original date posted:2016-12-19
📝 Original message:On 12/18/2016 12:51 PM, Douglas Roark via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> On 2016/12/18 12:07, Alice Wonder via bitcoin-dev wrote:
>> I almost did not update to 0.13.0 because the test suite was failing due
>> to python errors. How to fix them was posted on bitcointalk.
>>
>> 0.13.1 came with new python errors in the test suite. So I just said
>> fuck it.
>>
>> When the test suite actually works in my fairly standard environment
>> (CentOS) in the distributed release, I will upgrade.
>
> Can you post more info about the problems you're seeing, how you fixed
> them, your environment, etc., or at least post an issue on Github? I'm
> sure somebody would be happy to help. Some info on how to reproduce the
> problems would be very helpful. :)
>
> Thanks.
For 0.13.0 I had to do
export LANG=en_US.utf8
before running the test suite. I build in clean chroot build environment
to avoid accidental linking to non-standard libraries, and in that
environment the LANG is normally set to C as LANG normally doesn't
matter for compiling software that is expected to run regardless of what
the LANG is.
That I believe was fixed in 0.13.1.
In 0.13.1 the error is
Running test/bitcoin-util-test.py...
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "./test/bitcoin-util-test.py", line 12, in <module>
"bitcoin-util-test.json",buildenv)
File "/builddir/build/BUILD/bitcoin-0.13.1/src/test/bctest.py", line
54, in bctester
bctest(testDir, testObj, buildenv.exeext)
File "/builddir/build/BUILD/bitcoin-0.13.1/src/test/bctest.py", line
26, in bctest
outputData = open(testDir + "/" + outputFn).read()
FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory:
'./test/data/blanktx.json'
make[3]: *** [check-local] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/bitcoin-0.13.1/src'
make[2]: *** [check-am] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/bitcoin-0.13.1/src'
make[1]: *** [check-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/bitcoin-0.13.1/src'
make: *** [check-recursive] Error 1
0.13.0 test works just fine (once the LANG is set to something utf8)