StackSatsRaiseFamily
WildBill

Christian, Husband, Father, HODLer / Homeschool and Bitcoin. Stacks Sats and Raise Family.

Public Key

npub1ntlexmuxr9q3cp5ju9xh4t6fu3w0myyw32w84lfuw2nyhgxu407qf0m38t

Profile Code

nprofile1qqsf4lund7rpjsguq6fwznt64ay7gh8ajz8g48r6l5789fjt5rw2hlqpp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqpz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumn0wd68ytnwv46qprjth3

Publishing to

Author Public Key

npub1ntlexmuxr9q3cp5ju9xh4t6fu3w0myyw32w84lfuw2nyhgxu407qf0m38t

Show more details

Last Notes

2026-07-16 09:00:53 UTC

- reply

It wouldn’t be against Cuba. It would be for Cubans. I have personal friends, with family still there, who are asking for help. They own nothing and they’re not happy. There is no work because of the government and they’re only allowed electricity but for a couple hours a day.

2026-07-13 20:20:45 UTC

- reply

What would you do instead?

2026-06-08 21:26:18 UTC

- reply

I've given you 100 reasons you're wrong and you just can't understand. Last resort is to tell you to go prove yourself right.

2026-06-08 15:29:35 UTC

- reply

If Kaspa is a 'delusion' and the security is just an illusion of blind trust, stop complaining about it on the internet. Go attack it. Go rent some hashrate, forge a fake UTXO commitment, wrap it in a dishonest GHOSTDAG proof, and crash the network. The code is open-source. The bounty is worth a lot of money.
But you won't, because you can't. You know that breaking the network requires 51%. You lost the argument on the math, so you tried to move the goalposts to human politics. You keep insisting that a Layer 1 network must be slow and clunky to be secure, but Kaspa proved that cutting-edge cryptography can separate data storage from real-time enforcement. You’re not defending decentralization anymore; you’re just an over emotional zealot that the trilemma was solved without Bitcoin.

2026-06-08 11:10:58 UTC

- reply

You just laid out the sync process perfectly, but you missed the foundational rule of cryptography: A miner cannot dictate the hash; the math dictates the hash. You claim the node just confirms the UTXO set matches the number the miner wrote into the header, without knowing if the transactions were valid. But a miner cannot just write any random number they want. The ⁠utxo_commitment⁠ is a strict mathematical result of the ledger's entire history. If a miner tried to bake fake coins into that history a year ago, every honest node online at that exact second would have rejected the block instantly. That invalid block would have been orphaned and left in the dust. The only way that 'fake coin' hash could become the heaviest, valid Pruning Point Proof handed to a fresh node today is if the rogue miners successfully sustained a 51% attack against the honest network for an entire year. Kaspa didn't abandon verification. Kaspa realized that if an honest majority enforces the rules in real-time, the resulting Proof-of-Work header chain becomes an unforgeable cryptographic proof of the valid ledger state. You don't need to turn your hard drive into a museum of ancient data to enforce the rules of the present.
It’s sad to me you don’t understand this.

2026-06-08 02:39:27 UTC

- reply

I never said Kaspa uses ZK-proofs; I used ZK and succinct blockchains as examples to smash your primitive idea that you can't verify a ledger's validity without keeping every raw text file from 2015. A Kaspa pruned node doesn't run in 'SPV mode' like a light wallet—it holds and actively enforces the full UTXO ledger state. It just uses a thermodynamic header proof to verify how that state was reached instead of buying a 2TB hard drive to host a museum of dead data. But thank you for finally being honest at the end: 'L1 is supposed to be slow and small.' That's your real argument. It's not about math or security; it's a religious dogma. You believe a blockchain has to be slow to be pure. Kaspa solved the trilemma on Layer 1 using physics and mathematics.

2026-06-07 20:05:22 UTC

- reply

It’s clear you don’t understand cryptography or zero-knowledge logic. I’ve explained to you why you’re wrong and you’re just repeating the same wrong arguments.
YOU DO NOT NEED THE DATA TO PROVE THE MATH.
It really is the great paradox of Bitcoin maximalist religious zealots. They worship at the altar of mathematics and cryptography, yet they completely reject what cryptographic math is actually capable of achieving. They confuse data archiving with consensus validation. Your position is the only way to verify the state is to read every historical receipt (which you’ve never done). You need to study Merkle Trees, Polynomial Commitments, and Zero-Knowledge proofs. These proofs demonstrate with absolute mathematical certainty that a specific computational process was followed correctly, without needing to reveal or store the raw data that went into it.

2026-06-07 17:54:56 UTC

- reply

You’re failing to separate data storage from mathematical constraints.
Your argument is: "If you don’t manually read the script of a transaction from 2023, you can't verify if it broke your rules." You think that a miner could have sneakily broken a consensus rule (like printing 10 million fake coins) back in 2023, and that an archival node can just hand you a modern UTXO snapshot with those fake coins in it, and your pruned node will accept it because the snapshot is "consistent" with history.
That is mathematically impossible.
To understand the pruning point proof, you have to look at what is stamped inside a Kaspa block header. A block header doesn't just hold arbitrary text; it contains a Merkle Root Hash of the UTXO state. Every single time a block is mined, the miner has to calculate the new state of the ledger. If a miner in 2023 tried to execute an invalid script or forge fake coins, every honest node online at that second would calculate the state change, see that it broke the rules, and reject the block. The honest network would refuse to build on it.
Kaspa uses an advanced cryptographic structural backbone called a Posterity Chain (built on the principles of NiPoPoWs). Block headers don’t just point to their immediate parents. Every block header cryptographically commits to an exponential mathematical "skip-list" of ancestral block headers stretching all the way back to the Genesis block. It is a mathematically sampled backbone of history.
[Genesis] ——> (skips) ——> [posterity]
When your node boots up completely blank, it asks the network for the Pruning Point Proof. This file contains zero transaction data—it is purely a light chain of these interconnected, mathematically sampled Posterity Block Headers spanning from Genesis directly to the modern Pruning Point.
Your node takes this proof and puts it through a strict mathematical interrogation:
-It verifies the proof starts at the hardcoded, unchangeable Genesis block.
-It hashes the headers sequentially to ensure the mathematical line is completely unbroken.
-It reads the difficulty targets inside those headers and calculates the total accumulated Proof-of-Work (PoW). Because PoW requires physical energy, an attacker cannot write fake headers; they would have to burn millions of dollars in real-world electricity to generate a fraudulent proof heavy enough to fool your node.
-Once your node confirms that these headers represent the mathematically heaviest, legitimate chain in existence, it looks at the Merkle Root Hash printed inside that final Pruning Point Header. It then hashes the downloaded UTXO Snapshot.
If the hashes match perfectly, the snapshot is verified.
You ask: "Valid by whose rules?" Valid by the rules of the honest network that spent years of thermodynamic energy building that chain. If a miner in 2023 had printed fake coins, the honest network would have rejected that block. The heavy, legitimate posterity chain would have bypassed it entirely.
If an archival node tried to alter the historical database today to sneak those fake coins into the UTXO snapshot they hand you, the Merkle Root Hash of that dirty UTXO set would change. It would no longer match the Merkle Root printed inside the mathematically proven Pruning Point Header. Your node would see the mismatch and instantly throw the snapshot in the trash.
You are fundamentally confusing data availability with cryptographic verification. A Kaspa node doesn't need to read a script from 2023 to know it followed the rules, because a valid modern UTXO hash cannot physically or mathematically exist if the history preceding it contained an invalid rule change. The math of the current state is the proof of the past. The Pruning Point Proof uses a cryptographic posterity chain to prove that the snapshot you are holding is the mathematically unbroken continuation of Genesis, secured by the heaviest accumulation of physical energy on the network.

2026-06-07 14:44:42 UTC

- reply

I think part of your problem is you don’t understand a pruning point proof. A pruning point proof uses cryptographic sampling (similar to FlyClient/NiPoPoW architectures) to allow a node to verify the cumulative difficulty of the entire history using just headers. Because a valid modern UTXO hash can only be generated if every single transaction in history followed the rules, proving the validity of the header tip mathematically proves the validity of the snapshot state. You aren't bypassing verification; you are using math to verify the ledger state while throwing away the historical data storage. Kaspa separates enforcing the rules from archiving the past.

2026-06-07 13:35:57 UTC

- reply

You are incorrect about the computer science of how a Kaspa node actually handles state transitions and verifies data. You are arguing against a "strawman" version of how a pruned node operates.
You think a UTXO snapshot is just an unverified text file handed to you by an archival node, and you just blindly cross your fingers and accept it because it has a high Proof-of-Work score. The UTXO snapshot is not just "timestamped in the DAG", it is cryptographically bound to the BlockDAG’s virtual state. When a Kaspa node syncs, it downloads a Pruning Point Proof. This is a compact cryptographic proof. This proof mathematically demonstrates that the block header containing the hash of that UTXO set sits at the tip of an unbroken, valid chain of accumulated work leading directly back to Genesis. The node does verify the math: it verifies that creating this exact snapshot would require an attacker to expend more thermodynamic energy than the entire honest Kaspa network has produced since inception.
You assume that because you aren't checking a transaction from two years ago, a miner could have sneaked an invalid transaction into the past and ruined the current state without you knowing. This completely ignores how a UTXO ledger works. You cannot "build" a valid modern block on top of an invalid historical transaction because invalid transactions destroy the mathematical continuity of the UTXO set. If a miner in 2024 tried to create fake coins out of thin air, that block would be rejected by every node online at that moment. If an archival node tried to alter the historical database to include that fake transaction and feed it to a syncing node today, the resulting UTXO Merkle root hash would change. The new node would compare the hash of the dirty UTXO set to the mathematically proven headers and say, "The hashes do not match. This snapshot is fraudulent." You don't need to read a 3-year-old receipt to know the state is valid.
Yes, you pick what has the most Proof-of-Work. That is literally Bitcoin’s consensus mechanism. Nakamoto Consensus states that the valid chain is the one with the most accumulated energy. You're acting as though Bitcoin full nodes don't rely on PoW to determine the valid chain. If a Bitcoin node is presented with two chains that both follow the software rules, it always chooses the one with the most PoW. PoW is the ultimate arbiter of truth in both systems.
If an attacker had the computational power to rewrite Kaspa’s history, falsify a Pruning Point Proof, forge the cumulative PoW of the global network, and trick a syncing node into accepting a fake UTXO set, they would also have the exact same power that's needed to 51% attack. You keep calling it an SPV wallet. An SPV wallet downloads headers and assumes the transactions inside are valid without checking the rules. A Kaspa pruned node downloads a cryptographically secured state and fully validates every live transaction against the rules. Bitcoin maxis have a quasi-religious belief that if a node doesn't store a record of a meme inscribed on a block from three years ago, it isn't secure. Kaspa uses math and the laws of thermodynamics to prove that the current state is valid, throwing away the historical bloat so the base layer can actually scale. You aren't arguing against a security flaw, you're just arguing against a different design philosophy
Respectfully, you are claiming things that are not real, to be real.

2026-06-07 10:22:19 UTC

- reply

A Kaspa pruned node fully and independently validates every single transaction and block within its active consensus window. It executes the exact same validation code as an archival node. It calculates the cryptographic state changes itself. The only thing it does is discard the data once it passes the pruning point.
A Bitcoin SPV node does not verify transactions at all. An SPV node download headers, looks at the Merkle root, and says, "Well, the miners put this transaction in a block, so I guess it’s valid." It completely skips checking for double-spends or fake coins.
They are not the same at all.
You assume that because you don't have the data from 2023, you cannot verify the state today. But in a UTXO-based ledger, the current UTXO set is the condensed, mathematically proven result of all previous history. If a miner tried to invent fake coins out of thin air in 2023, the resulting UTXO set today would have an invalid cryptographic hash. A Kaspa node would instantly reject the snapshot because the cumulative Proof-of-Work headers wouldn't match.
Even on a full node in Bitcoin, if a user running a full node discovers a bad transaction from 2013 today, they cannot change it. If they try to unilaterally "blacklist" that old block, their node will simply split from the network, put itself on an isolated, useless island, and they will be left completely alone.
You are confusing data storage with consensus validation. A Bitcoin SPV node checks zero rules and trusts miners blindly. A Kaspa pruned node checks all rules for current consensus and trusts nobody. It executes full cryptographic verification of every block and transaction in its window.
If your definition of decentralization requires every participant to host a permanent archive of historical coffee purchases from three years ago on a Raspberry Pi, then yes, Kaspa doesn't fit your definition. But if decentralization means that any user can independently enforce the current rules of the network, prevent inflation, and validate their own financial state using raw math and Proof-of-Work, then a Kaspa node is as much of a full node as Bitcoin—it just throws away the trash when it's done.
Again, you don’t understand, and that’s ok. I’m used to it. Bitcoin religious zealots are many.

2026-06-07 00:46:11 UTC

- reply

That’s not how pruned nodes work. The claim that a pruned node "doesn't replay anything" is fundamentally false. A Kaspa pruned node absolutely does validate and replay blocks within the pruning depth window. It independently calculates consensus for all current traffic; it just throws away old historical data after it has been finalized by the network's cumulative Proof-of-Work.
A pruned node verifies the current heaviest chain/DAG headers. For an archival node to successfully feed a "lie" (a fake UTXO snapshot) to a newly syncing pruned node, an attacker would have to secretly mine a fake history with more accumulated Proof-of-Work than the entire real global Kaspa hashrate.
You’re just wrong because you don’t understand. And that’s ok. I’m used to that.
Kaspa has thousands of nodes. Counting publically available and saying that’s the totality is dishonest. Public nodes alone have spike over 1,000. The high throughput guarantees this. You have to cut latency. You’re making an assumption that’s illogical I counting only public nodes. Solo mining is the point.
Peer connections aren't a hidden vulnerability that breaks the cryptography of the network. It is a bottleneck, to be sure, but it doesn’t upend the project.

2026-06-06 18:04:40 UTC

- reply

Yes. And you can too: https://mykai.dev/

2026-06-06 16:10:24 UTC

- reply

Care to clarify objectively what you mean by “running Kaspa”?

2026-06-06 05:13:12 UTC

- reply

Typical Bitcoin religious zealot. Makes am unfounded claim and when asked to explain, can’t. I’ve had this conversation over and over and over again.

2026-05-25 04:00:37 UTC

- reply

There are hundreds of ongoing cases regarding Epstein files. Judges have to redact info. Not all redactions are from the DOJ. Likely a minority. Victims have to be protected, collateral damage has to be avoided, a fair trial has to be preserved, etc.

2026-05-19 13:13:59 UTC

- reply

Those same people will neglect Kaspa and try to champion LN. We’re watching it in real time.

2026-05-19 10:47:44 UTC

- reply

Never sell your Bitcoin was stupid from the beginning.

2026-05-19 02:35:35 UTC

- reply

You have no idea what the hardfork was. You immediately reinforced your bias. Making my point. The point also has nothing to do with speed.

2026-05-19 01:39:40 UTC

Kaspa’s testnet just successfully forked to accomplish something almost everybody said a proof of work protocol could never do. Kaspa made history today, in the name of feeedom and sovereignty, and almost no one in Bitcoin cares. We have lost our way.

2026-05-04 17:46:48 UTC

- reply

Nobody is mad at a bad take. It’s the lack of humility that’s sad.

2026-04-30 01:56:07 UTC

- reply

Nobody can say with certainty.

2026-04-30 01:48:36 UTC

- reply

I am more than happy to engage with you if you’re willing to be intellectually honest and sincere. So far all I’ve gotten is the opposite.

2026-04-30 01:34:21 UTC

- reply

Classic I meant something other than what I actually said. Probably the case here to then I guess? You should have a bit more humility. Fame and fortune are a hell of a drug.
https://blossom.primal.net/bebd4f75327e11d69cbd6ce3a5707d91850aec2bbf7fbd569f2c98d9eb943518.jpg

2026-04-30 01:23:37 UTC

- reply

No, what you said is that freedom from speech means freedom from consequences followed by some expletives.
Continuing in the conversation and doubling down, when you’ve been shown an example where you’re wrong, by claiming to mean something you didn’t actually say is what you’re doing now.
Probabilistic finality is another example of this same behavior. You’re aware and that’s why you ignored it in my last post.

2026-04-30 01:12:02 UTC

- reply

You would think you would be a bit more humble at this point.
Your use of the word consequence if factually incorrect. There are consequences, good or bad, to everything in life. Whether you meant consequences or not, you used the word. And @nprofile…l0pu is 100% correct. You may not be penalized under the law, but you can be fired in many states without justification. Put something stupid online and you’re asking for it these days.
Question for you. Does Bitcoin use probabilistic finality? Be a bit more humble man.

2026-04-21 11:20:46 UTC

- reply

This is the stuff that isn’t sensationalized in the media. This is the stuff that every arm chair quarterback misses when the US enters a conflict. There are real threats that the general public never hears of. It is only from the comfort and freedom of their home’s keyboard they can speculate how evil a nation is that affords them the ability to do so. And I hope that never changes.
#nevent1q…d3j0

2026-04-17 20:22:49 UTC

- reply

Name a topic I’ve avoided. I’ve addressed everything you’ve said head on. Even the incorrect stuff. If you made a claim, I’ve asked a question for you to substantiate your claim. It’s very simple.
The fact that you’re looking for validation from Meyer should concern you. He is not well and clearly has issues.

2026-04-17 20:07:56 UTC

- reply

You’re going to pay taxes in Bitcoin?

2026-04-17 20:04:02 UTC

- reply

You absolutely do. You’re appeal to authority every day. There’s all kinds of stuff you don’t know, but you trust the manufacturers, or the contractor, or the coder. You name it. Did you take the COVID vaccine? I didn’t. I gave authority to a different set of individuals.
You don’t think there’s people that would like to overtake the BTC protocol? There’s a lot of reasons to speculate.

2026-04-17 19:52:27 UTC

- reply

I’m not saying there is, NIST, Google, Loop said it, Deloitte, Chaincode said there is. I guess you know better than all of them? I’m willing to bet you haven’t dug into what they’ve said, you’re choosing to blindly argue that it’s a non-issue.
You’re ok with 1/3 of the Bitcoin supply reentering the market? Do you have any idea what that would do to the market? Think about that. Value would vanish quickly.

2026-04-17 19:49:04 UTC

- reply

Yet you keep responding emotionally unhinged and can’t objectively address the argument.

2026-04-17 19:41:26 UTC

- reply

There’s a difference in proactive and reactive. Proactive is before the problem arrives. Reactive is after. Surprised I have to explain that. The point of reference is the actual threat, not identification of it.
So you’re good with 6 million-ish BTC being stolen from individuals and being monetized? Have you thought about this? You don’t think that affects the protocol?

2026-04-17 19:36:52 UTC

- reply

So you’re ok with one centralized entity stealing 36% of Bitcoin?
Weird. That’s a hot take.
I’m not saying BIP-361 is a better solution, I don’t think it is. But all you’ve done so far is yell and cuss at me for raising the issue. All while saying you have me blocked… pretty comical while sad at the same time.

2026-04-17 19:31:51 UTC

- reply

And yet here you are writing to me with uncontrolled anger. Think about that.

2026-04-17 18:31:42 UTC

- reply

Watch him not answer. What are your thoughts on BIP-361?
#nevent1q…27tn

2026-04-17 18:30:01 UTC

- reply

He has me muted, yet here he is engaging in a conversation that he can’t see the half of…
My biggest issue with the Bitcoin maxi community is their inability to have objective conversations about anything. It’s turned into a religion. They think Satoshi is God. It’s a joke. And if you raise any questions to discuss anything whatsoever, you automatically are framed as a shitcoiner and muted. If you don’t see the problem with this, then you’re not part of any solution.

2026-04-17 18:25:41 UTC

- reply

I didn’t tell you to fall in line with my solution. But you certainly haven’t addressed the issue. You just ignore it. That’s the claim. Putting your feet up and saying quantum computer as a sigh up is just factually wrong at this point. You don’t like NIST? Fine. It doesn’t change the objectivity.

2026-04-17 17:38:46 UTC

- reply

Burying your head in the sand isn’t a solution.

2026-04-17 17:38:16 UTC

- reply

I guess reading is hard. I literally wrote, don’t be reactive. So there’s that…
Don’t like NIST? Fine. Google said. Loop said it. Deloitte said it. Chaincode said it. You can dismiss anybody because you don’t like them, but that doesn’t change the fact that P2PK coins are going to be stolen if something isn’t done.

2026-04-17 16:10:19 UTC

- reply

They are looking at the NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) guidelines.
NIST officially declared in 2024 that ECDSA (Bitcoin’s math) is "not quantum-resistant". This has been validated over and over again. You realize the math has already been solved? Once the hardware is here, it’s time to be reactive. You don’t want to be reactive.
You can say something if you want, but that doesn’t make it true.

2026-04-16 14:33:38 UTC

- reply

Haha the manufacturers a headline and I’m the problem? This place is mentally ill.
#nevent1q…zx7l

2026-04-16 14:33:02 UTC

- reply

Haha the manufacturers a headline and I’m the problem? This place is mentally ill.

2026-04-16 14:31:35 UTC

- reply

He literally doesn’t say anything about Israel in the video. Flash lies in his headlines over and over again. Watch his video.

2026-04-16 14:31:23 UTC

- reply

He literally doesn’t say anything about Israel in the video. Flash lies in his headlines over and over again. Watch his video.

2026-04-16 11:22:42 UTC

- reply

The kid just lies. I’m shocked people still think he’s an honest source of news. He just pushes biases for zaps.

2026-04-16 11:22:33 UTC

- reply

The kid just lies. I’m shocked people still think he’s an honest source of news. He just pushes biases for zaps.

2026-04-16 11:21:29 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…g0wu at it again! He posts a headline saying that Mexico‘s defense secretary says that 20% of weapons seized from cartels come from Israel. However, when you watch the video, the Mexican defense secretary, says nothing about Israel! It’s amazing the lengths that some people will go to reinforce their bias.
#nevent1q…dey5

2026-04-16 00:20:55 UTC

- reply

Whatever Epstein Cartel means, sure.

2026-04-15 11:33:48 UTC

- reply

I’m surprised anybody believes anything Iran says.

2026-04-14 12:19:41 UTC

- reply

He’s actually 100% correct here. Iran is the most prominent Shia country. I usually disagree with Graham, but he’s not wrong.

2026-04-05 10:14:07 UTC

- reply

John 8:58
[58] Jesus said to them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, before Abraham was, I am.” (ESV)
Exodus 3:14
[14] God said to Moses, “I AM WHO I AM.” And he said, “Say this to the people of Israel: ‘I AM has sent me to you.’” (ESV)
He loved us enough to come for us.

2026-04-03 17:43:05 UTC

- reply

Does nobody see a problem with this?
https://blossom.primal.net/a72dd5ddd2d74137bc2484f5f605138a5ac620b41be5e78a3bc8449f82aa5101.jpg
#nevent1q…xpcu

2026-04-03 17:42:44 UTC

- reply

https://blossom.primal.net/a72dd5ddd2d74137bc2484f5f605138a5ac620b41be5e78a3bc8449f82aa5101.jpg

2026-04-03 01:50:03 UTC

- reply

Depends. Are you going to say something new? Or repeat the same stuff every other BTC podcast does?

2026-04-03 01:49:20 UTC

- reply

https://www.iranintl.com/en/202601255198

2026-04-02 18:06:42 UTC

- reply

Does nobody see the irony of this?
#nevent1q…aenm

2026-04-02 18:06:00 UTC

- reply

I prefer that miners are fed with L1 transactions.
You clearly haven’t done the math on fees for opening and closing channels. Estimate for and substantiate how much miner revenue was generated last year from channels opening and closing. I’ll wait.

2026-04-02 17:57:23 UTC

- reply

Ln Sats are not BTC. Send Ln Sats to BTC address and see what happens.
That’s quite literally like saying dollar bills is the same as gold bullion, just liquid…
Watch towers only act retroactively. They identify bad actors after a grievance has been committed. That’s not security.
Payment channels is one bitcoin address to another. That’s the definition of peer to peer.
It makes me sad that this is how far Bitcoin has come.
#nevent1q…xpcu

2026-04-02 17:57:16 UTC

- reply

2026-04-02 17:24:50 UTC

- reply

Lightning sats aren’t Bitcoin.
Lightning sats don’t feed miners. Lightning channels aren’t completely secure (see Watchtowers).
L2s aren’t Satoshi’s vision in the White Paper.
These are the points I’ve made to you. Tell me I’m wrong.

2026-04-02 17:23:54 UTC

- reply

Keep up.
Lightning sats aren’t Bitcoin.
Lightning sats don’t feed miners. Lightning channels aren’t secure (see Watchtowers).
L2s aren’t Satoshi’s vision in the White Paper.
I’m not wrong about any of this. You calling me names doesn’t change any of this.

2026-04-02 17:20:37 UTC

- reply

What am I wrong about?

2026-04-02 15:52:04 UTC

- reply

And you require permission to swap them unless it’s your channel. This is my point. Keep up buddy.

2026-04-02 15:28:44 UTC

- reply

If you are sending, lightning sat, you are not sending bitcoin. Try sending lightning stats to a bitcoin address and see what happens. It makes me sad that I have to explain this to you.
It is quite possible to have a discussion. You fixing your anger and name-calling is a you problem, however.

2026-04-02 11:25:17 UTC

- reply

Well sure there is. You ask questions and have a formal discussion with one another. That’s how normal adult individuals interact. Name calling is what children do.

2026-04-02 11:24:23 UTC

- reply

Not your channel, then you need permission.
Please tell me you’ve seen the numbers in opening and closing channels for feeding the miners? It’s a non-starter.

2026-04-02 11:05:18 UTC

- reply

Was it your Lightning channel? And did that transaction pay miners?

2026-04-02 10:44:58 UTC

- reply

He didn’t say anything explicitly. He cowered away from discourse regarding the White Paper, Bitcoin, and Kaspa as most larger social accounts do. He’s scared of intellectual honesty and instead chooses to obfuscate. He knows what he’s doing. If there was nothing to be scared of, he would engage honestly. If Bitcoin could defend itself Odell wouldn’t throw out slurs, he’d engage intellectually. But that’s not what happens, is it, @nprofile…0fd0 ? I’m not trying to win a popularity contest. I’m speaking my mind and you threw out flippantly “retarded”. This is what Bitcoin has become. Don’t ask questions. Get in line. Idk why I expected anything different. At least @nprofile…xsyl had the decency to engage. He was wrong and ran after he did, but he engaged.

2026-04-02 10:38:48 UTC

- reply

Thank you for making my point.
I own Bitcoin. What does that make me?
Are there any other names you’d like to call me in your unchecked anger?
The white paper… the white paper should be your gold standard. P2P. Permission-less. Fedi or Lightning ain’t it regardless how you or anybody else copes.

2026-04-02 10:35:24 UTC

- reply

Trump didn’t bomb citizens. The US didn’t target citizens.
If it’s not hatred, it’s just stupidity of you think that’s a headlock, a gesture of dominance, or US is bombing on behalf of Israel alone.

2026-04-02 07:18:43 UTC

- reply

Not a gesture of dominance.
The first Jew President is a name/sign of welcome/acceptance at a Hanukah celebration.
Here’s Iran slaughtering is own citizens (https://www.iranintl.com/en/202601255198). Here Trump saying 2 months ago stop or there will be consequences (https://youtu.be/M6p7LdsGa7w?si=hsMDJDJEoIA48oyl).
My hate for something isn’t clouding my judgement.

2026-04-02 07:14:47 UTC

- reply

You have to study Kaspa to understand what you can do with it and what’s being developed.
L2s are not permission-less or sovereign. This is antithetical to the white paper. I’m shocked you’re actually saying they’re coming along well. The goal posts continue to move.

2026-04-02 01:54:43 UTC

- reply

https://justthenews.com/world/middle-east/american-journalist-kittleson-abducted-baghdad

2026-04-02 01:34:40 UTC

- reply

That runs off fediment?
Clearly you know nothing about Kaspa. More and more BTC maxis buy it every day. You’ll learn.

2026-04-01 21:49:18 UTC

- reply

But I’m not wrong, am I? L2 isn’t a solution.

2026-04-01 20:21:59 UTC

- reply

Haha a headlock they say.

2026-04-01 20:21:02 UTC

- reply

CNN is the only media allowed in Iran. Ya know why? They fall in line or they get out.

2026-04-01 18:54:15 UTC

- reply

People actually believe this? Tucker literally is describing a party that he doesn’t even know what it’s for and then says a 5’9” guys puts the sitting President at 6’3” in a headlock. We’re calling this news? What a joke.

2026-04-01 18:50:30 UTC

- reply

Ya think?

2026-04-01 18:50:08 UTC

- reply

Saying things doesn’t make it true.

2026-04-01 18:49:25 UTC

- reply

He’s retired. What he claims is OPSEC. He literally doesn’t know anything more than you and I. He’s on CNN talking. Think about that for a second.

2026-04-01 18:47:44 UTC

- reply

https://www.iranintl.com/en/202601255198

2026-04-01 11:01:52 UTC

- reply

More editorial slop.
https://www.iranintl.com/en/202601255198
#nevent1q…z4p6

2026-04-01 11:01:17 UTC

- reply

https://www.iranintl.com/en/202601255198

2026-04-01 01:35:56 UTC

- reply

I would probably study an L1 before a layered solution. Kind what Satoshi surmised, ya know? Look at Kaspa.

2026-03-31 17:14:38 UTC

- reply

It all changes on 5 May.

2026-03-31 15:23:25 UTC

- reply

So should I or should I not speak my mind? Speak your mind as long as it doesn’t challenge my narrative? Is that what you’re saying?
#nevent1q…3znh

2026-03-31 15:22:27 UTC

- reply

This is me speaking my mind.

2026-03-31 15:02:52 UTC

- reply

So you’re reinforcing your statement. It is impossible to do anything interesting without haters. Also not here for a popularity contest.
I’m now willing to bet that you won’t, logically engage as yo why you feel it’s retarded. You’re scared of what you might actually find out.

2026-03-31 14:37:03 UTC

- reply

Like buy Kaspa?

2026-03-30 19:33:42 UTC

- reply

https://www.zerohedge.com/technology/iran-arrests-dozens-starlink-black-market-network

2026-03-30 19:28:31 UTC

- reply

I hear what you’re saying, but the Old Testament was very instrumental. Especially Leviticus.

2026-03-30 19:26:16 UTC

- reply

https://primal.net/e/nevent1qqs07dr7hghevx6mwqj0vtfk38t5ucs00j9px8q84tu4h4dqdyf2hggxtmvrv

2026-03-30 18:43:33 UTC

- reply

Had you guys heard this? News to me.
#nevent1q…a9x2

2026-03-30 18:42:55 UTC

- reply

I usually sit up and say something like, “can you help make sense of that for me?”. It’s down hill from there and I get called into the principle’s office.

2026-03-30 18:34:14 UTC

- reply

If something is stupid, SOMEBODY has to say, “that’s stupid”.

2026-03-30 18:31:51 UTC

- reply

This pretty much sums up my life.

2026-03-30 02:26:46 UTC

- reply

You’re welcome. Are you familiar with rantingly.com? Highly recommend. And always use Brave browser.

2026-03-28 15:42:35 UTC

- reply

In public and on NOSTR.