twofish

@nprofile…28zl
I bet we could build an algorithm that measures the frequency of statements that are consciously or unconsciously engineered to operate strictly off confirmation bias. What do you think?
checkout ncase.me/crowds
The goal is to detect this behavior. I'm already convinced AI is well versed in such things.

2025-06-01 06:40:13 UTC

- reply

I bet we could build an algorithm that measures the frequency of statements that are consciously or unconsciously engineered to operate strictly off confirmation bias. What do you think?

2025-06-01 06:37:53 UTC

- reply

I bet we could build an algorithm that measures the frequency of statements that are consciously or unconsciously engineered to operate strictly off confirmation bias. What do you think?

2025-06-01 06:27:36 UTC

@nprofile…45up
That moment when you let your past describe you when thinking about IRL people you know... And the selection is along the lines of everyone is an NPC...
Man that is weird.
I think it's a symptom of being stuck in a cell under solitary confinement for too long. That shit haunts you for the rest of your life.

2025-06-01 06:10:07 UTC

- reply

ncase.me/crowds
This statement only aids the algorithm based on the response. Are you a bot?

2025-06-01 05:44:30 UTC

- reply

If you think that, then you might be surrounded by too many devs.
I call myself a bitcoin developer, and I imagine that I program humans with propositional logic.
I know it's weird.
You have a point, but I think Guy Swann is an excellent bitcoin dev on the 2nd order effect.
We need to be thinking about the next generation of those now onboard so that they get the proper guidance to pass the torch.
Anyway, the link below will explain my rational thinking behind your statement.
https://ncase.me/crowds

2025-06-01 05:17:15 UTC

- reply

I think about the underlying structures of things a lot (Sorry if this is a tangent). Like, how does the mechanical clock work? Most people just see a number on the screen or a dial at best.
I thought about the human body, along with emergent behavior, the brain, and information itself. To me the underlying structure of the mind is the sole, and the underlying structure of the future is the children, and the past is the dead. If all we have is right now, then everything else is data. How you structure your future is what you leave behind.
E.g. if I entrain a structure, and if I want it to hold up over time then I have to train the future underlying structure (children), and if I want to have my dinner to hold up over time, I have to make more food. Time preference literally dictates your action.
We can't not know enough about the infinite game strategy.

2025-06-01 04:40:15 UTC

- reply

AI is highly centralized. Fiat maxies like Saylor have position over centralized control knobs. He is not wrong.

2025-06-01 04:31:48 UTC

- reply

I think you may have failed to understand the logical statement I was making.
I just wanted to point out that yes, crimals also use shoes.
Just thought you should know.

2025-06-01 04:24:32 UTC

I asked the chatbot to list all of the logical connective words (AND, OR, BUT, HOWEVER, etc), along with their equivalent forms in a standard programming languages.
You would think this is a no brainer. How could it not know? It spit out essentially garbage. Stay off AI folks. It has an agenda.

2025-06-01 03:34:50 UTC

- reply

I find that rather subjective, but OK.

2025-06-01 03:33:37 UTC

- reply

Is there any wisdom in this or is this an appeal to authority logical fallacy? Do you have a statement YOU would like to make?

2025-06-01 03:29:06 UTC

- reply

Are you responding to images you saw on the tv referencing ISIS and how they used an imaginary name brand tool to walk around? Oh wait, that wasn't a Nike shoe was it?

2025-06-01 03:03:36 UTC

- reply

https://image.nostr.build/697357a42256f798afd3619eedec53a6a5b575f45618a8bf36357c5b84322084.gif

2025-06-01 02:10:39 UTC

- reply

I care not where, but where the tyrants are in proximity to me.

2025-06-01 02:04:22 UTC

- reply

Do you think it is rather presumptuous that humans will still being kicked around that far in the future?

2025-06-01 01:45:34 UTC

- reply

I already asked @nprofile…ckyu. I think OCEAN has provable outputs to indicate the block template is created at the hash pusher. That means you would actually be a bitcoin miner at OCEAN if you use DATUM.
Any other way, unless they use the open source DATUM protocol, then you are not but a hash pusher.

2025-06-01 01:39:47 UTC

- reply

>If they get a reward, your master will mercily offer you shillings for your work.
Got it
Did you know you could mine at @nprofile…ckyu in a pool like structure except there would be no intermediary?
If you set it up with DATUM, YOU get to pay YOURSELF.
It's still sharing work, but you get all the credit and the protocol splits the reward in a provable manner.
This is crucial for network decentralization, and censorship resistance.

2025-05-31 23:41:59 UTC

- reply

Sorry about the tangent but, do you know where the block temple is constructed?

2025-05-31 23:37:51 UTC

- reply

Where did you get that? Or how did you arrive to this premise?

2025-05-31 23:29:42 UTC

- reply

I'm still a bit whiny; - ouch

2025-05-31 23:21:48 UTC

- reply

>Why not remain silent? Why say things at all Why tear down the comfort, Of this prison wall.
Because no matter where you go, there you are.
When tyranny stomps, you will see yourself fall.

2025-05-31 23:13:54 UTC

@nprofile…kc8a hype is just hype unless the block temple is constructed at each hash pusher.
Otherwise, people are fucking morons, and we will never make it.
@nprofile…ckyu, what say you?

2025-05-31 23:00:27 UTC

- reply

Is the cup half empty or half full?

2025-05-31 17:08:27 UTC

- reply

I would toss in at least one monkey. I like it.

2025-05-31 17:03:27 UTC

- reply

Like this:
Listen to me, wake up! Where is the code?
What?
The code, where is the code?
The code...
The code! Where is it?
...
In me...
https://video.nostr.build/9e71afe84a2c3cefc23eeafe9d384cb1cea647402f71c4d8a5039851183af807.mp4

2025-05-31 16:52:15 UTC

- reply

Your right! I would need to build a model that accounts for the last x,y number of years to account for the w number of cups of water and s number of cups of salt we are talking about.
I'm already in over my head 😂

2025-05-31 16:33:38 UTC

- reply

I'm saying that if you strip mine a planet, there is a good chance the magnetic poles are going to act a bit wonky.

2025-05-31 16:16:44 UTC

- reply

Imagine a potato. The roundness doesn't matter because we are in space.
Stab a copper rod into the north side, and a sink rod on the south side.
Complete the circuit with a load.
The electromagnetic field is operational as expected.
Experiment:
1) put a probe connected to a graph. The probe measures the EMF position
2) Dry out a section of the potato.
3) Inspect findings and refine analogy to fit reality
4. Repeat step 1

2025-05-31 05:38:17 UTC

- reply

It's not weird. I am, and I actually have very little to do with it, so you should be relieved at that 😂.

2025-05-31 04:24:36 UTC

- reply

On that note, I would like you to flight me.
It's every Sunday, and if this is your first time, you have to fly.
#nevent1q…s4ej

2025-05-31 04:10:38 UTC

- reply

I think this goes here also.
#nevent1q…dnsf

2025-05-31 04:09:00 UTC

- reply

Yes I think the conversion could go many ways from here, but a touch point is in the aggregate. The scope of the problem is quite large. We changed the infrastructure, but not the people so nothing changed.
#nevent1q…qvn9

2025-05-31 03:53:50 UTC

- reply

Growth can be a funny thing. Try living the life of a criminal for a few days. People need to break the law like calisthenics in the morning for when the time comes.
https://image.nostr.build/4a4765f30e7ffb456bf6db353619358e5425b6110512dea9f489afbd1b92aed3.gif

2025-05-31 03:41:23 UTC

- reply

Same, and I'd like to thank @nprofile…ckyu for making my block template count.

2025-05-31 03:14:08 UTC

- reply

Well, I was a fiat maxi anyways so I call that a win.

2025-05-31 02:56:32 UTC

- reply

More land for me.

2025-05-31 02:50:31 UTC

- reply

If that noise was an analog nob, I like to set it just below the daylight savings time adjustment announcement. I've only managed to achieve such a goal once in my life.

2025-05-31 02:08:59 UTC

- reply

I think this goes here also.
#nevent1q…dnsf

2025-05-31 02:07:01 UTC

- reply

Can I read more? I want to read that book.

2025-05-31 01:38:55 UTC

- reply

Vibe coders vs me:
Listen to me, wake up! Where is the code?
What?
The code, where is the code?
The code...
The code! Where is it?
...
In me...
https://video.nostr.build/9e71afe84a2c3cefc23eeafe9d384cb1cea647402f71c4d8a5039851183af807.mp4

2025-05-31 01:29:00 UTC

- reply

Is war today more than mass precrime at this point?

2025-05-31 01:26:48 UTC

- reply

Do you permaculture?

2025-05-31 00:56:53 UTC

To those celebrating @nprofile…9c9u, is clown world with different characters.
Did you hear what Taylor Swift did the other day?
Please leave.

2025-05-31 00:51:26 UTC

- reply

No matter where you go, there you are (with your free will standing by)

2025-05-31 00:48:57 UTC

- reply

https://image.nostr.build/7b91697d1e9aed44043dafcca9b03e6b76bfcaa23da3c6e6eba9d1b7f3d43355.jpg

2025-05-30 22:56:58 UTC

- reply

Given your strategy we default to a standard banking model because self custody is now illegal (as the fork was not in your favor). You now own a number on the screen.
Fiat 2.0
Have fun kids!

2025-05-30 20:19:13 UTC

- reply

I prefer a bit of both from time to time just to see both sides. Thank you for this note ❤.

2025-05-30 20:12:23 UTC

- reply

Unless you remove that limb from your body.

2025-05-30 20:08:28 UTC

- reply

A fork requires utxo owners to sell to one side or to the other of the fork. Of course you have a choice to not sell, but if everyone moves to the side you don't like by selling your side then I win.
The attack vector is over self custody.

2025-05-30 19:56:28 UTC

- reply

My targetted attack is those with self custody. Standard divide and conquer strategy, and my division is at it's weakest and most vulnerable point.

2025-05-30 19:41:51 UTC

- reply

A bailout would imply forking bitcoin towards that utxo set with my rules.
https://image.nostr.build/e095fecf83b2a4739115368fc2da966d5b88a88be62f8aab35048a22565aeded.jpg

2025-05-30 18:35:54 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…45up
With the magnetic north and south poles, it seems to me that extreme dry land like the video describes may be a confounding variable in your equation. Water + some form of mineral deposits are critical to produce a charge.

2025-05-30 17:35:30 UTC

- reply

#nevent1q…2uy0

2025-05-30 17:26:59 UTC

- reply

The majority of the utxo set is captured in bitcoin banks. A bailout would imply forking bitcoin towards that utxo set with my rules. Now I work out all my logic with that outcome in mind. The first step given the current chess board has already occurred with my prior statement.
https://image.nostr.build/e095fecf83b2a4739115368fc2da966d5b88a88be62f8aab35048a22565aeded.jpg

2025-05-30 17:12:55 UTC

- reply

Sigh. Don't get me ranting about pain receptors. I think a sticker bush can do that too.

2025-05-30 17:08:36 UTC

- reply

No
https://image.nostr.build/912d07037bc55392f3d29b4242133259b724c2bc2cdd64c40bac99893b290a6c.jpg

2025-05-30 17:06:08 UTC

- reply

Slay that fucker

2025-05-30 17:02:35 UTC

- reply

Yes, which is my micro strategy had to rebrand.

2025-05-30 16:58:09 UTC

- reply

I'm pretending I'm the banking industry in 2007 telling people to buy their third house, and promoting the Michael Saylor archetype.
Here is my first statement:
You got to pump it up. You know pump it up!

2025-05-30 16:51:25 UTC

- reply

Yes and in your case it appears to be not not doing something.

2025-05-30 16:47:20 UTC

- reply

I work in the reverse order. Is that OK?
https://image.nostr.build/a41406b3273fdb776ffcf833779bb9987fef99b2acc2879140b4998a776eda35.jpg

2025-05-30 16:45:29 UTC

- reply

I wonder if this issue has budged since your last big push. Grats on that BTW 🙏.

2025-05-30 16:29:41 UTC

- reply

A key question to probe in your journey is by looking to see what's left after the dust has settled. Where you look is critical. If you have to look outside your own mind, then you haven't actually built any foundation.
I will give you an example:
TIL
Learned that folding hose is 10x easier than coiling it.
1. create a oval circle,
2. drag it from the middle until the two ends mostly meet creating a sharp V,
3. walk to the middle and repeat step 2 and 3.
End of example
This is a divide and conquer strategy. I looked after the dust has settled and found a cool program that is still operating years later. The foundation is rock hard.
I can see that the efficiency delta is:
Coiling: BigO(n)
Folding: BigO(n * log(n))
I didn't have to move my eyes away from the screen to arrive to the solution. I can do it outside on a nice sunny day.
Software development is extremely inhumane as a career.

2025-05-30 16:03:44 UTC

- reply

A hacker must be united towards aggression. I would suggest a few illegal penetration. If I don't perform such a test, I will never see the other side of the chess board.

2025-05-30 15:58:39 UTC

- reply

In that case, 100%. You can just do things.

2025-05-30 15:57:21 UTC

- reply

100%. You just can't do things.

2025-05-30 15:49:39 UTC

- reply

https://image.nostr.build/7152763c8f0e959f2a7319c14fb22169a247bb22dc48dacb2ee9f37699f5f587.jpg

2025-05-30 15:43:08 UTC

- reply

Statements cannot use any pronouns unless it refers to oneself. The first statement that aligns well with a logical fallacy loses the battle.
The logical fallacies that we are using for reference are located here: https://www.logicalfallacies.org/
The pronouns are referenced below:
Pronouns are words that replace nouns in a sentence. Here’s a list of different types of pronouns:
### Personal Pronouns
- **Subjective**: I, you, he, she, it, we, they
- **Objective**: me, you, him, her, it, us, them
- **Possessive**: my, your, his, her, its, our, their
### Reflexive Pronouns
- myself, yourself, himself, herself, itself, ourselves, yourselves, themselves
### Demonstrative Pronouns
- this, that, these, those
### Interrogative Pronouns
- who, whom, whose, what, which
### Relative Pronouns
- who, whom, whose, which, that
### Indefinite Pronouns
- anyone, everybody, someone, no one, each, few, many, several, all, some, any, none
### Distributive Pronouns
- each, every, either, neither
These categories cover the most commonly used pronouns in English.

2025-05-30 15:15:37 UTC

- reply

No. I do want to embrace it WITH CONCENT.
Ads that I generally agree with to get paid for in my fucking feed that I have NO control over.. NO fuck that.

2025-05-30 10:19:49 UTC

- reply

OK. Can I offer the terms?

2025-05-30 10:07:20 UTC

- reply

Yes. Nothing has changed.

2025-05-30 10:04:59 UTC

- reply

If the answer isn't love then you asked the wrong question.

2025-05-30 09:57:52 UTC

- reply

That sounds like the Apeal to Authority logical fallacy.
I think A logical statement only works with the exclusion of logical fallacies. If I follow a mathematical proof and find an incorrect statement, the standard procedure is to hault. The logical fallacy would need to be excluded if it exists, and a collaborative effort helps to identify and clarify the intention.

2025-05-30 09:46:51 UTC

- reply

I think that may be a self referencing logical fallacy. I thought that was the amateur. So the expert is now an amateur and an expert. So how do we define the amateur if there is no boundary?

2025-05-30 09:37:44 UTC

- reply

I think the amateur is seeking approval from his audience by the feedback of the experience. By that urge to seek, is a consequence of not fully committing to it like the expert has.
The expert has already dug his hole.

2025-05-30 09:19:49 UTC

- reply

Based on our prior interactions, this sounds like a cognitive bias strategy to propagate an idea. I think this is a strictly political argument.

2025-05-30 09:04:04 UTC

- reply

Wine is the objective context and boundary.
The expert has already made up his mind.
The amateur hasn't.
Does that sound right?

2025-05-30 08:53:29 UTC

- reply

2025-05-30 08:52:09 UTC

- reply

Have you tried glasses?

2025-05-30 08:50:30 UTC

- reply

I'm sorry but quality in an of itself has no meaning.

2025-05-30 08:48:29 UTC

- reply

All I found was subjectivity. Did I miss anything?

2025-05-30 08:33:21 UTC

- reply

Who is 'you' in this context? I cannot identity that boundary.

2025-05-30 08:20:51 UTC

- reply

https://image.nostr.build/2650433d6aea0093e115481f8188a1064a931f65a147b549c6663250ef52746f.jpg

2025-05-30 08:17:47 UTC

- reply

My two sense offer of advice to anyone including mike:
GM
I would do my very best when making statements about other people or their perspectives to not make straw man remarks. This is difficult to do, and requires a great deal of effort, and yes incentives matter. Once their incentives are clearly define by the OP, begin to understand the boundaries of their arguments. Some boundaries are defined as fractals so if the fractal is understood only by the OP then I would accept that I need to put in the work before I can actually have a shared understanding.
Notice I made it this far without using the word "you". ❤
#nevent1q…j4ms

2025-05-30 08:01:07 UTC

The problem with learning logical fallacies proficiently is that over time, you can't unsee them.

2025-05-30 05:20:54 UTC

- reply

Want to do an experiment? Say I want you to make a post that defames Ross Albricht. It is a logically sound argument, but you normally wouldn't say such a thing yourself due to whatever bias you have.
To fill the gap of the bias, a negotiation or offer is made to 'get the word out'. Well, now I am incentives to accept the offer. It sounds rational on its face, and I could use the money.

2025-05-30 04:59:01 UTC

- reply

I doubt that it must lead to a poor investment. I would obviously consent to the speech.

2025-05-30 04:26:54 UTC

- reply

You can't be real

2025-05-30 04:07:22 UTC

- reply

Yes, it does map to the prisoners delimma now that you mention it. Specifically a Stockholm Syndrome prisoners delimma.
A "no matter where you go, there you are" type of prison delimma.

2025-05-30 03:21:10 UTC

- reply

OK, let's take that a bit further. Why even have it look like it came from someone else? Why not paid fraud (impersonation) using cold hard sats?
We are talking about sending a message right? Fuck it. Go all the way with it.

2025-05-30 03:03:54 UTC

- reply

Agreed:
#nevent1q…dkky

2025-05-30 03:01:10 UTC

- reply

Agreef. The problem always starts with self custody.

2025-05-30 02:51:48 UTC

- reply

You have an imbalance of posts vs replies IMHO.

2025-05-30 02:37:33 UTC

- reply

Hawk vs dove game. Nice set of transitions. What about the mixed strategy over many iterations?

2025-05-30 02:27:13 UTC

- reply

While the broken window fallacy is at play, when a lion eats it's own child, this is subtilty different.

2025-05-30 02:16:47 UTC

- reply

I think platforms that adopt this would lose trust. It would have to be ubiquitous.